Blarmed&Dangerous
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2015
Oh no, I got unfriended on Facebook somehow.Tears in the rain
Haha, me too - and all our mutuals. She must have pruned HARD.
Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.
- Thread starter Markass the Worst
- Start date
Haha, me too - and all our mutuals. She must have pruned HARD.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
She is literally the omega femoid, I've cooled it with the misogynistic remarks in recent times but reading the OP re-activated the part of my brain dedicated to hating women that hasn't been used in a long time.
Mister Rogers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 13, 2021
Great research here--this provides a hugely illuminating window into the reality of Aella which doesn't at all line up with the persona she has worked so hard to create online. Even though this guy is being a simp, I feel for him. He's got similar interests to Aella--his header pic is him with Sam Harris and Steven Pinker. He genuinely thinks he can make a connection. He subs to her, drops $200, and is shocked that she doesn't even respond to his messages.
He tries to contact her on Facebook and the reaction is, "Get the FUCK away from me you disgusting little cripple pervert. How DARE you contact me on my REAL account."
Just amazing. And while most simps have only themselves to blame for their behavior, and yes, he should have known better, the reason he doesn't is that Aella works SO hard to portray herself as actually connecting with these people.
From her article on escorting:
Seriously, guys! She leaves a part of her soul with her simps. No wonder the poor guy thought he could exchange a friendly message.
Also lmao at her talking about her "personal, non-porn" Facebook account.
Just amazing. News flash: if you openly post your nudes online, post details about who you're dating, getting railed by 6 people at orgies, how many times per year you cry, poop, and shower--you don't have a "personal" account anymore, ffs.#AellaHatesCripples
Forest Portal Triumph 747
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2021
Thanks for complimenting me on my research fellow farmers, but I will have to let you know that all it took was: me stumbling onto her other Twitter account, looking at its recent comments, coming across an exchange from February 10 (9 days prior to my post), and then simply clicking on the account that she replied to. The account that she replied to, @ThinManOnWheelz, already had all those pics I shared in the post out in the open. My 'research tactics' were simply casual browsing and saving publically available pics from some Canadian secular humanist in pain from what the Gnome Dick Sucker said. Not hard at all, not long at all.
What does this imply? Well, the rest of us don't have to be savvy at conducting research on the Internet to easily find even more dirt on Aella. And this is the one website on the Internet with arguably *the best* Internet researchers around, so...Aella is definitely in for even more extensive exposure than what has been on display in this thread so far.
Undoubtedly her rationalist friends, who at the very least are smarter than Isabella Loretta Janke's friends, will try to figure out how to damage control, but given her very poor levels of 'opsec' it'll be all for naught.
Let's face it though, she probably still has a decent chance of marrying a tech multimillionaire in this day and age...
edit: here are some more revealing tweets
^the 'dudes' replying to her question of "what's it like to be a dude" are mainly saying: lonely, horny, some saying the typical lib sentiment of 'not as hard as being a woman but still challenging'
and
"I have a telegram group for Onlyfans girls where we exchange tips and tricks, and I share everything I know that got me (at one point) to 0.03%. Girls in the group have been seeing their earnings increase! If you'd like to join, just fill this out:"
"when people insult me by saying im an ugly whore, im like... you're saying i'm successful *despite* my looks? This then implies that my success must come from hard work and talent as opposed to my appearance! Why thank you my good sir!"
"i would like to thank /pol/ talking about me" (attached screenshot of poltard hornyposting)
https://twitter.com/Aellagirl/status/1294158868042231808/photo/1
"There's a few accounts that post my stuff without mentioning me, and when I complain in the comments and let people know it's me, they block me. These accounts have hundreds of thousands of followers and they get tons of RTs on my content. I hate them."
^a bit telling that this is what she uses the word 'hate' for
What does this imply? Well, the rest of us don't have to be savvy at conducting research on the Internet to easily find even more dirt on Aella. And this is the one website on the Internet with arguably *the best* Internet researchers around, so...Aella is definitely in for even more extensive exposure than what has been on display in this thread so far.
