War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
And what about in the immediate area? How many missiles can they toss up to take down NATO fighters that won't leave them with holes due to empty launchers? Holes the Ukrainians are almost certainly going to anticipate and plan to exploit. Yes, the Russians had plenty of SA-2 missiles in inventory after shooting down Powers. But how many actually loaded and ready in his AO?

Keep in mind the Russians gave orders that fighter pilots were to ram him if necessary, so it isn't like they were sparing any effort to shoot him down.
Would they even need to use anything fancy to draw Russian fire?

My understanding is that the U-2 wasn't hard to hit because it was fast, it was hard to hit because it was wayass up there.
 
You keep missing the important that to do so took every missile in the area. I don't think firing 14 missiles at one F-35 is a winning ratio for the Russians, because if we send in half a squadron of 6 planes that's 84 missiles that need to be launched to take them all out. Can Russia spare 84 S-300 missiles?
Yes is the short answer, not just 14:1. If an enemy had to expend 30:1 and lose a few TEL's to counter battery fire, they'd still be the winners in an engagement. I also promise you that the US would stop flying into contested space long before they got to that Kill ratio.
 
Last edited:
Would they even need to use anything fancy to draw Russian fire?

My understanding is that the U-2 wasn't hard to hit because it was fast, it was hard to hit because it was wayass up there.
Definitely. And the Russians knew exactly where it was coming from, too, and where it was headed, since there had been several other flights prior to it. And in a twist of fate you'd expect more from fiction, his was the last scheduled flight across the border.
 
Definitely. And the Russians knew exactly where it was coming from, too, and where it was headed, since there had been several other flights prior to it. And in a twist of fate you'd expect more from fiction, his was the last scheduled flight across the border.
Something similar happened with the F-117 shootdown, the Serbs tracked the escorting F-16's when it took off from Italy, using low frequency radar that was very low resolution but showed Aircraft were in the air.
 
The problem with supplying fighter planes:
1675214577729.png

Fundamentally the problem of the "second-best air force" applies here. Any plane you send no matter what is going to suffer if its runway can be bombed, its AWACS nonexistent, facing superior numbers of enemy fighters while being spammed with SAMs.

So far all aid to Ukraine has come as a slow drip-feed, that simply doesn't work in the context of aircraft.
 
And what about in the immediate area? How many missiles can they toss up to take down NATO fighters that won't leave them with holes due to empty launchers? Holes the Ukrainians are almost certainly going to anticipate and plan to exploit. Yes, the Russians had plenty of SA-2 missiles in inventory after shooting down Powers. But how many actually loaded and ready in his AO?

Keep in mind the Russians gave orders that fighter pilots were to ram him if necessary, so it isn't like they were sparing any effort to shoot him down.

Again, separate out "Russia vs. NATO" and "Russia vs. Ukraine".
In Russia vs. NATO, NATO could wild-weasel Russia into exhausting its air capacity, and would have the planes to capitalize on Russia air defenses being exhausted: the CAS planes to pound russian positions, and the ground forces to roll them up.

Ukraine lacks the air fleet and ground forces to capitalize on any rearm period. Even if we want to pretend you have a couple F-16's able to get the Russian air defense to blow their loads, there is only so much the rest of the Ukrainian airforce could do against dug in positions.

If Russia expends 20 SAMs a day, they can keep that pace for a year before they run out of current stocks of S300 missiles. Even if you give Ukraine 200 F-16s, if Russia - just on the S300 - can manage a 40:1 SAM to Plane loss ratio, Ukraine will run out of fighters before Russia runs out of missles.
 
It is always funny to see when westerners are sperging about slavic languages.

Rule of thumb: most slavic languages have dialects that are different from the language of literature (i.e. the main one you learn in college and school - I have no idea and I don't want to know if there is an english name for that). Sometimes very radically, sometimes even a dialect of one language is closer to the neighboring language than to its "parent" language. This is the case with slovak dialects, for example: it has three very different ones, one of which is very similar to polish and ukrainian, the second is the basis for the official language, and the third is actually a variant of the czech language.

Poles have similar issues, in practice there are three dialects of the polish language: official, kashubian, silesian. There is no chance for users of the last two to get along.

Other sort of chaos isin the Balkans, once croatian andserbian were two equal dialects of one language (and that was recently, sometime until 1970), now they are considered two separate languages. Recently, montenegrin and bosnian were recognized as separate languages, 40 years ago they were simply dialects of serbo-croatian.

I will not tell you about the orc language, I do not know it and I have not had contact with it - I will only explain that the famous maps "half of Ukraine speaks the orc language" is nonsense. This area is using surzhycs (I don't care if their is a proper name in eglish for that), i.e. mixed dialects of ukrainian and russian.

