Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[quackrock]

If LessWrong is nerds who got lost in the sauce, Aella's their celebrity chef who can't cook an egg.

 

[Tilapia]

Lol. Her whole posts is about skepticism but she expects us to believe this rather ludicrous, unsubstantiated claim that anyone who "commits to strong lies about [her] online" (i.e. anyone who criticizes her actions at all) is mentally ill.

It is heartening to see people in the comments calling bullshit, even if they're doing so far more politely than I would.

 

[Mister Rogers]

Cool that Aella wrote a 5,000+ word defense of herself, arguing that she *checks notes* is not self-obsessed, on a site about *checks notes again* effective altruism.

Her dissecting someone's critique of her behavior and rebutting it with "that wasn't my internal experience" just confirms the account was essentially factual, she just didn't like the inferences they drew.

Lastly, the "I've found that people who commit to strong lies about me online are more likely to have what I perceive to be symptoms of mental illness," is probably the funniest part of all this. For being a rationalist, she's not above a good ad hominem when it suits her.

 

[Dean Pentel]

"CATTY GAY MAN ALARM HAS BEEN SOUNDED"

Hard LOL @Alfred MacDonald.

 

[Freya]

"This thread is dedicated to doxing me"

 

[Tilapia]

One of the articles she whines about (found here) is actually pretty interesting, has it been discussed in this thread before? This is my first time reading it.

Some highlights:

It is no wonder she related so strongly to an article about EA also having dodgy consent practices in which women are set up to be preyed upon by creepy men, and came to the defense of EA.

 

[Markass the Worst]

One of the articles she whines about (found here) is actually pretty interesting, has it been discussed in this thread before? This is my first time reading it.

Some highlights:

View attachment 4594258

View attachment 4594266

View attachment 4594278

View attachment 4594282

It is no wonder she related so strongly to an article about EA also having dodgy consent practices in which women are set up to be preyed upon by creepy men, and came to the defense of EA.

She addresses that too, and denies basically everything.

Cool that Aella wrote a 5,000+ word defense of herself, arguing that she *checks notes* is not self-obsessed, on a site about *checks notes again* effective altruism.

Her dissecting someone's critique of her behavior and rebutting it with "that wasn't my internal experience" just confirms the account was essentially factual, she just didn't like the inferences they drew.

Lastly, the "I've found that people who commit to strong lies about me online are more likely to have what I perceive to be symptoms of mental illness," is probably the funniest part of all this. For being a rationalist, she's not above a good ad hominem when it suits her.

I do find it interesting how her entire frame is "they just hate me" and "they have mental illnesses" and "they have evil intent and just want to lie about me!"

I don't know if she realizes this, but we don't hate her. Nobody does really. We all just want to laugh at her. And so far she's doing a really great job at being laughworthy.

Or wait, let me put this in terms rationalist spergs can understand. You know how Schlomo says "the AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which it can use for something else"? Well, the Kiwifarmer does not have you, nor do they love you, but you are made out of lulz which it can use for laughs. For such a rationalist Aella seems to be having a really hard time understanding that.

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

Or wait, let me put this in terms rationalist spergs can understand. You know how Schlomo says "the AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which it can use for something else"? Well, the Kiwifarmer does not have you, nor do they love you, but you are made out of lulz which it can use for laughs. For such a rationalist Aella seems to be having a really hard time understanding that.

How does Roko's basilisk fit into this picture?

 

[Markass the Worst]

How does Roko's basilisk fit into this picture?

If you don't make a fool of yourself for our viewing pleasure we will torment you for eternity using AGI. The probability might be 0.00000001 but the disutility of being tormented for eternity is 999999999999999 so you should believe me and do as I say because reasons. What's a pascal's mugging?

 

[Mister Rogers]

This is interesting, from one of the articles Aella is furious about that @Tilapia posted a tad above. The context is that Aella led some attacks on several prominent members of the rationalist community and had them driven out / canceled based on perhaps false/exaggerated claims. Another member of the community questioned her tactics in a post, and she's frustrated by it:

The “hahaha, you and Mark Lippmann both have the ‘good’ thing, I don’t really get it" rings true because it's TEXTBOOK Aella. Her Twitter is full of statements about how she isn't like all the other normies who have a sense of shame, or right and wrong, or revulsion, typically in the form of: "i don't really get embarrassed about that kind of thing like most people do... i don't know. it just doesn't even occur to me?"

