Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
This isn't exactly a show of strength in the case or the ethics investigation. I wonder if he is going to give up the tin shed in the strip mall and stop pretending to be a working attorney entirely.
How so? He simply dissolved the entity that houses his law practice that no longer practices law. He has Rekeita Media, LLC registered in TX.
 
How so? He simply dissolved the entity that houses his law practice that no longer practices law. He has Rekeita Media, LLC registered in TX.
If he has administratively dissolved Rekieta Law LLC at this point, there may have been something improper about how he used the company - he may have comingled the finances or failed to keep up with his administrative requirements. That could come up in his lawsuit with Monty. Rekieta Media LLC may have the same problems, too, but it's not a named defendant.
 
I was pretty interested in getting a look for the sake of curiosity, because one of the first things I heard about Rekieta slipping was his locals chat degeneracy. What does his curated stable of paypigs look like?

Where I’m at now, I don’t think “wine moms” does it justice. It’s fucking dominated by unscrollable walls of tl;dr schizoposts with no insight, with a smattering of blatant creeps who put up with it for glimpses of nudes. And that one dude who holds up a mirror and gets shit on by rackets himself.

Assessment complete. Curiosity satisfied
They're certainly a strange bunch. CompleteRandom, who collects thirst trap lewd pics from wine moms and had a complete tard out meltdown when he thought a bot was being implemented to stop him posting them
Cari Machet, the Robert Paulson lookalike 50 year old Anarchist whose favorite insult is telling people they are "death"
CGoody, the arrested development sped who likes to text the underage daughters of lonely women he sleazes up to, and who doesn't threaten rape over Internet slap fights, he just hopes it happens, so Quote Me Accurately shitlord
ArttheCuck, who's wife is definitely not fucking other men behind his back, and Egalitarian Stains, who takes shitposts as personal attacks but totally doesn't care
And SallyLeather78, the ass and tiddy poster who needs attention and complements from anonymous Internet creeps to make her feel a bit better
And an assortment of other sycophants, simps, borderline pedo Age of Consent spergs and leathery old sluts who are virtually interchangeable as far personality goes, basically the NPC meme made manifest.
Its a fun group.
Locals is the cream of the Balldosphere.
 
Last edited:
They're certainly a strange bunch. CompleteRandom, who collects thirst trap lewd pics from wine moms and had a complete tard out meltdown when he thought a bot was being implemented to stop him posting them
Cari Machet, the Robert Paulson lookalike 50 year old Anarchist whose favorite insult is telling people they are "death"
CGoody, the arrested development sped who likes to text the undersge daughters of lonely women he sleazes up to, and who doesn't threaten rape over Internet slap fights, he just hopes it happens, so Quote Me Accurately shitlord
ArttheCuck, who's wife is definitely not fucking other men behind his back, and Egalitarian Stains, who takes shitposts as personal attacks but totally doesn't care
And SallyLeather78, the ass and tiddy poster who needs attention and complements from anonymous Internet creeps to make her feel a bit better
And an assortment of other sycophants, simps, borderline pedo Age of Consent spergs and leathery old sluts who are virtually interchangeable as far personalities goes, basically the NPC meme made manifest.
Its a fun group.
Locals is the cream of the Balldosphere.
Egalitarian Stains makes literal shitposts with her dirty, shit smeared ass.

if Rekieta didn't take the bug eyed car crash this is when he finally gets gay fully
I LIKE WHERE THIS IS HEADING!
 
