oh, yes.
Her react to Milk Tea was the biggest failure, and a huge mistake. Constantly asking somebody (a very well informed and educated somebody) to provide proof of a negative is ridiculous. Her proof was her words. Chantal can’t grasp this.
Chantal! You need to provide proof positive. And you can do that easily. Flashing a certificate would clear the whole thing up. A marriage cert is not ‘private’. It’s designed to be shown off. There is no sensitive info one there. And even if there is the odd identifier, redact it. She’s proudly shown legal docs online before, even though she said, tattily that “no one shows legal docs online. She certainly has. Remember that letter from the Canadian police about her case? Proud as punch to show that off.
Chantal is the one who needs to provide proof. Not milk tea. Her proofs are her knowledge and genuine understanding of ME ways. (Including the shady, corrupt aspects). Her proof is actually knowing and working the visa systems for 15 years including the ups and downs of the hoops. ( hoops, not loopholes)
Milk Tea won that one. Chantal did nothing but…
- Get snotty, bitchy and mock MTs wig.
- mock MTs accent
- ramble about ‘loopholes’ and totally not fake documents.
- agree with herself on the screen.
- insult MTs background
- giggle nervously
- Hamster deflection
- at one point she addresses MT and says “How can you say this when you have no proof either”.
- Either? Meaning you have none also?
Chantal has made a mistake with this react. She Disproved nothing that MT said. Not a single thing and doubled down about having to be vague and jumping through loopholes. Loopholes sound shady AF.