These are MUCH bigger differences than between english in Australia and english in London. Literally two people who, in theory, use the same language in the same country may not understand each other (a Pole speaking kashubian and a Pole speaking silesian), when two people a few countries away can (a Croat will understand a Montenegrin, as long as they both speak the official language) .
This whole region has a rich and convoluted history, I can't recommend this lecture enough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJczLlwp-d8&list=PLh9mgdi4rNewfxO7LhBoz_1Mx1MaO6sw_
I'm only like 9 hours in, and they have already touched on the role language played in formation of different states and the like.
But yeah, that aside, I fail to see anything wrong with the letter, it's written in typical formal manner. It's not in "poor Russian", it's absolutely normal.
 
There's a New York Times article about the two men who fled conscription from the east coast of Russia to Alaska:
mxsg.jpg

Their asylum case is still pending. Just my opinion but they're more deserving than the masses flowing across the Mexican border with canned sob stories.
 
That's a laughable reward, considering cost of the tank itself.

1) Just how many socks do you have on KF?
2) There's absolutely nothing wrong with how the letter is composed, if you're talking about the one @Sprawy Handlowe PPHU provided. You're being retarded, stop embarrassing yourself.
It might still be fake, but your purported familiarity with the language is questionable to say the least.
You seem a little upset I doubted this very sketchy claim, which was too much even for reddit (it was removed from a pro-Ukraine subreddit, which is very revealing). Also, why are you accusing me of socking if I'm posting under, you know, my account?

Well, let me get to the issue in your post. This site goes into it in detail:


My Russian isn't up to the task so here's a machine translation:

Fake: Fighters of the Chechen Akhmat battalion attacked NTV journalist Olga Zenkova and her cameraman in Melitopol. This is reported by Ukrainian Telegram channels.​
The truth: Olga Zenkova is not a war correspondent and does not cover events in the NWO zone. She works in the Ural bureau of the NTV television company and​
and shoots stories in the cities of the Urals and Western Siberia. In January 2023 video stories by a journalist were shot in Yamal (January 4 and 6), Surgut (January 23) and Chelyabinsk (January 30). There is no information indicating that Zenkova could have been in the SSO zone on January 17.​
The authors of the fake published a photo of the alleged appeal of the NTV channel's editor-in-chief, Alexandra Kosharnitskaya, to the Investigative Committee (IC RF). A number of inconsistencies suggest that this document is fake. First, it is not the victim who reports the crime, but his employer. And he does not apply to law enforcement agencies, but to the media relations department of the Investigative Committee, whose function is not to receive reports of crimes. If a crime had been committed, the victims would have gone to the police.​
Secondly, the document says that the members of the "Akhmat" detachment allegedly introduced themselves before the commission of the crime, which seems absurd. Thirdly, the legal wording is incorrect. Instead of "насильственных действий сексуального характера" they say "насильственных действиях полового характера". (edit mine: violent acts of a sexual nature can be defined both ways but not formally, and this is not a legal criminal complaint by the purported victims) The NTV network has a serious legal staff that would not have made such mistakes in the documents.​
The fake story was spread by a Ukrainian social networking account, through the mass creation of comments on the posts.​
NTV's official Telegram channel published a denial of the fake, calling the information about the attack on the journalists "bullshit".​

1675226168957.png

So, while no, I'm not a proficient Russian speaker, I can read a little Russian, and understand basic grammar, as well as the differences in the Russian judicial system and the US legal system, since it's my profession.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself, как сказали в Америке.
 
Last edited:
There's a New York Times article about the two men who fled conscription from the east coast of Russia to Alaska:
View attachment 4392244

Their asylum case is still pending. Just my opinion but they're more deserving than the masses flowing across the Mexican border with canned sob stories.
Call bullshit. Even if you believe Russia is that desperate for manpower, there's no way they'd draft someone as old as the dad.
 
Again, separate out "Russia vs. NATO" and "Russia vs. Ukraine".
In Russia vs. NATO, NATO could wild-weasel Russia into exhausting its air capacity, and would have the planes to capitalize on Russia air defenses being exhausted: the CAS planes to pound russian positions, and the ground forces to roll them up.
I would less its less "exhausted" in terms of raw quantitative attrition, and more "exhausted" in the sense of decoy drones, DRFM jamming causing false radar contacts, flustered crews unsure which stand-off attrition is being aimed at their HQ and which is being aimed at them, anti-radiation loitering munitions going crazy, etc.

