Pre-K teacher attacks idea of 'childhood innocence,' claims toddlers not too young for 'sexuality' discussion - William 'Willy' Villalpando called the idea of 'childhood innocence' a 'mythology'

(Article, archive)
A pre-kindergarten teacher and early childhood professor repeatedly attacked the idea of "childhood innocence" and claimed that early childhood teachers should introduce children to gender ideology at the youngest ages, Fox News Digital found.

William "Willy" Villalpando works at Santa Ana College in California where he teaches early child development. He also indicated on his Instagram that he is a pre-kindergarten educator.

Fox News found documentation that Villalpando worked in the Rialto Unified School District pre-k division from 2016 through at least June 2021, the latest date California updated teacher's records. It was unclear whether Villalpando continued to work at the district for the 2022-23 academic year, and they refused to respond. When Fox News reached out to Villalpando's Rialto district email address it was not returned to sender.

In 2020, Villalpando called the idea of "childhood innocence" an example of "mythology."

Childhood-innocence-.jpg


"There is a common mythology that children live in this world of pure innocence, and that by introducing or exposing them to the real-world adults are somehow shattering this illusion for them. Therefore, there is a banning of topics and issues that children should not be exposed to, as if they are not experiencing them already."

On another occasion, he said, "I'm tired of the ‘Childhood Innocence’ argument… Stop blaming a phenomenon that doesn't exist."

He went on to attack the idea that children shouldn't be exposed to "sexuality," claiming that "such a view is a very white, Christian, upper-class, cis-gendered, and hetero-centric."
Willy-V.jpg

"Not talking about Queerness in the Classroom, is NOT Letting Children be Children. It's Telling Those people They Do Not Deserve to Exist," he said in September 2021. "Kids are never too young."

"Let's work to deconstruct some of our own biases. (Adults incorrectly link discussions on sexuality and gender as equating to discussions about sex.)," the early childhood educator said.

The district Santa Ana College where the teacher works told Fox News that they do "not condone any form of attack on 'childhood innocence.'

"Our RSCCD community college courses in Child Development and Education Studies do not address nor teach gender studies," the district said.

He said in a November 2022 podcast of "Rainbow Parenting" that "we have so many people who tell us that this is inappropriate stuff we can talk about. And so I'm like, hey, no, we can't talk about this."

The teacher went on to say that if parents didn't have the conversations with kids, it was up to teachers to foster classroom environments that "may make others uncomfortable."

"Children who are exposed to environments with more fluid understandings of gender, are more likely to understand that gender is fluid."

He added that educators should talk to little kids about queerness even if parents have avoided the topic.
Willy-V-prof.jpg
"Parents haven't already had conversations about these things with their kids, that kids don't know, that they might be intersex, that they might be agender... non-binary. And really, children have a right to see themselves in our classrooms. It's not okay to just forget about them or push them out just because it might make us uncomfortable or may make others uncomfortable."
queerness-in-classroom.jpg
According to Villalpando, "talking to children about gender" includes telling them that it is a "social construct."

"This goes alongside teaching children to ask others for their pronouns. Trust me when I say children get this so much faster than adults give them credit for. Let kids practice with you," he said.

Villalpando's social media accounts went dark after Fox News Digital reached out for comment.

"[C]hildren are exploring and understanding gendered association before they say their first words," he said.

"Around 3 to 4 months old, infants [sic] show a sex and gender preference in who they look at."

"At 3 years old, a child can label their perceived gender identity," he said. "By 4 years old, children have a stable sense of their gender identity and have assumptions and beliefs of what they can and cannot do based on their gender (i.e. dolls are for girls, cars are for boys)."

Other teachers in California have raised the topic of gender ideology in their classrooms.

A California teacher named Olivia Garrison bragged about helping students hide their social transitions from parents. Fox News Digital found that Garrison, a 9th grade history teacher, worked at Del Oro High School located in the Kern High School District.

TikTok-teacher-NYT.jpg
Social transitioning is a first step for transgender children. It entails adopting new names, pronouns, changing their clothing and getting haircuts to match a preferred gender expression.

The New York Times reported, "Olivia Garrison, a history teacher in Bakersfield, Calif., who is nonbinary… has helped students socially transition at school without their parents' knowledge."

"My job, which is a public service, is to protect kids… Sometimes, they need protection from their own parents," Garrison told The Times. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Another teacher in the Sacramento City Unified District, Danita McCray recommended using a "gender unicorn" with toddlers to introduce gender theory.
Danita-McCray-Featured-Image.jpg

"Now, early childhood is 0 to 8 years old, so that's kind of like from preschool to third grade… And the focus… of this workshop is to provide you with positive strategies to support transgender and gender non-conforming children," McCray said in a video exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital.

