Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

• Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
• Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
• Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
• Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”

[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walkerart of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalisth my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.

Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.

…

Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’ … ‘That is Not What We Say to the Public’ … ‘People Won’t Like That’ … ‘Don’t Tell Anyone’

Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

www.projectveritas.com

Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company…

archived 26 Jan 2023 01:25:36 UTC

archive.ph

 

[heathercho]

lmao, Project Veritas. these guys are fucking scum even among journalists, glorified tabloid reporters, but they get passed around because the counterculture is so thirsty for the kind of opinion confirmation libs get from the MSM every day. the headline is straight up disingenuous tabloid bullshit - if you even just read the text summary of the conversation in the article, it's obvious this guy is not saying Pfizer is literally breeding new coronavirus variants to infect the public so they can sell more vaccines. this is what I gather from the actual video:

- Pfizer's virology team is trying to induce minor mutations in the 'rona in a laboratory setting, to hopefully create variants that may later crop up in the wild, allowing them to accelerate vaccine development/testing and get it to market sooner than the competition
- the guy neutrally agrees that the vax is making his company a lot of money. note that he's not a money guy according to any other selectively presented slice of info - "executive" is technically correct in a sense, I guess? but he's a science lead (R&D Strategy and mRNA Planning), not one of the chief jews in charge of company moneymaking policy
- he asks the Project Veritas guy not to tell anybody because it's perfect ammo for some shit-sucking journoscum to disignenuously twist into a sensationalist story which would certainly get him fired. according to their usual modus operandi, this Project Veritas dude is likely somebody who's been "undercover" and trying to get closer to this guy for a while in order to hopefully pull a morsel like this, meaning the journo-rat has likely spent a significant amount of time pretending to be this guy's friend, recording every conversation they have, building trust with the express aim of betraying it as soon as he got something juicy. note that in the video they appear to be at some kind of restaurant getting drinks, meaning he probably deliberately baited the guy into getting sauced up in the hopes that he would start talking reckless

this is why companies like Pfizer have draconian internal policies for dealing with the media. whatever the truth of what's actually happening inside a company like that, the media guys who are out there looking for stories are fucking predators. they know which stories have an audience waiting for them and all they need to get is a couple compromising pictures, a couple of unflattering lines caught on recording, just enough to make it look bad because they know what the audience wants to believe is way more important than the actual mundane details. if you can provide a plausible path to the thing the audience already wants to believe, bam, instant viral news story. truth is only valuable as seasoning - you want enough to make it interesting, but not too much or you lose the sensational flavor. this retard made the mistake of choosing to trust somebody while being a prime target for predatory journalism and now he's out on his ass for it, so "Veritas" can have their big story and pretend like it's yet more proof that they're the Real Deal. journoshits once again prove themselves to be the lowest form of life on the planet

What an @Arm Pit Cream opinion to have.

Completely wrong of course, but that goes without saying.

 

[Fatniggo1488]

Has anyone checked any academic databases? He should have some published works if he has a MD, though they'd be kinda hard to find.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Simply your profound ignorance of corporate job titles which vary greatly anyway.

There is not one singular director of R&D and even then a director as a role would not be the top dog of research and development. This would most likely be a role called Chief Product Officer or something like you linked here. This guy was likely a director under a Vice President of some kind if Pfizer follows anything even remotely resembling normal corporate hierarchy. Hint: The product org or whatever Pfizer calls it probably has at least a dozen vice presidents leading their various efforts.

So, more accurately because you're a fucking retard this gay jogger was miles below the dude you linked and his job title reflects that.

Jordan reported directly to the guy linked here, not “miles below.” Generally, a President of something is going to outrank a Director of something.

I find it disingenuous that this fag linked a President of r&d and told us that it was the Director. Either retard or gay op.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Has anyone checked any academic databases? He should have some published works if he has a MD, though they'd be kinda hard to find.

No, they’re not hard to find, just scroll up on this very page and click the link to Twitter

 

[byuu]

Things I learned from a glance over this thread:
- The holocaust didn't happen
- Elon Musk is the antichrist
- 9/11 was an inside job

 

[TJT]

Jordan reported directly to the guy linked here, not “miles below.” Generally, a President of something is going to outrank a Director of something.

I find it disingenuous that this fag linked a President of r&d and told us that it was the Director. Either retard or gay op.

As I said, shit varies a lot.

At my org I report to a Director who reports to a VP who reports to a C-suite and we are a lot smaller than Pfizer.

But that guy must feel pretty bad. Even if he doesn't get suicided with two bullets to the back of the head his fast-track career to big pharma executive is dead in the water.

