Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

FpnHic8XwAY6HXn.jpg
 
Another symptom of Holholphrenia: Putin did 9-11!



A Ukrainian "expert’"says 9/11 was organised by Putin.

"I flew to the US & warned the head of the FBI that someone by the name of Bin Laden from an unknown terrorists organisation will be used by Putin to hijack civilian airplanes & crash them”. https://t.me/cheburashkas_war_room/12344

Except for the past two decades the US and Uniparty luminaries like Hillary Clinton and Condoleeza Rice officially admit they created and funded Al Qaeda, and Bin Laden was a recipient of copious US and Saudi funding, for the express purpose of fighting the USSR in Afghanistan, and is cited as a textbook example of blowback.
 
Another symptom of Holholphrenia: Putin did 9-11!

View attachment 4612041

A Ukrainian "expert’"says 9/11 was organised by Putin.

"I flew to the US & warned the head of the FBI that someone by the name of Bin Laden from an unknown terrorists organisation will be used by Putin to hijack civilian airplanes & crash them”. https://t.me/cheburashkas_war_room/12344

Except for the past two decades the US and Uniparty luminaries like Hillary Clinton and Condoleeza Rice officially admit they created and funded Al Qaeda, and Bin Laden was a recipient of copious US and Saudi funding, for the express purpose of fighting the USSR in Afghanistan, and is cited as a textbook example of blowback.

From the info we have that the media refuses to report. Most of it is on wikipedia actually.

Thinktanks in around 2000 published a paper stating there would need to be a "New Pearl Harbor" in order to galvanize political and public support for new US foreign "interventions". Soon after, the US was trying to organize with the Taliban a security arrangement in Brussels, because the US Establishment needed to try and cut off part of Russias growing Oil and gas Industry.

So the US offered that the Taliban protect a pipeline being proposed to be built in Afghanistan. And in exchange they would be compensated. Or if they refused, they'd just come in and fuck them up and build and protect the pipeline themselves. The Taliban refused.

Around 8 months later September 11 happened. The media said the perpetrator was the former CIA asset Bin Laden who was in Afghanistan. How convenient.

Over the next 20 years where the US occupied the country, the pipeline was being built. While the US attempted to continue to try and get the Taliban to protect the pipeline. Many assassinations of Taliban leadership took place until they finally accepted.

taliba2.jpg

To ensure the pipeline was protected, and that the Taliban would stablize the country, the US decided to leave most of their equipment and vehicles behind for them.

flag.jpg
 
Last edited:
While Rishi Sunak is contemplating sending fighter jets to Ukraine, to please Zelensky, Sunak's wife earns tens of millions through the Infosys (digital ID) company that operates out of Moscow. He says he knows nothing about it.....

I'm fairly sure Infosys has nothing to do with Moscow or russia in general. I work as a contractor for a pretty big US bank, and they don't do work with anyone affiliated with certain countries (eg: russia), and they - for everyone's pleasure - are in a contract with Infosys.

No sir, that PoS company is a true bred indian codemonkey zoo, based in india.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fatniggo1488
Behold the Wunderwaffe!

View attachment 4610592
INFLATABLE HIMARS lol lol lol

Holhols are now using inflatable models of the HIMAR, MLRS and M777 howitzers.

In the Czech Republic a television show explained how fake decoys are made in the likeness of the HIMAR. The AFU camouflage them using rubbish and tree branches.

The Holholphrenics will try to convince you this is stunning and brave-but no, its not. Erwin Rommel did this in North Africa, using wooden Panzer and Messerschmitt mock-ups to fool the Allies (and it worked, for a time), and you know why? Because he didn't have as many tanks and planes as he needed and eventually the Afrika campaign was abandoned altogether.

This also begs the question why fake howitzers are needed if Ukraine is winning and Russia is losing, and where all our aid and money went (but we, as in anyone not brain dead, already know the answer).

>Russia has destroyed 140% of HIMARs sent to Ukraine
>This means at least 40% were our decoys

That's a nice marketing spin but kinda clashes with the fact that Ukie spergs always have to point out when Russia destroys some other military vehicle and misidentifies it as a HIMAR. Which that in itself was amusing since it by default meant some hohol 88 Mike had a really bad day.
 
