Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

How many people will show up to Aella's birthday gangbang?


  • Total voters
    168
  • Poll closed .
Scott Siskind's latest blog post talks about Rachael's poll. He says he's boggled by the results but then in literally the same sentence dismisses his confusion by saying "and Aella is a national treasure." No I am not making this up, you bet he wouldn't do this for any other random twitter poll.
View attachment 4652608
source (a)
This is another example of how badly constructed her "study" questions are. They are leading, expose her hypothesis baldly, and fail to define the terms to make sure everyone involved is actually talking about more or less the same concept.

It appears she's angling at "being not like the other girls, I do not have PMS. Normie girls, being emotional and not rational like me, only have PMS because they imagine it with their girlish emotional womanbrains." And the ghosts are intended as a proxy for generalized womanbrain. Alas the results don't actually appear to reflect this hypothesis- most women who get PMS do not believe in ghosts and most women who don't believe in ghosts do get PMS.

Rachael seems to misunderstand what commitment in a relationship actually means:
View attachment 4652644
source (a)
All relationships have the understanding that if your partner fears you, they will leave, no need to spell it out. As one reply put it:
View attachment 4652665
That's not breaking commitment that's being a decent human being.
Pure autism. Only a hopelessly broken autist without sufficient compensatory IQ would need this idea that "being decent to your partner and not engaging in outrageous acts of violence or cruelty is an expected starting condition for all commitments" explained to her.

A bit old but gold: Rachael also misunderstands what people she calls "anti-degeneracy" actually believe.
View attachment 4652671
source (a)
Yes she's literally saying "not being degenerate is bad for my mental health." If she criticizes "anti-degeneracy ppl" for this I wonder how she would respond to the numerous instances of degenerate people having miserable mental health and actively suffering, often as a direct result of their degeneracy.
I'm tempted to make a quip about pentobarbital or hemlock tea here...compassionate plans for rabid dogs and unwashed thots who can't stop corrupting the youth.
 
I think she'd do one or both of these things:

1. Apologize in the contrived way she usually does over podcasts when she's put on the spot.

2. Secretly judge their use but act like she's completely accepting of it. Other than the year where she supposedly did LSD every day she seems mild in her drug use; she just makes a point to let you know. At one party she opened with "I"m on drugs! — Phenibut!" (And I mean, yes, phenibut is a drug, but it's not like MDMA or mushrooms or something where you should warn someone in case you act radically different. She might as well have said "I took a Benadryl!")
Hey i listened to your everthing wrong with lw talk and I really enjoyed it, it was enlightning and pretty fun, the point about IQ tests measuring how not-smart you are rather than how smart you are was great, do you have any good book recs on the topic of what IQ really is?
 
One of this 2 houses is the "lower middle class" house from where poor Rachel escaped from.
 

Attachments

  • african_mud_hut.jpg
    african_mud_hut.jpg
    927.1 KB · Views: 136
Other than the year where she supposedly did LSD every day she seems mild in her drug use;
This is very funny because if you do LSD every day it will just straight up not have an effect on you because of how quickly your brain builds up a resistance to it. You talk to anyone who actually does LSD regularly and they'll tell you to take at least a week between doses. Unless she was "microdosing" which as far as I can tell doesn't actually do anything and is a placebo, but does seem like something she would claim to do.
 
literally the same sentence dismisses his confusion by saying "and Aella is a national treasure."
She has her nudes and sex videos all over the internet, things she continues to produce. So long as horny rationalists have access to those materials, she'll always be a "national treasure," her "research" and "contributions to the space" be damned.
 
Why do these "rationalists" all talk the same? They all take 20 minutes to say something that would take a normal person 1 minute to say.

don't have ability to write anything at length right now but I came across by far the most "sounding like what CoolFool is talking about" writing I've seen all year

lukeprog turned his breakup with his girlfriend into an advice article: https://archive.is/N6c8Z

here are some choice quotes

I felt proud, but even Luke₂₀₀₅ also felt a twinge of "the universe is suboptimal," because Alice hadn't been able to engage that connection any further. The cultural scripts defining our relationship said that only one man owned her heart. But surely that wasn't optimal for producing utilons?

Before long, Alice was always pushing me to spend more time with her, and I was always pushing to spend more time studying psychology. By then I knew I couldn't give her what she wanted: marriage.