 

[TJT]

Has anyone checked any academic databases? He should have some published works if he has a MD, though they'd be kinda hard to find.

The Twitter thread I linked found his blog from his time at Yale.

These high dollar services to purge you from the interwebs are pretty impressive. I wonder how much it cost him or Pfizer's attornies.

 

[Otterly]

This is the director of R&D, not whoever the fuck Veritas is claiming is.

He’s A director. Not THE director. Director is a job title. Associate director, director, senior director, then executive director and vice president. Even VP level is a level, not ‘VP of the whole thing.’ It’s a job title, like senior project director or assistant director.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

He’s A director. Not THE director. Director is a job title. Associate director, director, senior director, then executive director and vice president. Even VP level is a level, not ‘VP of the whole thing.’ It’s a job title, like senior project director or assistant director.

Dude, click the link. The link you’re responding to doesn’t even contain the word “director”.

 

[mister fireworks]

I work in research/development. For every idealistic ‘let’s cure this awful disease that paralyses people’ employee there’s another who are total sociopaths who want to know ‘what if we…?’ Without any consideration of the fact that what they want is unethical. The doctors who want to do head transplants. Tranny surgery. The unit 731s and the Mengeles.
Everyone is doing gain of function work and it seems that racially based plagues are in vogue. This is known. It’s kept on the down low, becasue the public don’t like that kind of thing., but if they’re doing it we should too.
So my opinion of what likely happened is this. Work has been done for a decade or so in SARS since it was discovered because it’s likely it would have happened again. So someone who’s of the ‘what if’ persuasion gets a grant to look at what if we can tinker with these to, yeah, like see what’s coming and prevent it! Yea prevent. Call the program prevent, sounds good.
The work can’t be done openly in the states, so it’s done in wuhan. They take wild caught samples from bats in caves and they start playing with the cleavage sites using previous work. And if you think there’s not collaborations and industrial spying at that level you’re wrong. There is.
But Chinese labs have Chinese safety standards. Sars1 got out at least twice, and this either leaked or was released deliberately. That can’t happen? Again, having worked at western labs and seen the mice who were supposed to be in the airlock in a public corridor, I can only laugh hollowly,
Then it’s out, and it’s a scenario. And every authoritative an wet dream, every bit of corruption and grift takes over, and now you’re locked down. Politicians aren’t the brightest, they do t understand the science and they’re easily cowed, scared and dazzled into doing whatever they want to. There’s public cries for a vaccine, and the manufacturers are told ‘whatever, make one I’ll give you full immunity, just do it.’ Andvthe embedded Raytheon and darpa lads rub their hands with glee and say yes, this is exactly what we can test the mRNA on. They test it to the worst possible standards, and there’s a few tens of millions of deaths but whatever, the share price is up up up!
That’s the nicest case scenario and it’s absolutely plausible. Everyone horrible has benefitted in their own area of grift, from PPE to blockchain enabled tracking to government grants.

what the fuck are you even talking about? Shining sample of the type of people screeching about covid.

 

[Otterly]

Dude, click the link. The link you’re responding to doesn’t even contain the word “director”.

Yeah, he’s the CSO. That’s the C suite level. The Jordan chap who got caught by PV is director level, which as many of us have pointed out, is a job title, and that’s mid level management.
That doesn’t mean that a person with that job title can’t be involved in high level stuff, but it’s a job title. Maybe we are talking at cross purposes, I’m responding to people who think the Jordan guy is ‘THE director’ as in senior / exec level or saying it’s false becasue the dude in the link is ‘THE director.’ That’s not how the hierarchy works in pharma.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Yeah, he’s the CSO. That’s the C suite level. The Jordan chap who got caught by PV is director level, which as many of us have pointed out, is a job title, and that’s mid level management.
That doesn’t mean that a person with that job title can’t be involved in high level stuff, but it’s a job title. Maybe we are talking at cross purposes, I’m responding to people who think the Jordan guy is ‘THE director’ as in senior / exec level or saying it’s false becasue the dude in the link is ‘THE director.’ That’s not how the hierarchy works in pharma.

