Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

The issue isn't that all men are "pro-rape", as you frame her assertion, or even that all men "would rape if it wasn't illegal", as she actually asserts it. The issue is that (practically) all men have the capacity to rape, being bigger and stronger. As psychology-sperg, Jordan Peterson, often points out, "a harmless man doing no harm is no virtue at all, but a dangerous man restraining himself is a virtue".

It is big, strong, virtuous, men who discover and uphold the laws. Good men need to be big and strong in order to defeat the scoundrels and the vicious.

Men are the rapists, yes and obviously, simply because men are the big ones. Women's rape tends to be the statutory kind, where she's an adult and he's an adolescent, because that's the only man she's capable of dominating in that way. A woman's inability to commit rape does not make her a virtuous person any more than a weakling man's inability would.

Imagine for a moment if women were larger than men, everything else being equal. At that moment, women would treat men the same way that they treat children now. How many pregnancies were aborted yesterday? That is not to say that all women are vicious. There would be virtuous women who would become the cops and the soldiers that men are now, but suddenly the capacity for violence would be reversed.


-Vincent Price, introduction to The Black Widow by Alice Cooper
Analogies fall apart as soon as you walk into the real world, especially elaborate and long winded ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dylan
.....average tranny socials poster

...you know you make posts like these in jest, but then when you occasionally brave reading that godforsaken thread:

the majority of men are gross and dehumanizing to the women they want to fuck and can’t express their sexuality towards women in a way that’s not degrading and disrespectful and the fact that you think that sniffing her clothing that she gave to you in good faith isn’t strange just proves that. Furthermore men do not care about not wanting to be those “bad men” at all in fact most men are unabashed about being perverts. Men are not ever repressed or ashamed of their sexuality unless they’re gay. It’s not our fault that the male libido is inherently predatory and creepy just stop being weird. And also, I don’t even know any sexually aggressive lesbians and if there were they’d be called out just as often as men you’re just making that up.

Oh so you’re a handmaiden, that’s good to know. Anyways nobody called women helpless victims except you, I never said that we should dictate male sexuality, I just have an opinion of it. Just like men have an opinion on whores, single mothers, women with abortions etc we can opinions on men who have gross out of control sex drives without controlling their sexuality our trying to tell them how to live. Stop acting like men are oppressed because women call them creeps sometimes. They’re not repressed, nobodys trying to “fix” them, they’re not helpless creatures broken down by evil feminists,
they’re certainly not oppressed, and yes, if a man thinks with his dick in a way that’s creepy I will clutch the fuck out of my pearls. The fact that men are constantly battling their coom urges is not something to feel sympathy for and definitely not something to say if you’re trying to defend male sexuality. Men have no clue on how to understand women’s sexulaity either and yet theyve had zero problems actually legitimately dictating our bodies for centuries and especially now that RvW is overturned. BTW, call me when those sexually aggressive lesbians commit 90 percent of all rapes.
she goes on to defend Amber Heards bed shitting antics
all heavily upvoted, this is what null wanted for the farms I suppose
 
a six y.o. searching 'sexy girl poo poo' is not into 'scat porn' you utter retard.
1674318849902.png
1674319264644.png

When I think of the people normalizing female sex toys, teenage boys are definitely who I think of first.
Screenshot 2022-11-28 at 21-32-52 pumpkin pie pagliacci (@Slatzism) _ Twitter.png


Screenshot 2022-12-02 at 02-02-20 pumpkin pie pagliacci (@Slatzism) _ Twitter.png
 
a six y.o. searching 'sexy girl poo poo' is not into 'scat porn' you utter retard.
View attachment 4308970 View attachment 4308995

When I think of the people normalizing female sex toys, teenage boys are definitely who I think of first.
View attachment 4308980

View attachment 4308983

This is pretty much peak TERF brain damage.

Some girl doing something she’s not supposed to be doing? CLEARLY A MALE IS RESPONSIBLE!

Thanks to being indoctrinated by feminist literature, they literally can’t imagine girls looking up porn by themselves without a man somewhere setting it up.
 
a six y.o. searching 'sexy girl poo poo' is not into 'scat porn' you utter retard.
[images]

When I think of the people normalizing female sex toys, teenage boys are definitely who I think of first.
[images]

This is pretty much peak TERF brain damage.

Some girl doing something she’s not supposed to be doing? CLEARLY A MALE IS RESPONSIBLE!

Thanks to being indoctrinated by feminist literature, they literally can’t imagine girls looking up porn by themselves without a man somewhere setting it up.

Anna Slatz has completely lost her mind. She needs to log off and take a sabbatical. Poor girl.
 
frens all the talk about same sex parenting households was really interesting. although im against troonism i for years had payed no thought to THE GAYS but the more i think about it the less friendly i am towards it. if you guys have more studies or any books or any material discussing homosexuality i would love to read it.
 

Jesus Christ… Absolute madness!

“If men collectively refute gender ideology, it would end!”

Lady, you don’t see many men at all the tranny rallies. There are a lot of handmaidens demonstrating “allyship”.

And aside from the troons themselves, it sure as heck aren’t men who jump on your Twitter feed and insist that “transwomen are women”.

“Feeling despair about pornography.”