Undoubtedly her rationalist friends, who at the very least are smarter than Isabella Loretta Janke's friends, will try to figure out how to damage control, but given her very poor levels of 'opsec' it'll be all for naught.
Let's face it though, she probably still has a decent chance of marrying a tech multimillionaire in this day and age...
edit: here are some more revealing tweets
^the 'dudes' replying to her question of "what's it like to be a dude" are mainly saying: lonely, horny, some saying the typical lib sentiment of 'not as hard as being a woman but still challenging'
and
"I have a telegram group for Onlyfans girls where we exchange tips and tricks, and I share everything I know that got me (at one point) to 0.03%. Girls in the group have been seeing their earnings increase! If you'd like to join, just fill this out:"
"when people insult me by saying im an ugly whore, im like... you're saying i'm successful *despite* my looks? This then implies that my success must come from hard work and talent as opposed to my appearance! Why thank you my good sir!"
"i would like to thank /pol/ talking about me" (attached screenshot of poltard hornyposting)
https://twitter.com/Aellagirl/status/1294158868042231808/photo/1
"There's a few accounts that post my stuff without mentioning me, and when I complain in the comments and let people know it's me, they block me. These accounts have hundreds of thousands of followers and they get tons of RTs on my content. I hate them."
^a bit telling that this is what she uses the word 'hate' for
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
Our whore attempts introspection and fails miserably, like everything else in her life. This is gonna be a long post, buckle up if you want some sperging.
Archive of the thread: https://archive.is/16e2H
CBA to do a screenshot of all of it but here's the moneyshot:
This is a PERFECT example of a quintessential Rachel / Aella post. She's a fucking walking selection bias. "If I pay the smallest lip service to pretending to legitimately ask for feedback, I have done all I need to do and can keep fucking around like an idiot".
Constantly asking for feedback is such a cliche signal with these fucking weirdos. But actually taking advice and applying it in some way is IMPOSSIBRU. Better mainline more LSD because these normies just don't understand quirky pickme whore science.
Taking a couple years off, shutting the fuck up on social media for double that, and taking actual and real data science classes? EXTRA IMPOSSIBRU!
She's always done this and will likely continue to forever. The cum and drugs have rotted whatever potential intellect there ever might have been.
But the simp army launches into action to suck her girldick. "Oh queen, you have such deep insight that we normies would have no hope of ever having. Please post your shoddy cosmetic surgery body and talk about how much cum you drank in the last hour, maybe with a tiny graph that an elementary school kid could do better of some bullshit poll, answered only by people stupid enough to take you seriously."
Society just doesn't get it. The future of data science, hell, all science will be perpetually single (oh but 'poly' because like autistic men and trooning out, damaged women have to get that validation by getting railed by nerdy losers, if she can't get a normie) literal prostitutes with drug-fried brains. We just haven't caught up. Literally this (not her but it absolutely explains her life):
I swear, any simps of hers must be incels or other losers that would cuck themselves if they had a chance with women as every other thought that goes through this "Girl on the Internet Syndrome" whore is always "what's the most horrifically socially revolting thing I can do" . It's so obvious from how often it ends up in posts.
Then the roastie is absolutely amazed at being ridiculed and (obviously) would never be able to form and maintain a healthy stable relationship. That this is impossible for her but hasn't dawned on her, as how unfit she is for anything beyond being a walmart greeter at a sex trafficking ranch, encapsulates how you can smuggle such midwittery past nerds if you debase yourself enough for them to think you might, someday, somehow touch their dick.
Looks can get you anywhere, especially if your looks are a 4/10 and you're around 3/10 men hoping to get free access to that diseased hole.
I don't know what's sadder, Rachel, or the people that are even unable to cuck themselves in real life so they do it over Twitter and lie to her that she's anything more than a bit of cosmetic surgery different from a homeless drug addict.