"I've done research. I have got my doctorate degree. Children are not too young at five years old. Children understand gender as early as three years old," she said.

Skye Tooley, a teacher at Saturn Street Elementary, located in the Los Angeles Unified School District, discussed on TikTok using a "gender-fluid" stuffed animal to teach children on pronouns and being non-binary. Gender fluidity refers to change over time in a person's gender expression or gender identity, or both.

Stuffed-animals-teacher.jpg

"This is a llama unicorn... I thought it was so cute to let my kids name the llama unicorn. It was a mistake. So this little llama is gender-fluid; we will be practicing pronouns with this little llama," Tooley said.

"[Children] are very much ready for these topics, and are way more accepting than adults when it comes to... gender, gender assumptions, pronouns, all the things. And it is child-development appropriate and age appropriate," the teacher said.

Tooley provided another example of a stuffed animal that had they/them pronouns.

"I started talking [to students] about Norbert the Narwhal … who uses they/them pronouns, and we practice making mistakes with their pronouns as well as correcting them."
 
That makes absolutely no sense
It's a bit insane, but think of it simple as them treating sexuality and genders as personality types as what they're doing.

This also leads to the confusion for them when interpreting people being against teaching kids about trannies and the variety of madeup sexualities. To them it's just telling kids about these different personalities they could have, ignoring the fact it could lead a young girl to end up with zipper tits to make their body match the personality they've decided they have.

They don't seem to make the connection that they're telling kids that they must adhere to strict behavioral and physical norms based on how they identify.

Lot of it seems to come from trying to rationalize all the tranny insanity or the paranoia of deranged women. This woman wants to be asked every few seconds during sex if she still consents? Can't be that she's insane or a sexual abuse victim, it must be the world just doesn't understand how important asking for consent is.
 
Something I should add is that, in theory, I think there is nothing wrong with sex-Ed classes being taught in schools provided that the students being taught about sex are at least 13. The main purpose for these classes was to educate students about sex because it was thought that they would get unhelpful ideas if they relied on friends (assuming their parents were being too prudish) for sexual education, since there could be problems if your entire sexual education comes from other horny teenagers.

The problem is that, in practice, these classes become a good way for degenerate people and institutions to get into your kid‘s developing mind and put all sorts of degenerate nonsense in there. Ironically an even worse problem than what these classes were meant to address.
I thought so too, and kind of went back and forth about it, but ultimately I think that's just a responsibility of the parents. They'll pick up what they need to in biology anyway, anything beyond that is too specific for a public setting where strangers have access to minors.
 
The notion that children need to be exposed to sexual content especially as it pertains to degenerate behavior* and that innocence is a christian or White Bourgouise construction that either oppresses browns, gays or gay browns is actually a rather old one. There were Jews that made similar arguments in the 1950s, and queer and gay activists who said such things in the seventies and eighties.

People would be genuinely surprised how long such notions have percolated in corners of academia and especially in homosexual activist circles.

*There was a Jewish author IIRC who argued that exposing kids to things like drag and homosexuality was a way to prevent them from becoming fascists or Nazis. The same idea is seen here that it’s a political necessity children be exposed early to the concept of “gender fluidity”. Obviously a lot of the goal is simply to gain sexual access to children, but there is a definite political agenda as well.

Children whose minds are polluted with this filth and madness the thinking goes will never actually throw Schlomo into the oven.
 
I thought so too, and kind of went back and forth about it, but ultimately I think that's just a responsibility of the parents. They'll pick up what they need to in biology anyway, anything beyond that is too specific for a public setting where strangers have access to minors.
Yeah I’m in agreement with you that Sex-ed classes nowadays are more trouble than they are worth, its rare that parents nowadays are weird prudes that don’t want their children to know what sex is until they are 18, so it’s better for little billy to learn the birds and the bees from his parents rather than Chesterella Molesterson the drag queen.

I think there would still be a place for Sex-ed classes in an ideal society, especially considering how many kids these days are getting their sexual knowledge from extreme porn, take for example that one Aussie/Kiwi teenage girl who did some crazy shit like a triple-anal gangbang and now has to wear a colostomy bag for the rest of her life because she and the other teenagers just thought that was a normal thing to do during sex.

Unfortunately I think the powers that be have no interest in developing a healthy sexuality in the next generation, I think they want quite the opposite in fact.
 
Just like what other people said in the article posted earlier.

Anyone, and I mean ANYONE, who says crap like "childhood innocence is a myth" or other things along that line is 100% a pedophile.

