You linked:
Which indeed was published yesterday
You quoted a paragraph from this link:
Now in reality, this paragraph was retardedly turned into a single link by you. In the original:
As we can see, the link "at least 150,000 dead" leads to:
Published on June 9th, 2022
WhicPosted seven days ago; nevertheless i am sure you will sperg out and claim an army that loses h nowhere backs up said claim.
The link "Ukrainian losses" leads to:
Published on January 20, 2023
Also fails to back up these claims or make any new ones, as "triple digit daily losses" has been a claim made for many, many months, as demonstrated
The link "a fragile Ukrainian defensive posture" leads to:
Published on June 10th, 2022
Which again provides amusement, as it is inexplicable how an article 8 months ago demonstrates that Ukraine is in a fragile position today
I understand that being a vatnigger, with the long history of Russian clumsy stupidity to live up to, embarrassing mistakes like this will be made from time to time, and will provide entertainment every time they are made. Much like a retarded Russian using a cell phone and getting his entire unit incinerated by HIMARS
Desperately clutching for remarks from a woman that you detest as a globohomo liar enemy to Western civilization is also amusing. Any port in a storm, I suppose. But who cares? 100,000 dead hohol soldiers has failed to bring Russia any noteworthy advances, despite hilariously embarrassing micropeen waving over advancing less than ten miles in Bakhmut in 6 months. It's all maskirovka to conceal the deep failure of the chimp who rules Russia as the war drags on with no Russian victory in sight