Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's this 2022 item got to do with the Russian ethnics in Donbas not being able to leave to Russia in 2014?
Do you know that those territories are literally broken from Kyyyyivvv? Ukraine's laws do NOT apply there. Even before the Russian SMO.
I think I am gonna leave the thread for now as you people are making me desire for some sort of mass cleansing of low IQ types and implementation of eugenics to a level that the Nazis would only dream of, and only slapfights can result from this.
It's one thing to be an elegant shitposter filled with irony like Badungus, and another to be a low IQ sperg. You have to do better.
vatnik is an affectionate term, like khokhol piggies. Such is life, filled of gypsies, niggers, hoholinhos and vatnikcels
Holy shit we got the NATO simp so malding he has to leave that is kinda cool I have a shitposting career started in 1994 but I think I will add this one to my lol list.
 
I think if drones keep getting destroyed, the military will have no choice but to send out planes to do reconnaissance, and when that happens there will be dogfights between Russians and Ukrainians. They will fight for aerial dominance and it will be recorded like project wingman
This thread is dumb enough without chatbots shitting it up. We even have an Albanian here to bring down the average IQ.

Here's some Armata action, caption says he's firing on the LGBT forces. Must be talking about American mercenaries.

 

More MacGregor & Scott Ritter interviews I already linked a few videos from them, but ofc the hoholsimps dismiss anything that's goes against the Saint Ukraine of Democracy narrative.

I hope that with more trained Ukrainian fighter pilots we'll finally see a proper dogfight. I'm not an expert in military aviation, some people have told me that jets don't do dogfights anymore, but I don't think they're right.
Ukraine doesn't really have any fixed wing aircraft left. They could potentially get some lend leased at some point, but for now that isn't an option for them.

With the amount of SAMs on the ground, I don't think we'll see much aircraft vs aircraft action, especially not dogfight style.
 
Nope. That was feature, not a bug.

Gold standard is just not applicable, never was and all that sperging about it or new reserve currency is just a huge cope.

I'm just calling it how I see it.
wealth.jpg
 
Here's something I'm always wondering about: why don't the infantry on both sides carry entrenching tools like spades? Foxholes and trenches are always useful for cover, yet in no videos recorded during this war do I see them
They absolutely fucking do, update your bot.

Also spades are a Russian/Soviet meme that date back to the Great Patriotic War aka WW2
 
It's just a bot shitting up the thread.

Fortifications are usually dug with full size shovels and heavy equipment like backhoes and such. Won't be able to dig much with a spade in frozen ground in the winter. If you need to make one in an expedient manner and can't find any heavy equipment, can use one of these. A shaped explosive charge made for digging trenches.

Should be able to use auto-translate if you really want, but it's self-explanatory.
 
I am completely baffled at some of the defenses of American military operations post-Korea and Vietnam. War hasn't been about obliterating the enemy for decades, its all about establishing spheres of influence. Is America good at obliterating enemies? Absolutely. Is it good at establishing spheres of influence and control? FUCKING LOLOL.

Modern warfare is no longer about crushing enemies. Its about geopolitical control and exerting influence. Good if you can crush enemies. If you can't control what you just crushed, then guess what, there's no fucking point. Lets look at some of America's bangers. This is going to be long, so skip if you don't want a lesson in geopolitics in the ME and some of Africa.

---

>Afghanistan
Started appropriately as a world-wide supported action against a hostile government hiding a terrorist cell. It later then mutated into a 20 year nation building hand holding exercise that the only thing we held in Afghanistan was Kabul and everywhere else was hell on Earth. Which came from the constant mistake of every empire that has ever invaded Afghanistan, including repeating the mistakes we made when we got involved in the 1980s: That it is a culture driven by tribal allegiances and you cannot force a minority, democratic government upon it.

