- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Quick reminder that the district court and the appellate court had to rewrite the entirety of Texas contract law just so they could dismiss Vic's lawsuit.
Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)
- Thread starter Useful_Mistake
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
There's something strangely poetic about the once Christian lawyer, Nick Rekeita hiring the general counsel for the Satanic Temple.
Get thee behind me, Satanic Temple!
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
IME you put it in as almost-boilerplate so that if cause arises later you don't have to amend your prayer. I've never seen anyone get excited about it one way or the other.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
A prayer for relief has to be more than just insane (e.g. demanding a billion gazillion dollars) before it's penalized, sort of like you're generally not penalized for listing every imaginable affirmative defense in your answer even if they're not remotely applicable.
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2021
I thought all lawyers represent that particular client. It's in their hypocritic oath after they pass the bar.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
Nobody reads the prayer for relief except federal clerks writing a bench memo about diversity jurisdiction.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Gotta say OVER $75,000. There are literally cases where someone pled exactly $75,000, because they didn't get that whole EXCEEDING thing in § 1332, and their case got thrown out. PROTIP: plead $75,000.01.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Depending on how retardedly Nick's defense goes, it may be generous to Nick.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Out doubt randazza will admit to a tort in the response, but this is a lolsuit. Anything is possible.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
I want to see the balldo on the exhibit list
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
"And, your honor, get this! If you use the code NOSE, you get 30% off. Now that's a deal!"
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
If Montagraph's melon defloration, Umbrella Man videos, and his..... photography get brought in as exhibits, Monty might do that in retaliation (add the bottle picture, too).
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2019
While I have my doubts that any of that would be allowed by the courts, I'd love to see the transcript of the hearing where both sides are arguing adamantly over which object was touched inappropriately while the judge starts hinting that the bailiff just fucking execute him.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Nick mentioned in response to a superchat during the Murdaugh trial stream that Randazza was supposed to file his response, but nothing's showing up yet. The last document's still the pro hac vice order.
If the response was actually filed it should be hitting the docket any time now. Guess we'll have to keep an eye on it.
Unless the response is late, of course.
edit: It's not a response, it's a stipulation. Apparently, Quest's lawyers conferred with Randazza, and they've decided that they need to amend their complaint...
tl;dr: amended complaint will be due 7 days from the date the court signs the stipulated order, Nick's response will be due 14 days thereafter.
If the response was actually filed it should be hitting the docket any time now. Guess we'll have to keep an eye on it.
Unless the response is late, of course.
edit: It's not a response, it's a stipulation. Apparently, Quest's lawyers conferred with Randazza, and they've decided that they need to amend their complaint...
tl;dr: amended complaint will be due 7 days from the date the court signs the stipulated order, Nick's response will be due 14 days thereafter.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
Fantastic. Instead of a quick motion to dismiss based on the obvious problems in the complaint we now get the full show as the lawyers confer and agree to maximum lolsuit silliness.
I’m looking forward to the revised complaint and Randazza’s response.
I’m looking forward to the revised complaint and Randazza’s response.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It would be a huge waste of time for both sides to go through the motions of an MtD followed by a nearly inevitable grant of leave to amend. Personally I think they should have not agreed to it and just gone ahead and filed the MtD and opposed the leave to amend, and filed for sanctions on top of that, just on principle but hey, maybe Nick isn't finding that even the dumbest of his Nickers want to fund his luxury lolsuit defense, and Randazza is costly counsel.
In any event, this is the same result that was most likely at much less cost. And remember, Minnesota doesn't have a SLAPP statute. Ironically, SLAPP is intended to reduce litigation but we see what happened in the Vic case. It actually encouraged not just litigating but massively over-litigating a rather simple case.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2019
It is shocking how retarded the parties are in this suite.
Montegraph: Retarded grifter thinking he can win.
Rekieta: Retarded grifter thinking he can monetize this lawsuit into a net positive.
Monetgraph's lawyer: paid by the hour and doesn't appear to respect rekieta at all.
Rekieta's lawyer: gets paid stupid amounts by the hour.
This lolsuit is almost as perfect a storm as the weeb wars had been. As soon as monty has a GFM we will achieve equilibrium. You will have a big money loud mouth that just bought a new vehicle claiming total victory soon™. The loud mouth has money behind him and industry support. The loud mouth shows off all of his expensive purchases and wife to own the haters. The loud mouth will become irate with kiwifarms and those calling him a cuck.
pic unrelated
