"Hunger cliff" looms as 32 states set to slash food-stamp benefits - Everyone's second favorite tween book, coming to a city near you

Article: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/food-s...in-32-states-emergency-allotments-march-2023/
Archive: https://archive.md/YtxsG
=========================
A "hunger cliff" is looming for millions of Americans, with 32 states set to slash food-stamp benefits beginning in March.

The cuts will impact more than 30 million people who are enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, in those states, according to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Among the states where recipients are facing cuts are California and Texas, which have greatest number of people on SNAP, at 5.1 million and 3.6 million recipients, respectively.

The reductions are due to the end of so-called emergency allotments, which bolstered food-stamp benefits at the start of the pandemic as Americans grappled with the massive disruption to the economy. While the U.S. is certainly on more stable footing than in 2020, households are now struggling with high food costs — groceries were about 10% higher in December than a year earlier — making the timing of the SNAP cuts particularly challenging, experts say.

"This hunger cliff is coming to the vast majority of states, and people will on average lose about $82 of SNAP benefits a month," said Ellen Vollinger, the SNAP director at the Food Research & Action Center, an anti-hunger advocacy group. "That is a stunning number."
That means a family of four could see their monthly benefit cut by about $328 a month. The worst-hit could be elderly Americans who receive the minimum monthly benefit, Vollinger said. They could see their SNAP payments tumble from $281 to as little as $23 per month.

Meanwhile, 18 states had already ended their emergency allotments early, with some citing the strengthening economy as the reason. In states like Georgia that have cut nutritional aid, however, food banks have seen a surge in demand since June, when the benefits were cut, according to Pew Research.

The remaining 32 states that had continued the additional aid are losing that extra money in March due to a provision in the 2023 Omnibus spending bill, signed into law in December, that directs the emergency allotments to end next month.

More than 40 million on food-stamps​

Despite the rebounding economy, many Americans continue to struggle with food insecurity, experts say. Food-stamp enrollment remains high, with 42 million people receiving the benefit in October 2022, the most recent data available, or 6% higher than in 2020, according to USDA data.

It may seem like an oddity that SNAP enrollment has increased given that the nation's unemployment rate is at its lowest since 1969, but many workers still can't find full-time work or line up enough hours to pay the bills, Vollinger noted. Most working-age people who receive food stamps are employed, research has found.
"What sometimes gets missed in that conversation is the part that so many SNAP households are employed, but often employed at low-wage levels — they aren't in jobs that are family-sustaining so they still qualify for SNAP," she added.

"Bracing for it"​

Because the food-stamp cuts were signed into law only in December, neither states nor individuals had much time to prepare, critics say. One food-stamp recipient in Colorado tweeted that she was sent "tips" from the state on how to cope, such as by stocking up on nonperishable food while she still has a higher benefit amount.

"We are reducing your food stamps and we know you will have a hard time surviving so here are some tips don't say we didn't ever do nothing for you," she wrote.

Meanwhile, food banks say they are expecting an increase in demand as food aid is slashed.

"People are having to choose between putting food on the table and paying rent," Erin Pulling, CEO of Food Bank of the Rockies, told CBS Colorado. "We are seeing more people than ever needing help with food assistance."

Of the food stamp cuts, Pulling said, "We're bracing for it."
=========================
No lie, probably gonna look into getting a bread maker.
 
Last edited:
You know the answer to this socialist, fatherless behavior? Charity. Give food to your local food bank for those that actually need it. They will come, the fakes won't think of it. I know I worked at one years ago.
If anyone here needs a food bank, beware of any meat you get. I've seen way too many people get rotten meat.
 
why? what benefit is it to anybody to starve them?
Because entitlement is poison. If they're not just making their money through some extralegal means, then let them go to a church for charity. If they're actually too disabled to work, there's already SSDI.

edit: I ought to elaborate my position. When people get something for free, their brain does a funny little trick where it convinces them that they deserve it. So, they lose all sense of gratitude for what is society's decision to grant them something that they've in no way earned. This results in shitty moochers. People who live off the generosity of others should never lose sight of their good fortune in being taken care of by people who have no other motivation but kindness.
 
Last edited:
it's not.

food banks are a stupid waste of resources. how does it make sense to move food around an extra time?
Because it's not my tax dollars going to it. It's people actually giving their food of their own free will. That's the fucking difference you absolute ingrate. For every sucker that wants to cheat the system that walks through the doors, ten more walk through that actually need it. I've seen it. The world needs more compassion in it, and the government giving away money is the opposite; it makes them dependent.
 
Because it's not my tax dollars going to it. It's people actually giving their food of their own free will. That's the fucking difference you absolute ingrate. For every sucker that wants to cheat the system that walks through the doors, ten more walk through that actually need it. I've seen it. The world needs more compassion in it, and the government giving away money is the opposite; it makes them dependent.
are you a 12yo who just discovered rand or just very stupid? how do you think food banks are funded? individual charitable giving is a drop in the bucket. things that look like pure charity are always either directly funded by taxes or indirectly by grants from foundations who exist because they are tax shelters. this goes one million times for anything involving food, since that is expensive as shit to run because it has to follow food regulations.

please tell me how your podunk town runs a food bank with none of this out of a church basement that has no plan for how it's gonna continue when the three old ladies who pay the electrical bill die because that is super relevant to how to deal with an entire country.
 