Less "run the enemy's stockpiles down over a matter of months/years" and more "temporarily saturate, confuse, blind, immobilize or destroy everything in this specific AO to give the [insert air mission here] the window of opportunity it needs".
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
So in Belgium, there is an armsdealer that is sitting on a bunch of military hardware.
To be precise , it is AFV (armoured fighting vehicle) which he has around 500 of them.
Among them, he has:
50 leopard 1 (west german tank from the 60s, not specific which version it is)
38 Gepard (mobile AA)
112 sk 105 (Light tank with 105 mm gun, so packs a punch)
100 VVC2 and 70 M113 (VVC2 is an italian version of M113)
fun fact: Beligum doesn't have any tanks left after they sold them to this dude and now they want to buy it back from him and he wants halv a mile for each of them.
According to him, he is also in talk with Ukraine to sell his shit to them.
 
Call bullshit. Even if you believe Russia is that desperate for manpower, there's no way they'd draft someone as old as the dad.

Theres a video I saw on youtube from the 80's, maybe early 90's? An interview with a former CIA agent. Where he said, the CIA would either infiltrate or subvert a major publication, in order to get public on side in an overseas conflict. Most of the time he would pose as an informant. Show the Journalist his ID.

Then he'd start telling the journalist information he suspected the Journalist already knew, this was about building trust between them that this informant was legit. After a while of talking and sensing the Journalist trusted him, he started feeding the journalist false information, information that would frame the US in a good light. At the end of the interview, the Journalist thought he had a scoop and would go back and write the article.

He told the reporter the whole reason he was talking to him, is because he thought what the CIA was doing was wrong.
 
Last edited:
but your purported familiarity with the language is questionable to say the least.
Google translate is as far as her familiarity reaches.

If that indian company is transporting oil with old tankers, is there a greater chance of a spill?
Are the margins for Russian oil really that small now?
Those tankers are probably the same ones that have transported russian oil for years. What's happening is what I actually predicted a while back: The marine insurance market is starting to shift a little, as there is room for a disruptor outside the G7 to take advantage of a wide open, unserved market.

Russian oil is still selling under the price cap, so it's not yet the win people seem to want to believe it is.
 
Rybar on ruzzkie state TV: 'around half of VDV pedos are now in hell':

source: https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1620409293353918464

I didn't expect such losses, I assumed they lost about 20-30% of VDV. So what is the VDV intended for? Most of the shit the paratroopers got in the early stages of the war, before the NATO toys arrived
Probably intended to dance around in gay as fuck striped shirts like they've done for years. Seriously what kind of faggot designed those sperg shirts they always wear? They look like clothes CWC would wear.
 
United States are reading a 2 billion dollar care package, which include long range weaponry

ASHINGTON, Jan 31 (Reuters) - The United States is readying more than $2 billion worth of military aid for Ukraine that is expected to include longer-range rockets for the first time as well as other munitions and weapons, two U.S. officials briefed on the matter told Reuters on Tuesday.

The aid is expected to be announced as soon as this week, the officials said. It is also expected to include support equipment for Patriot air defense systems, precision-guided munitions and Javelin anti-tank weapons, they added.

and Ukraine is suppose to get around 120-140 tanks in a "first wave" from the west.
In the article, they claim that these tanks are western made, but not what kind of models they are (could be anything from M1 Abrahams to some shit from the 50s)
USA have advised Ukraine to wait until they get their tanks before they start the spring offensive

 

Ukrainian authorities conduct nationwide anti-corruption searches​

Hours after President Volodymyr Zelensky promised “new reforms,” Ukrainian authorities on Wednesday conducted a series of anti-corruption searches across the country, according to the country’s parliamentary majority leader.

David Arakhamia announced on Telegram that authorities were conducting a “spring raid campaign instead of sowing campaign.”

Alongside “a whole series of covert investigative actions,” Arakhamia said that property searches were conducted of former Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, businessman Ihor Kolomoisky, and politician Vadim Stolar.

He said that the “entire management of the customs” agency has been dismissed, there have been “searches in the State Tax Service,” and that authorities have served “notices of suspicion to senior officials of the Ministry of Defense.”

“The country will change during the war,” he said. “If someone is not ready for change, the state will come and help them change.”

Zelensky announced on Tuesday that his administration is preparing to introduce changes ahead of talks between Kyiv and the European Union scheduled for Friday.

"We are preparing new reforms in Ukraine. Reforms that will change the social, legal and political reality in many ways, making it more human, transparent and effective," Zelensky said in a video address, adding that further details would be announced at a later date.

Ukraine's Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal had announced the "summit" earlier on Tuesday but provided no details on who would attend.

