- Joined
- Apr 6, 2019
This is another example of how badly constructed her "study" questions are. They are leading, expose her hypothesis baldly, and fail to define the terms to make sure everyone involved is actually talking about more or less the same concept.Scott Siskind's latest blog post talks about Rachael's poll. He says he's boggled by the results but then in literally the same sentence dismisses his confusion by saying "and Aella is a national treasure." No I am not making this up, you bet he wouldn't do this for any other random twitter poll.
View attachment 4652608
source (a)
It appears she's angling at "being not like the other girls, I do not have PMS. Normie girls, being emotional and not rational like me, only have PMS because they imagine it with their girlish emotional womanbrains." And the ghosts are intended as a proxy for generalized womanbrain. Alas the results don't actually appear to reflect this hypothesis- most women who get PMS do not believe in ghosts and most women who don't believe in ghosts do get PMS.
Pure autism. Only a hopelessly broken autist without sufficient compensatory IQ would need this idea that "being decent to your partner and not engaging in outrageous acts of violence or cruelty is an expected starting condition for all commitments" explained to her.Rachael seems to misunderstand what commitment in a relationship actually means:
View attachment 4652644
source (a)
All relationships have the understanding that if your partner fears you, they will leave, no need to spell it out. As one reply put it:
View attachment 4652665
That's not breaking commitment that's being a decent human being.
I'm tempted to make a quip about pentobarbital or hemlock tea here...compassionate plans for rabid dogs and unwashed thots who can't stop corrupting the youth.A bit old but gold: Rachael also misunderstands what people she calls "anti-degeneracy" actually believe.
View attachment 4652671
source (a)
Yes she's literally saying "not being degenerate is bad for my mental health." If she criticizes "anti-degeneracy ppl" for this I wonder how she would respond to the numerous instances of degenerate people having miserable mental health and actively suffering, often as a direct result of their degeneracy.