Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
I think that we might be reading in a bit much with the benefit of hindsight, but I will say that his opinions and stances now are very much (and rightly so) questionable. How much was a LARP for his audience to make them think he was like them?

I seem to now recall that when asked about anime, he would pretty much name the same 2-3, then go ahead and say he did not have much time for it.

Same with WH40K.

With guns, he literally talked about the same 3, but said he never shot them much. He also spouted a lot of boomer FUDD nonsense.

What's to say that the family man role he played was not just as put upon because that was wholesome to his audience?

Not making a definitive statement, but the questions and concern of the OG fans thinking this are not baseless.
Agreed. Questions and concerns from the OG fans are far from baseless, which is why the hypocrisy is so apparent and Nick's new title of "hypocrite" is well earned.

That said, I am noticing a curious behavior in some of the people on this thread regarding a kind of persistent denial or lack of self-awareness. For example, @Yandex Captcha Solver put out a post on earlier this week wherein Nick's locals were discussing pedophilia and age of consent, complete with maps listing ages of consent by area. Come Wednesday, here we are on the farms doing the same thing, maps and all, when Drexel was initially being discussed (I won't link because I don't want to single anyone out, so if you're curious, go back).

This is a curious phenomena to me. Very interesting to watch the overlap between Nick's fans on locals and KF. I suppose that's all I should say on the matter for now.
 
A fair assessment. I would still like to post what I've found so far for posterity (likely sometime Monday) and so that others can have the benefit of looking up the details in one place.

Two things I am curious about:

1) How did people come to the conclusion that T was 18 when Drexel (allegedly) became sexually involved? Drexel does bring T up frequently so maybe I missed it, but I am unsure if there was actually a clip or if this is people doing number juggling based on separate accounts from Drexel.

2) Does anyone know if Drexel's relationship with T is still active given his "relationship" with Kat?
Sorry if I missed something, but why are you referring to this person as "T"?

Has Drexel referred to her by the name "T", or is it just an appellation you created?
 
Why would you assume I'm female? It was a gay bar. They didn't let women in. OK, the occasional fag hag would sneak in and the owner would throw a fit. But there were no lesbians in there ever.
You said you were married to lawyer, who was a "him" and that he stayed with you because he was a catholic. Or was that someone else? It doesn't really matter either way.
 
Sorry if I missed something, but why are you referring to this person as "T"?

Has Drexel referred to her by the name "T", or is it just an appellation you created?
There's a clip where Drexel says "let's call her 'T'" in an attempt to hide her identity. I'll have everything in my upcoming Drexel post.

Sorry for the confusion.
 
I seem to now recall that when asked about anime, he would pretty much name the same 2-3, then go ahead and say he did not have much time for it.
It's thanks to Nick I heard about Ninja Resurrection, an ultra-violent 90s OVA with a hilarious dub and questionable takes on Christianity. That's not something a surface level person would know about, although maybe someone who knew about obscure anime back in that era (Nick is the right age) would know about it.
 
Same with WH40K.
The man has limited editions of 40k novels sitting on his backdrop, if it's a larp it's a fairly expensive and time consuming one, these turds sell for $200-300 a pop and can be a pain in the rear to track down in some cases.

That plus the bunch of paints, miniatures, and his lore stream, I'd say that while he might not be into the wargame itself* it was, at least at the time, a genuine interest of his.

*: the game itself is autistic as fuck as anyone even passingly familiar with wargames will tell you; however GW have found and capitalized hard on the gold mine that is the lore surrounding the game, to the tune of over a hundred novels made about the universe. Needless to say at this point the portion of the fan base which might actively buy products yet never even have played a single round of 'kill team' aka warhammer lite must be the majority.
 
It's thanks to Nick I heard about Ninja Resurrection, an ultra-violent 90s OVA with a hilarious dub and questionable takes on Christianity. That's not something a surface level person would know about, although maybe someone who knew about obscure anime back in that era (Nick is the right age) would know about it.
That was a pretty common to know about anime back in ye olden times. Weebs of those times would try to introduce normies to it by selling it as Jubei fighting Jesus. Plus it's the sequel to Ninja Scroll which is probably one of the more well known anime of the 90s.
 
The man has limited editions of 40k novels sitting on his backdrop, if it's a larp it's a fairly expensive and time consuming one, these turds sell for $200-300 a pop and can be a pain in the rear to track down in some cases.

