- Joined
- Feb 7, 2018
We got a Derish mention whooo we did it lads.
DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell: General Discussion #2
- Thread starter actually
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2021
I wonder if this is how DasBooCuck imagined his life would turn out?
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
so i started this post just to comment on one thing and it devolved into being a MESS of me reacting to the podcast, so I apologize for this mess of a post.
ok, that's the end of it. this post became an unbelievable mess and I apologize for it, but I hope anyone who reads it found something of value.
the only thing I want to add, is if I had been in contact with Craig, I would've pointed him towards the reporter, I would've pointed him towards the Rambo and Howard video, the Hospital story, I feel like talking to people outside of "the vortex" and screeching about 16.59 or whatever just makes you look insane to someone else, but pointing them to "look, here are people who were in his life, people who knew him personally and got fucked because of him." I think that's easier to understand for someone outside of all this. But I'm going back2work now.
i'm listening to this and these people seem like faggots, all I'm saying. this lispy perpetually sleepy bitch on the bottom right
"bankruptcy information, any information about it, is not your information to have"
1. the information is made public, isn't that how we fucking got it?
2. the information is ours to have because if someone is sitting here going "HELP. I NEED 5000$ OR I LOSE MY HOUSE AND I'M GONNA GET RAPED" and then that person gets 5,000$, and it comes out that they spent it all on booze and cocaine, yeah, that's our business to know. we gave money under false pretenses and we deserve to know how it's spent.
moistcritikal gets a shit ton of donations, where does that money go? i don't know. it's not my business to know because critical doesn't sit there going "I NEED 5K OR I WILL BE HOMELESS", he doesn't mention money, people give him money of their own free will for their own reasons, therefore he can spend it as he wants.
phil explicitly goes "I NEED MONEY FOR MUH BILLS AND TAXES OR I'LL FUCKING DIE" therefore, we have a right to know if that money is actually going to bills and taxes, otherwise it's money extorted under false pretense.
the top right faggot seems somewhat reasonable from the one sentence I've heard him say.
"just because something a matter of public record does not mean you should post it in a chat"
moving goal posts I feel, you said earlier "it's not your business" and now you moved it to "well, you shouldn't say it right here in this location"
this sleepy faggot also can't pronounce "hypocrisy" said "hippo-crissy" so his opinion matters little to me.
"streamers ask for your subs"
subs don't cost me money, neither do likes on a video or my view. is suttering craig a retard? "how is it different to beg for money between phil and pewdiepie?" is he serious?
once again, the top right man seems fairly reasonable. no idea who he is.
"doing good is a matter of perspective"
if you have 100k and you're not doing good you're retarded.
"im sure he does play mobile games on his stream"
yeah this man did a ton of research, didn't he? really putting that journalism degree to use.
from what I've heard of him I honestly think the man in the top right is the most reasonable of this little bunch.
"he skirted the rules, I've done a TON of research in the past two days, I've done a ton of research and he didn't say click on the ads but he was like "wink wink""
he absolutely said outright "PLEASE click on the ads" I was fucking there for it? how did this man get a journalism degree?
"if the question isn't satisfactory or the answer isn't satisfactory, I'll ask him. you guys gotta remember I have a degree in journalism, I know how to ask people questions."
I mean, from what I've seen of your research on phils history so far, I am not filled with optimism about your talents, craig.
i like how the woman in the bottom left only ever added in "doxxing is illegal" and then got told it wasn't and that's been her contribution for the past 20 minutes. also nice harry potter funko pop, not very polite of you in today's climate, I feel.
craig just said derich is a "whale who donates a lot of money" man is really putting that journalism degree to WORK. god DAMN. fucking making Larry King look like a BITCH out here.