Just cut the illegals and drug addicts from the program, problem solved.
I also felt that some community service should be a requirement; at least for those without work. Not gonna ask for a full 40 hour week (or could, willing to go either way); but no one eats for free. Set up part-time volunteer shit at different places, even if all they do is sit there because there's nothing to do; then have the manager or whoever sign off on them being there. Hell, for someone to claim unemployment, they have to do weekly paperwork saying they applied for jobs; we can do the same for other forms of assistance.
 
I also felt that some community service should be a requirement; at least for those without work. Not gonna ask for a full 40 hour week (or could, willing to go either way); but no one eats for free. Set up part-time volunteer shit at different places, even if all they do is sit there because there's nothing to do; then have the manager or whoever sign off on them being there. Hell, for someone to claim unemployment, they have to do weekly paperwork saying they applied for jobs; we can do the same for other forms of assistance.
Not a bad idea, excluding anyone old or disabled of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moths
Just in case anyone is curious how the normienet is talking about Food Stamps:





 
>they're currently defrauding the taxpayer
>if they can't defraud the taxpayer anymore, the'y'll just rob him instead
the proper response to blackmail attempts is to call the bluff, and when push comes to shove you answer violence with violence.
in this case that means abolishing the welfare programs, and if people then turn criminal, throw them in prison.
The solution is gunstamps and ammostamps for taxpayers then and the problem will likely sort itself out
 
There's a difference between the people who legitimately need them and the people that have always lived off of them so they think they're entitled.

I like to give the benefit of the doubt when I see someone flash an EBT card. Lord knows I've been there.

But funny thing I noticed. Since the introduction of the EBT card, and how hard the states try to make them look like credit cards, there's a lot less "God, I need a better job and get off foodstamps" than there was when you got a booklet of literal play money.

Then there's this:


People who need them usually go and stock up at the first. Sure, they've got some cookies, maybe some candy, and some soda, so there's little luxuries.

But not everyone is a deadbeat on these programs.

But the deadbeats really ruin it for everyone else.
 
I didn't know what foodstamps were until I hit High School and I met a friend whose family was on them. His mom worked two jobs, and while he worked to have his own money, he had no problem helping out with his job doing retail. You will never hear such ire for foodstamp leeches, from other people who are on them for other reasons. And it really hits differently when you get your first job, you understand you'll be working x-hours a week, for y-hourly rate, and so at the end of the two week pay cycle you should be earning z-dollars. Then you see how much California takes out to provide for everyone else, and it should make most people mad, some never get that far; and it's not like this is a rich/poor thing, it's a concept of putting in time/effort and coming up with less than those putting in nothing.
 
This morning we walked close enough to the public library to see how many cars were parked on the side of the road waiting for the free food. Didn't see any from our vantage point. Will try to check every Monday.
 
Because it's not my tax dollars going to it. It's people actually giving their food of their own free will. That's the fucking difference you absolute ingrate. For every sucker that wants to cheat the system that walks through the doors, ten more walk through that actually need it. I've seen it. The world needs more compassion in it, and the government giving away money is the opposite; it makes them dependent.
When my kids were little, had them save a dollar of their allowance each week to buy food for the food bank. Maybe once a quarter we'd take their collected money, with some extra from me, go to a local supermarket, and buy nonperishables, which we placed in the collection bin for the food bank. Good way to teach kids to care for the less fortunate.

Have known people who got food from food banks. They weren't grifting or shamming, they were hungry. Luckily we never had to. Sometimes it's a good idea to walk a mile in someone else's shoes.
 
I also felt that some community service should be a requirement; at least for those without work. Not gonna ask for a full 40 hour week (or could, willing to go either way); but no one eats for free. Set up part-time volunteer shit at different places, even if all they do is sit there because there's nothing to do; then have the manager or whoever sign off on them being there. Hell, for someone to claim unemployment, they have to do weekly paperwork saying they applied for jobs; we can do the same for other forms of assistance.
That is basically how it already works. You couldn't be bothered to google and yet you have an opinion.


There are buttloads of programs that come and go that babysit crazy people and retards at work and everyone hates them and they are rife with abuse.

I don't know why people are like this about EBT.
 
There are buttloads of programs that come and go that babysit crazy people and retards at work and everyone hates them and they are rife with abuse.

I don't know why people are like this about EBT.
Don't look at me, I'm against every government handout/program on principle because they ALL attract varying degrees of abuse, mooching and foster dependency while they all run off money taken from me for honest work.

You can call me a miser or say I lack compassion by your calculus, but you can't say I just have it out for only EBT.
 
Last edited:
Good, motivate people to be self reliant and actually work for what they have since I guara-damn-tee you that a lot of these food stamp assholes werent even putting a single ounce of effort at change and improving their situation and achieve independence. They are more than ok with being in their pen, fatting up.

The growth welfare state to this scale was a fucking mistake because of basic human nature. Now that the good times are ending, they will be forced to adapt and they will likely lash out.
 
Back