I can't wait for the arc of after perpetually being unable to find a moneybags to put up with her retarded shit, stealing from her ever dwindling pack of loser friends, until even they see her for what she is and she ends up on the street.
Archive of the thread: https://archive.is/16e2H
CBA to do a screenshot of all of it but here's the moneyshot:
This is a PERFECT example of a quintessential Rachel / Aella post. She's a fucking walking selection bias. "If I pay the smallest lip service to pretending to legitimately ask for feedback, I have done all I need to do and can keep fucking around like an idiot".
Constantly asking for feedback is such a cliche signal with these fucking weirdos. But actually taking advice and applying it in some way is IMPOSSIBRU. Better mainline more LSD because these normies just don't understand quirky pickme whore science.
Taking a couple years off, shutting the fuck up on social media for double that, and taking actual and real data science classes? EXTRA IMPOSSIBRU!
She's always done this and will likely continue to forever. The cum and drugs have rotted whatever potential intellect there ever might have been.
But the simp army launches into action to suck her girldick. "Oh queen, you have such deep insight that we normies would have no hope of ever having. Please post your shoddy cosmetic surgery body and talk about how much cum you drank in the last hour, maybe with a tiny graph that an elementary school kid could do better of some bullshit poll, answered only by people stupid enough to take you seriously."
Society just doesn't get it. The future of data science, hell, all science will be perpetually single (oh but 'poly' because like autistic men and trooning out, damaged women have to get that validation by getting railed by nerdy losers, if she can't get a normie) literal prostitutes with drug-fried brains. We just haven't caught up. Literally this (not her but it absolutely explains her life):
I swear, any simps of hers must be incels or other losers that would cuck themselves if they had a chance with women as every other thought that goes through this "Girl on the Internet Syndrome" whore is always "what's the most horrifically socially revolting thing I can do" . It's so obvious from how often it ends up in posts.
Then the roastie is absolutely amazed at being ridiculed and (obviously) would never be able to form and maintain a healthy stable relationship. That this is impossible for her but hasn't dawned on her, as how unfit she is for anything beyond being a walmart greeter at a sex trafficking ranch, encapsulates how you can smuggle such midwittery past nerds if you debase yourself enough for them to think you might, someday, somehow touch their dick.
Looks can get you anywhere, especially if your looks are a 4/10 and you're around 3/10 men hoping to get free access to that diseased hole.
I don't know what's sadder, Rachel, or the people that are even unable to cuck themselves in real life so they do it over Twitter and lie to her that she's anything more than a bit of cosmetic surgery different from a homeless drug addict.
I can't wait for the arc of after perpetually being unable to find a moneybags to put up with her retarded shit, stealing from her ever dwindling pack of loser friends, until even they see her for what she is and she ends up on the street.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2023
Yeah, I read that whole dumb chair thread. She seems to be under the impression that she did her work humbly and acknowledged imperfections. When really she was constantly retweeting things about how all of the previous chairs in the room sucked actually, and her chair was no different than the rest of the chairs, and that if it was different, then perhaps her chair was even superior to the all the chairs that the professionals built. Then she wonders why people, who have spent their lives perfecting the art of making chairs, are pissed off.
The whore wanting "professional, clean-cut men" is a huge tell. She doesn't want a man who has baggage, but is dejected that those same men are not willing to overlook the decade she spent being a whore. Even if people on the Internet were honest with her, and told her that, yeah, professional clean-cut men in their 30s are not looking for 35-year old camwhores, I doubt she would have listened or changed her lifestyle in any way.
Just be careful and make sure your icon and name aren't visible, and that you didn't like something with a low amount of likes so she might figure it out.
This is the weirdest thing about her surveys and nobody talks about, probably bc no one here cares enough to take her surveys.
When you take her kink or relationship survey, at the end you get compared to fictional character(s) that match you.
