Douglas Mortimer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
I wonder if Ralph gave him something. Shaggy's dedication is near peak gator levels these days
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol.he needs to maintain composure and self control continuing forward.
Apparently only 3 people have access to the court documents. They aren’t public. If Faith or Vickers didn’t give him the copy, he would have to FOIA request. Vickers checked, he’s the only one that requested so Ethan had to have given the documents to Faggy. That’s my understanding. Idk.Now prove Ralph directed him to do it. I can't imagine sending someone a copy of a public legal filing could be considered a violation of a restraining order by itself. I could always be wrong though. If Ralph had sent it to me I would post it here before even looking at it. Would Ralph be in violation then? How about me?
Ifyou'reVickers isn't carefulyouhe will be branded a vexatious litigant before this is over andyourVickers' family will be really screwed.
I'm arguing that it's probably not a violation for Ralph to send a copy of his own public court filing to anyone. If Ralph sent you a copy of the public restraining order itself would that be a violation of that restraining order? I am not a lawyer and could be wrong.Apparently only 3 people have access to the court documents. They aren’t public. If Faith or Vickers didn’t give him the copy, he would have to FOIA request. Vickers checked, he’s the only one that requested so Ethan had to have given the documents to Faggy. That’s my understanding. Idk.
I’d think it would be obvious why he gave it to him and he’s not allowed to directly or indirectly (thru a messenger) mess with the Vickers. But honestly I hope the Rage Hog argues that. Judges love nothing more than their intelligence to be insulted.I'm arguing that it's not a violation for Ralph to send a copy of his own public court filing to anyone. If Ralph sent you a copy of the public restraining order itself would that be a violation of that restraining order?
Of course if he included "here post this on the internet for me" that could maybe be a violation but the only thing that can be proven at this point is that a public court filing was sent.
He's FOIA'ed shit before, so that's my belief.What Eso and May are talking about is what was filed yesterday.
View attachment 4412184
The tl;dr is that Ralph has an upcoming court appearance to defend himself for contempt in the proceedings. His lawyer just filed the legal equivalent of Ralph saying "ITS NAWT TRUUUUUUUUUUE!"
That's the supposed big Ralpha W.
The (one way) DVRO states that Ethan Ralph cannot harass Faith Vickers directly or through a proxy such as EsoFaggy.Now prove Ralph directed him to do it. I can't imagine sending someone a copy of a public legal filing could be considered a violation of a restraining order by itself. I could always be wrong though. If Ralph had sent it to me I would post it here before even looking at it. Would Ralph be in violation then? How about me?
This is already a public document prepared by his attorney, not sensitive privileged info. The burdon of proof is on the accuser to demonstrate Ralph's intent. Ralph's defense to could easily be "I was letting my lawyer speak for me by sending the document he filed publicly with the court." Now you get to prove otherwise. Of all the things they seem to have Ralph on cold this ain't it.I’d think it would be obvious why he gave it to him and he’s not allowed to directly or indirectly (thru a messenger) mess with the Vickers. But honestly I hope the Rage Hog argues that. Judges love nothing more than their intelligence to be insulted.
Prove his intent was to harass Faith Vickers. That's all I'm saying. If he sent that public document to you with no other comment would that be harassing Faith Vickers? My gut says no but I'm just a Farmer.The (one way) DVRO states that Ethan Ralph cannot harass Faith Vickers directly or through a proxy such as EsoFaggy.
That would change things. Now prove it.Shaggy IS Ralph.
Sure, if I didn't publicly taunt them, I guess? EsoFaggy did the opposite. I think he FOIA'ed the documents and Vickers now has his dox. There's no way Ethan Ralph would be stupid enough to send those files, though I've been proven wrong before. Never bet on him not being a fucking retard.And fuck everyone for making me defend Ethan Ralph. This is just an interesting though experiment.
I wasn't saying that to be involved in your gay little argument so, no.That would change things. Now prove it.
Vickers stated on his Twitter that he FOIA'd the list of people who FOIA'd the document. His name was the only one, thus proving Ralph must have given Eso the doc.Sure, if I didn't publicly taunt them, I guess? EsoFaggy did the opposite. I think he FOIA'ed the documents and Vickers now has his dox. There's no way Ethan Ralph would be stupid enough to send those files, though I've been proven wrong before. Never bet on him not being a fucking retard.
I'd assume at least 75% of the violations Vicky's going to file are bogus anyway, but some will stick.
What a fucking retard.Vickers stated on his Twitter that he FOIA'd the list of people who FOIA'd the document. His name was the only one, thus proving Ralph must have given Eso the doc.
I'm also curious howVickers stated on his Twitter that he FOIA'd the list of people who FOIA'd the document. His name was the only one, thus proving Ralph must have given Eso the doc.
I'm unsure of the timeline but I believe it's been at least a month since Eso tweeted the contempt order. Also, you can relax, I'm not Vickers. If I were I've have made it a point to tell everyone repeatedly and without solicitation on this site when discussing any perceived genius legal strategies.I'm also curious howyouVickers filed a Freedom of Information Act request and had it filled in about 15 minutes. The last one I filed took 8 months. That was New York but still. You know there's paperwork involved with those right? A phone call isn't normally a Freedom of Information Act request.
The chances of Vickers being declared a vexatious litigant are effectively nil. Even people who file dozens of totally baseless lawsuits can go a long time without that happening to them. And Vickers is represented by counsel (who have professional obligations not to engage in frivolous legal actions) and half of it is technically being brought by his daughter.Honestly the vexatious litigant could become a problem in the future if he's not careful. I don't see anything that really spikes the needle yet, but he needs to maintain composure and self control continuing forward. My personal feelings on the matter would to probably take this much more private and only make things public after the rulings but it's his legal drama, not mine.
Agreed. Believe me, I'd find it hilarious for Ralph to get smacked down in court for the Eso watermarked documents. But he hasn't proved intent and as far as I'm aware, Ralph is not subject to a total gag order in relation to the case.This is already a public document prepared by his attorney, not sensitive privileged info. The burdon of proof is on the accuser to demonstrate Ralph's intent. Ralph's defense to could easily be "I was letting my lawyer speak for me by sending the document he filed publicly with the court." Now you get to prove otherwise. Of all the things they seem to have Ralph on cold this ain't it.
[...]
Prove his intent was to harass Faith Vickers. That's all I'm saying.