So I broke up with Alice over a long conversation that included an hour-long primer on evolutionary psychology in which I explained how natural selection had built me to be attracted to certain features that she lacked. I thought she would appreciate this because she had previously expressed admiration for detailed honesty. Now I realize that there's hardly a more damaging way to break up with someone. She asked that I kindly never speak to her again, and I can't blame her.

I hope you hate this as much as I do!
 
don't have ability to write anything at length right now but I came across by far the most "sounding like what CoolFool is talking about" writing I've seen all year

lukeprog turned his breakup with his girlfriend into an advice article: https://archive.is/N6c8Z

here are some choice quotes





I hope you hate this as much as I do!
Of course it wouldn't be a LessWrong post if it didn't mention using drugs and recommend becoming a poly cuck.
 
don't have ability to write anything at length right now but I came across by far the most "sounding like what CoolFool is talking about" writing I've seen all year

lukeprog turned his breakup with his girlfriend into an advice article: https://archive.is/N6c8Z

here are some choice quotes





I hope you hate this as much as I do!
Holy fuck. The post itself is garbage, but I think the comments are even worse. Lots of long winded screeds, talks about poly and drugs, but the funniest part is that there are commenters legit having slap fights over simple word usage ("You should say 'some women want', not 'women want"), which then devolve into political fighting :story: Totally rational, guys.
 
So I broke up with Alice over a long conversation that included an hour-long primer on evolutionary psychology in which I explained how natural selection had built me to be attracted to certain features that she lacked. I thought she would appreciate this because she had previously expressed admiration for detailed honesty. Now I realize that there's hardly a more damaging way to break up with someone. She asked that I kindly never speak to her again, and I can't blame her.
Subjecting women to lectures on evolutionary psychology while trying to initiate a breakup should be considered a crime against humanity, not because it's "damaging" but because it's boring and dry as fuck; someone please tell the rationalist women to start billing in instances like this by the minute.

As a joking aside, my new Lolcow business idea is to be a personal injury lawyer for the rationalist community for mental harms caused explicitly by being bored (near) or (to) death. Gonna work it into the Deathfat MLM business model somehow so I can fund the BP Chat upline :evil:
 
So I broke up with Alice over a long conversation that included an hour-long primer on evolutionary psychology in which I explained how natural selection had built me to be attracted to certain features that she lacked. I thought she would appreciate this because she had previously expressed admiration for detailed honesty. Now I realize that there's hardly a more damaging way to break up with someone. She asked that I kindly never speak to her again, and I can't blame her.

Haha. I don't believe it for a second. This guy told her that because he knew it would hurt her, and he wrote a public article, again doubling down on his claim that she lacked features he was attracted to, knowing that it would rub salt in the wound.

He doesn't bother examining his own psychology as to whether he is intentionally hurting her out of spite, but will find all of the evo psych justifications in the world as to why he is a shallow asshole.

What a scumbag.
 
don't have ability to write anything at length right now but I came across by far the most "sounding like what CoolFool is talking about" writing I've seen all year

lukeprog turned his breakup with his girlfriend into an advice article: https://archive.is/N6c8Z

here are some choice quotes





I hope you hate this as much as I do!
Best part is that he eventually realized he shouldn't have said all that to her, but he's still wrong about why he shouldn't have said all that to her.

Nature is amazing. Thanks for the specimen.
 
don't have ability to write anything at length right now but I came across by far the most "sounding like what CoolFool is talking about" writing I've seen all year

lukeprog turned his breakup with his girlfriend into an advice article: https://archive.is/N6c8Z

here are some choice quotes





I hope you hate this as much as I do!
What fucking features were those? Knowing this community he was probably mad she didn't look 12
 
don't have ability to write anything at length right now but I came across by far the most "sounding like what CoolFool is talking about" writing I've seen all year

lukeprog turned his breakup with his girlfriend into an advice article: https://archive.is/N6c8Z

here are some choice quotes





I hope you hate this as much as I do!

It would be one thing if it was just, "this is how we're different and I see this causing friction down the line and creating a life that I, personally, do not want."

No, he had to frame it (for an hour!) as evolutionary psychology! It's not "I don't like these traits," it's "no one could ever love you because SCIENCE"
 
Back