Crime A Troubled Mother Faces Murder Charges in Her Young Children’s Deaths - Strangled her three children to death with an exercise band. Was it PPD or postpartum psychosis?

Chilling details emerged at an arraignment of Lindsay Clancy, accused of strangling her three children. Her lawyer argued she was mentally ill, but prosecutors outlined methodical planning leading to the deaths.



By Ellen Barry
Feb. 8, 2023
DUXBURY, Mass. — Lindsay Clancy lay paralyzed in a hospital bed on Tuesday afternoon, occasionally blinking or shutting her eyes, unable to do anything but listen as lawyers told two narratives about how she had strangled her three children.

The prosecutor said it had been meticulously planned: She had concocted an errand that would keep her husband, Patrick, out of the house for about 25 minutes, just long enough so she could do it.

And she had then strangled each of her children with an exercise band, an act that would require holding each of them down for at least four minutes. Then she leapt from a second-story window, a fall that fractured her spine.

“The defendant stated that after he left the house that night, she killed the kids because she heard a voice, and had, quote unquote, a moment of psychosis,” Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague said during a virtual arraignment via Zoom.

“She heard a man’s voice, telling her to kill the kids and kill herself because it was her last chance,” Ms. Sprague said.

The defense lawyer told a different story. Since the birth of her youngest child, eight months ago, he said, Ms. Clancy had repeatedly sought help for postpartum depression, eventually being prescribed 13 psychiatric medications in a four-month period. But suicidal thoughts kept surfacing, culminating in a break on Jan. 24.

“This is not a situation, your honor, that was planned by any means,” said Ms. Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington. “This is a situation that clearly was a product of mental illness.”

In the last two weeks, since Mr. Clancy arrived home to a horrific scene, this community has been trying to make sense of it. Ms. Clancy, 32, worked as a labor and delivery nurse. She was known as a generous friend and a doting mother. She had no criminal record, nor any reported history of abusing her children — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and the baby, Callan.

Ms. Clancy has received a good deal of sympathy, much of it from women who have experienced postpartum depression and psychosis. Online supporters have adopted the hashtag LAOL, which stands for Lindsay’s Army of Love. Mr. Clancy appealed to the public to “find it deep within yourselves to forgive Lindsay, as I have.”

But Tuesday’s arraignment made it clear how difficult it would be to untangle Ms. Clancy’s mental state from her actions.

The Plymouth County district attorney, Tim Cruz, is prosecuting Ms. Clancy on charges of first-degree murder, which carries the state’s maximum penalty, life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, as well as three counts of strangulation and three counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon.

1675927601463.png
Lindsay Clancy
Credit via Facebook

Mr. Cruz, a rare Republican prosecutor in Massachusetts, is widely seen as uncompromising. He successfully pushed for two consecutive life sentences for Latarsha Sanders, who fatally stabbed her two sons in Brockton, Mass., despite her family’s insistence that she was psychotic and delusional.
The extent of Ms. Clancy’s mental illness is only gradually coming into view.
Prosecutors said on Tuesday that she had never reported psychosis to her husband and that a psychiatrist who evaluated her in December had concluded she was not suffering from postpartum depression. On Jan. 5, less than three weeks before the killings, she had been released from a five-day inpatient stay at McLean Hospital, a psychiatric hospital, without any warning that she posed a danger to herself or others.
The case is unfolding at a moment of rising awareness of mental illness and failures in the mental health system.
“If I were the D.A., I would be reticent to charge this as murder — it feels misaligned with our current understanding of mental health, and misaligned with the public reaction,” said Daniel Medwed, a professor of criminal law at Northeastern University.