We ARE at cross purposes, I believe. What I’m trying to say is that the guy above Jordan doesn’t have any “director” title at all; his title is “President” in the link provided. He can’t be THE Director because he’s not a director, he’s a President

 

[Otterly]

We ARE at cross purposes, I believe. What I’m trying to say is that the guy above Jordan doesn’t have any “director” title at all; his title is “President” in the link provided. He can’t be THE Director because he’s not a director, he’s a PresidentView attachment 4347564View attachment 4347568

Yes. Jordan is director level. Dolsten is CSO. It’s a reporting chain that’s quite short, IMO is he reports directly to the CSO. Most director level would report into snr/exec director or VP, depends what they’re doing. Dolsten wouldn’t have a director title, he’s the CSO and president of the unit listed.
A typical org chart would be:
President/VP top of unit, although that’s variable, then under them exec director/and director/medical officer etc . Under them, associate directors, and then under them the people doing the work. Project managers, regulatory, scientists, whatever the unit is doing.
My point is that people are misunderstanding what director means in this context. It’s a middle management label and it means nothing much what his title or his bosses title is. The meat is the talking about intent to do the work and the regulatory capture . Post keeps doubling for some reason.

 

[AgendaPoster]

Has anyone checked any academic databases? He should have some published works if he has a MD, though they'd be kinda hard to find.

MD is Medical Doctor, it's not an academic doctorate title.
He should have some academic participation considering he was employed in that position by such a large corporation.
I should mention he completely lacks the qualifications for such a position, not to brag but even with 3 times more qualifications Pfizer would reject you with 99% certainty for such a high level position.
His whole shtick is highly suspicious.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Yes. Jordan is director level. Dolsten is CSO. It’s a reporting chain that’s quite short, IMO is he reports directly to the CSO. Most director level would report into snr/exec director or VP, depends what they’re doing. Dolsten wouldn’t have a director title, he’s the CSO and president of the unit listed.
A typical org chart would be:
President/VP top of unit, although that’s variable, then under them exec director/and director/medical officer etc . Under them, associate directors, and then under them the people doing the work. Project managers, regulatory, scientists, whatever the unit is doing.
My point is that people are misunderstanding what director means in this context. It’s a middle management label and it means nothing much what his title or his bosses title is. The meat is the talking about intent to do the work and the regulatory capture . Post keeps doubling for some reason.

Right.

I was being autistic because Cistern Rumbler misstated what was in the link he provided while claiming it debunked this whole affair.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

MD is Medical Doctor, it's not an academic doctorate title.
He should have some academic participation considering he was employed in that position by such a large corporation.
I should mention he completely lacks the qualifications for such a position, not to brag but even with 3 times more qualifications Pfizer would reject you with 99% certainty for such a high level position.
His whole shtick is highly suspicious.

Who is "Jordon Trishton Walker"?

Project Veritas recently released a video featuring "Jordon Trishton Walker," Pfizer executive who revealed shocking new info. But finding anything about him is tough. Here is what I've found so far.

brianoshea.substack.com

 

[AgendaPoster]

Who is "Jordon Trishton Walker"?

Project Veritas recently released a video featuring "Jordon Trishton Walker," Pfizer executive who revealed shocking new info. But finding anything about him is tough. Here is what I've found so far.

brianoshea.substack.com

Severely unqualified, mega-uber-diversity hire.
As I said, Pfizer would not hire a white cishet dude with those qualifications above rudimentary lab work at best

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Severely unqualified, mega-uber-diversity hire.
As I said, Pfizer would not hire a white cishet dude with those qualifications above rudimentary lab work at best

He’s black AND gay, so I guess that either says where we are, or he’s a spook cloned from the Obama vat

 

[Otterly]

MD is Medical Doctor, it's not an academic doctorate title.
He should have some academic participation considering he was employed in that position by such a large corporation.
I should mention he completely lacks the qualifications for such a position, not to brag but even with 3 times more qualifications Pfizer would reject you with 99% certainty for such a high level position.
His whole shtick is highly suspicious.

Yeah I’d agree with this. You dont walk into director level easily. An MD isn’t enough and urology experience isn’t getting you the knowledge you need for complex research like this.
What stands out to me is the BCG stint and the bit I think I saw in his CV earlier in this thread or another about a stint doing mandarin.
BCG, like many consultants are basically another corporate/government/spy arm. That he had some involvement with china with a consultancy that’s fairly shady, then directly into director level in a research area he has zero background in is shady. The short reporting chain is odd. Not completely unknown, but the people I know who do this are working in specific projects way above their pay grade (nothing shady, I must add for the ones I know.)
I am also fairly sure I’ve seen BCG involved in other ‘pies’ but I’ll leave that to my fellow autists to dig up

 

[Weppers]

This director topic is only up for discussion because someone who claimed this story was easily debunked has, when asked to do so, only offered up their own lack of knowledge and reading comprehension as evidence.