Stanford student reported for reading Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ - Student reported to campus officials over Snapchat photo of them with the book

bea28940ae7ffaa602ef56bf148e2e3e200cd90d.jpg


Reported to the university following a social media post

A Stanford University student has been reported to campus officials for reading Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” book.

“A Protected Identity Harm report has been filed after the circulation of a Snapchat screenshot,” of the student, according to The Stanford Daily.

The reporting system “is the University’s process to address incidents where a community member experiences harm because of who they are and how they show up in the world,” according to Stanford.

“The photo of the student reading the book was posted to another student’s Snapchat story Friday evening, according to a screenshot of the image obtained by The Daily,” the campus newspaper reported. It did not provide a copy of the image nor any further context that would explain how the student harmed anyone.
“Swift action was taken by the leadership in the residential community where both the individuals who posted and the one pictured are members,” campus rabbis Jessica Kirschner and Laurie Tapper wrote in an email to Jewish students.

The Fix emailed Kirschner and asked if there should be punishments for the student and for more information on the Snapchat and the email the rabbis sent out. The Fix also asked if there should be a removal or other action taken against the 76 copies of “Mein Kampf” that the university has.

“I do not believe we should ban books, or punish the reading of books, even books whose content is as offensive as Mein Kampf,” she said via email. “This is antithetical to the purpose of the university and the spirit of free inquiry.”

“As a residential community as well as a learning community, it is important for students to have space and support to work through how individuals interpret things differently, and the distance that can emerge between intent and impact,” the rabbi said on Monday evening.

She did not respond to a follow-up question that asked for clarification on Hillel’s involvement in the report.

University officials are “working with the leaders of the residence that the students belong to address the social media post and its impact on the community,” the paper reported, based on comments that spokesperson Dee Mostofi provided it.

Mostofi and the campus media team did not respond to a Monday morning email from The Fix that asked for more information on what specifically the student did to harm others and if the university would remove or restrict access to its own copies of the book.

A Jewish student argued that whether the book was read as part of a distasteful joke, as rumored, or for a class, it should be allowed.

“Though Mein Kampf carries a hateful, genocidal message packed with poor writing, this should not disqualify the book from being read,” Julia Steinberg wrote in the Stanford Review. “In fact, Mein Kampf is worth reading because it exposes the mind of one of the most consequential men of the 20th century, and allows readers to comprehend the kind of thinking that, when given power, leads to violence.”

[ORIGINAL ARTICLE]
[ARCHIVE]
 
I see the book all over the place, still. It’s an uninteresting book that edgy kids gravitate to. They like to carry it around because it draws this sort of attention.

Big fucking deal.
And to think then Mein Kampf is now in the public domain while Anne Frank's diary isn't yet... Btw, that reminds me of this Stonetoss comic.
1675982262498.png
 
And to think then Mein Kampf is now in the public domain while Anne Frank's diary isn't yet... Btw, that reminds me of this Stonetoss comic.
View attachment 4480116
Funny enough I have family members who say that Bibles belong in the fiction section, but personally I blame their strict Catholic upbringing.

The fact that they're reporting a person for reading any kind of book is ridiculous. Would you rather he watch TikTok all day or something?
 
76 copies and they get mad someone reads one.
It's an important book to understand the rise and motivations of the instigator of the biggest war in history (so far).
Besides, all the anti-Japanese and anti-Italian racism in it is funny.
 
When I was in college, it was part of the curriculum, andceveryone loathed it for being boring and disjointed to read, being essentially a social media page before such was invented.
 
As much as I think this a ridiculous controversy, I can see where the concern is coming from (don't lynch me just yet, I hate jews just as much as the next guy).

There are some things you just know you don't want to read in public. There is nothing wrong with it, but you know it will attract unwanted attention.

I think there is a high chance this dude is just an edgy faggot trying to attract attention. And I don't stand behind this type of faggots. They are the ones who actually hurt the legitimacy of the movements they decide to randomly grift on.

In a nutshell, there is nothing wrong about reading anything. And there should never be.

Openly reading shit that you know will make you glow seems like a legitimate reason to raise concern to me though. That's what incel do, try to attract attention by any mean they can.
 
Last edited:
I've read both Mein Kampf and Zweites Buch. Unless you really want to know what an actual Hitler Rant looks like, neither of them are legitimately worth reading, even if you're a hardcore National Socialist. They're just Hitler telling his life story and ranting about the various issues Germany was facing at the time. Though in Zweites Buch, he also admits had he known he'd become Reichskanzler und Führer des deutschen Volkes, he'd have never published Mein Kampf. And, well, Zweites Buch was never officially published for reason.

I'm inclined to agree with @rel=alternate, this sounds like an edgy dipshit doing something for attention, not a legitimate attempt at getting an alternate viewpoint.
 
Funny enough I have family members who say that Bibles belong in the fiction section, but personally I blame their strict Catholic upbringing.

The fact that they're reporting a person for reading any kind of book is ridiculous. Would you rather he watch TikTok all day or something?
I think they legitimately would. Books are old and gay and don't come in entertaining 2 minute snippets. I honestly think some segment of the population no longer has the attention span for a book.
 
Back