Shmyhal told Politico in an interview published Monday that Ukraine, which was granted EU candidate status in June last year, has an "ambitious plan" to join the bloc within the next two years.


Ukraine: Putin preparing major offensive in eastern region of Luhansk to mark anniversary of Russia’s war, officials say​


Russia is mustering its military might in the Luhansk region of Ukraine, local officials said, in what Kyiv suspects is preparation for an offensive in the eastern area as the first anniversary of Moscow’s invasion approaches.

The Kremlin’s forces are expelling local residents from their homes near the Russian-held parts of the front line so that they cannot provide information about Russian troop deployments to Ukrainian artillery, Luhansk governor Serhii Haidai said.

“There is an active transfer of (Russian troops) to the region and they are definitely preparing for something on the eastern front in February,” Haidai said.

Military analysts anticipate a new push soon by Moscow’s forces, with the Institute for the Study of War saying that “an imminent Russian offensive in the coming months is the most likely course of action”.

A new offensive might also coincide with the invasion’s first anniversary on February 24.

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reported on Wednesday that Russia is also concentrating its efforts in neighbouring Donetsk province, especially in its bid to capture the key city of Bakhmut.

Donetsk and Luhansk provinces make up the Donbas, an industrial region bordering Russia that President Vladimir Putin identified as a goal from the war’s outset and where Moscow-backed separatists have fought Ukrainian authorities since 2014.

The regional governor of Donetsk, Pavlo Kyrylenko, posted images of the aftermath of the shelling in Bakhmut, showing huge black holes in residential buildings in the embattled city.

He said that Russia is “actively deploying new military personnel to the region”.

Donetsk was one of four provinces that Russia illegally annexed in the autumn, but it controls only about half of it. To take the remaining half, Russian forces have no choice but to go through Bakhmut, which offers the only approach to bigger Ukrainian-held cities.

Russian forces have been trying for months to capture Bakhmut. Moscow-installed authorities in Donetsk claimed Russian troops are “closing the ring” around the city.

The Russian shelling of Bakhmut, where most residents have fled and others spend much of their time in cellars, killed at least five civilians and wounded 10 others on Tuesday, Ukraine’s presidential office said.

Ukraine is keen to secure more Western military aid as it tries to fend off the much larger Russian forces. It has already won pledges of tanks and now wants more.

Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, tweeted on Wednesday that talks are under way on securing longer-range missiles and fighter jets from Ukraine’s allies.

Asked to comment on media reports about a new package of US military assistance to Ukraine expected to be announced soon, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described it as “a direct path to inciting tensions and taking the escalation to a new level”.

“It will require additional efforts on our part, but it won’t change the course of events,” he said in a conference call with reporters.

The Western allies are trying to broaden their coalition in support of Ukraine.

Nato Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said on Wednesday in Tokyo that he sought stronger cooperation and more “friends” for the alliance in the Indo-Pacific region.

Press Association – Susie Blann, AP

 
You seem a little upset I doubted this very sketchy claim, which was too much even for reddit (it was removed from a pro-Ukraine subreddit, which is very revealing). Also, why are you accusing me of socking if I'm posting under, you know, my account?

Well, let me get to the issue in your post. This site goes into it in detail:


My Russian isn't up to the task so here's a machine translation:

Fake: Fighters of the Chechen Akhmat battalion attacked NTV journalist Olga Zenkova and her cameraman in Melitopol. This is reported by Ukrainian Telegram channels.​
The truth: Olga Zenkova is not a war correspondent and does not cover events in the NWO zone. She works in the Ural bureau of the NTV television company and​
and shoots stories in the cities of the Urals and Western Siberia. In January 2023 video stories by a journalist were shot in Yamal (January 4 and 6), Surgut (January 23) and Chelyabinsk (January 30). There is no information indicating that Zenkova could have been in the SSO zone on January 17.​
The authors of the fake published a photo of the alleged appeal of the NTV channel's editor-in-chief, Alexandra Kosharnitskaya, to the Investigative Committee (IC RF). A number of inconsistencies suggest that this document is fake. First, it is not the victim who reports the crime, but his employer. And he does not apply to law enforcement agencies, but to the media relations department of the Investigative Committee, whose function is not to receive reports of crimes. If a crime had been committed, the victims would have gone to the police.​
Secondly, the document says that the members of the "Akhmat" detachment allegedly introduced themselves before the commission of the crime, which seems absurd. Thirdly, the legal wording is incorrect. Instead of "насильственных действий сексуального характера" they say "насильственных действиях полового характера". (edit mine: violent acts of a sexual nature can be defined both ways but not formally, and this is not a legal criminal complaint by the purported victims) The NTV network has a serious legal staff that would not have made such mistakes in the documents.​
The fake story was spread by a Ukrainian social networking account, through the mass creation of comments on the posts.​
NTV's official Telegram channel published a denial of the fake, calling the information about the attack on the journalists "bullshit".​

View attachment 4392296

So, while no, I'm not a proficient Russian speaker, I can read a little Russian, and understand basic grammar, as well as the differences in the Russian judicial system and the US legal system, since it's my profession.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself, как сказали в Америке.
You said it was broken Russian, full stop. I told you it's not, because it's simply fucking not.

