Executive Order 2023.02 (henceforth "NIGHTMARE WORLD WHERE FACT AND FICTION COEXIST")

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
AI voices and things are already too scary, good rule. I heard from some vtuber loving pals that people are already getting letters from clover and things over making content that makes their girls look bad. I blame the countless vocaroos of V-tuber horse porn ( horse farts included) that keep getting waved around. I wonder how many problems this AI stuff will make
 
It is crazy to see how far this "fake person" technology has progressed in the past five years or so.
I remember being amazed by deepfake when it first became a thing, along with very sophisticated chatbots like character.ai and others.
This technology is extremely impressive as well; all three of these can be combined with each other to make a very convincing fake person.
I can be kind of a doomer so I don't really care that much about where this leads at the moment, I am just amazed at how all of this is real.
Feels like some kind of sci-fi fantasy film or something but it actually exists.

Obviously this will cause a lot of problems, but think of what it can be used for in terms of entertainment/wonder?
Now, if somebody shows my future employer a video of me wishing for total nigger death, I can just claim it was a fake video.
This alone makes the tech extremely useful to me. Think of all the possibilities. Computers are so fucking cool.
 
Well Trump card for everything. Fake news. Hear this scandalous secretly recorde...
Oh fuck you.
Although lives will still be ruined.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Spooky Ghost
Thanks for letting us know, Null. And they called me an idiot for keeping new thread notifications on for meta discussions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trauma care
But text is exempt from the rules for some reason?

Everybody and their mother understands that text can be easily faked, and so they (rightfully) expect them to be supported by actual evidence. The presumption is that they are fake until supported by further proof.

These recent AI voice recordings are (oftentimes) exceedingly convincing by themselves, and it is not unreasonable to expect them to be taken at face value, especially as consumer grade technology to fake someone's voice (especially this easily) is bleeding edge. Ergo; the presumption will often be towards their veracity rather than against it.

This has a twofold issue:

A: Short term: It will be extremely easy to fake outrage against someone by manufacturing voice clips of them admitting to whatever you like, and the well will be poisoned by the aformentioned tendency to immediately believe something like a voice recording to be true.

B: Long term: Faith will soon be eroded in voice recordings to the degree that someone will be able to far more easily declare a recording of themself in a compromising position to be "Fake".
 
Last edited:
Back