Meghan Markle has been 'upset and overwhelmed' by portrayal on 'South Park' episode: report - South Park Literally Said She Acts Like This, And She Goes And Acts In The Same Way

Screenshot-133.png



Meghan Markle is reportedly not too happy with how she's been portrayed on Wednesday night's episode of the adult comedy show "South Park" titled "The Worldwide Privacy Tour."

A source told The Spectator that Markle has been "upset and overwhelmed" by the episode's release and is "annoyed by South Park but refuses to watch it all."

Though the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were not directly named in the episode, it featured characters described as Canadian royalty and dubbed "the prince and his wife," which clearly parodied the couple. In the parody, the young royal couple beg for privacy while drawing attention to themselves in a spoof-like way.
The show also calls the "wife" character a "sorority girl, actress, influencer and victim," to which she replies, "Yeah, that's totally me."


The prince and his wife, who wears a dusty pink outfit that clearly resembled Markle's outfit for Trooping the Colour in 2018, also plug the prince's book — "Waaagh" — the cover of which strongly spoofs Prince Harry's bestselling memoir "Spare."
The episode is packed with jokes, innuendoes and thinly-veiled references, and it ruthlessly skewers Harry and Markle in traditional "South Park" style.

At one point during the episode, the prince and his wife make an appearance on the talk show "Good Morning Canada." The two walk in holding placards demanding privacy before sitting down to discuss the prince's new memoir.

During the talk show conversation, the host asks, clearly referring to Markle's former TV show "Suits" and career in Hollywood: "Isn't it true sir, that your questionable wife has her own TV show and hangs out with celebrities and does fashion magazines?"

He adds, "Well, I just think that some people might say that your Instagram-loving b---- wife actually doesn't want her privacy."

"How dare you, sir!" the prince shouts angrily. "My Instagram-loving b---- wife has always wanted her privacy!"
Royal commentator Neil Sean said that there could be legal ramifications due to the latest episode of the comedy show.

"Their legal team are casting an eye over the episode to see what is wrong, and what could be turned into something more sinister. This appears to be their course of action rather than laughing it off, enjoying the moment and showing the world that they get the joke," Sean wrote. However, he did note that the creators of "South Park" have yet to receive anything.



Link



Poor Harry.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot-132.png
    Screenshot-132.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 13
Meghan Markle and Alec Baldwin’s dumbass wife are both complete lolcows. I follow subreddits about both of them, even though a lot of the content is just women screeching about how much they hate them. They’re both narcissistic grifters who scammed and latched onto celebrities that were so awful nobody normal would marry them.
 
I hope her getting mad about the episode leads to even more degrading appearances in future episodes.

Reminds me that I haven't watched South Park in years. I should start watching again, it's a funny ass show and I love it when they make assholes out of these insufferable celebrity types.
 
Not a bad episode. They could have cut a little harder; but I’ve a feeling her mouth will result in a probable repeat performance by South Park.

Pretty tame for a South Park episode that had a lot of material at their disposal. I hope it’s the jugular they go for on her next appearance.
 
Not a bad episode. They could have cut a little harder; but I’ve a feeling her mouth will result in a probable repeat performance by South Park.

Pretty tame for a South Park episode that had a lot of material at their disposal. I hope it’s the jugular they go for on her next appearance.
Mu favorite line is when Harry says, "What? You're an ethnic woman?"
 
So, South Park accurately described her to a T and she's pissed and is threatening to sue? I got bad news for you lady, but the truth is an affirmative defense in defamation cases.
So is being a public figure, being a subject of clear satire and being a known awful person to the point that people already believed you were capable of the very behavior "lied" about - I.E. - it didn't actually cause you any harm as everyone already had made up their minds about you long before that.

It'd be as if Hitler tried to sue someone who said he was a pedophile for slander/libel from the Fuhrerbunker - It'd be hard to impossible to prove that claim harmed his reputation in any way as he'd already made all the enemies he was going to make by late 45' .

She's known around the world as a self-centered cunt, and has been known as such for literally years. Even IF the writers of South Park weren't protected by satire and truth, it'd be hard to prove it hurt her in any way except her feelings, which even when you're rich, is not actionable.

All her detractors just said - "Lol, yeah" and any defenders she had said - "How dare you!" (thus proving no libel happened if there are people out there clearly rejecting it)
 
Last edited:
Royal commentator Neil Sean said that there could be legal ramifications due to the latest episode of the comedy show.
Ha. Aha. Ahahaha. Ahahahahahahahaha.

Honestly, I want these fucktards to do it; try and get South Park in court over this shit. If only to have someone record Markle's dumbass face when the judge tells them it's parody, it's legal and throws it out.
(To say nothing of the fact that doing this would simply prove the show's point even more; that they say they shun attention, but seem to actively chase it.)
 
So is being a public figure, being a subject of clear satire and being a known awful person to the point that people already believed you were capable of the very behavior "lied" about - I.E. - it didn't actually cause you any harm as everyone already had made up their minds about you long before that.

It'd be as if Hitler tried to sue someone who said he was a pedophile for slander/libel from the Fuhrerbunker - It'd be hard to impossible to prove that claim harmed his reputation in any way as he'd already made all the enemies he was going to make by late 45' .

She's known around the world as a self-centered cunt, and has been known as such for literally years. Even IF the writers of South Park weren't protected by satire and truth, it'd be hard to prove it hurt her in any way except her feelings, which even when you're rich, is not actionable.

All her detractors just said - "Lol, yeah" and any defenders she had said - "How dare you!" (thus proving no libel happened if there are people out there clearly rejecting it)
Yeah, but I like my explanation better because its shorter and funnier.
 
Back