The issues "warfakes" (how fitting) points out could be explained in a number of ways:
First of all, the fact that it's addressed by the media entity to the person in charge of dealing with media is because, as the letter clearly states, military and police refused to do anything about it. Stands to reason other channels would be used, anything will do as long as you get a response, if the people whose job it is to help aren't helping. You'll be knocking on every door if something like this happened, and it happens all the fucking time. Shit like this gets swept under the rug faster than you can say "Kyiv"

Chechens bragging about their position is just par for the course, you'll probably know before they even enter the building - it's typical mountain nigger behavior, so it is entirely plausible that they would let it slip at some point. It's not at all absurd, when it comes to professionalism, Kadyrov's tiktokers aren't exactly a prime example. These people are always a problem wherever they go, and their behavior among civilians is shit because no one holds them accountable. As far as deboonking goes, this argument is really weak.

The only real mistake here is using "Насильственные действия полового характера" as opposed to the proper term "Насильственные действия сексуального характера", which could just as easily be explained by incompetence, though even professionals mess up terminology sometimes. Though this one at least qualifies as sus.
It's not my area of expertise, I can only speak for grammar. "Половые преступления" is a term that's seemingly used interchangeably though, from what I could find.
But that's neither here nor there, your claim was "broken Russian" and it's still bullshit, since we're in the weeds of legal terminology and semantics rather than grammar, to which I have already attested as a native speaker.

Again, I'm not saying the letter isn't fake, it's just that the "evidence" you and these teletubbies cling to is a copout, because you're goddamn children playing internet detectives "fighting informational war", it's pathetic.
Just NTV coming out and saying it's not true is sufficient. Although if you turn on conspirological mindset, it could've been a rogue employee blowing the whistle in the face of a coverup. Not saying it's the case, but it is a possibility. Speculation isn't off limits for you lot when it comes to dunking on Ukraine and their supporters, so entertain me here for a moment.
Call bullshit. Even if you believe Russia is that desperate for manpower, there's no way they'd draft someone as old as the dad.
They came for my dad, he's over 50. Likely because of his officer rank, which is meaningless since he did alternative (civil) service and doesn't know a single thing about the army, not that they care.
He was out of town fishing that weekend, so they fucked off and haven't returned since. They got some other poor sod instead to meet the quota, then mobilization "stopped".
Depending on who you are, they might put effort in chasing you down, like that one airliner pilot who was taken straight out of cockpit trying to get on his scheduled flight after receiving summons: https://news.yahoo.com/video-shows-russian-pilot-taken-094900119.html
Stands to reason that pilots are exceedingly valuable.
 
Last edited:
@Astro Galactic Megalul

The only real mistake here is using "Насильственные действия полового характера" as opposed to the proper term "Насильственные действия сексуального характера", which could just as easily be explained by incompetence, though even professionals mess up terminology sometimes.

Erm... it isn't. In criminal code of RF they use полового rather than сексуального as far I see.

Part of CC RF reffereing to sexual crimes is titled Преступления против половой неприкосновенности и половой свободы личности.

Full text of art. 131 CC RF:

1. Изнасилование, то есть половое сношение с применением насилия или с угрозой его применения к потерпевшей или к другим лицам либо с использованием беспомощного состояния потерпевшей, -

наказывается лишением свободы на срок от трех до шести лет.

2. Изнасилование:

а) совершенное группой лиц, группой лиц по предварительному сговору или организованной группой;

б) соединенное с угрозой убийством или причинением тяжкого вреда здоровью, а также совершенное с особой жестокостью по отношению к потерпевшей или к другим лицам;

в) повлекшее заражение потерпевшей венерическим заболеванием.

Not sure how it works in Ural Mountains, but when one is in Germoney reffering to anything related to law, oftes usses words as close as can to the ones used in relevant legal act. I don't see any reason to use 'сексуального' in anything related to art. 131 CC RF: or use 'половое' (according to title of that glova - part of CC RF) or 'Изнасилование' (as name of offence used in art. 131).

full text of CC RF: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/c91dee89e2267902e5aaf1e1601d8362c01e7833/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back