Clearly the guidedtrack thing she uses was meant for silly pop culture quizzes and has some kind of inbuilt feature to compare the results with a database of fictional characters. There's no warning this will happen and it's very weird and unprofessional, so my guess is that she just can't or doesn't know how to turn this feature off.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2017
Wait people actually want to have sex with this beast? I wouldn't dare breath the air around her.
Also the fact that fucking Lex of all people was able to snag an interview is funny to me, but I'm not too surprised. His podcast used to be standard pseudo-intellectual dreck, now it's pseudo-intellectual dreck with the occasional e-celeb cameo for his more terminally online viewers. Podcasts and their consequences.
Also the fact that fucking Lex of all people was able to snag an interview is funny to me, but I'm not too surprised. His podcast used to be standard pseudo-intellectual dreck, now it's pseudo-intellectual dreck with the occasional e-celeb cameo for his more terminally online viewers. Podcasts and their consequences.
grapeshark77
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
This is what I don't get about her - if you just saw her on your feed and knew nothing, you'd think she was a reasonably attractive woman. Then you actually read her tweets and realize that she's dumb and somewhat insane. You find the tweet where she mentions not showering and it turns out she's gross, too. This is all on her public Twitter, nothing to do with KF.
I do empathize with that guy who wasted 200 bucks on her although he was starting to sound a bit like someone you'd watch a true crime video about so I don't know how he acted privately. Her whole thing is sex and she's bad at it. The porn is bad, she put less effort into OnlyFans than actual adult stars, and now she's mid-30's and wants a rich attractive husband. I think even the crowd that's into this stuff will eventually move on to someone younger/smarter.
Forest Portal Triumph 747
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2021
I think the guy who gave her 200 Canadian dollarinos isn't a threat to anyone, just on the spectrum, frustrated, extremely online, and undoubtedly socially stunted all his life. Arguably typical of the rationalist, secular humanist, "girls getting into sex work is great because it makes it easier for me" crowd. Genuinely well-meaning, but the way they communicate raises eyebrows.
to be slightly fair to Aella, she's not in her mid-30s. She turned 30 last year and will turn 31 this year if she hasn't already.
"People go on screeds and call her a satanic evil CIA/ZOG psyop to seduce more girls to be OnlyFans thots and doxxing her fam and addresses and shit and I just fucking post gnome.
Out of all these things, it’s the gnome posting that has broken her…"
to be slightly fair to Aella, she's not in her mid-30s. She turned 30 last year and will turn 31 this year if she hasn't already.
"People go on screeds and call her a satanic evil CIA/ZOG psyop to seduce more girls to be OnlyFans thots and doxxing her fam and addresses and shit and I just fucking post gnome.
Out of all these things, it’s the gnome posting that has broken her…"
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2020
You can't just say that then not elaborate
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
Think it was posted earlier, but here you go:
https://aella.substack.com/p/how-my-consensual-nonconsent-orgies
This may be of interest to you guys.
I'm about to drop some more links in the rationalists thread too. Epstein links AND little girls.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2023
Yeah, those types of men are famously harmless.
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2022
(Link | Archive)
From the reading of her "Methodology" article (Link | Archive) and from reading through the survey and a number of her tweets about the various errors in polling, allowing people to retake the quiz, not identifying individual participants to account for this kind of error, not adhering to any Ethics Boards regarding the questions she is asking or the information she has gathered and stored, etc. - I am left wondering why she doesn't just take two entry level Psychology statistics courses (hell, sociology or anthropology would also work) or pick up a quantitative methods book to even give herself the very basic defenses against scrutiny lol.
Not gonna sperg too hard about the forensic psych or criminological implications of setting up people who may have violent sexual fantasies with the kind of questions she's asking with no exit interview or debrief, but there are reasons why the people who do this kind of research "have the badge" of being Researchers (Actual surveying of sexual practices, typology and creation of frameworks for analysis, experimentation/manipulation of IV/DVs in fetish populations). You created a Quizly page, Aella, that's it.
