Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No need, you're allowed to be racist against white people. In fact, it's considered a virtue to the neo-marxists.So they going to walk this back and explain that it's not what you think it is?
This sounded suspiciously pro-white though and we can't have that.No need, you're allowed to be racist against white people. In fact, it's considered a virtue to the neo-marxists.
He's allowed to fuck up a little, he's on their team after all and they all know he's a brain dead serial retard at the best of times.This sounded suspiciously pro-white though and we can't have that.
So the token negress that replaced the ginger is going to explain it's not what you think he was saying. Of course the president likes sucking nigger cocks just ask him and Michael Obama. Jokes aside, is it me or is there a lot of industrial accidents lately?He's allowed to fuck up a little, he's on their team after all and they all know he's a brain dead serial retard at the best of times.
Irrelevant but the carbon dioxide creates carbonic acid by combining with the H and O. It's part of the reason algae blooms are bad. They use up co2 during the day, raising ph and lowers at night when its inactive.Beyond that; water is inert, so unless some sort of biological contaminant is introduced it isnt going to decay into "rotten water" or anything of the sort. Though apparently carbon dioxide can dissolve into still water and cause it's PH to drop over a period of time, which can make it taste weird.
The DOE proposed a maximum annual gas consumption of 1,204 thousand British thermal units (kBtu), also known as the EL 2 standard, for all gas cooking tops. If that rule is finalized, only half of those appliances that are currently on the market would be able to meet the new standard.
>release tons of dangerous chemicals in the air around majority-white townsBiden Admin Proposes To Block Half Of Current Gas Range Models | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Let's go Brandon.
I'm sure with how well industry has been able to meet demand lately that they can all switch production immediately and there won't be a massive fucking shortage.Biden Admin Proposes To Block Half Of Current Gas Range Models | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Let's go Brandon.
Don't make me tap the sign.Biden Admin Proposes To Block Half Of Current Gas Range Models | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Let's go Brandon.
Biden Admin Proposes To Block Half Of Current Gas Range Models | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Let's go Brandon.
Isn't the problem that banks are firmly federally controlled? Thats why weed places have to deal in cash. Much harder for Sears (or whoever makes ovens) to switch to a cash businessJeez I wonder why they're trying to get people to switch from a power soyrve that's difficult to turn off on just one end to one that is, surely no sinister ulterior motives there.
The Feds really are pushing states to starts just telling them to fuck off (using "sanctuary states" as precedent for added laughs).
Biden Admin Proposes To Block Half Of Current Gas Range Models | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Let's go Brandon.
They really have a hard on for banning pipes with holes drilled in them.Biden Admin Proposes To Block Half Of Current Gas Range Models | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Let's go Brandon.
Why on Earth would you repeal such an order? Wouldn't he want to abuse that so he could get rid of all Trump loyalists and then revoke the order?
To me, it's as simple as this : DeSantis can afford to wait his turn. Trump cannot. Why risk sticking your neck out and go toe to toe with Trump and risk pissing off his supporters which you'll need in the general election in 2024 or 2028?
The last point I'll make is that some of you really have what can only be best described as DeSantis Derangement Syndrome. Seriously, the moment since Trump announced he was running for 2024, a number of you have been doing nothing but bitch and moan about every little thing DeSantis has or even hasn't done, and it really wouldn't suprise me if I were to look at posts you made priod to Nov 2022 of you praising him. Just stop, or at the very least, take that crap somewhere else. It's annoying, and it has nothing to do Biden.
Biden Admin Proposes To Block Half Of Current Gas Range Models | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Let's go Brandon.
Damn they used to wait a little more than a a few weeks to go ball to the wall like this. They are really desperate to put everyone in the pod and make us eat the bugs huh?
Not gonna happen. I am not gonna obey that shit. Neither is anyone outside any of the Bug Hives.
Jeez I wonder why they're trying to get people to switch from a power source that's difficult to turn off on just one end to one that is, surely no sinister ulterior motives there.
The Feds really are pushing states to starts just telling them to fuck off (using "sanctuary states" as precedent for added laughs).
I'm gonna keep posting it until it finally sinks in, or until I get too depressed to care if it ever sinks in...again.View attachment 4657717![]()
FACT FOCUS: Biden administration isn't banning gas stoves
Following comments made by a member of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, misleading claims that the Biden administration is planning on banning gas stoves have spread widely across social media platforms this weekabcnews.go.com
January 12th, didn't even keep it in their pants two months.
According to Forbes, Binance provided hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to other significant players in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. This included Justin Sun’s TRON [TRX], Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda Research, and the Amber Group. They stated:
“According to blockchain data examined by Forbes, from August 17 to early December–about the same time FTX was imploding–holders of more than $1 billion of crypto known as B-peg USDC tokens were left with no collateral for instruments that Binance claimed would be 100% backed by whichever token they were pegged to.”
Forbes claimed that Binance imitated FTX’s pre-bankruptcy moves by similarly manipulating its clients’ money. According to US authorities, FTX allegedly paid money to Alameda Research despite it being against the law.
As per a Forbes report, the corporation allegedly moved $1.8 billion in assets belonging to its customers.
Moving money across wallets is common and poses no problems, according to Binance’s CSO.
The biggest cryptocurrency exchange in the world, Binance, has refuted a Forbes article alleging that the company shifted $1.8 billion related to its users’ assets.
According to Forbes, Binance “quietly” shifted $1.8 billion deposited “as collateral intended to secure its customers’ stablecoins” between August 17 and early December 2022, leaving many of its users with unbacked cash.
According to Patrick Hillman, chief strategy officer of Binance, moving money across wallets is normal and not an issue. Because “there are wallets and a ledger,” Hillman claimed, “there was no mixing.”
The allegations against Binance
Forbes stated that USD Coin [USDC] tokens, the stablecoin created by Circle, were used to steal $1.1 billion from clients and send it to Cumberland/DWR, a high-frequency trading firm based in Chicago. To convert the collateral into its own Binance Dollar [BUSD] stablecoin, the corporation “may have supported Binance in its efforts.”
According to Forbes, Binance provided hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to other significant players in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. This included Justin Sun’s TRON [TRX], Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda Research, and the Amber Group. They stated:
“According to blockchain data examined by Forbes, from August 17 to early December–about the same time FTX was imploding–holders of more than $1 billion of crypto known as B-peg USDC tokens were left with no collateral for instruments that Binance claimed would be 100% backed by whichever token they were pegged to.”
Forbes claimed that Binance imitated FTX’s pre-bankruptcy moves by similarly manipulating its clients’ money. According to US authorities, FTX allegedly paid money to Alameda Research despite it being against the law.
The exchange’s response
In response to Forbes’ charges of improper handling of user funds, Binance said there had been no misconduct. The company’s spokesman confirmed that the in-question transactions were a part of their internal billing procedures. Moreover, they had no bearing on the collaterization of user assets. The firm stated:
“While Binance has previously acknowledged that wallet management processes for Binance-pegged token collateral have not always been flawless, at no time was the collateralization of user assets affected. Processes for managing our collateral wallets have been fixed on a longer-term basis and this is verifiable on-chain.”
The actions taken by Binance to mitigate the effects of the negative press are not insignificant. The exchange has been involved in several circumstances that have damaged its reputation. Notably, the CEO of FTX accused the CEO of Binance of planning the demise of his exchange, and there was controversy when Binance failed to collateralize its BUSD stablecoin by up to $1 billion.
After years in which reserves were combined with customer funds and at least one significant stablecoin, Binance-peg BUSD was not always completely supported. Binance recently announced it was switching to a semi-automated procedure for managing the reserves of its tokens.