NATO has deployed Weapon of Indiscriminate Cringe.
Why does it always have to come back to Harry Porter for fuck's sake. Considering troons are up in arms about TRANS GENOCIDE if you even interact with the franchise somehow, that's not going to make NATO looks good in troons' eyes.
 
Behold the Wunderwaffe!

View attachment 4610592
INFLATABLE HIMARS lol lol lol

Holhols are now using inflatable models of the HIMAR, MLRS and M777 howitzers.

In the Czech Republic a television show explained how fake decoys are made in the likeness of the HIMAR. The AFU camouflage them using rubbish and tree branches.

The Holholphrenics will try to convince you this is stunning and brave-but no, its not. Erwin Rommel did this in North Africa, using wooden Panzer and Messerschmitt mock-ups to fool the Allies (and it worked, for a time), and you know why? Because he didn't have as many tanks and planes as he needed and eventually the Afrika campaign was abandoned altogether.

This also begs the question why fake howitzers are needed if Ukraine is winning and Russia is losing, and where all our aid and money went (but we, as in anyone not brain dead, already know the answer).

Do you think the guy realizes that if the "40%" of destroyed HIMARS are decoys, and the remaining 100% are real HIMARS, that means that Ukraine has zero remaining HIMARS and the decoys accomplished effectively nothing? He's literally arguing that his company is pointless.
 
Putin bros it's over, Estonia mommy prohibited Rossiya from playing with their nuclear toys.

View attachment 4613333

A chihuahua woman moment.

yes it's a real tweet unsourced
Just realised you have русский стандарт in your profile picture. That shit is absolutely rank. I'll admit I'm not a fan of alcohol but from my time living in Russia I have come to despise this brand. Come to think, I have never seen it on the shelves in my country. Do you still have them even after sanctions?
 
Do they think the Harkonnens were the good guys? 'Cause, I mean, nobody in Dune are "good guys" exactly, but of all the people to fight with, you wouldn't pick the Harkonnens. I guess it would be difficult to push a pro-Fremen message given they're basically just ISIS, but you could just not mention Dune at all.

Also, William Wallace lost, Han Solo was a drug-smuggling mercenary, the Death Star was full of civilians, the Na'vi were murderous xenophobes and animal rapists, and finally, Thanos won.

So really all you're left with is a big-headed British kid covered in shit. Which actually sounds pretty fitting for NATO.
 
Last edited:
Do they think the Harkonnens were the good guys? 'Cause, I mean, nobody in Dune are "good guys" exactly, but of all the people to fight with, you wouldn't pick the Harkonnens. I guess it would be difficult to push a pro-Fremen message given they're basically just ISIS, but you could just not mention Dune at all.

Also, William Wallace lost, Han Solo was a drug-smuggling mercenary, the Death Star was full of civilians, the Na'vi were murderous xenophobes and animal rapists, and finally, Thanos won.

So really all you're left with is a big-headed British kid covered in shit.
I think they meant "fighting with the Harkonnens" as in, "in a fight with them", as in adversaries.

They have to mention Dune because the movie came out recently so people are aware it exists and therefore they must mention they are the good guys there as well. They forgot to mention that they're the Fellowship of the Ring fighting against Mordor because it's been a few years since the last Hobbit movie.
 
I think they meant "fighting with the Harkonnens" as in, "in a fight with them", as in adversaries.

They have to mention Dune because the movie came out recently so people are aware it exists and therefore they must mention they are the good guys there as well. They forgot to mention that they're the Fellowship of the Ring fighting against Mordor because it's been a few years since the last Hobbit movie.
Wouldn't you just write "fighting the Harkonnens" rather than "fighting with the Harkonnens" if that were the case? The extra word quite changes how it sounds. Whole thing reminds me of when McCain called conservatives "Hobbits" as an insult, because he didn't realize the Hobbits were the heroes.

I wonder why they didn't mention being Maverick? That was recent and super popular.

Maybe it was the Taiwan flag on his jacket.
 
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: ChefKiss and Aidan
Back