Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

How many people will show up to Aella's birthday gangbang?


  • Total voters
    168
  • Poll closed .
This person’s lukewarm takes have been annoying me for years because some people I used to follow simp for her despite thinking of themselves as rationalist Vulcans above that sort of thing.

This is a classic case of a utterly unremarkable woman finding a untapped reservoir of male attention in a niche filled with nerds and instantly becoming an e-celeb without actually having to distinguish themselves.

There are plenty of women in similar spheres of interest as Aella who are genuine. The main difference is that they’re usually discussing topics that aren’t just themselves. Aella can only talk about herself and crib from smarter people without giving credit.

This thread was long overdue. Thank you for your service, OP.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if this has been talked about, but back in the early days when she was first posting the Gnome photo sets, she had a YT channel where she'd share her views. One of the videos was that she doesn't consider herself a feminist because modern feminists are all about making women into victims and she didn't feel like one. She kept it up for a few months, but then eventually took it down because of pressure.

I haven't really paid much attention to her since that time period but god damn she has said some dumb shit.
 
Fucking 100k a MONTH for a 5/10? Good god, OnlyFans simps need to face the walls...
She's not ridiculously attractive to the point of being intimidating, has decent tits, pseudo intellectual and is easily accessible online to her fans. So she's the perfect girl to the terminally online NEET.
Wait, this is the kind of garbage she was making $100K a month off of? Is OnlyFans really that easy to make money on you can just be vaguely attractive, stick a crappy camera in the corner and the dollars roll in? (Disclaimer: I just clicked around, I did not watch all 17 minutes so maybe I missed the $100K value part.)

Are the regular porn stars aware they can make this much money and not even have to shower once a week?
OF is no different from the rest of the influencer economy. In other words, 1% of the thots rake in almost all the profits while the rest make far below minimum wage.

 
I vaguely remember him dating someone who went by "Ozymandias", yeah. Although Scott claims to be asexual. But also I've seen a lot of "asexual" people having sex so I don't know if that even means anything anymore.

I go over the $100k figure here. Seems like it was only for two months at most.
My mistake, I must have skimmed over that one. Here is my penance.

yuddoandaella.png
 
Aella said:
She got pregnant. She had an abortion, and then I guess it was a pill abortion, so she was having like cramps and passing a lot of tissue which she was under the impression it was fetal tissue, and then she took LSD.

Then when she was tripping on lsd she passed a lot of fetal tissue and then she ate it.

After this she had the experience of developing a sexual fetish for blood, which i personally found pretty cool.
She says even weirder shit on her Twitch streams.

 
She has added "doing surveys as an artform" to her bio:
surveys_artform.png
(archive)

Speaking of which she made another pedophilic twitter poll:
prepubescent_sexuality.png
source (a)

Most of the replies are horrifying so I'll only cap the ones that aren't:
prepubescent_sane_replies.png

Retweet of poly apologism:
poly_retweet.png
source (a)
(archive of rt)

She's shilling her Askhole cards again:
askhole_stock.png
source (a)

Which haven't been covered before, but basically it's a set of cards of the exact kind of edgy questions Aella likes to ask on twitter.
askhole.png
source (NSFW) (a)
 
Hi, I knew Aella IRL: https://www.instagram.com/p/CZeTKUQOtMb/
Screenshot 2022-10-07 164203.png

(I am in the center. Huge Last Supper energy here.)

I am, past this post, probably not going to use this forum as a way to reveal information. If you want information, you can DM me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/a.macdonald.iv/ — I am extremely transparent about who I am and have no desire to conceal my identity. My ethos is best described by the quote "anything that can be destroyed by the truth should be" and I try my best to live that. (note: I will not use Twitter.)

She got me cancelled from the local Austin LW community. We had beefed previously over two things:

1. A post where she thought the field of philosophy was a waste of time because it was "namedropping." (This is citation.)

2. A post where she disparaged the field of philosophy because she was working at a library, and so was her coworker who had completed a major in philosophy, which led her to do the "haha no economic value --> useless" reasoning; nevermind that MIRI relies entirely on donations and is not profitable outside of that, or that much of theoretical math is... you get the idea.