So when she justifies flooding the market with AI child porn and people observe that's depraved, then she responds with:

Spoiler: Pedophilia Bad? Wow I Guess I'm Missing That Thing

Spoiler: Another Example: I Just Don't Get Monogamy; How Can Cheating Bad?

Not only is tactic this a sort of humblebrag, it's also a justification for her bad behavior because she implies people who do have a normal sense of right/wrong, good vs. evil, etc. are simpletons bound by some arbitrary social construct that she's above. "I'm evil? Huh, weird. I just don't get the whole concept. Guess I'm OK with being evil!"

 

[Dr. Butt]

View attachment 4592230
View attachment 4592237

What a crazy bitch. Alfred's posts referred to checkable facts and documented events, that, barring a literal conspiracy against her, can be corroborated by other people in her life or at said events.

ETA - I do wish he hadn't Kobe'd and given himself his nickname. Never give yourself a nickname. That's something for the boys to decide. E

I also find her characterisation of internet hate mail from a coomer as "stalking" to be wildly offensive. I think we all know at least one woman who has had to go to court because of someone following her home, harassing her at work, threatening to murder her (in person), and so on - i.e., an actual stalker - and can tell that she is likely using the word "stalker" to mean "internet commenter".

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Perhaps a redundant observation, but I find it most fascinating that her "brand" is to simultaneously be a "rationalist" and a wanton hedonist who throws orgies with "drug roulette." There is nothing at all rational about subjecting yourself to fruitless risk for questionable (if any) gain. Engaging in such behaviors compulsively suggests a total lack of self-control that is shameful for a "rational" actor.

 

[Tilapia]

This bitch has been living in my head rent-free all day.

One thing that my brain won't let go of is her constant references to having to "vet" the people she invites to her rape parties. On her post in the EA forums, she laments,

"I've had to give up on the idea of throwing parties at my house where guests are allowed to invite unvetted friends."

Again, in her Substack article about her "consensual nonconsent orgies," she again gives this anecdote:

"Our last event, we experimented with allowing people to bring +1’s. I think we were reasonable in trying this, but from now on I think I’d rather only allow people to bring +1s if they’ve already attended 1-2 events and are a ‘trusted member’ of the orgies.

E.g., at the last event, a man purchased a couple’s ticket with a woman he was in a relationship with and vouched for. After vetting the woman, we didn’t accept her for the event. "

What is this "vetting" process? She does not elaborate.

This very much seems like a cult tactic of discarding any women who they believe will regret their participation in these rape parties, criticize them, speak to the media, or go to the police. There seem to be a lot of safeguards in place, not for the women, but for the men, so that if a woman is sexually assaulted, they can blame her for not reading the rules or following directions or whatever the fuck, and also breaking the NDA if she names who assaulted her.

All of this is extremely alarming enough by itself, but in the context of her doing her "research," where she gathers extremely personal and intimate details about women's sexual preferences and past abuse, and then collects email addresses for people who "want to explore their kinks further". It seems like a very easy way to hand-select victims, and already have a complete survey's worth of blackmail on them.

This is a sex cult.

 

[Hitman One]

Damn, I feel kind of weird that I've coomed to her pics and vids a while back after a piratechad uploaded them online. It's like that feeling when you hear about a former coworker you thought was cool getting arrested for murdering and eating people.

Please keep me in your thoughts in these difficult times.

 

[Dr. Butt]

Please keep me in your thoughts in these difficult times.

No.

 

[Edict of Expulsion]

In case any causal readers aren't horrified enough at the antics of a creature so vile that it somehow manages to exist like a social leper with no self-control, no sense of a non-totally-solipsistic existence, and only can trick absolute fucking idiots that have been drinking the kool aid in their cult long enough to not be immediately repulsed and rightfully disgusted at even the thought of Rachel.

A person so deluded, is Nate Soares.