If he has administratively dissolved Rekieta Law LLC at this point, there may have been something improper about how he used the company - he may have comingled the finances or failed to keep up with his administrative requirements. That could come up in his lawsuit with Monty. Rekieta Media LLC may have the same problems, too, but it's not a named defendant.
Not seeing it from just this, but I suppose we may see... I would think that a lawyer would know better, but this is Nick, so...
They're certainly a strange bunch. CompleteRandom, who collects thirst trap lewd pics from wine moms and had a complete tard out meltdown when he thought a bot was being implemented to stop him posting them
Cari Machet, the Robert Paulson lookalike 50 year old Anarchist whose favorite insult is telling people they are "death"
CGoody, the arrested development sped who likes to text the undersge daughters of lonely women he sleazes up to, and who doesn't threaten rape over Internet slap fights, he just hopes it happens, so Quote Me Accurately shitlord
ArttheCuck, who's wife is definitely not fucking other men behind his back, and Egalitarian Stains, who takes shitposts as personal attacks but totally doesn't care
And SallyLeather78, the ass and tiddy poster who needs attention and complements from anonymous Internet creeps to make her feel a bit better
And an assortment of other sycophants, simps, borderline pedo Age of Consent spergs and leathery old sluts who are virtually interchangeable as far personalities goes, basically the NPC meme made manifest.
Its a fun group.
Locals is the cream of the Balldosphere.
I have to get my People of LOCALS feature to my scrape together.

I will try to resolve the bug fixes this week on the code, then try to out something out for the top 5 or so. There is plenty of material here on the Farms
 
Not seeing it from just this, but I suppose we may see... I would think that a lawyer would know better, but this is Nick, so...
To be clear, I am completely speculating, and we will likely never know why he filed the administrative dissolution now. Mundane things, like not wanting to continue paying the fees, are also possible.

However, the timing raises some questions - Monty suing Rekieta Law LLC and Nick Rekieta by name is an attempt to "pierce the veil" on the corporation, which you can only do in a few cases cases. The usual cases are: (1) outright fraud or (2) if the corporation was not set up properly in the first place (if it is too close to its owner). Remember that "LLC" means "Limited Liability Corporation," and it is a legal instrument designed to limit personal liability in case you get sued (which is exactly happening here). If the veil gets successfully pierced, Nick is personally open to a huge amount of liability from his former clients.

If the corporation was set up improperly, dissolving the corporation to avoid questions about this would probably be a good strategy.

Monty is also suing the wrong corporation - he probably should have sued Rekieta Media LLC. Despite Nick's 1L-level mistake of saying "that's a TX company so it has to be sued in TX," he should still be able to sue that company in MN since Rekieta's house is their principal place of business. My guess is that the "corporate veil" is much stronger on Rekieta Media LLC than on Rekieta Law LLC, since the Rumble/Locals deal is a big money contract and Nick's accountant would have told him to do that properly.
 
To be clear, I am completely speculating, and we will likely never know why he filed the administrative dissolution now. Mundane things, like not wanting to continue paying the fees, are also possible.

However, the timing raises some questions - Monty suing Rekieta Law LLC and Nick Rekieta by name is an attempt to "pierce the veil" on the corporation, which you can only do in a few cases cases. The usual cases are: (1) outright fraud or (2) if the corporation was not set up properly in the first place (if it is too close to its owner). Remember that "LLC" means "Limited Liability Corporation," and it is a legal instrument designed to limit personal liability in case you get sued (which is exactly happening here). If the veil gets successfully pierced, Nick is personally open to a huge amount of liability from his former clients.

If the corporation was set up improperly, dissolving the corporation to avoid questions about this would probably be a good strategy.

Monty is also suing the wrong corporation - he probably should have sued Rekieta Media LLC. Despite Nick's 1L-level mistake of saying "that's a TX company so it has to be sued in TX," he should still be able to sue that company in MN since Rekieta's house is their principal place of business. My guess is that the "corporate veil" is much stronger on Rekieta Media LLC than on Rekieta Law LLC, since the Rumble/Locals deal is a big money contract and Nick's accountant would have told him to do that properly.

If they have to sue Rekieta Media in TX, perhaps we will get a Ty Beard arc after all.
 
To be clear, I am completely speculating, and we will likely never know why he filed the administrative dissolution now.