20 years of shit stopping did NOTHING and we abandoned it basically overnight as our 'expertly trained Afghan army' (who raped children and gave USMC PTSD from the cries of the kids in tents) collapsed in under two weeks in perhaps the most hilarious 'war' I've ever seen, where basically the entire military surrendered and took amnesty from the Taliban and got 80 billion of free US equipment to fund its army.

Now the US doesn't talk about it and pretend it never happened. Anyone praising the US should take very, VERY careful note of what we did in Afghanistan and treated the people who helped us out there. We left them to fucking die. Our current involvement in Afghanistan is pretending they don't exist while China happily expands its sphere of influence into Afghanistan, free of the West because no one recognizes it. Congrats on the twenty years of nothing and then handing everything to China for basically free. Oh wait, except like the 20 trillion we used to launder money through it.

State crushed? Nope. Sphere of Influence? Chinese. Geopolitical embarrassment? Yup.

>Iraq
Complete and utter clusterfuck. Yes, we crushed an aging military and deposed a despot. A true neo-con adventure, where, we committed the mistakes of Afghanistan in completely misunderstanding what the country is about. Before Afghanistan and Iraq, we were actually in the black. Yes, shockingly, America once had a national surplus instead of a national debt. I know this is hard to believe. What did we accomplish? Well, now Iraq is in a perpetual state of civil war, instead of a two-week civil war, where ethnic and religious factions battle it out because secular despotism was the only thing keeping it in check. To say the US has any influence in Iraq is hilarious, and it is one bad day away from becoming yet another theocracy. Our sphere of influence in Iraq is something I would consider non-existent. What we basically did was remove a dictator from power and replace it with nothing, leading to a massive power vacuum and civil war.

State crushed? Yes. Sphere of Influence established? Nope. Geopolitical embarrassment? Yup.

>Libya
People sort of forget this one, but the US has a huge hand in it. Particularly the gnarled fingers of Hilary Clinton and the still-Imperialist France (which somehow people fucking forget, I don't know how, but its still basically a colonial empire in fucking Africa, competing with the Chinese). Ghadaffi had the absolute gall to decide to create an African version of the Euro, backed by gold.

You see, France didn't like this because most of the profit from nations it 'loans' comes in the form of natural resources and forces these nations to pay it back in Euros, which cripples their economies, relying on further loans from France, which they then pay in Euros, getting to keep a decreasing amount of their own GDP, forced to employ the equivalent of corporate script as currency which then means more loans from France...well, you get the point. The formation of a continent based currency would thoroughly fuck France's schemes in the ass. So colluding with Hilary Clinton (likely behind Obama's back if the rumors are true), Libya was next up on the freedom tree. We overthrew Ghadaffi and replaced it with....ISIS. Yes, the current biggest sphere of influence holder in Libya is currently ISIS, probably their last hold out. The overthrow of Ghadaffi also lead to the European refugee crisis so he sort of got the last laugh out of the whole thing.

Certainly, the people of Libya didn't get anything. But hey, France got to keep its child slaves! At the cost of its entire cultural heritage. Truly, sometimes you get what you fucking deserve.


State crushed? Yup. Sphere of Influence? ISIS (and Russia via Wagner PMC @Feline Supremacist ). Geopolitical embarrassment? Yup.

>Syria
Yet another one. When the Syrian civil war started, America flooded the opposition with weapons, cash and training, as well as sending the Green Berets in to train rebels (notably Kurds). Obama wanted a harder push, but the US had enough adventures in the desert for an eternity, so he couldn't go as far as he wanted. But we were definitely involved. Assad's response was unexpected, but sadistically brilliant: Release all the criminals. Especially the religious ones. Yet again, not learning from Iraq and Afghanistan, we did not know what the point of this was. Assad did. The freed criminals, of course, signed up with the rebels. But there was one little problem. They wanted control.

When the US backed rebels sent a negotiator over to talk things out, the freed criminals sent him back so badly beaten (dead, of course) he was unrecognizable. The freed criminals then took up arms against US supported rebel groups, and crushed them to dust, allowing the Syrian army to hold out pretty much indefinitely and eradicate all US interference into Syria.