That plus the bunch of paints, miniatures, and his lore stream, I'd say that while he might not be into the wargame itself* it was, at least at the time, a genuine interest of his.

*: the game itself is autistic as fuck as anyone even passingly familiar with wargames will tell you; however GW have found and capitalized hard on the gold mine that is the lore surrounding the game, to the tune of over a hundred novels made about the universe. Needless to say at this point the portion of the fan base which might actively buy products yet never even have played a single round of 'kill team' aka warhammer lite must be the majority.
Nick has repeatedly said that he was more interested in the lore of 40k than collecting (and painting) plastic crack. This is why he has the books.
 
Agreed. Questions and concerns from the OG fans are far from baseless, which is why the hypocrisy is so apparent and Nick's new title of "hypocrite" is well earned.

That said, I am noticing a curious behavior in some of the people on this thread regarding a kind of persistent denial or lack of self-awareness. For example, @Yandex Captcha Solver put out a post on earlier this week wherein Nick's locals were discussing pedophilia and age of consent, complete with maps listing ages of consent by area. Come Wednesday, here we are on the farms doing the same thing, maps and all, when Drexel was initially being discussed (I won't link because I don't want to single anyone out, so if you're curious, go back).

This is a curious phenomena to me. Very interesting to watch the overlap between Nick's fans on locals and KF. I suppose that's all I should say on the matter for now.
I mean... Does it go beyond the fact that we are having a meta-discussion on the LOCALS degenerate discussion?

I think if there is any overlap, the OG 'disinherited' are here. You do not see a lot of the Nose-guarding you used to get.

But hello to all the LOCALS people that are lurking! Hope you enjoy my work archiving your degeneracy! Support minority-owned businesses!
 
You said you were married to lawyer, who was a "him" and that he stayed with you because he was a catholic. Or was that someone else? It doesn't really matter either way.
@Swole McPole said,

"I will say this though. The only reason I'm still married forty years in is because I married an observant Roman Catholic. An anglican would have dumped my ass years ago. For a long time, it was touch and go whether the priest was actually going to marry us because I was struggling with his arguments about divorce. I just thought it was reasonable to acknowledge that somebody could change their mind at some point down the road and when that happened, divorce would probably be inevitable. He wasn't having any of that. Either I took my obligations seriously, or we weren't getting married in his parish."

and

"And I know how much small town provincial lawyers make. I've been married to one for forty years. They aren't starving. They'll do things that they love all the time, not to earn an extra few quid, but simply because they love to do it -- whether that be free legal clinics for battered wives, volunteering in their local parks or playing in local orchestras. They don't expect to be paid for these things -- because they make a decent upper-middle class salary."

I didn't see anything about a male spouse, and (personally) I read those [quoted] as male. And "he" in the first quote as referring to the priest (as the comment goes on to say "or we weren't getting married in his parish").

As far Anglican/culturally observant Catholic, I think Swole's observation is correct. Which is great and all, until personality disorders or major deception comes into play.

good question

I actually feel really bad for women born in this era. I've considered what I'd suggest to a woman who's in their 20s and wanting to trad out. The irony is, trad women are easier to find than trad men at this point. There are probably a hundred times more home making women who are very conservative or politically disinterested than there are men who work and don't jerk off to hentai.

I think that love is a thing people have to maintain. It might come in a hot flash but if you don't nurture it, it goes away. Most people tend to let feelings rule them and when they lose interest they just assume that it's just not meant to be, but that's probably not the case and two committed people can love each other for life. Unrequited love is its own thing, and I think that is fueled by obsession.
Can someone give me the full definition of "trad"? I'm seeing it held up in this thread as a moral good. My knee-jerk reaction to terms like that, based on how it's floated around and by whom sometimes, is to dismiss it as shad low and reactionary. But I'm interested in perspectives, and terms often get bastardized (heh), so I'd like to know which morals rate, and how/how much.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I mean... Does it go beyond the fact that we are having a meta-discussion on the LOCALS degenerate discussion?

I think if there is any overlap, the OG 'disinherited' are here. You do not see a lot of the Nose-guarding you used to get.

But hello to all the LOCALS people that are lurking! Hope you enjoy my work archiving your degeneracy! Support minority-owned businesses!
I suppose it depends on how ironic/serious the posting surrounding consent/grooming/pedophilia was regarding Drexel. Maybe some people didn't get the memo that it was a just a meta discussion. A number of them seemed legitimately upset to varying degrees. This makes the situation quite ironic since just days prior we were laughing at the locals for having such a similar discussion online.