Right. The timing is very suspect. I will say this: At the beginning of the month Nick was VERY stressed abt this lawsuit. A few of us privately were, like, 'Huh? It's Monty - why tf is Nick freaking out?'

That's when he started over-sharing about the delay he asked for in Dec. around his birthday (16th) which he didn't file on time. It seemed like a mundane thing considering his visible stress about it. (And there's a difference between grifting off of this suit - which he's def done too - and visibly stressing. Both things can be true.)

The fact that he was PHYSICALLY (IIRC) going into Monty's lawyers' offices to try to discuss the case reeked of desperation.

Monty is also suing the wrong corporation - he probably should have sued Rekieta Media LLC.

Definitely. But isn't Rekieta Media registered in TX? (Sorry, I don't have time today to research.) I think we know that from the Twitter drama. For good reasons, Monty wants to sue him in MN where there's already an ethics investigation going on due to Keffals, blue state, etc.

In any event, if Nick dissolved RekietaLaw LLC AFTER the lawsuit was filed (and it looks like he did) that's an ex-post-facto problem, methinks. (Or something - you get my point. He'd still be liable for damages.)

(Separately: Funny that Nick's not mentioned that Keffals is supposedly going into rehab. He's not touching Keffals due to the outstanding complaint.)
___________

Here's my question and a quick google isn't helping: Don't you need an LLC to PRACTICE law, and get paid for doing it? ... Either within a partnership or as a 1-man show? It seems like you'd need one. I could be wrong. (Also, maybe it doesn't matter. Nick doesn't want to practice law anymore - and has said so.)

Anyway, I HAVE QUESTIONS - lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Owlbear
Definitely. But isn't Rekieta Media registered in TX? (Sorry, I don't have time today to research.) I think we know that from the Twitter drama. For good reasons, Monty wants to sue him in MN where there's already an ethics investigation going on due to Keffals, blue state, etc.
Lawsuits against corporations have two valid forums:
  1. Where it is registered (usually Delaware or Nevada unless the person forming the corporation is retarded) - TX for Rekieta Media LLC
  2. Where its principal place of business is - MN, since that is Rekieta's house and main office
This is why Google, a Delaware Corporation, is always getting sued in California, but why the Tesla securities fraud lawsuits (about a Delaware company whose principal place of business is Texas) are handled in Delaware. Either is a valid forum for suing a corporation.
In any event, if Nick dissolved RekietaLaw LLC AFTER the lawsuit was filed (and it looks like he did) that's an ex-post-facto problem, methinks. (Or something - you get my point. He'd still be liable for damages.)

(Separately: Funny that Nick's not mentioned that Keffals is supposedly going into rehab. He's not touching Keffals due to the outstanding complaint.)
Dissolving Rekieta Law LLC and tacitly admitting that it is not a valid corporation still doesn't put it on record that it was not a valid corporation. If he has to argue about whether the corporate veil exists or not, then evidence that it is invalid goes on the public record. That exposes Nick Rekieta to future liability from clients who hated him without those clients having to guess as to whether Rekieta Law LLC was a real business at the time. At least, that's my theory as to why he's doing it (presumably at the advice of his lawyers).
Here's my question and a quick google isn't helping: Don't you need an LLC to PRACTICE law, and get paid for doing it? ... Either within a partnership or as a 1-man show? It seems like you'd need one. I could be wrong. (Also, maybe it doesn't matter. Nick doesn't want to practice law anymore - and has said so.)
No need for an LLC. Most lawyers use an LLC or an LLP as their corporate structure because it works well for them, but you can practice law as a sole proprietorship (an individual). The individuals carry the law licenses. The benefit of the LLC is that your business is considered a separate unit for legal purposes. If you have $10 million personally and your LLC has $100k of cash, when your business is sued, the $100k (plus the future income of the business) is all that is accessible to the plaintiff if you have set up the corporation properly. Incidentally, this does not protect you from legal malpractice claims, but it does protect you from normal business lawsuits.