"the last thing I want to do is put you guys or my family in harms way"
you're interviewing fucking DSP, not Edward Snowden. calm down. your house isn't going to get firebombed if you don't ask phil about his bankruptcy.
ok, looks like they're wrapping it up so I'm done here. i just want to say as one final thing is I find Craig to be deeply unsettling to look at. He has like, unbelievably handsome eyes and really shiny/nice skin? but he doesn't look handsome or nice, he has this weird uncanny valley look where he should be handsome but he's not and I hate it? is it just me?
"bankruptcy information, any information about it, is not your information to have"
1. the information is made public, isn't that how we fucking got it?
2. the information is ours to have because if someone is sitting here going "HELP. I NEED 5000$ OR I LOSE MY HOUSE AND I'M GONNA GET RAPED" and then that person gets 5,000$, and it comes out that they spent it all on booze and cocaine, yeah, that's our business to know. we gave money under false pretenses and we deserve to know how it's spent.
moistcritikal gets a shit ton of donations, where does that money go? i don't know. it's not my business to know because critical doesn't sit there going "I NEED 5K OR I WILL BE HOMELESS", he doesn't mention money, people give him money of their own free will for their own reasons, therefore he can spend it as he wants.
phil explicitly goes "I NEED MONEY FOR MUH BILLS AND TAXES OR I'LL FUCKING DIE" therefore, we have a right to know if that money is actually going to bills and taxes, otherwise it's money extorted under false pretense.
the top right faggot seems somewhat reasonable from the one sentence I've heard him say.
"just because something a matter of public record does not mean you should post it in a chat"
moving goal posts I feel, you said earlier "it's not your business" and now you moved it to "well, you shouldn't say it right here in this location"
this sleepy faggot also can't pronounce "hypocrisy" said "hippo-crissy" so his opinion matters little to me.
"streamers ask for your subs"
subs don't cost me money, neither do likes on a video or my view. is suttering craig a retard? "how is it different to beg for money between phil and pewdiepie?" is he serious?
once again, the top right man seems fairly reasonable. no idea who he is.
"doing good is a matter of perspective"
if you have 100k and you're not doing good you're retarded.
"im sure he does play mobile games on his stream"
yeah this man did a ton of research, didn't he? really putting that journalism degree to use.
from what I've heard of him I honestly think the man in the top right is the most reasonable of this little bunch.
"he skirted the rules, I've done a TON of research in the past two days, I've done a ton of research and he didn't say click on the ads but he was like "wink wink""
he absolutely said outright "PLEASE click on the ads" I was fucking there for it? how did this man get a journalism degree?
"if the question isn't satisfactory or the answer isn't satisfactory, I'll ask him. you guys gotta remember I have a degree in journalism, I know how to ask people questions."
I mean, from what I've seen of your research on phils history so far, I am not filled with optimism about your talents, craig.
i like how the woman in the bottom left only ever added in "doxxing is illegal" and then got told it wasn't and that's been her contribution for the past 20 minutes. also nice harry potter funko pop, not very polite of you in today's climate, I feel.
craig just said derich is a "whale who donates a lot of money" man is really putting that journalism degree to WORK. god DAMN. fucking making Larry King look like a BITCH out here.
"the last thing I want to do is put you guys or my family in harms way"
you're interviewing fucking DSP, not Edward Snowden. calm down. your house isn't going to get firebombed if you don't ask phil about his bankruptcy.
ok, looks like they're wrapping it up so I'm done here. i just want to say as one final thing is I find Craig to be deeply unsettling to look at. He has like, unbelievably handsome eyes and really shiny/nice skin? but he doesn't look handsome or nice, he has this weird uncanny valley look where he should be handsome but he's not and I hate it? is it just me?
ok, that's the end of it. this post became an unbelievable mess and I apologize for it, but I hope anyone who reads it found something of value.
the only thing I want to add, is if I had been in contact with Craig, I would've pointed him towards the reporter, I would've pointed him towards the Rambo and Howard video, the Hospital story, I feel like talking to people outside of "the vortex" and screeching about 16.59 or whatever just makes you look insane to someone else, but pointing them to "look, here are people who were in his life, people who knew him personally and got fucked because of him." I think that's easier to understand for someone outside of all this. But I'm going back2work now.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2020
One thing makes me wonder: what exactly is Phil hoping to gain by getting "interviewed" by this small podcast? Does he hope to catch some "retro" fans? The Quartering for whatever it was worth has a bigger reach then Craig. This seems like two people trying to milk each other for something to gain. Also Phil: you doxxed yourself faggot. And also opened mail you were not supposed to open. You filmed it for fucks sake!
