- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe this is an unpopular opinion but I still find some of their non-political articles funny.They are really going all-in on this troon defense.. it's obsession at this point. They haven't done anything funny in like ~10+ years at the very least. It's all woke humor now. (being "correct" in place of being funny or making jokes)
Maybe this is an unpopular opinion but I still find some of their non-political articles funny.
View attachment 4620046
Lately feels like all they can talk about is JKR, though.
(Trying to add a quote from another thread (troon media) here, hope it worked.)Not just that, gays are mainstream enough (and have been a punching bag long enough before that), that you can play them for humor. You can have a hypersexual gay character getting shot down in a multitude of funny/harsh ways by straight dudes and even the gays will think it's funny. Gays are allowed to get their comeuppance when they misbehave or ignore social norms.
You absolutely cannot make fun of trannies, though. Even in fiction. Anything bad that happens to them is never their fault, it's always a sign of their oppressed status instead.
Anti-consumerist? In the series I read, the protagonist has a trust fund which is a literal vault of gold, and all the magical items that he buys are described in loving detail. Yes, it's made clear that family and friendship are far more important than material possessions, but that's hardly a groundbreaking revelation for a children's book.And why would they think it was anti-consumerist in the first place? They're just offended that the ideology the erroneously projected onto a series of entertaining children's books was never there, and their anger at this realization is directed outward at JKR rather than inward at their own stupidity.
Pitbull's name comes from a game that had dogs sent into a pit and forced to kill as many rats as possible.Maybe this is an unpopular opinion but I still find some of their non-political articles funny.
View attachment 4620046
Lately feels like all they can talk about is JKR, though.
There is no way The Onion cowards would ever DARE to mock a troon, unless it's a right wing troon like Jenner.(Trying to add a quote from another thread (troon media) here, hope it worked.)
The Onion's non troon stuff is still funny. For the most part, they'll skew whoever's in their path, both the "target" and the "narrator". But troon immunity makes for some sad, sad reading.
Considering how there have been people downplaying the BLM riots of 2020 despite all the publicity and tweets supporting it, they absolutely could if they wanted to.The best part of the hogwarts stuff is that they are going so completely all-in on it that there is no chance of them being able to memory hole or downplay it.. They literally screeched for weeks on end that buying/playing/streaming the game is literal violence against troons, and then this happened:
View attachment 4618418
(Searched and couldn't find this but clocks if it's been posted.)
The Onion must've got hella clicks from this bc they've gone FULL ROWLING DERANGEMENT SYNDROME.
View attachment 4619648
![]()
Twitter response is predictable squeeing megacoom. They'll be wiping the jizz off screens for days.
Oh yeah, The Onion's just a Rowling content machine these days. https://twitter.com/TheOnion/status/1627729871454539779?s=20
Spoiler: Troons saying she will sue. No she won't sue them. She's not an idiot and understands satire.
The Onion: “Hi. Thanks for doing this interview with us today.”
J.K. Rowling: “Tell me which genitals you have right now.”
The Onion: “Why is your lawyer here? Are you preemptively suing us for defamation over this interview?”
J.K. Rowling: “Yes, because somehow I always come off as the bad guy when discussing this topic.”
The Onion: “Name your favorite kind of transphobia, go!”
J.K. Rowling: “Threats. Wait, that was a trick question!”
The Onion: “New York Times opinion columnist Pamela Paul recently wrote a column titled ‘In Defense of J.K. Rowling.’ Have you read it?”
J.K. Rowling: “Nah. That shit is behind a paywall, and I’m not wasting any money on that dogshit excuse for journalism.”
The Onion: “Do you feel at all guilty to have disappointed some fans with your views?”
J.K. Rowling: “Hell no. Look, I wrote those books for kids 20 years ago. If you’re still into that shit, you’re a fuckin’ loser.”
The Onion: “Don’t you find it hypocritical to publicly attack a marginalized community when your fortune and fame comes from books that champion a bullied outsider?”
J.K. Rowling: “Well, that’s fiction. I’d be very anti-Harry Potter if he were a real person.”
The Onion: “Will you be silenced?”
J.K. Rowling: “No. I’m a middle-aged billionaire with access to the latest medical technologies. You’ll keep hearing from me for the next 350 years, at least.”
The Onion: “Some activists have—”
J.K. Rowling: “Well, I never—look, if you’re going to spew hateful rhetoric at me, we’re going to terminate this interview right here and now. Christ, how low some journalists will stoop! We can continue, but you’re going to have to ask more respectable questions.”
The Onion: “Would you tell us about a time that you were personally victimized by a trans person?”
J.K. Rowling: “Yes, I remember like it was yesterday: you see, I was advocating for their total annihilation and then a few of them said some mean words to me on the internet.”
The Onion: “Why couldn’t you just take your billions of dollars and go away?”
J.K. Rowling: “And what, take all this hate out on my house staff? I already do that, and it doesn’t help.”
The Onion: “Do you think you’ll recover from this?”
J.K. Rowling: “Eh, Leonardo da Vinci was a pedophile and he seems to be doing fine, reputation-wise. I think I’ll probably skate through.”