It also doesn't protect you if you don't operate the business as a separate unit, which is what Monty's lawyer is suggesting in his lawsuit. This usually means separate bank accounts, separate credit cards, separate records, etc.
 
Last edited:
Lawsuits against corporations have two valid forums:
  1. Where it is registered (usually Delaware or Nevada unless the person forming the corporation is retarded) - TX for Rekieta Media LLC
  2. Where its principal place of business is - MN, since that is Rekieta's house and main office
This is why Google, a Delaware Corporation, is always getting sued in California, but why the Tesla securities fraud lawsuits (about a Delaware company whose principal place of business is Texas) are handled in Delaware. Either is a valid forum for suing a corporation.

Dissolving Rekieta Law LLC and tacitly admitting that it is not a valid corporation still doesn't put it on record that it was not a valid corporation. If he has to argue about whether the corporate veil exists or not, then evidence that it is invalid goes on the public record. That exposes Nick Rekieta to future liability from clients who hated him without those clients having to guess as to whether Rekieta Law LLC was a real business at the time. At least, that's my theory as to why he's doing it (presumably at the advice of his lawyers).

No need for an LLC. Most lawyers use an LLC or an LLP as their corporate structure because it works well for them, but you can practice law as a sole proprietorship (an individual). The individuals carry the law licenses. The benefit of the LLC is that your business is considered a separate unit for legal purposes. If you have $10 million personally and your LLC has $100k of cash, when your business is sued, the $100k (plus the future income of the business) is all that is accessible to the plaintiff if you have set up the corporation properly. Incidentally, this does not protect you from legal malpractice claims, but it does protect you from normal business lawsuits.

It also doesn't protect you if you don't operate the business as a separate unit, which is what Monty's lawyer is suggesting in his lawsuit. This usually means separate bank accounts, separate credit cards, separate records, etc.
I'm gay
 
I came across one site that listed Rekieta Media LLC as an inactive LLC. Then I looked further and the Texas state site lists its "Right to Transact Business in Texas" as "FORFEITED". This indicates that they are not even properly maintaining that LLC. Among other things, that status means according to Texas Sec. 171.252. "If the corporate privileges of a corporation are forfeited under this subchapter: (1) the corporation shall be denied the right to sue or defend in a court of this state;"

To see the LLC record, search this link for Rekieta Media.

This behavior is either totally reckless or the LLC is an empty bag that Nick doesn't actually use. Letting the status of the LLC lapse kills alot of the protections associated with using it.
 
I came across one site that listed Rekieta Media LLC as an inactive LLC. Then I looked further and the Texas state site lists its "Right to Transact Business in Texas" as "FORFEITED". This indicates that they are not even properly maintaining that LLC. Among other things, that status means according to Texas Sec. 171.252. "If the corporate privileges of a corporation are forfeited under this subchapter: (1) the corporation shall be denied the right to sue or defend in a court of this state;"

To see the LLC record, search this link for Rekieta Media.

This behavior is either totally reckless or the LLC is an empty bag that Nick doesn't actually use. Letting the status of the LLC lapse kills alot of the protections associated with using it.
corp.png

Oh gosh Nick, I guess I let your LLC's registration lapse. I didn't realize you were using it as the lynchpin of your legal strategy and your contracts with Rumble.

Ty Beard strikes again!
 
If he has administratively dissolved Rekieta Law LLC at this point, there may have been something improper about how he used the company - he may have comingled the finances or failed to keep up with his administrative requirements. That could come up in his lawsuit with Monty. Rekieta Media LLC may have the same problems, too, but it's not a named defendant.
I can answer that. He has failed to keep up with his administrative requirements, but we don't know yet whether why it happened and whether it was intentional.