There is no way this woman has actually ever had intercourse with a man. Just no way.
 
Anna Slatz has completely lost her mind. She needs to log off and take a sabbatical. Poor girl.
She does come out with some absolutley demented bangers
I don;t know about you lads, but I'm always jerking off to the latest 'public stoning' porn mashallah
1674369238586.png

Average day on Ovarit
Over the years of observing them in various different places, a seeming constant everywhere is this insane, deeply bitter hatred of little boys they all seem to have. If they weren't such useless pathetic histrionics I'd say some of these women could potentially be dangerous.

FgwACbTaUAISWE6.jpg
 
Last edited:
a six y.o. searching 'sexy girl poo poo' is not into 'scat porn' you utter retard.
View attachment 4308970 View attachment 4308995

When I think of the people normalizing female sex toys, teenage boys are definitely who I think of first.
View attachment 4308980

View attachment 4308983
Jeez, with these feminist ideologues it's either "all sex is bad" (radfems) or "showing your tits + cooch on OnlyFans is empowering and if you disagree you're a prude!" (more mainstream woke types/liberal feminists). They really have no concept of middle ground.
 
frens all the talk about same sex parenting households was really interesting. although im against troonism i for years had payed no thought to THE GAYS but the more i think about it the less friendly i am towards it. if you guys have more studies or any books or any material discussing homosexuality i would love to read it.
Pre-Obergefell, the rallying cry was that same-sex marriage/adoption was wrong because "Kids need a mother and a father!" This was like anti-homeschoolers telling homeschooling supporters, "Kids need to be at school with other kids!" - tautologically assuming the premise. Why do they need both sexes as parents? Families were already so broken and gender stereotyping so decried by this time that it wasn't clear. It was easy to fall for the idea that hey, there are so many kids who need loving homes, and are we just going to let them go unadopted and let them have neither a mother nor father figure? Isn't the foster care system worse than the home of a vetted gay couple?

The problem with the national debate was that it centered the adults, not the children. All progressives heard was "Only heterosexuals can adopt children lovingly with pure intentions! Homosexuals are untrustworthy deviants!" and got offended on behalf of all the gay people who would never hurt a child. But that's not the real argument; one doesn't have to go that far. A same-sex couple, like a couple below the poverty line trying to adopt, can have the purest and most loving intentions - they're still a suboptimal environment for the child.

Children raised by a same-sex couple will either lack a parent of the same sex or a parent of the opposite sex. Lacking a same-sex parent is the more obvious problem: children naturally hunger for same-sex role models and need a parent who can relate to the distinct sex-based challenges of growing up. My dad was a great dad, but he sure wasn't great help with my physical and emotional "girl problems"; the best help I could get was from peers or women who did not know me as their own daughter, no substitute for actual motherly guidance. Fatherless boys are even worse off, when they have impulses that women can't even understand and all a mother can do is try to subdue and tame and scold away the behaviors that trouble her, leading him to repress and hate his male nature. Lacking a parent of the opposite sex gives children no role models for their heterosexuality - boys seeking a motherly woman and girls seeking a fatherly man will be seeking an image completely foreign to them, and they will have no understanding parent to confide in about "girl issues" or "boy issues" respectively.

Waiting to get adopted sucks, but what sucks even worse is having the possibility of a mother or father closed off for the rest of your childhood. That's what happens when gay couples say "mine!" to kids that could've been adopted by a man and a woman. And that's assuming they even do adopt kids who need homes instead of ordering designer donor babies.

It's tempting to rely on statistics to suggest same-sex parenting is wrong because "bad things are more likely to happen." But let's not lose sight of the mechanism, the cause underlying all these negative outcomes. Their view of gender and sexuality is distorted from the start, before they can really understand how this world runs on the polarity between feminine women and masculine men. To develop a healthy gender/sexual identity of their own is an uphill battle, and this leads to the comorbid emotional and behavioral issues we see in the generation of homosexual adults.

Screenshot_20230124-033413.jpg

What Allie gets wrong here (luv her ordinarily!) is that GCs don't believe "men and women are different" in the simple way that conservatives, innocent children, and virtually every society throughout human history believed. They believe 1) men and women are different physically and the physical differences matter, but 2) mentally we're all blank slates only influenced to be feminine or masculine by patriarchal socialization. The charge against transwomen being women is not "you don't have what it takes to serve a woman's role like us," but 1) womanhood refers to a biological reality transwomen don't share and 2) the mental and behavioral traits associated with womanhood are a product of oppression, so it's insulting to identify with them and claim to be truly a woman on that basis.

Once you make that huge easily falsifiable claim that men and women are blank slates, once you already have the tendency of accepting inconvenient data despite it offending the progressive agenda, it's not hard to go peak radfem. Mainstream progressive feminism handwaves the question away ("just because people are different doesn't mean they deserve equal rights! shut up and don't be a meanie about it!"), but radical feminism explicitly rests upon it (if gender cannot be abolished, there's no hope that a society without "patriarchy" will succeed). These women will never be able to successfully tackle the trans issue and protect women if they can't even be honest about the nature of women.

It reminds me of the "anti-SJW" pipeline: Equality for women is good -> Today's feminist movement sucks because it isn't standing for real equality -> Wait, who said we even needed "equality"?
 
Back