“Society,” he added, “is way ahead of the law here.”
More than two dozen countries have laws decreasing penalties and providing psychiatric care for mothers who kill children under the age of 1. In 2018, Illinois was the first U.S. state to pass a law making postpartum illness a mitigating factor in sentencing.
Ms. Clancy posted frequently on social media, leaving behind a trail of family snapshots and updates on her mental health. In one post, last fall, she described an adverse reaction to Zoloft, a commonly prescribed antidepressant, which she wrote had left her with such “extreme insomnia” and lack of appetite that she stopped taking it.
Over the four months preceding the killings, Mr. Reddington said, she had been prescribed 13 psychiatric medications, an assortment of benzodiazepines, antidepressants, mood stabilizers and Ambien, which is used as a sleep aid.
“This continued even up until the week before when her husband went to the doctor and asked her for help and said, ‘Please, you’re turning her into a zombie,’” he said at a hearing last week. At Tuesday’s arraignment, he said she had been suffering from postpartum depression, “as well as a possibility of postpartum psychosis that is pretty much ignored.”
Prosecutors, meanwhile, cast the killings as carefully planned.
Using data from Ms. Clancy’s phone, Ms. Sprague described at length how Ms. Clancy had spent the afternoon of Jan. 24 — making a snowman with her children and taking photos that she sent to her mother and husband. Then, at 4:13 p.m., she searched for a restaurant to order takeout, using Apple maps to calculate how long it would take to drive to the restaurant and back.
At 4:53, she texted Mr. Clancy, who was working from a home office in the basement, and asked him to pick up the food — a Mediterranean power bowl for her, scallop and pork belly risotto for him. They had a 14-second call at 5:34 p.m., which Mr. Clancy described as unremarkable, though “she seemed like she was in the middle of something.”
When Mr. Clancy returned to the house, shortly after 6 p.m., he was confused to find it quiet, Ms. Sprague said. Setting down the containers and climbing up to the second floor, he forced open the door of the master bedroom to discover blood on the floor and an open window.

He ran down to the back yard, where his wife was lying, with cuts on her wrists and neck, and asked her where their children were. A recording of a 911 call captured the audio as Mr. Clancy climbed down the stairs to the basement. “At one point, he calls out, ‘Guys?’” Ms. Sprague said. “He can then be heard screaming in agony and shock as he found his children.”

All three had exercise bands tied around their necks. Cora, 5, and Dawson, 3, were pronounced dead at the hospital. Callan died three days later.

Maternal infanticide frequently takes place in the context of postpartum psychosis, a syndrome that occurs in one or two births per thousand and is characterized by delusions and hallucinations that can come on suddenly.

Courts and juries have responded to these cases in disparate ways. The best known is that of Andrea Yates, a Texas woman who was charged with murder in 2001, after she drowned her five children in a bathtub. She later said she had been following the commands of Satan, who had told her it would save them from hell.

In Ms. Yates’s first trial, in 2002, a jury found her guilty after just three and a half hours of deliberation. After that conviction was overturned, the jury in her second trial, in 2006, found her not guilty by reason of insanity.

It’s not unusual for doctors and family members to miss signs of postpartum psychosis in high-functioning women, according to Teresa Twomey, a lawyer and author of “Understanding Postpartum Psychosis: A Temporary Madness.”

Ms. Twomey, who said she had suffered a psychotic break after the birth of her daughter, remembered repeatedly calling her husband to warn him there were intruders in the house. He would drive home, reassure her there was no one in the house and leave again, figuring, as she put it, “maybe a squirrel got into the attic.”
Eventually, she said, she began to vividly visualize acts of violence against her baby, and was so fearful of her own potential actions that she collected the knives and scissors in the house and stowed them in the back of the closet.
In the case of a patient like Ms. Clancy, Ms. Twomey said, “we make the assumption that she would know, and could self-report.” But, she added, “if you’re high-functioning, and you’re paranoid, people are looking for reasons you wouldn’t have this illness.”
In a sermon last Sunday, the Rev. Robert Deehan, who had baptized the youngest of the Clancy children, asked parishioners to look more closely at their neighbors and family members, to consider, as he put it, “what burden the other person might be carrying.”
It had been a difficult week. The morning after the killings, Father Deehan sat with Mr. Clancy for an hour, praying. Later, he visited Ms. Clancy in her hospital room while she was still unconscious and delivered the sacrament of anointing of the sick, which is sometimes known as last rites. On Friday, at a funeral Mass for the children, he read the eulogy Mr. Clancy had written for them.
“Poor Pat kind of went off by himself because he’s still grieving, as you would imagine, and wanting to be apart and just alone, having some space,” he said. “So we gave him that space.”
In Duxbury, a seaside town settled in the 17th century, opinion was split, with some calling for draconian punishment and others, especially women, expressing sympathy.