The posting on KF in question was related to Drexel and not a hypothetical (like locals), thereby allowing allegations of racism, demands of evidence of pedophilia/grooming, a map being used, etc. This appears to have been compounded by people jumping to conclusions and not using agreed upon terminology. Not good, but not really avoidable for conversations in this format.

In any case, it appears that some people weren't able to discern the irony/parallels between the locals hypothetical of a minor lying about their age (that got out of control) and the Drexel allegations (that was also getting out of control). Further to the point, it's a touchy subject in general. People getting a bit stressed is likely because they have strong stances on sexual allegations against someone if it includes minors, which is completely understandable (and not because they have any particular love for Drexel). I cant know this for sure though.

As far as the OG 'disinherited is concerned, indeed, many seem to have migrated here (or are just visiting). I also agree that there isn't a lot of Nose-guarding. In addition, I would like to assert that while we may be united in laughing at Nick, some of the shared ideals that may have drawn some people to Nick in the first place (however genuine he was) are still present and is exemplified in the overlap with locals (minus the wine moms). For example, they have their consent map guy and so do we, and if their consent map guy gets disinherited, he can always try to join us at the farms.
 
I'd say Penthouse, he's more that type (and I was going to make that comment but forgot to), except at least some of those bitches are probably nasty-ass slam pigs you wouldn't boast about.
Adam Carrolla had a caller one time that said he did some gangbangs with some of his high school wrestling buddies back when they were in high school. Some sleazy weirdo dude saw them at a gym and paid them money to film them “bang his wife.” Caller, in retrospect, thinks it was likely amateur porn.

Anyways, he says the chick was like a 5 with low light and was probably more of a 3 if they had not all been drunk.

This rings true of people I have known into swinger culture. They all have said that the chicks at swinger parties who want to get group fucked are almost always nasty gross bitches that like the fantasy of so many guys wanting to fuck them.

Gangbangs are like looking like Mr Universe. Deluded retards think actual hot chicks are into this shit, but the reality is that it’s only beastly alley whores. Same with looking like a roided freak show. Most women are into the physiques of Brad Pitt in Fight Club and Ryan Reynolds in Deadpool, not the superhuman physiques of Ronnie Coleman and Jay Cutler. Mr Olympia physique is mostly only desired and admired by other men.
 
Tfw no uncontacted rainforrest tribe porn-virgin trad bf. (:_(
Maybe you can try Sub Saharan Africa?
No tough would be working 12 hour days of menial labor. Or living in your car because your wife kicks you out and you have no money or family to help out.

This is privileged rich person problems. Fuck him and his arrested development.
Tough would be not having enough money to feed yourself, or forcing yourself to learn how to write with your feet because you lost your hands from a bomb. Nick's hardest day in his life was unpacking that St. Andrews cross and then trying to lift and tie his wife on it or when he was trying not to crash his sports car.
Can someone give me the full definition of "trad"? I'm seeing it held up in this thread as a moral good. My knee-jerk reaction to terms like that, based on how it's floated around and by whom sometimes, is to dismiss it as shad low and reactionary. But I'm interested in perspectives, and terms often get bastardized (heh), so I'd like to know which morals rate, and how/how much.
There's no real definition since it basically anti-"whatever progressive women are" for a bunch of different ideologies/cultures. Nick Fuentes and AF have a definition of the "trad" women and that should horrify on how wide that term means. Cultural differences generally define what "traditional" is and given the myriad of cultural differences in cultures, yeah, good luck.
In the US, it was told to me (by multiple women) it is generally considered "disrespectful" for a man to walk slightly in front of the woman they're with. In (parts of) China, it is expected because for the man to lead because in the event of danger he is supposed to give the woman a chance to flee.
It could probably generally summed up as fidelity and common sense to not be retarded. Which are rare qualities in this age of clown world. Having children too would probably be a big one.
Mr Olympia physique is mostly only desired and admired by other men.
I got news for you buddy. It means you're a incel (according to Rekieta)! Since you're not into Nick's shitty ass. After all in Junkyard Boyz (A 110% gay film) that Orlando Torres and Adam Logan do not fit either of your descriptions so there must be a market for his musty ass.
Thomas Pallipon
 
@Swole McPole

Can someone give me the full definition of "trad"? I'm seeing it held up in this thread as a moral good. My knee-jerk reaction to terms like that, based on how it's floated around and by whom sometimes, is to dismiss it as shad low and reactionary. But I'm interested in perspectives, and terms often get bastardized (heh), so I'd like to know which morals rate, and how/how much.