Do not give ANYONE like that the benefit of the doubt. No sane person would ever say something like that. This is as blatant as someone holding a giant sign saying "I am a pedophile."
Considering how miserable I was as a child I never really believed in it growing up.
 
True, they should not be above suspicion.

But they aren't the ones demanding that they have unfettered access to other people's kids as some kind of civil right. They aren't looking to make this lunacy not only acceptable, but celebrated.

The LGBT crowd wants everyone to forget that they were in league with NAMBLA back in the day. Walter Breen, Marion Zimmer Bradley, Harvey Milk, Allen Ginsberg, et al were all in favor of kidfucking, and even committed it.

I will consider them complicit in institutional noncery until they condemn this and fight against it in a way I find satisfactory.
Every single player in the ushering of sexual liberation and gay rights was a pedophile, every single one.

 
I have children.

I keep an exceptional eye on the news for all the cases within the city in which I live. I also know the Federal prosecutor in my city who is responsible for prosecuting these monsters. They are the sneakiest fucks to have ever walked the Earth and if you are a father or mother and you think your Pedo problem is waiting for you down the road at the local Tranny or gay nightclub, you're a fool.

They hide in plain sight and will most likely be in positions of great trust and be considered beyond reproach - because that's the cover they need to have in life in order to avoid detection.
Someone start looking into this faggot. He has children and I don’t trust him around kids with how gleefully he’s defending diddlers
 
Yes, that's true. And in fact, at the age of 4 a child can already consent and it only takes it one more year to understand politics and thus it should be allowed to vote. He who is old enough to vote should also be old enough to use assault rifles, to drive and to drink. He who is old enough to drink should be allowed to do drugs. You know, alcohol is just a drug. Why do we allow one drug but not others, like coke? That's hypocrisy. Let 5year olds coke the shit out of their heads. I mean, they are already old enough to vote. You can vote, you can do coke, as an old saying goes. Stop being a cis-gendered Nazi, you bigot.
Of all the retarded trans theories, the one about children being conscious of their own male-ness and female-ness at very young ages may actually be true. The case study for this is no less than David Reimer, patient zero of troonsanity, whose parents (for reasons that were not entirely insane at the time) tried to raise him as a girl after a botched circumcision. But as young as four, his biology was already asserting itself in his behavior, making him aggressive and more inclined toward physical activities and boy toys like trucks, and he never seemed comfortable with girl stuff.

Now, if a child identifies as OPPOSITE their biology, something has gone badly wrong. But four years old isn't necessarily too young for children to start grasping some of the behavioral (but NOT sexual) differences between boys and girls.
 
I try to avoid the autistic thunderzone cuz shit like this makes me MATI like nothing else does. (bonus if it's on MSM and all the parents who don't want their children molested are "uneducated")
It's pretty sad. A few years ago it wasn't hard to find LGBTwhatever people who vehemently HATED pedos. A pretty good example of this is when Soph LaBelle was caught using a real child's likeness as a kink piece reference. In current year, talking to kids about all the kinks is a fundamental human right for gays everywhere.
Tldr; the slope is very slippery
 
I try to avoid the autistic thunderzone cuz shit like this makes me MATI like nothing else does. (bonus if it's on MSM and all the parents who don't want their children molested are "uneducated")
It's pretty sad. A few years ago it wasn't hard to find LGBTwhatever people who vehemently HATED pedos. A pretty good example of this is when Soph LaBelle was caught using a real child's likeness as a kink piece reference. In current year, talking to kids about all the kinks is a fundamental human right for gays everywhere.
Tldr; the slope is very slippery
You left out the part where when everyone called him out he said he was he was indulging his kink responsibly, and EVERYONE gave him asspats because every other comment was shot down near instantly because billy is a cave dwelling mongoloid that dpesn't leave the internet unless he's on tour and even then his phone is probably in his unwashed 'girl' cum stained hand.
 
Pedo's have been successful in luring people into belief that the Trans community is loaded with Pedo's and the trick has worked; because I hear it from a lot of anti-trans that Pedo's are primarily in the trans and gay community. It is blatantly false and has been a good tactic to lure suspicion away from the primary group of Pedos which is the average straight male, usually married, has a good career and has ensured their entire life is an exquisite and elaborate lie designed to steer people away from recognizing them.
Explain Keffals, Bobposting, Nick Bate and Jonathan Yaniv.
 
You left out the part where when everyone called him out he said he was he was indulging his kink responsibly, and EVERYONE gave him asspats because every other comment was shot down near instantly because billy is a cave dwelling mongoloid that dpesn't leave the internet unless he's on tour and even then his phone is probably in his unwashed 'girl' cum stained hand.
I'm aware that many people defended him because "muh trans", but I literally can't understand your post.
 
Back