“The first thing everybody did was look up her Facebook page, and on her Facebook page you can see literally how in love she was with her children,” said Julie Catineau, a psychiatric nurse who hosts a podcast, “Psychology Unplugged.”

“I believe in my heart that this woman was suffering,” she said. “That woman was out of her mind suffering.”

Ms. Clancy will remain in the hospital until she is cleared to be moved to a rehabilitation facility. A probable cause hearing in the case is set for May 2. Speaking to reporters last week, Mr. Reddington indicated that he planned to argue that she was not guilty by reason of insanity.

“The legal system is a heartless juggernaut that would not be affected by public opinion,” he said. “They will proceed as they deem appropriate. I hope they will temper justice with mercy, as they say. If they don’t, then it will be a trial.”


Ellen Barry covers mental health. She has served as The Times’s Boston bureau chief, London-based chief international correspondent and bureau chief in Moscow and New Delhi. She was part of a team that won the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. @EllenBarryNYT
 
She wasn't psychotic when she carried out the murders. Blahblahblah
I didn't say she was, but thanks for your tedious over-explanation of something I a) was not talking about and b) already understood.

The point is that it is stupid for the prosecutor to claim "ShE nEvEr MeNtIoNeD pSyChOsIs!!!" as if it's some sort of "Gotcha", when psychotics do not know when they are breaking from reality.
 
I understand the nuance here and given she's already paralyzed and doesn't present a threat to society, I wouldn't be upset if she was not given a life sentence as she already has one.

I don't know how I feel about post partum but I definitely feel sick by the amount of drugs they had her on. At some point, at some combination, how is it not similiar to being strung out on crystal meth for a week? And the doctors recommended it, even while her husband begged for mercy.

Its scarier to me that there's such a rigid belief and faith in this mental health system that it has to absolutely only be her fault despite actively seeking help and resources on a regular basis. After pumping her full of narcotics, they blame her for not only not recovering, but succumbing to her psychosis. The drugs cannot possibly have anything to do with it and she cannot have any adverse reaction to the cocktail. She can only be full blown psychotic to her core with desire to kill babies.

I'd maybe feel different if she was on one or two, maybe even four or five. But to try THIRTEEN mind altering chemicals in less than a year ... might as well be induced psychosis in an already susceptible woman. Doctors are psychotic.
 
When I read about this case, what makes me want to puke is her husband's plea to forgive her. Bitch, please! Are you going to really forgive her? As in: let's say, hypothetically, they acquit her, and you take her back, and make new kids with her after what she did? Would you let her take care of your kids? I definitely wouldn't.

There was something definitely wrong with her, and so she got prescribed all these meds. It's criminal that she got so many, however, I don't think we should "forgive her". She took lives of three innocent children, and we should make sure that she will never be able to do it again.
 
How old was the baby? They don’t specify.
Probably under 12 months I suppose? Given that there was 2 years between the other kids. This is no excuse but popping out a kid is a fucking trip, its like an invisible hand dials every anxiety from a baseline of 3 to over 9000, and I was considered "quite calm" during check ups which meant most mothers came in to the health centreactively crying and freaking the fuck out.

It reminds me of another similar case where the mother was really having massive breakdowns that were increasing after each kid and the doctor warned after number (4?) that she should have absolutely NO MORE. But her husband was one of those fundie types and his pastor kept saying that she would be cured by another kid. No surprise what happened when she had another kid.

Someone I know is looking after his grandkids because his daughter in law, after being completely normal, developed schizophrenia after 2 kids, with the voices and everything. I'm surprised post-partum mental shit is not really talked about that much, because it's such at odds with the misty idea of a nice contented Mom and her nice little cooing baby rather than the reality of 18 months of getting back from 'Nam.

(And a dozen different meds suggested they were trying to force her into gift-card bliss rather than getting some professional helpers in,)
 
I wonder why nearly every pre-modern societies had strict control over their women and every religion has the same opinion over female decision-making capabilities. Probably a mysogynistic culture that somehow materialized independently in every civilization and in every era.