Probably has a broad definition depending on the group your talking to... I think a lot of people imagine a 1950s housewife that you would see on TV or whatever.

My personal definition is a woman who puts her family over her career (SAHM or homemaker) and a man who must provide for them and that lifestyle. Obviously strict monogamy is a condition of this. I don't think religion plays a role.
 
I like this "Shaftsburry" guy. Seems like an experienced optometrist.

Can someone give me the full definition of "trad"? I'm seeing it held up in this thread as a moral good. My knee-jerk reaction to terms like that, based on how it's floated around and by whom sometimes, is to dismiss it as shad low and reactionary. But I'm interested in perspectives, and terms often get bastardized (heh), so I'd like to know which morals rate, and how/how much.
Traditional. At the very core, it means "traditional gender roles," which date to long before such things as "religion" or even "marriage." Men hunt/gather, women birth/nurture. This is a simple and direct concept hardwired into the human condition over millions of years, not just an outline of how housewives acted in the 50s. The fact that said outline does not conflict with the basic idea of traditional gender roles is, of course, unsurprising, but it goes way beyond that.

When we start adding qualifiers such as "traditional, Catholic" is where things start to get wordy.
 
Last edited:
I got news for you buddy. It means you're a incel (according to Rekieta)! Since you're not into Nick's shitty ass. After all in Junkyard Boyz (A 110% gay film) that Orlando Torres and Adam Logan do not fit either of your descriptions so there must be a market for his musty ass.
Thomas Pallipon
I can’t be bothered to look them up right now to link, but there are several god meta studies that look into the Grecian ratio and the more classical Roman ratio of beauty proportions for men. The deviations between the two methods are minimal but the starting point is different. Grecian ratios rely heavily on wrist, elbow, knee and ankle circumference.
 
good question

A lot of guys (trannies and Nick Fuentes (soon a tranny)) think that being a woman is the easiest shit in the world because you can just turn sex into money, but that's a purely male view of the world that doesn't translate into success and happiness in practice. I actually feel really bad for women born in this era. I've considered what I'd suggest to a woman who's in their 20s and wanting to trad out. The irony is, trad women are easier to find than trad men at this point. There are probably a hundred times more home making women who are very conservative or politically disinterested than there are men who work and don't jerk off to hentai. Even if you went into an Amish community, I'm sure there's issues with printed porno mags and guys sleeping around and being assholes.

I think that love is a thing people have to maintain. It might come in a hot flash but if you don't nurture it, it goes away. Most people tend to let feelings rule them and when they lose interest they just assume that it's just not meant to be, but that's probably not the case and two committed people can love each other for life. Unrequited love is its own thing, and I think that is fueled by obsession.
Well said
 
Meanwhile in Drex hugbox...

We have one of Drex fans concern about what Drex has been posting on Nick's discord about the grooming allegations. Drex jumps in and says that it's BS and also confirms that he is still in contact with the girl in question (talked to her last night). Drex puts it out that he might do a show about this whole situation with the girl in question to "put an END to the BS".

After a back and forth of posts, he pulls the Drex fan (and everyone) into voice chat, which I assume was a struggle session.

Seems the non simp is all assmad at being called out for the bullshit talking faggot he is.
"I pray for the day Internet anonymity ends so they can face the consequences"
This nigger is no different to the troons, wanting to silence people from laughing at the shit they put out there.
BIG ALPHA :story:
Boy I'd call you a grooming house nigger to your face. Because thats what you are. You wouldn't do shit. I know your type. All fucking talk.
Guy brags about getting his friends daughter into sick kink shit when he's been around her since she was a child and now he's all angry he's getting laughed at and called out for the fucking gross manipulative sleezey cunt he is?
Yeah I'm sure your "sub" will be able to go on your fake talk radio show and clear it all up, tell everyone exactly what you told her to say.
Once again a guy condemned out of his own mouth by shit he said gets all angry when called out on it.
Groomer stay mad.
 
Last edited:
Back