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
They said a couple times that Phil "doesn't seem as bad as people are accusing him". They never even watched a small clip from his streams.
Free Jasper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2022
Yeah your sperg was kind of how I felt. Everything had some pussy cop out.
“Bankruptcy information is private!” (No it isn’t)
“If he tells me he doesn’t want to answer, that’s ok”
“Nobody deserves to be harassed”
“No matter what I ask people will be angry”
“I think it’s just the case there was a little white lie from Phil (about WWEC).
Fuck yourself alongside that brain dead barbie that thinks doxxing is illegal.
I wish we could move on and not give this clown the attention he craves. Possibly a good time for a piss break from the vortex because I’m already tired of Craig.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
This was supposed to be funny? Seriously, why bother with low-effort garbage like this? Oh wait, because it's Phil.
Brownshirt Freshman
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2022
Adam seems to be the only one there with his head on straight. He actually has lots of experience on youtube so it makes sense that he could see through DSP without even doing research. Very on the mark saying he views his audience as dollar signs. The other guy is a total retard fag though. Yes his bankruptcy and financials are our business when he begs for money to blow on a shitty mobile game, don't know why this is complicated. Oh well not like this is going to happen. Craig admitted to listening to detractors and even believing a lot of it. Phil will run away and shit on craig for the next ten years.
Free Jasper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2022
I think the funniest part was hearing DSP didn’t want to be interviewed but wanted to slip in as part of ‘the gang’.
Lol what a lonely fucking faggot he is.
Lol what a lonely fucking faggot he is.
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2021
So from what @JimiHendrix put in his excellent post we can pretty much predict that the "interview" will be a bunch of "back in the day" famous internet people blowing each other and talking about how hard it is to be E-famous, in a vain attempt to leech viewers off each others failing YouTube channels (and in Stuttering fags case detractors as well).
EDIT: @Agent Proper I hope you will set up a containment thread for the liquid cancerAIDS this shitshow of an "interview" looks to be.
EDIT: @myone That gonna be a "whatup fellow podcasters" moment for sure, and yeah might be the only thing worth watching it for.
EDIT: @Agent Proper I hope you will set up a containment thread for the liquid cancerAIDS this shitshow of an "interview" looks to be.
EDIT: @myone That gonna be a "whatup fellow podcasters" moment for sure, and yeah might be the only thing worth watching it for.
Last edited:
Coke Zero
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2021
Still ripping off avgn 15 years later
RaidenAUndertale
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2021
He's right tho. Phil is not as bad as people accuse him. He's way worse!
myone
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2020
The guy with zero social interactions, who's talking to a camera the whole day, only leaving the house for groceries once per week, trying and failing to fit in on a gaming podcast... that could be the only genuine entertainment value from a DSP appearance on a podcast.
King of Hateful Slurs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2021
I'm 100% sure the question about WWE Champions is going to be:
Craig: Do you play WWE Champions, Phil?
Phil: No, I don't.
Craig: You sure?
Phil: Yep.
Craig: There you go, it's not true after all!
Craig: Do you play WWE Champions, Phil?
Phil: No, I don't.
Craig: You sure?
Phil: Yep.
Craig: There you go, it's not true after all!