Oh yeah, and then those criminals went on to call themselves ISIS and cut a swath through the entire Middle East. The US, through its involvement and meddling in Syria, created the worst terrorist and insurrectionist group of the modern era to date. I don't know how you fuck up harder than that, but America will find a way.

State crushed? lol no. Sphere of Influence? Russian, Iranian and Chinese. Geopolitical embarrassment? ISIS created, so what do you think?

---

And these were just the big ones. We've had plenty of smaller fuck ups. If you are clapping at US involvement, you are a delusional fucking retard. I'm sorry, but you're just a dumb motherfucker. There is nothing scarier for you than the United States 'supporting' you. Because we're supporting you for ourselves. We honestly do not care what happens to you. Our press is basically a state press and sure, it'll bitch and moan if your people die, our politicians will say a few worlds and pretend to care by laundering some money through NGOs (all NGOs are fucking OPs btw, none of them are real).

The United States Government does not care about you. It does not admit it is wrong. It does not talk about these things. Ukraine is simply there to bleed Russia. Period. End. Do you think the US cares if Ukraine ceases to exist as a result of throwing Eastern European bodies into a buzzsaw? Fuck no. Does the United States care if Ukraine ceases to exist? Absolutely not. All we care about is fucking Russia over. And by the looks of it, shocker, we're failing.

Our sanctions have proven fruitless. We've shown the world you can defy Western monetary institutions and survive. We have shown that a unipolar financial world is not inevitable. The damage this has done is more catastrophic than if we just let Russia have Ukraine. We can bully around small states like Libya if they dare try to defy global hegemony. You can't do that with Russia, Iran, China and India. Cracks have been created that cannot be sealed. And for what? So boomers can jerk off to a conflict they never got to see?

And make no mistake, as soon as Zelinsky finds himself to be a liability rather than an asset, he'll find himself surrounded by a Wagner platoon with Sean Penn's Oscar shoved up his ass sideways.

Obama fucking warned all of you. The US does not have allies. It has interests. And I've shown you what happens to our 'interests'.
 
Last edited:
So uh who is winning now?

Globally, no one
Regional, countries with lots of natural resources that havent involved themselves in the war
In the current conflict, Russia is gaining most ground around Bakhmut. Failed offensives at Vuhlnedar with large documented losses and some gains against the Ukies at the Kreminna-Svatove front. Russia has the initiative rn, its up to the autist analyst to determine whether this is a win or not
 
>Syria
Yet another one. When the Syrian civil war started, America flooded the opposition with weapons, cash and training, as well as sending the Green Berets in to train rebels (notably Kurds). Obama wanted a harder push, but the US had enough adventures in the desert for an eternity, so he couldn't go as far as he wanted. But we were definitely involved. Assad's response was unexpected, but sadistically brilliant: Release all the criminals. Especially the religious ones. Yet again, not learning from Iraq and Afghanistan, we did not know what the point of this was. Assad did. The freed criminals, of course, signed up with the rebels. But there was one little problem. They wanted control.

When the US backed rebels sent a negotiator over to talk things out, the freed criminals sent him back so badly beaten (dead, of course) he was unrecognizable. The freed criminals then took up arms against US supported rebel groups, and crushed them to dust, allowing the Syrian army to hold out pretty much indefinitely and eradicate all US interference into Syria.

Oh yeah, and then those criminals went on to call themselves ISIS and cut a swath through the entire Middle East. The US, through its involvement and meddling in Syria, created the worst terrorist and insurrectionist group of the modern era to date. I don't know how you fuck up harder than that, but America will find a way.

State crushed? lol no. Sphere of Influence? Russian, Iranian and Chinese. Geopolitical embarrassment? ISIS created, so what do you think?
You kinda missed that at one point, CIA and Pentagon fought on different sides of the war for control over Syria
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back