Spoilering some of the most painful survey blunders below (leading, poorly worded, explicitly stated errors by Aella that she can't edit out, etc.) in the order that they appeared "taking the survey"
maybe everything is normal? lol goes into asking height, weight, and then the landing page for Part 2 of Childhood questions. For my methods disclosure I will let you know that I selected trans of some description (you can't navigate backwards, only reset all and I've already forgot) sexually attracted to ~whatever~ genitals and identities (it's a Likert scale, so the middle of the road although there's not necessarily a "neutral" or none answer, it's both or some sliding scale of both/one.
Why is verbally abused by an adult woman bolded like that lol. oh wait, she does the same now with physical abuse by men and more of the same.
By the way Aella, when you set a question up like this and then do the same to different words in the following question, people with some learning disabilities (including people on the spectrum and ADHD) can experience a processing disruption similar to the Stroop-effect, where there might be a delay and then accurate response, or they may inaccurately respond to the question seeing the bold and not recognizing the difference in words. Sorry no more free advice from me, I charge a $5000 consultation fee for how to fix your stupid sex quiz.
ok back to the rape tree, when you respond with whether you were sexually abused you must answer who your abuser was, if you answer sibling Aella asks you about how many siblings you have, you can answer up to 7+ - more family questions and then some Big 5 q's that you get on any employment survey or Sporcle quiz (I don't know how many, I stopped counting but there were a lot)
These are bad set up statements and I am increasing my offer of a consultation fee to $7500 because of them.
Ok then pain/torture/rape questions which are Likert based and not eventful, still about a million more qualifiers with explicit categories than the zoophile shit above, I guess Aella has more personal experience with one than the other - vore questions that don't reference Justin RPG - oh, and then it's done? it asked if I was honest, I said no - but then you get asked to join an anonymous directory of others to find each other by kinks ........
Okay I am revoking my consultation offer as you could not fucking pay me to be within a nautical mile of this. Aella if you are directing pedophiles to one another you need to turn in your quiz making hat and walk off of a long pier. Even the perceived impropriety of this, wherein you are just asking questions lol on top of EVERYTHING else, offering to connect people who have paraphilias that enter criminality with NO CARE to the harm that this could cause should be enough for you to be haunted off of the internet forever. I am stunned.
(Sorry for the pic spam y'all, I'll fuck off and go back to lurking now. Edited to add: finally got the archive to go through!)
Attachments
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
She seems to have deleted this tweet for whatever reason. Here's the archive.
Pro-tip for everyone: You must ALWAYS ARCHIVE EVERYTHING. Read Archival Tools. If a tweet is NSFW and can't be archived through twitter.com, use nitter.nl or another nitter instance. Aella is deleting shit like crazy. This isn't the first time DFEing has happened, the Lotharlorraine blog deleted her Calvinist story when people in the r/polyamory thread found it.
Mister Rogers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 13, 2021
I alternately wonder if this could be someone related to her parents or CARM.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Mate we all love your content, but you've got to drop this pretentious style. It's very "cringe" and "fedora-pilled". Just be yourself! Trying to appear smart only makes people appear stupid.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2020
Fuck it I finally understand all those Muslims saying the West is a culture of decadence and degeneracy that needs to be destroyed.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
For a dAtA sCiEnTiSt, you'd think she's got enough evidence that she's not going to get picked.
ETA - the assertion that her ex-boyfriend was fucking women "younger and prettier than her is a little troubling, since she was only born in 1992. If this was before she started hooking, she'd have been 24 or under, which means that to be non-negligibly younger than her, the other women must have been at most 19? Which is all right if that man was her age, but if he was 10 or more years older (which straight women's boyfriends often are) it sounds like they're both pieces of shit.
@tallinfaulkner great totally normal sounding name. don't forget to dilate.
Last edited: