Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
I wonder if the "worst day of my life" thing have something to do with the marriage and - if it wasn't cheating - that it was the day where Kayla told Nick she wanted to try swinging, and Nick didn't want to. If so, pour one out for Nick. That would mean he spent the last year stuck in a living hell where he agreed to go to all these trashy swinger haunts and pretend to enjoy it while trying to prevent another man's dick entering his wife.

Now...the people on this thread had Nick dead to rights on the Hedonism II vacation, matching both the beach photos and the room from their stream. People sounding like Nick and Kayla were caught on audio chatting with some guy at the Gay 90s in Minneapolis talking about a 41st birthday the night of Nick's 41st birthday. And according to Nick, Kayla attempted to get him to humiliate himself by wearing matching thongs to the Gay 90s underwear party.

The "admitted his wife wants to swing" quote from the DM is interesting verbiage because it implies Kayla was the one who initiated the situation.

I guess it could be that Nick was lying to Faran.

It could be that Faran was outright lying about what was said. Faran has been shown to tell lies and I would be prepared to accept Nick at his word if he claimed she was not telling the truth, but to my knowledge, neither Nick nor Faran have implied that.

Instead, they both said she "misunderstood" and Nick explicitly said:

Read it carefully... that isn't what the DM from Faran actually claimed Nick said! She said that Nick told her that Kayla wanted to "swing".

I find the fact that he did not go point-by-point in the DM and deny everything puzzling. It could just be that one of the statements plainly happened: "swinger island", aka Hedonism II, which Faran appears to have known about almost two months before it was even speculated on KF. I am working on clipping specifically what he said that's relevant to each point in the DM, but suffice it to say he didn't really address much cleanly. He just had the usual "we are monogamous" spin. I think he explicitly denied the sex room (the one claim by Faran that is still consistent with monogamy).
Nick has been munching box ever since hoping to keep her satisfied, literally Noseguarding to keep Drex the Sex Pest from taking root in her wilted rose garden.
 
If I am reading this VERY charitably, he might have said something like:

Kayla/I found this really cool ADULT vacation place. I/she showed it to her her/me and she was Really excited! It's a place that has all kinds of fun stuff, and stingers usually go there. Guess if we go there, we are SWINGERS??? hueh hueh hueh!
I would be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt if he actually said something like that. He just dissembled like he usually does.

LLC ISSUES [responding to a chat comment]: "Yeah my LLC hasn't shown payment since 2020. I have a company who is supposed to take care of it.... whatever... To get reinstated I'll just pay the $200 back fees. Whatever."
Rekieta Law LLC, the last payment is 2021, actually.

Rekieta Media? I'm not sure, but I don't think he's even realized that yet.
 
All of this for a 5/10 jew bride with cheap tattoos?
Holy shit you could land a plane on that fivehead. That's practically troon-level malding.
Idk, personally I’m getting to the point of being skeeved out by “I like being me.”
"I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!"
9k (7).png
If so, pour one out for Nick. That would mean he spent the last year stuck in a living hell where he agreed to go to all these trashy swinger haunts and pretend to enjoy it while trying to prevent another man's dick entering his wife.
Pretty sure that particular horse bull has already escaped the barn.

Nick just needs to up his snack tray skills at this point.
Men who like used cars are a lot like cucks. Inheriting a used up women with a loose pussy who lived on ram ranch. If you like sloppy pussy and bull cum than by all means pick used.
Holy fuck a car isn't a bitch you weirdo, it's a machine. A straight up new car can be an absolute dud and often is. I'd rather have a used car I paid nearly nothing for but has a 10 year record of no problems than pay out the ass for a new lemon. If the repairs cost more than the car did, then I just buy another.

I'm also totally fine with a few dents. When I'm trying to change lanes, those dents say go ahead motherfucker, try to stop me with your new shiny piece of shit, I don't care.
 
Last edited:
1677856243315.png

tf when you walk into Gay90s, and no one even trys to traffic you.

YEAH, why does that happen? I sometimes can't reply to you. Is it under review or something?

ANYWAY, Elissa has clipped it. My post has more context and words but video is more entertaining:

Man is he eyeing that banana at the start.
 
He has trapped himself in terms of depositions and even how he can defend himself.
He's more or less locked down his ability to change his story at any time in the future. And without the other side even needing to depose him. Great strategery there Nicko.

The other side has hours and hours of inebriated rambling to use in cross examination. And can probably slip in a lot of shit just to be embarrassing.
 
He’d have to put down the balldo.
Legitimately, he needs to take 3 months off the internet to get his life sorted out.

Go to counselling for addiction

Go to marriage counselling

Get a financial advisor and a budget

Go to counselling for any broken family ties

Get off social media entirely

Get a firm business plan.

He probably will not.

I would be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt if he actually said something like that. He just dissembled like he usually does.


Rekieta Law LLC, the last payment is 2021, actually.

Rekieta Media? I'm not sure, but I don't think he's even realized that yet.
His shtick about 'I don't lie' has come back to bite him in the arse.

As much as I respect the 'our relationship is none of your business' as a general rule, HE was the one who invited internet retards into knowing the gory details.

Everything he says is suspect.
 
Holy fuck a car isn't a bitch you weirdo, it's a machine. A straight up new car can be an absolute dud and often is. I'd rather have a used car I paid nearly nothing for but has a 10 year record of no problems than pay out the ass for a new lemon. If the repairs cost more than the car did, then I just buy another.
You also want something that’s fairly common, so you don’t get fucked with the “sorry, they don’t make X part anymore,” or if you DO, you can get one from a salvage yard.

God help anyone who buys European cars that aren’t VW or BMW. Even then you’re looking at shit like “this entire coolant system is made out of plastic and oh btw, it has to pressurize to 30 psi.”

To tie this back into a Nick thing, I had a 2001 Mustang back in the day. I was just psyched that they dropped the bubblemobile aesthetic from the 90’s, and I was a young retard.

Ford, in its infinite quest for total planned obsolescence, changed the brake proportioning valve every model year between 1999 and 2004. If you needed a new one, it had to be the exact model year, and by 2006 you couldn’t get one from Ford anymore.

Tl;dr, if I had money to burn I wouldn’t waste it on a fucking mustang.
 
He's more or less locked down his ability to change his story at any time in the future. And without the other side even needing to depose him. Great strategery there Nicko.

The other side has hours and hours of inebriated rambling to use in cross examination. And can probably slip in a lot of shit just to be embarrassing.
Imagine how a "greatest hits" package from Racket's streams would look to a Minnesota jury. Especially in closing arguments.
 
The "admitted his wife wants to swing" quote from the DM is interesting verbiage because it implies Kayla was the one who initiated the situation.

Nick has consistently portrayed Kayla as the one initiating at least part of this. I'll reiterate some of what I posted in January here for convenience and spoiler them so they don't take up space on the thread in addition to a few other things.

Nick's recounting of events has that Kayla posted her bottle-ass pic before he did in his message to Kiwi Farms video. Kayla asked Nick what he thought (and it didn't register as a "shit-test" to him).


74D5DA12-6DD5-4069-9D54-B6367DB45502.png12F083E4-76C7-4EEE-B5ED-89C9227D1C4A.pngd22a789a2a0c2e11a133d16fce6a50db4d0d040aaaf0e40c546eee17cee8d70e.jpg

2022-11-18 basicbitch.PNG


2022-12-19 Nick in Chat1.jpg2022-12-19 Nick in Chat2.jpg


2023-03-01 Faran DM Leak 2 .jpeg

2023-03-03 The Real Lady Rackets.pngchannels4_profile.jpg

He just had the usual "we are monogamous" spin.

Given their repeated offenses against the concept of monogamous relationships, especially in a sexual context (for example, lewds/nudes are inherently sexual and sharing them violates that), it is highly likely that Nick and co. are supplanting the definition of "monogamous" with the definition of "consensual", but still using the word "monogamous". This mental slight of hand is most likely an attempt to reconcile non-monogamous behavior through consent within the marriage.

Another example would be the married folk who post lewds in Nick's chat. What they are doing might be consented to by the concerned parties, but it is clearly not monogamous behavior, which is why it clearly confuses people in the chat who actually practice monogamy and why the attempted defenses of the lewding locals are laughable. Reasonable/sane people do not redefine words and then not expect a breakdown in communication.

The only reason to use the word "monogamous" would be to placate their conscience in some way, though it would be simpler for them to stop mixing terms and definitions of clearly defined words just to justify their lifestyle in a bid for broader acceptance.

Nick has been munching box ever since hoping to keep her satisfied, literally Noseguarding to keep Drex the Sex Pest from taking root in her wilted rose garden.

Nick and Drexel would agree:

 
He's more or less locked down his ability to change his story at any time in the future. And without the other side even needing to depose him. Great strategery there Nicko.

The other side has hours and hours of inebriated rambling to use in cross examination. And can probably slip in a lot of shit just to be embarrassing.
Wouldn't most of his video's not be admissible unless they were the specific defamatory statements?
 
Wouldn't most of his video's not be admissible unless they were the specific defamatory statements?
They're adverse admissions by a party, so they'd mostly be admissible. They couldn't introduce completely irrelevant material just to make him look bad, but since the defamatory statements are in the context of the kind of content he airs, it's hard to imagine much of it would actually be completely irrelevant.

So they'd fall into the "more prejudicial than probative" test and I think Monty can probably pretty much introduce any public statement Nick has made that has the remotest connection to the case.

It's hearsay, but well within numerous exceptions, and Nick is available to be examined about it. So if he says something that contradicts anything he's said in public, they can introduce any prior inconsistent statements he's made, or in many cases probably introduce it independently as evidence of Nick's state of mind.

They might not want to overdo that, because if they inadvertently show Nick has a habit of making wild statements and hyperbole not meant to be taken seriously, it underscores the claim (that Monty's idiot lawyer made in the original complaint) that shit Nick says is not meant to be taken seriously.

I hope this case at least gets to depositions because they will be fucking hilarious, with Randazza doing things like asking Monty if he really does suck little boys' dicks and Nick pulling a Ron Soye and not remembering shit he said on stream.
Imagine how a "greatest hits" package from Racket's streams would look to a Minnesota jury. Especially in closing arguments.
It's reminiscent of the fantasy of introducing Monica Rial and Jamie Marchi's embarrassing lolishit to a Texas jury, except has a chance of actually happening.
 
Last edited:
New user here... Rekieta complained about this place on stream (I see his channel some times), and just because he was kinda being hostile towards the users here, i asked myself, what it's going with this Kiwi thing?... well, what fucking shitshow, fucking hell.

I knew something was weird with all the sex talk that was going on with almost all streams... I don't watch everything, but i noticed the change... You don't go from a wholesome family man lawyer that is like any random dude, to drink like a fucking pirate and have entire streams talking about sex stuff almost all the time, without having some problems on the prívate side of your life... I found it weird at the time, and now all makes sense. What a disappointment.

Being real, i think Nick is a cuck or is getting there.

Because it's always the same story when couples start with the "having fun" shit, always the same language (A man using the word "adventurous" is the most gay shit ever when it comes to talking about his wife), always the same coping mechanism when people find some weird shit about them (now everyone is a "prude", "people with no life", "weirdos", "boring fags", shit like that)

My speculation after going through some post here, is that Nick, hearing about Drex and all these dudes other stories about sexual stuff, got himself into the "it's normal just to spice things a little bit" narrative with all that talking... and I seeing how his wife posted suggestive pictures and talks to other women on Locals (probably boosting her ego with all those thirsty mf in there and horny af because his husband is a fucking mess, and not only that, she probably is the one that started all this shit, because there's no way she wasn't hearing all these talks and seeing how Nick was way too much interested on it), she probably got into that narrative too, so they both thought it was a good a idea to be more "adventurous"... the problem is, that shit always end up in a relationship getting ruined.