"Administrative Termination" is an automatic process that occurs when a Minnesota LLC does not file the required annual renewal paperwork, per MN Statutes section 322C.0705. While such a termination may result from oversight, an administrative termination is also an easy and automatic way to end an LLC.

The MN SOS website shows that Rekieta Law LLC previously filed for renewal on December 27, 2021, and before that on November 30, 2020. The renewal deadline was December 31, 2022.

The MN SOS website also shows Northwest Registered Agent as registered agent for Rekieta Law LLC and they ought to be the ones taking care of the annual renewal. Their website indicates that they provide that as a service for their clients. Either Rekieta instructed them not to file the renewal (or stopped paying them) or else he was filing the documents himself for some reason and chose not to do so in 2022.

It could be that when Rekieta heard in December that Monty was trying to sue he took action to stop the renewal being filed. It could also just be that earlier in 2022 he determined that he was done practicing law and decided to allow Rekieta Law LLC to be terminated.

If the corporation was set up improperly, dissolving the corporation to avoid questions about this would probably be a good strategy.

Monty is also suing the wrong corporation - he probably should have sued Rekieta Media LLC. Despite Nick's 1L-level mistake of saying "that's a TX company so it has to be sued in TX," he should still be able to sue that company in MN since Rekieta's house is their principal place of business. My guess is that the "corporate veil" is much stronger on Rekieta Media LLC than on Rekieta Law LLC, since the Rumble/Locals deal is a big money contract and Nick's accountant would have told him to do that properly.
Montagraph's attorney David Schneider has raised some doubt about whether or not he is actually suing the right corporation.

In his filing he included a letter from Rekieta related to Rekieta's practice of law that showed that not only did Rekieta in his law practice use a very similar logo, there's another thing he didn't pick up on - the email address for Rekieta listed at the bottom is the same one that used to be included in the description of Rekieta's YT streams before he got banned. The letter is marked as exhibit 24.

exhibit24.png
 
I can answer that. He has failed to keep up with his administrative requirements, but we don't know yet whether why it happened and whether it was intentional.

"Administrative Termination" is an automatic process that occurs when a Minnesota LLC does not file the required annual renewal paperwork, per MN Statutes section 322C.0705. While such a termination may result from oversight, an administrative termination is also an easy and automatic way to end an LLC.
Good to know - some states have a different category for "intentionally dissolved" and "dissolved because you are late." 1 year late on registration usually doesn't do it.
The MN SOS website also shows Northwest Registered Agent as registered agent for Rekieta Law LLC and they ought to be the ones taking care of the annual renewal. Their website indicates that they provide that as a service for their clients. Either Rekieta instructed them not to file the renewal (or stopped paying them) or else he was filing the documents himself for some reason and chose not to do so in 2022.
PL: I use Northwest, and that's an optional service and it is pretty expensive for what it is (I think it's an extra $100-200 to avoid filling in a short online form). If you are a DIY lawyer to the same level as Mr. Rekieta, you might not pay for it. Of course, you aren't paying for the form, you're paying for the fact that you're otherwise going to forget to file that form.
 
The guy doesn't work. His wife doesn't work. The kids are homeschooled. If he wants to go to the beach, he can go to the beach any time he wants any day he wants. Its not like the guy is dealing with a 9 to 5 job or the public schools. Its not like he is trapped in a schedule where holidays are precious time off. He also has plenty of money.
Yup this guy has been on more vacations, traveled more of the US then probably I'd bet 70 % of Americans. Only time i was able to get away was for my Honeymoon. Poor me shit is laughable
 

Who the fuck designed his logo and stationary? Did he just have his wife do it? If I'm looking to hire a lawyer, I want one that's concerned about the detail of things -- that's pretty much what the practice of law is.

So why would you go with a corporate identity that says 'Detail isn't important -- I don't give a fuck about that stuff.' Presumably he's attempting to go with a cheap and cheerful branding instead.

"We might be shit, but we aren't spending your money on graphic design."
 
Back