The Onion: “Where does all of this lead?”
J.K. Rowling: “To the grave, as do all things.”
The Onion: “Why are you such a huge fucking hateful dork?”
J.K. Rowling: “I prefer the term ‘fantastical bigot.’”
The Onion: “How would you defend your books to those who call for boycotts of Harry Potter because of the detestable things you say online?”
J.K. Rowling: “I would say they are separate. I am something of a human being, whereas a book is a stack of word paper. Plus, I have a vagina, whereas a book has a penis.”
The Onion: “Why were you absent from the Harry Potter reunion? Did HBO bar you from attending?”
J.K. Rowling: “No, I was busy that day protesting a 13-year-old wearing a skirt.”
The Onion: “Was it embarrassing when you used a pseudonym to see if people would like your work without the name J.K. Rowling attached, and it turns out that they didn’t like it at all, and then you had to reveal you were using a pseudonym to increase the sales?”
J.K. Rowling: “Yes, quite.”
The Onion: “Do you have any words of encouragement for aspiring transphobes?”
J.K. Rowling: “Find the time in your day to practice transphobia every day, even if it’s for only 15 minutes.”
The Onion: “What do you think about cisgender people who support trans people living as their preferred gender?”
J.K. Rowling: “They can all die, too.”
The Onion: “Let’s talk about some other issues. Are you anti-abortion as well?”
J.K. Rowling: “Oh, not at all. In fact, in the books, the Gryffindor Seamus Finnigan is an aborted fetus, and he’s quite popular and a very proficient duelist.”
The Onion: “Do you have anything you’d like to tell your fans?”
J.K. Rowling: “I just want to say that there are thousands of my fans, potentially millions, who spend time online debating why the wizards didn’t stop the Holocaust. Some of them defend the wizards and concoct all sorts of tortuous explanations for why the wizards didn’t stop the Holocaust. Many of them display a startling lack of actual historical knowledge, and most of them seem entirely unaware that expending so much energy even debating this kind of intercession of fiction into one of humanity’s worst atrocities is fairly grotesque on its face—so I’d just like to say, keep at it! You’re almost there!”
Pretty much. The article even says as much:There is no way The Onion cowards would ever DARE to mock a troon, unless it's a right wing troon like Jenner.
![]()
Must-Read Reflections On The Battle Over Trans Rights
Over the past several months, the rights and acceptance of transgender and gender-nonconforming people have increasingly been the subject of both legal challenges and heated public debate. The Onion sifts through the many essays published by lesser news organizations to find the smartest and...www.theonion.com
They're sacred cows.
because a trans is not born, is made. And it involves spending a lot of $$$$They keep talking about laws being passed to kill off trans people but...where? Unless they consider HRT and childhood transition bans to be murder.
Apparently there was a charm placed on Queenie to seduce her to work for Grindelwald because of her dangerous ability to read minds. When I saw the movie, it didn't seem like that. She seemed like she made the decision herself and that she just did it because she was mad at the break-up or something.I liked the first one, second one was a little more messy. Rowling is good at writing characters, their thoughts motivations and the movie failed in this department. Like why a character that died in the last movie is suddenly alive? Why would a witch who wants to marry a muggle side with a faction that wants to oppress muggles and somehow justify it by her love for the muggle?
For me this (and Cursed Child) shows that Rowling shines when she has full control over the narrative including access to characters' heads but isn't very good at visual storytelling.
Wasn't she proficient with both charms and mindreading? She should be quite aware of it, maybe even more resistant than usual wizard.She seemed like she made the decision herself and that she just did it because she was mad at the break-up or something.
Yeah i'm pretty sure that article is JKR cope for bad writing. It might have been that the film writers just wanted Queenie to have any role and inserted that needless betrayal for the drama. She and the Jacob became irrelevant after the first film, imo.Wasn't she proficient with both charms and mindreading? She should be quite aware of it, maybe even more resistant than usual wizard.
I think it could work in a book where we would have some insight into her thoughts and feeling. It would be a compelling character arc, from well-meaning airhead to reluctant supporter of a dangerous political group to realization what really stands behind those slogans and becoming a little more bitter and distrustful but also wiser and more capable.It might have been that the film writers just wanted Queenie to have any role and inserted that needless betrayal for the drama.
One of the mods on r/againsthatesubreddits it’s threatening to global ban people who are in r/HarryPottergames unless they refund legacy donate the money to a trans charity and prove it to the (trans) mod of there subreddit
Hold on, didn't reddit make an explicit rule against this sort of thing? Not that they ever enforce their rules when wrongthinkers are the targets, but I'm pretty sure they announced something to that effect a couple of years ago.One of the mods on r/againsthatesubreddits is threatening to global ban people who are in r/HarryPottergames unless they refund legacy donate the money to a trans charity and prove it to the (trans) mod of there subreddit
They just can't take the L.One of the mods on r/againsthatesubreddits is threatening to global ban people who are in r/HarryPottergames unless they refund legacy donate the money to a trans charity and prove it to the (trans) mod of there subreddit