Say you tried to write something nice about your ex, yet a totally accurate description is enough to get Google to remove it for a ToS violation. I give you:

Spoiler: "My Ex is a Shit-eating Whore"

Her response:

Spoiler: Why You Should Date Nate

Why You Should Date Nate
by aella; I dated him seriously for about 9 months

Before I talk about why you should date Nate, I should clarify I’m probably speaking to a subset of women who’s already overlapping with his culture a lot. If you’re very warm culture, there’s a good chance you won’t be compatible with him and I probably would recommend you not try. He can go into modes where he thinks entirely about work or math for weeks on end, and you probably won’t get a lot of attention during these periods. He’s not very into parties or dancing or socializing, and has a confidence/forcefulness in his speech that some (sometimes including me) can find offputting. He’s firm in his own viewpoints in a way that can disrupt the way people navigate social belief processes, which can be destabilizing for those vulnerable. I would not recommend dating Nate if you don’t already have a strong grip on your reality and an ability to be clear about what you feel and what you want.

That being said, Nate is great.

1. Nate is practically in a fantastic position for a serious relationship with potential for babies or house buying. He’s very financially stable, he is great with money (a rare balance of frugality and easy but laser-precise spending), and he’s considering having kids
2. Nate is super accepting. He might be one of the most accepting people I’ve ever met; when I do things that usually annoys people (like being messy or being too tired to help clean or not wanting to go get food even though they got me food yesterday) when I am having a strong reaction that in other situations people might easily perceive as upsetting or irrational, Nate has displayed pure compassion and lack of judgment. Being around Nate has caused me to notice how many tiny flinches I have built in anticipating small social punishments from others, because he never socially punishes me (For example; I am used to people getting annoyed with me when I express discomfort with their driving, but he never gets irritated at me for this, and actively reassures me it’s okay). He’s also deeply accepting of himself; often past partners have had difficult behavior that comes out of self-judgment or self-avoidance, and I’ve never seen Nate act from this. When I’m around him, a part of me learns how to deeply relax and it’s seriously incredible and rare.
3. Nate has a ton of compassion for the world. He is very motivated by helping others; something that doesn’t come from guilt or pressure, but calm, clarity, and genuine care. He is really kind, of the unusual form that is untainted by obligation or politeness or doing what he thinks he ‘should’ do; his kindness is pure and exactly aligned with what he wants.
4. He is super chill. It’s very difficult to make him angry, and he handles life bumps with calm ease. If a car breaks down, or a flight gets cancelled, this won’t bleed into his mood and make him more irritable with you.
5. He is extremely competent and intelligent. He comes to good conclusions with a lot of speed and precision; he knows how to weigh what he wants and minimize time spent in pointless middle grounds. He is high energy and really good at getting practical stuff done. I often have the feeling that I can trust him to take care of me without it building any resentment on his part.
6. Nate is clear and direct. He likes making explicit the implicit, he states directly his emotional state and makes requests of yours, if he doesn’t like a thing then he says it without you having to guess, his stated preferences are his actual preferences.
7. Nate is full of rage and grief and defiance at the world. He sees the world as tragic, as having the potential to be so much greater than it is. He keeps in contact with the sorrow of others, and this is a weight he carries continually and close to his heart.
8. Nate is really good at sexual chemistry. His persistence, perceptiveness, and competence makes him one of the few men I’ve met who doesn’t werewolf. Obviously compatible kinks are important, but even if you’re not extremely compatible he is still fantastic. (If you have anti-compatible kinks this might be less good, though). His general attitude is that your arousal is his responsibility; in stark contrast to many men I’ve dated who expected me to get aroused based on their default behavior and were disappointed when I didn’t. He is great at using his voice, body language, and vibe to yeet your mind into outer space.
9. Nate can be playful and affectionate. He loves physical contact and wrapping his body all the way around you. He’s also deadpan hilarious; if you blink you’ll miss it.
10. I’m probably missing some things. Part of the reason we’re not working out is that we miss each other in some deeper ways, and I anticipate there’s some more hidden, valuable parts about Nate that I am not built to see - but maybe you are!

If you’re interested, email him at so8res@gmail.com, or fill out his “date me” survey here

If your takeaway is "holy fuck, how can someone be so detached from reality to come off with that response to the acid-rotted prostitute, congratulations. You're sane and god help you if your life is ever in such a state where people that even willingly choose to interact with someone that would *forces down vomit* date Aella.