2.a. She described the library job as "a physically intensive job shelving books." I had ratio'd her here, because I said it was "the most bourgeois job description I've heard lately, perhaps ever." A man spent the course of several days arguing with me that I was wrong because library work requires you to occasionally squat, and the squat is an intense exercise, and therefore it was indeed an intense job. (I wouldn't know!) After asking why he spent so much effort doing this, it was because he "liked her for her mind." As I've found, this is a very common euphemism.

This happened a while ago so I already have a pre-written summary: https://app.simplenote.com/p/c70Nb5

She moved here in May 2021; I helped her move, both to sincerely try to make amends and selfishly because she paid for the food of whoever did. (The restaurant we went to had a plate of 30 chicken wings and she makes more than four of my parents. Come on.)

One point of note is that I also used to be a sex worker — gay escorting, specifically. (And guys, "escorting" just means you arrange a place to meet up in advance. "Prostitute" is just the general term. It's not a fancy version of the other. You can call me either.)

An ex of mine also had brief experience with the porn industry, and Aella had never been to a strip club while one of my exes was a stripper. This meant that whenever we discussed sex work, she was never truly the center of attention because she had no experience with Homoworld or Real Porn or strip clubs and consulting my opinion was necesssary to have a complete view on sex work. I enjoyed doing this considerably.

I figured I had until October until she had found some way to remove me — I exceeded my expectations and lasted until December.

There are two traits about Aella stand out that persist in real life that I think more people should be aware of:

1. She is one of the most self-centered people I have ever met, and the closest thing I have known to a lizard (i.e. person who seems to lack some basic humanity). I don't mean she is selfish or that she hogs things or that she is narcissistic; my wording is precise here. She is self-centered; there is a Copernicaellan view where she is much more at the center of her own universe than most people are at the center of their own universe. (We all are, of course, but it's a matter of degrees.) Specifically, she will not talk about anything unless it is related to her or she started the conversation. Once on the local Discord she got drunk and didn't do this — the reactions among many of us were like "dude, Aella is being cool. This is weird."

One of her most lizard moments was describing love as a "status transaction", which is just absurd — is it a "status transaction" if a mother holds her baby with unconditional love?

1675061311415.png


Finally, and this is more my subjective call, but: Aella does not laugh at jokes. You can tell bangers and she will either be blank or kind of chuckle, unless she's aware she's "supposed" to. I do not trust people who have a horrible sense of humor.

2. She will deliberately center the conversation around herself at the expense of the conversation or others. (The card game "AskHole" is ulteriorly designed to do this; there are a disproportionate amount of questions about sex work.) During the 2021 Astral Codex Ten Megameetup, she advertised it on her page and it was derided as "the Aella meetup" because she occupied a central table and this was described by one guest as "holding court." One person who showed up to see Aella asked a pregnant wife holding her baby if she was a sex worker. She was described as "a goddess." To test my hypothesis that she will be unable to handle a conversation sufficiently not about her, I sat next to her for about ten minutes and talked with some friends about nothing related to her. At some point she petulantly said "I'm moving" and relocated to a spot where she would get more attention. During the dinner, she spent about a third of the time looking at the ceiling — like a child would do to over-advertise to their parents that they were bored. Once, when she felt a concept was socially important (this is key; she does not care about its real importance) she petulantly said "I DON'T UNDERSTAND" and either turned her head away or outright walked away, my memory fails me here. But the expectation was that we were supposed to care, and go out of our way to make it friendly to her.

3. I need you to really burn this one into your brain, because this is something you will forget, and you will need to constantly remind yourself about: a great majority of what Aella writes or creates is produced by someone else. Many of her edgy tweets are grabbed from parties, and the person who said it is too paranoid about losing their job to be tagged, so she reposts it as if it was hers. She does not seem to have a good sense of what plagiarism is, or when you should cite someone or give proper credit. So, as I said, a great deal of Aella's stuff is not actually Aella. For example, I doubt she produced any of the graphics or charts on her data work. She is, in my view, shameless about taking credit for what other people have done, which goes back to why she thinks philosophy is a lot of "namedropping."

