Diseased Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

Seconded. This is a neutral ground, feel free to tell all regarding your interactions with SS staff. It's interesting to us one way or the other.
It’s all over twitter although R&S locked down most of their accounts so you can’t see it. Another clown has made underhanded threats discussing where I live including street names. So much for keeping children off the internet.
 
It’s all over twitter although R&S locked down most of their accounts so you can’t see it. Another clown has made underhanded threats discussing where I live including street names. So much for keeping children off the internet.
You're talking about the ones with the black and white avatar of a manga girl, yeah?

Cause as I've said before, I recognize that from an old discord server he owned as"Nightmare" before it got nuked with his account. And considering I've seen that "ugly and malevolent" side of him.
 
If that makes me a "miserable retard' then so be it.
Your illness doesn't, but you reading a message on a forum online and feeling so personally attacked you must interject yourself in the conversation to tell everyone that you are different does. Literally nobody was talking to you.
Stupidity like this doesn’t even bother me anymore.
It didn't bother you so much you just had to post about it online. Sure.

The website being added to Wokepedia will hopefully accelerate whatever retarded ideas people want to exercise upon the freedom of information and Internet foundations to cover up the fact they failed as parents, or have no hobbies aside from pearl clutching online.
 
Your illness doesn't, but you reading a message on a forum online and feeling so personally attacked you must interject yourself in the conversation to tell everyone that you are different does. Literally nobody was talking to you.
Just adding some insight as to why different people find themselves on the site.
 
there is no understanding for parents on SS, because a lot of people there are 20-30 year old NEETs stuck in arrested development from when they were teenagers.
Unfortunately... Then again, grief does a whole lot, and they're likely stuck in the "anger" stage. Though why they remain there is the question... 🤔

It's not good for them long term... Then again, it could be do to their struggle to take some responsibility.

I'm no parent, but I am trying to empathize with them... Though based on the messages I'm reading, they seem too far gone in their bloodlust crusade... 🙁
 
These Wikiclowns are so manipulative. Who defines "significant scholarly influence"? Especially concerning something niche? I can tell you, there are A LOT of Wiki pages with theses and papers that are not by any means "significant", and yet they are cited on multiple pages. Gotta love how Wikipedia's policies only matter when it suits the argument.
 
SS recently got a Wikipedia article from all the attention they've been getting. And wouldn't you know it, look at what's in the infobox:
View attachment 4539493
That's right, direct links to the site. In contrast to the Kiwifarms article where apparently linking to us is deemed too great a threat to life to do. Despite the NYT claiming the site has killed more than 45 people (which is even reprinted in the article) while even the worst allegation against the farms is like 5 people or so. Also, lolcow Taylor Lorenz is cited in the article:
View attachment 4539866

The talk page is worth a laugh:
View attachment 4539629
Apparently someone debated about the value of using Lamarcus and Diego's real names in the article, citing "muh harassment". But apparently it's okay to include them if the full name is printed in media outlets. So basically, doxing is okay on Wikipedia as long as journoscum do it.

Also they have a weird wikipedo policy against using master's theses if they don't have a "significant scholarly influence" so the one by Elisa Sartori (that @GenociderSyo found) simply can't be cited.

SS'ers are not happy about this:
View attachment 4539778
View attachment 4539774
source (a)

I would agree with them, Wikipedia holds very strictly to the rule of "only reliable sources" (most of the time being journo outlets) and they literally have a rule against original research, so nobody is allowed to go to the site, see that they have a Recovery section, and report that they have a Recovery section, even when proving it with archives, links, screenshots, and everything. As far as I know, no coverage of the site, whether it be journos or other places on the Internet even mentions that they have a Recovery section except for the OP of this thread.

Speaking of which let's look at some of that coverage.

Reddit (r/videos):
View attachment 4540141
source (a)
reveddit (a)
unddit (a)

r/Gamerghazi (bonus mention of Byuu/Near):
View attachment 4540250
View attachment 4540293
source (a)
reveddit (a)
unddit (a)

ResetERA:
View attachment 4540445
View attachment 4540446
source (a)

TV Tropes:
View attachment 4540450
source (a)

Needless to say Tantacrul's video has spread far and wide, whatever its faults.

The site is so evil they need to advertise it as much as possible.

Remember kids do not visit Santioned Suicide, learning suicide methods is not OK
 
It’s all over twitter although R&S locked down most of their accounts so you can’t see it. Another clown has made underhanded threats discussing where I live including street names. So much for keeping children off the internet.
Although the accounts are locked down, I would imagine you have screenshots though, right? Allegations are better backed up with evidence. Obviously censor the street names thing, but it will be very interesting to see exactly what you're referring to, rather than anecdotes.
 
These Wikiclowns are so manipulative. Who defines "significant scholarly influence"? Especially concerning something niche? I can tell you, there are A LOT of Wiki pages with theses and papers that are not by any means "significant", and yet they are cited on multiple pages. Gotta love how Wikipedia's policies only matter when it suits the argument.
It's the same in academia, that's where they learn this behaviour. Academia is not the place for critical thinking, free thought and the pursuit of knowledge and truth they proclaim to be.
 
Back