Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%

  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%

  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%

  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%
  • Total voters
    559
Mikemikev said:
I've really nothing to say to anti white garbage. Rot in hell.
Click to expand...
What I said wasn't white. I think that whites and jews have both had things go bad for them recently and there needs to be a european-israeli alliance against the syrian invaders
 
  • Deviant
Reactions: JSGOTI
@Autphag has a message for you, @Mikemikev.

https://mongaran.wordpress.com/2016...-being-unthrottled-at-the-kiwifarms-tomorrow/

I’ve some basic terms of engagement with Mikemikev:

  • Holocaust debate bores me to death. I give it, usually, as opposed to right-out denial, a revisionist spin, given better data of Jewish population growth based on revised edits saying it’d flatlined rather than reversed, arguing a mitigated scale of extermination. Beyond that I don’t find it interesting enough in itself, beyond the base implications it has for becoming some atoning enabler permitting Jewish political recalcitrance.
  • Race and intelligence is my real interest in debating this guy. He seems to know horse-shit about the wider evolutionary implications even if he can cite genome sequence numbers or whatever.
  • I want to see how dissonantly he handles the fact that I’m simultaneous sexually degenerate yet politically pure.
  • He has been bitching and whining about things like ad hominems, “sociopathic bullying liars”, “intellectual cowardice”, and similar slurs; they don’t wash with me. You can only point out that you’re simply being prodded for so long without it utterly dominating the points one primarily posits on their side’s participation. He can either learn to just deflect insults, whcih any teenager does in secondary school, or I’m going to leave out of boredom.
  • I’ll probably be attacking his involvement in Metapedia. It’s an otherwise great resource which I’ve learned a good deal from, and I’d be simply heartbroken if he had any major involvement with the project, because judging by his forum post’s workmanship, it sounds like he was a nigger-rigging, knuckle-dragging functionary who would perjure the site’s usual commitment to impartiality.
  • People needs to remember that he doesn’t have an education to speak of. Computer science is basically a way of putting meaningless autistic compulsions to a degree; that isn’t an acquisition of even hard skill-sets (computer science is thus, neither STEM nor human discipline, it’s basically special ed taken to Bachelor’s level), it basically just means he can’t even autodidactically learn to do what most regard a hobby. Especially with how pathetic the British curriculum on it was back then. One needs to remember also that he attended an ex-poly.
    I don’t feel intimidated otherwise by his utter lack of self-acculturated writing, research, and literary-interpretation skills. This one should actuallly marginally redeem me.
Click to expand...
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Scribbler, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and Pandas Galore
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Deviant
Reactions: Begemot, JSGOTI, Dynamite Ninja and 4 others
Mikemikev said:
It's a color metaphor for race, not literal. But then, you knew that and you were just being an idiot. Which you can't help.
Click to expand...

And you just proved why it's meaningless. If it's little more than a generalized color descriptor, what special advantage does it confer? And no, I'm intimately aware of all the racialist theories about how having white skin somehow makes white people superior to everyone else, but outside of theoretical crap, what inherent advantage did being born white confer on you simply by being white?

If it's merely a generalized descriptor, it's a toothless term that confer nothing except to describe the general color range of your skin pigment, nothing more.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, Scribbler, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 2 others
Cynical said:
And you just proved why it's meaningless. If it's little more than a generalized color descriptor, what special advantage does it confer? And no, I'm intimately aware of all the racialist theories about how having white skin somehow makes white people superior to everyone else, but outside of theoretical crap, what inherent advantage did being born white confer on you simply by being white?

If it's merely a generalized descriptor, it's a toothless term that confer nothing except to describe the general color range of your skin pigment, nothing more.
Click to expand...

You're just a moron with no understanding of biology.

chimpburgers said:
Autphag: LOL that is LITERAL intellectual cowardice.
Click to expand...

Whereas you failed to debate here? Ironic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Begemot, JSGOTI, Mark Corrigan and 5 others
Mikemikev said:
You're just a moron with no understanding of biology.
Click to expand...

So outside of THEORIES based on racial characteristics that cannot be proven or even have a consensus of accuracy with the scientific community as a whole (which you'll write off to the Jews most likely), you assume you're inherently superior to everyone darker than a tanned white guy.

And ad hominem is a bad way to win arguments Mike.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Scribbler, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Pandas Galore and 3 others
Cynical said:
So outside of THEORIES based on racial characteristics that cannot be proven or even have a consensus of accuracy with the scientific community as a whole (which you'll write off to the Jews most likely), you assume you're inherently superior to everyone darker than a tanned white guy.

And ad hominem is a bad way to win arguments Mike.
Click to expand...

Can you tell me without googling how Darwin and Mayr defined race? They both defined it differently, and simply.

Additionally your strawman of what I think is even more stupid than usual.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: Begemot, JSGOTI, Dynamite Ninja and 4 others
Mikemikev said:
Can you tell me without googling how Darwin and Mayr defined race? They both defined it differently, and simply.
Click to expand...

No, and I have no biology credentials, so I won't try to, and frankly I could care less, because even if you are right about race providing inherent advantages, then from where even many of your fellow travelers in such beliefs sit, you have squandered those gifts, so even by your own standards you're an untermensch amongst your peers.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and Mikemikev
Cynical said:
No, and I have no biology credentials, so I won't try to, and frankly I could care less, because even if you are right about race providing inherent advantages, then from where even many of your fellow travelers in such beliefs sit, you have squandered those gifts, so even by your own standards you're an untermensch amongst your peers.
Click to expand...

You could care less?

You were saying something about ad hominem.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: Begemot, JSGOTI, Dynamite Ninja and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back