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2018
Called it. DSP is just so narcissistic, so greedy, so corrupt, so selfish, so lazy, so belligerent, such a pathological liar, and so fucking terrible at games that he defies belief.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2021
Dave is going to hate the game not even 5 minutes in.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022
GunnlaugurSassoon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2020
@Agent Proper if you're still talking to Craig via DMs tell the guy who was already an internet has been in 2010 the numerous instances of DSP feigning distress, how he'd lose his house (#savethehouse folks!!!!!), literally having fundraisers to pay for taxes only to not pay taxes and ask for more money to pay taxes, literal months of saying he needs donations to afford groceries while undeniably spending money on mobile games, and guilting his fans to give him money so he can eat out because if they don't give him money he'll have to eat a sandwich for dinner instead.
Tell him to have DSP open WWE Champions to him to prove his account as it's a 10 second process that could prove his innocence but he has adamantly refused for no actual reason
If he sees all that and still gives DSP the garbage interview he almost definitely will, it'll at least show his garbage interviews are also as intellectually dishonest as The Quartering.
his skin is oddly tight on his face. He looks like someone is pulling leather incredibly tightly against a skull. Also, a weaselly smile.
Tell him to have DSP open WWE Champions to him to prove his account as it's a 10 second process that could prove his innocence but he has adamantly refused for no actual reason
If he sees all that and still gives DSP the garbage interview he almost definitely will, it'll at least show his garbage interviews are also as intellectually dishonest as The Quartering.
his skin is oddly tight on his face. He looks like someone is pulling leather incredibly tightly against a skull. Also, a weaselly smile.
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
@Agent Proper
JimiHendrix's post raises a bunch of issues that you know they're going to be used by DSP to give red herrings and the usual void responses. Without actually answering anything of course, lots of words with no substance, I can already see: "What? Derich doesn't even donate, what are you talking about? See Craig, it's all fabricated bullshit" (an example, this will happen with any and all inaccurate info, it's DSP's best scenario).
I also just heard Craig saying that he doesn't know if he uses the 5K on content, or if he plays mobile games on stream, this is a train wreck, he definitely needs more help to get things right.
If you're in contact with him, you can guide him a little more (you don't have to, that's above and beyond as they say).
There needs to be (in my opinion) sure and properly structured questions, because otherwise this will flop hard. My first, absolutely indispensable question is the Jasper WWEChampions reveal, the famous .gif needs to be shown in DSP's face and be asked about it.
Also, the first Discord Leaks (Andre PFP), the photos need to be shown to him and he must say what is wrong or inaccurate about those images. He should be asked to tell where do the 5K business expenses go. If the LINE phone is still there (I actually haven't checked in some months, so don't currently know), how does he defend it. These are ideas, but the questions have to be asked clearly and firmly, supported by evidence, because otherwise a rant off to nowhere is going to be made.
JimiHendrix's post raises a bunch of issues that you know they're going to be used by DSP to give red herrings and the usual void responses. Without actually answering anything of course, lots of words with no substance, I can already see: "What? Derich doesn't even donate, what are you talking about? See Craig, it's all fabricated bullshit" (an example, this will happen with any and all inaccurate info, it's DSP's best scenario).
I also just heard Craig saying that he doesn't know if he uses the 5K on content, or if he plays mobile games on stream, this is a train wreck, he definitely needs more help to get things right.
If you're in contact with him, you can guide him a little more (you don't have to, that's above and beyond as they say).
There needs to be (in my opinion) sure and properly structured questions, because otherwise this will flop hard. My first, absolutely indispensable question is the Jasper WWEChampions reveal, the famous .gif needs to be shown in DSP's face and be asked about it.
Also, the first Discord Leaks (Andre PFP), the photos need to be shown to him and he must say what is wrong or inaccurate about those images. He should be asked to tell where do the 5K business expenses go. If the LINE phone is still there (I actually haven't checked in some months, so don't currently know), how does he defend it. These are ideas, but the questions have to be asked clearly and firmly, supported by evidence, because otherwise a rant off to nowhere is going to be made.