I can't possibly do it all justice. Not gonna go full 'rat' line-by-line. But some niggling takeaways:

1. 9 fucking months. Imagine the smell. Even seeing the freakish antics of Rachaella in person would be enough to tip off anyone with an ounce of intelligence but this genius signs on for almost a full year.
2. How many Johns you think she took in during all of that? Cuck fetish or does this loser really have no better options?
3. It's not just onlyfans, it's her having No Other Skills besides opening up her legs. This. Is. A. Whore. saying she has "Intellect"? How does this man dress himself?
4. This poor bastard apparently is head wizard of one of the significant grift orgs the "Machine Intelligence Research Institute" or "MIRI". (Think press releases trying to be what OpenAI became but turns out jewish sexual deviancy and letting actual fucking prostitutes be tastemakers for your genetic dead end autists is just one of many, many, bad signs.) How they trick donors, year after year, to keep the lights on at such an FTX-lite is beyond me.
5. Of-fucking-course the autismo has a manbun
6. Again, is it coom brain or detachment from society and normal people that would cause this loser to try to stick up for her 'data collection'. It's telling your five year old they're the scariest dinosaur but you're talking about a freakish adult and trying to convince other adults. Sucking the girldick of the whore is 'rational', who knew!
7. Does it take stupidity or perversion to make this your life, even when your only social interaction are cultists for years. You would think some sense of normal human disgust would still be present.
8. Again, the cult is so deep it's just so fucking weird. Google Docs to date these losers? Excuse me? Who would go out of their normal life, go online, see the "holy shit, this person is absolutely batshit, let me fill out a fucking job application for them. You do not make eye contact with the crazy homeless. Why in all that is austistic would anyone sane touch this?
9. Anyone should never let their friends or family or anyone they don't despise near these people
10. Being surrounded by ugly autists really must make any loser crave whatever diseased pussy they can get
11. They both try this "there are other great qualities, trust me bro". Is there really anyone short of a serial killer that are less trustworthy than these disgusting fucks.
12. "Cultural gap between us was too large". No shit you absolute shit-eating-prostitute-dating fucktard. Maybe rot your brain with acid for half a decade and try again? These people holy fuck.
13. "handles lifes bumps with calm ease" link was her getting off on cutting his dick 'accidentally' during sex. Not only having sex with aella, but she maims you, and you're just like "yeah, that's what my life is. this normal". If the loved ones of any rat's were on fire they would say something autistic and walk away dispassionately.
14. "Nate is super accepting" he would certainly have to be you diseased disappointment. The absolute ruined relationship she has with her father? Not a red flag for ol Nate here. What the fuck would be with this guy?

Might rant more but wow. You think you have found the bottom but there's just more and more.

There's no possible way anyone actually leaves Rachaella on 'good terms'. No matter how shit-eating retarded a simp is. So chances are there are some threads to be pulled.


By the way, OP should probably be updated. Her onlywhores keeps e-begging for shit about her birthday. So if it's not a lie, OP can be updated to birthday being Feb 22.

 

[Markass the Worst]

By the way, OP should probably be updated. Her onlywhores keeps e-begging for shit about her birthday. So if it's not a lie, OP can be updated to birthday being Feb 22.

Any screenshots/links/archives of this? I'll update if it's credible enough.

 

[keke]

There seem to be a lot of safeguards in place, not for the women, but for the men, so that if a woman is sexually assaulted, they can blame her for not reading the rules or following directions or whatever the fuck, and also breaking the NDA if she names who assaulted her.

Is there anything else that suggests this or is that based on what has already been said regarding vetting and disallowing identifying guests? Have NDAs been explicitly mentioned?

 

[Edict of Expulsion]

Any screenshots/links/archives of this? I'll update if it's credible enough.

Genius move by the diseased whore.

Archive, can be found on this page searching "birthday":

Aella OnlyFans

archived 22 Feb 2023 01:37:55 UTC

archive.is

 

[Dr. Butt]

What the fuck is going on with this man's body"? He has biceps, tits, and thicc thighs while also being lanky.