Good thing we now know better! 🤡
Quoting myself since it's relevant here
 
How old was the baby? They don’t specify.
The baby was a boy named Callan, aged 7 months. Callan died three days later from his injuries.
When I read about this case, what makes me want to puke is her husband's plea to forgive her. Bitch, please! Are you going to really forgive her? As in: let's say, hypothetically, they acquit her, and you take her back, and make new kids with her after what she did? Would you let her take care of your kids? I definitely wouldn't.

There was something definitely wrong with her, and so she got prescribed all these meds. It's criminal that she got so many, however, I don't think we should "forgive her". She took lives of three innocent children, and we should make sure that she will never be able to do it again.
Sounds like his Reverend inspired him to say that. It talked about how he was praying with him afterwards. I think he'd be perfectly rational in not forgiving her. Some people only God can forgive.
It reminds me of another similar case where the mother was really having massive breakdowns that were increasing after each kid and the doctor warned after number (4?) that she should have absolutely NO MORE. But her husband was one of those fundie types and his pastor kept saying that she would be cured by another kid. No surprise what happened when she had another kid.
That was Andrea Yates. I think the husband was just as guilty in that particular case. He actively prevented her from family planning with reasonable gaps between children and from taking any psychiatric medications and seeing professionals. He kept her isolated and had his own radical religious interpretation that even his pastor challenged him on.
In this case however, the husband seems to be very supportive or at the very least, was not actively keeping her away from care. He was even presumably getting her meds at CVS when she killed all their children.
I'm surprised there is no antipsychotic medication mentioned in the articles. If she actually suffered PPP, that should have been the primary medication. Not shooting a clusterfuck of meds at a wall to see what sticks.
 
Last edited:
Has anyone been following this case? Tiktok is crazy for it and considers her the new Andrea Yates. @Chandelier @Android raptor What do you gals think? I only found out about it from a reddit thread where everyone was pretending to be a psychiatrist sharing their PPD experiences:
I feel so bad for the dad having to go to all his kids' funerals and lol the bitch paralyzed herself for life. Is it a "certified woman moment" when you jump out a window after killing your kids but only break your spine?

It's like a horror movie. He's going to have PTSD for life. No one talks about that when they obsess over the mum's mental health. Though I agree that PPD and postpartum psychosis are legit entities. Who knows if she actually had them or is just some kind of sadist.
Worse than a horror movie.

I feel for him, but I wonder - she had 13 meds prescribed within 4 months, at some point in the 8 months since the 3rd baby was born. Why did both she and he not recognize that if whatever she's telling docs leads to that number of rx, then something is really, really wrong with her? She's a damn L&D nurse and had had 3 babies; he is surely is at least moderately educated person as well, or at least can add 2 and 2 - if nothing else he had experience with her as a mother to compare. Let's say she was cracked/deluded as to her own srste if mind (though not so cracked she didn't know to go see a doc and get meds...) and also putting on the best larp in the history of ever - no way he didn't know anything was amiss, and he's a damn fool to leave a person on unholy amounts of meds prescribed in an incredibly fast amount of time home alone with 3 children under 6.

I just can hardly believe that - either under the influence of that many meds (including Ambien at times), or just someone docs thought should be - she seemed perfectly fine and normal at home - or even very functional.

I also wonder if she'd had issues post-partum before, or more longstanding mental health issues, even mild stuff (mild depression or anxiety), treated or not.
 
Damn, that's upsetting. The last I heard, the youngest was in the hospital being treated for injuries because of what the mother did. Guess they passed. Poor baby.

I'm torn, on one hand the bitch planned and carried out killing her children but on the other the quacks she was going to kept changing her meds and she might have just eventually snapped. Why didn't they just give her some reglan and see if she got better instead of guessing (reglan was developed as an antipsychotic in the 60s and can be used to treat morning sickness during pregnancy).
 
I'm just amazed that this stupid, crazy waste of skin bitch was left alone with her kids when she was clearly fucking insane. That husband is a fucking moron.

I'm so sick of the excuses being made for idiot cunts like this. If the bitch is on 13 different medications, she is NOT competent to be around the children without supervision. How is this not immediately obvious? This twat should be thrown in a river.
 
13 different medications and clear severe mental illness = never ever left alone with young children. Seems like a whole litany of failures here. At the end of the day, she killed three innocent children and she should be fully punished for it. There should also be an inquiry into her treatment.
 
Back