Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
"Anyone who disagrees with me is an incel."
No, just anyone who disagrees with me on whether it's possible to find another person to have sex with. If somebody disagreed with me about like, economics or their top 5 rappers or whether NASCAR is a real sport, I wouldn't be calling them an incel because that would make no sense.
 
No, just anyone who disagrees with me on whether it's possible to find another person to have sex with.
I very clearly stated it was totally possible, but not worth the effort. That was my whole thesis - that was what made my post different from most of the others I've seen in this thread.

It's not my fault you have poor reading comprehension.
 
Guys guys guys everyone calm down...
What the hell is sex?
JBPS.jpg
 
I very clearly stated it was totally possible, but not worth the effort. That was my whole thesis - that was what made my post different from most of the others I've seen in this thread.

It's not my fault you have poor reading comprehension.
Okay fair point, but who are you top 5 rappers and is NASCAR a real sport?
 
And there you go.
That's the root of this entire issue, and it's not going away until women choose not to work or are forced not to.
Women will never choose not to work, because you can convince a woman to do anything, no matter how retarded, if you promise her it will bring her social status. I mean, look how many women are literally cutting off their tits because The Algorithm told them it would make them special.
 
How?

No, seriously, how? Unless you're telling me to rape somebody, which for obvious reasons I won't, I don't know what you want me to do different.
Here are your options.

A) Be unreasonably attractive for the type of woman you want to bang

B) Be average/below average and message a woman on a day she feels like it, hope she doesn't call you a creep/ignore you/call the cops

B2) If the above happened hope she didn't just want the dopamine/self esteem hit of being messaged and actually wants to meet you

B3) If you actually meet her hope she doesn't just want a free meal

B4) If you actually have sex hope she doesn't regret it and cry rape

Keep in mind you're competing with A for all of this. Happy hunting!
 
Once again, this an economic issue. People don't have sex because they can't afford the outcome of sex which is kids. You aren't going to screw too many women without getting one pregnant. The decline in birth rates follows the deindustrialization of the US. Then you have all the legal and illegal foreign labor making things worse. All thanks to capitalism. Capitalism has to go. We need something else. This capitalism shit isn't working. It's destroying the country and making sure white people go the way of the Dodo and Dinosaurs.
 
This guy gets it. IMO, society in general is reeling from hyper-promiscuity, coupled with birth control. Sex without the ultimate gratification of raising a family just becomes hollow after a while.

Lots of people ITT are saying that the issue is women just aren't putting out enough, but I disagree. Casual sex was never as enjoyable to women as it was to men. They have a biological imperative to find a man who is able to take care of them and their progeny. The real issue is economic in nature. Most men in this country can barely afford to take care of themselves, let alone a wife. We really shouldn't be expecting women to give us sex for free and do nothing in return to support them.
But women are putting out casually. Look at rates of sexlessness; men are far higher than women.
Agree to disagree then. IMO, most women didn't willingly choose to juggle raising children and having a career. Even today, most women would willingly leave the workplace in an instant if they can find a man who could support them. Most men would also willingly support a homemaking wife.

It's almost as if there's an issue that's larger than the behavior of both men and women at play here.
I strongly disagree. They appealed to female vanity to get them to want to go out and compete with men, girlbossing it up with "YOU GO GIRL YOU DON'T NEED NO MAN" rhetoric. You see it a lot with the propaganda of the time. It all was marxist bullshit in the end but they were right; appeal to female vanity and you shall never lack for success. At least in western countries.
 
Back