Seriously: write that last one down, or somehow create a reminder that appears everytime you read her stuff. It cannot be said enough.

As it is, I feel like this is more than enough to occupy your headspace for now.

If you want to go deeper, there are countlesss things that annoy me about Aella that we can discuss over Facebook DM or Instagram. It is an infinite well.
 
Last edited:
I need you to really burn this one into your brain, because this is something you will forget, and you will need to constantly remind yourself about: a great majority of what Aella writes or creates is produced by someone else. Many of her edgy tweets are grabbed from parties, and the person who said it is too paranoid about losing their job to be tagged, so she reposts it as if it was hers. She does not seem to have a good sense of what plagiarism is, or when you should cite someone or give proper credit. So, as I said, a great deal of Aella's stuff is not actually Aella. For example, I doubt she produced any of the graphics or charts on her data work. She is, in my view, shameless about taking credit for what other people have done, which goes back to why she thinks philosophy is a lot of "namedropping."

So we've got another Naomi Wu on our hands? This would be very interesting if you can provide any concrete evidence of it
 
So we've got another Naomi Wu on our hands? This would be very interesting if you can provide any concrete evidence of it
I don't, sorry. I'm aware that makes it more or less hearsay, but the only instances I could provide are in the Austin LessWrong/ACX discord, which I am banned from, and Discord wipes your access to chat histories once you're removed from a server.

The specific case where I noticed this was when I criticized the methodology of her political compass fetish and noticed what I was saying silently incorporated into her writing, even though she hadn't so much as acknowledged the criticism in our discussion. That's the best I've got on that end. I noticed her farming out the discussions to multiple chats, then sort of puppeteering the arguments and incorporating what other people said with the strong suggestion (on her blog) that it was her own thought. This is more of a Carlos Mencia style method than Naomi Wu.

She's always had problems with citation and ... acknowledging that other people did things she can't just do independently, or won't do independently. This is from our philosophy beef, when I told her that mentioning the names of philosophers was not "namedropping" but crediting the person who thought of the idea:
https://archive.md/1n8rU
1675076202735.png


I cannot stress enough that she thinks she can do more or less whatever field she wants on her own accord with little to no training. For example:
1675076354099.png


Note: She does not do this.

She farmed out a question about "natural progesterone" to the health and fitness section of the Austin LW discord. She was trying to figure out if she should take a vitamin E oil that has progesterone derived from yams, as opposed to I guess just taking birth control — my memory fails me on why exactly she was asking, but she considered her pseudo-doctor's lack of connection to standard medicine a good thing.

Men will go out of their way to help her, so she can effectively ask Man A about X and then Man B about X and Man C about X and pit their responses against each other and see what they say. IMO this is fine, actually, as long as you're upfront about it, but she acts as if these are thoughts completely of her own.

So, yeah, this is more of a Carlos Mencia situation — it's less like "I got a man to write my whole essay for me" and more "by drawing together what has been said from man A, man B, man C, man D, man E (and so on) I have assembled something that looks complete and like I did it entirely on my own." Carlos Mencia retold other people's jokes in his own style; she'll rewrite what other people say and not bother to correct someone if they thought she came up with it.

This is the main thing: I've literally never seen her credit someone. I think that alone speaks volumes.
 
I'm still unsure on her "Autism". I know woman do have autism in different ways to how men do and seeing videos of her she seems to have autism hand movements but at the same time she just comes off as a cunt who thinks she is smarter and better than everyone while also being incredibly stupid for that exact same reason.

Reading that post about her just sorta reaffirms that her autism really does not affect her much and she is just kinda a cunt who skirted by doing the most basic bitch shit that would get her praise and being a rich girl also helped that.
She does not seem to have an actual personality and probably would let you put your willy in her stinky unwashed cheese hole if you said she was smart to reaffirm her dimwitted belief.

Also huge ass egghead
 
Back