Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

This is mental illness:
Screen Shot 2023-01-21 at 9.53.23 PM.png
Screen Shot 2023-01-21 at 9.55.09 PM.png
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, Loose Goose and 3 others
FILTH Tourist said:
  • Why not move your NSFW content to a different website that specializes in it?
Click to expand...
That's what these people don't get. It's not enough that they practically took over a website for on demand pornography. (I'm talking about OnlyFans; I heard it was meant as something else.) It's not enough that they want tolerance for capitalizing on gender dysphoria for social trends. They want their degeneracy out for EVERYBODY to see at all times.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Ebonic Tutor, Flaming Insignias and 3 others
PurpleEater said:
This is mental illness:
View attachment 4311466
View attachment 4311467
Click to expand...
Without exaggeration, it took me at least 7 minutes of moderately intense critical reading to figure out what these faggots are trying to moral signal about. I have a theory. Let me take along on my journey of discovery:

Step one: Based on the web design this appears to be from a website called Twitter.com. Due to my unfamiliarity with the user interface, I have still have never figured out what order to read any screenshots from this website. I'm 100% serious, that is not a joke.

Step Two: As a heuristic, I decide the order doesn't matter. These can be treated as independent, spontaneous eruptions of impotent whinging, with no causal relation to each other with no logical through-line.

Step three: The consensus seems to be that restaurants are somehow bad? And these people are attempting to broadcast some sort of righteous indignation at people who eat there. Here's where I was stumped. What possible reason would people have for such an assertion?

Step four: Look for clues. "Social murder"? Red herring. Completely vacuous psuedointellectal leftist word salad. Reservations? Michelin stars? Perhaps some sort of bitter jealousy and class resentment is at play here?

Step five: breakthrough. Three years. Wait, is this about COVID? It can't be. The timeline checks out.

Step six: HAHAHAHA NIGGAS STILL SCARED OF RESTAURANTS??? LMAO

Thank you, I hope you found this post informative.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Z2137, Flaming Insignias, Lizard Pope and 6 others
LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV] said:
I'd be extremely rare to find someone who has no libido or is not just saying it due to some sexual trauma. But still, a girl who doesn't feel sexual attraction is still a girl.

Unless we are talking about a freak of nature that is born without genitals non binary doesn't mean anything.
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as non-binary.
Even if you are born without a genitalia, you will still inherit the reproductive structure of one of the sex. Even if you are born as an anomaly like "super hairy woman", you will still have the female biology structure within, with the exception of a defect that causes you to grow more hair. Your dna will ALWAYS be either male or female.

The Last Stand said:
That's what these people don't get. It's not enough that they practically took over a website for on demand pornography. (I'm talking about OnlyFans; I heard it was meant as something else.) It's not enough that they want tolerance for capitalizing on gender dysphoria for social trends. They want their degeneracy out for EVERYBODY to see at all times.
Click to expand...
Tbf, Onlyfans wasn't initially made for porn. Onlyfans was made as a competitive option to Patreon. The thing about porn is, it consumes any site/app that includes it, so Patreon decided to ban porn content because it was quickly filled with it.
Onlyfans, deciding to capture the market, decided to allow porn content, but regret it later as they got stuck with it, which is why there was a time when OF wanted to ban porn content too. So OF is now synonymous with porn, but if you go to their homepage, there is no sign that they are marketing porn.

While some might think "what's so bad about porn?” In the eyes of business, it's still a niche market, by being a pornographic app, they cannot get the valuation of the billions like FB, Twitter, IG etc. The porn stars are earning, but OF is not earning as big as you think.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, Flexo and 7 others
Muh_Soggy_Knee said:
I always assumed that it was a fancy way of saying that they're a Tomboy or something.
Click to expand...

Technically, according to their logic, everyone is non-binary, since not everyone is a walking gender stereotype and there's no way to "feel" like a man or a woman.

It's bizarre because in this school of thought, gender is both a made-up social construct but also Very Important. It's confusing.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, Lizard Pope and 3 others
Slap47 said:
View attachment 4310469

Critical theory.
Click to expand...
"Clearly the girl is being forced to eat a hamburger -- a staple of the American food culture -- as part of America's ongoing colonization of the world. Instead, Japan should instead be isolated, just like before the War happened, so that this girl is eating a rice ball instead."

-This idiot, probably.

Remember, these are the same types of people who will accuse you of bigotry if you object to demographics being inserted into historical contexts they don't belong in. To them, a black tranny in 19th century France is not political in the form of historical revision, but a girl eating and enjoying a sandwich is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anondorf, Mexican_Wizard_711, UnsufficentBoobage and 5 others
It seems that doing something - that SJWs relate to identity politics - "just because it's cool" really makes the SJWs REEE.

Wokeism really is a "no fun allowed" cult that treats ethnicity, "gender", etc. as holy. Not to mention hyper-fixates on it.

Slap47 said:
Critical theory.
Click to expand...
That "all art is political" BS is another example of how "social justice" is a "no fun allowed if you're an oppressor" cult.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, Caesare and 5 others
PurpleEater said:
Technically, according to their logic, everyone is non-binary, since not everyone is a walking gender stereotype and there's no way to "feel" like a man or a woman.

It's bizarre because in this school of thought, gender is both a made-up social construct but also Very Important. It's confusing.
Click to expand...
Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Their logic folds in on its self when you realize that the only reason why they think Kino is non-binary is BECAUSE she is a girl. If Kino was canonically a boy, then Kino's attire would just be standard and nobody would be making the argument they are nb. So to acknowledge Kino as non-binary you are inherently acknowledging that she is a girl too.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, Flexo and 4 others
DoubleD said:
Where does Twitter keep finding these people?

View attachment 4294426
Link, Archive



Back in the day, Stephen King wrote horrifying books. Now he writes horrifying tweets.
Click to expand...
1- Abolish School
2- Abolish the family
3- Arm youths
4- Violence is a legitimate means for survivors to reclaim their autonomy

Has this guy never heard of Africa? Territorial warlords already perfected the practice of kidnapping kids and using them as child soldiers in political civil wars. They even get to kill their parents most of the time.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, Flexo and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back