And all that starts with exhibitionism, because i remember Nick saying something about having sex with his wife in risky situations... that's is when the path to the cucking fetish starts, because they are getting off involving other people in their intimacy, it doesn't matter that is not a direct contact, they get excited at the thoughts of other people catching them or hearing them having sex.
That shit gets boring after some time, and to keep going with this sexual thing, they need to do more in that direction... so, i think that is when Hedonism vacation comes into play (seeing other naked, other people seeing them naked, seeing other people fucking, probably fucking in front of other people).

I saw a post here talking about his wife traveling by herself to this Hedonism shit... If that is confirmed... then there's no doubt Nick is a cuck. (If that is true, there no way she wasn't getting fucked by other dudes there).

Pd; This entire website is really ok for what I've seen... some "gamer" words here and there... I don't know why so many people is freaked out about it. (Maybe is because they got something to hide, probably)
 
They're adverse admissions by a party, so they'd mostly be admissible. They couldn't introduce completely irrelevant material just to make him look bad, but since the defamatory statements are in the context of the kind of content he airs, it's hard to imagine much of it would actually be completely irrelevant.

So they'd fall into the "more prejudicial than probative" test and I think Monty can probably pretty much introduce any public statement Nick has made that has the remotest connection to the case.

It's hearsay, but well within numerous exceptions, and Nick is available to be examined about it. So if he says something that contradicts anything he's said in public, they can introduce any prior inconsistent statements he's made, or in many cases probably introduce it independently as evidence of Nick's state of mind.

They might not want to overdo that, because if they inadvertently show Nick has a habit of making wild statements and hyperbole not meant to be taken seriously, it underscores the claim (that Monty's idiot lawyer made in the original complaint) that shit Nick says is not meant to be taken seriously.

I hope this case at least gets to depositions because they will be fucking hilarious, with Randazza doing things like asking Monty if he really does suck little boys' dicks and Nick pulling a Ron Soye and not remembering shit he said on stream.
It would be funny to see Monty airing nicks deposition like he did in weeb wars, bit of a contraposso turn of events.
 
They're adverse admissions by a party, so they'd mostly be admissible. They couldn't introduce completely irrelevant material just to make him look bad, but since the defamatory statements are in the context of the kind of content he airs, it's hard to imagine much of it would actually be completely irrelevant.

So they'd fall into the "more prejudicial than probative" test and I think Monty can probably pretty much introduce any public statement Nick has made that has the remotest connection to the case.

It's hearsay, but well within numerous exceptions, and Nick is available to be examined about it. So if he says something that contradicts anything he's said in public, they can introduce any prior inconsistent statements he's made, or in many cases probably introduce it independently as evidence of Nick's state of mind.

They might not want to overdo that, because if they inadvertently show Nick has a habit of making wild statements and hyperbole not meant to be taken seriously, it underscores the claim (that Monty's idiot lawyer made in the original complaint) that shit Nick says is not meant to be taken seriously.

I hope this case at least gets to depositions because they will be fucking hilarious, with Randazza doing things like asking Monty if he really does suck little boys' dicks and Nick pulling a Ron Soye and not remembering shit he said on stream.

It's reminiscent of the fantasy of introducing Monica Rial and Jamie Marchi's embarrassing lolishit to a Texas jury, except has a chance of actually happening.

I don't think there is any real chance of Monty winning, even with Rekieta making it easier.

I do think the lawyer ethics board (whatever it's called) may end up punishing Rekieta because they are likely getting tired of the bullshit he is causing (just or unjust).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
"Been through real shit" what did he mean by this? No, seriously what did he mean by this, have they lost a kid? Was the house foreclosed on? Did he lose his job? Cheating? Sickness? Oh no, they just don't find each other attractive anymore and have gotten bored of waking up to the same face.

"Venerable?" On what fucking planet? What are these hardships that they overcame? Why should I respect a marriage that's lasted how many years and is already imploding, one that hasn't even had to go through the difficulty rising teenagers yet? A marriage that has never faced money problems, I mean has the wife ever even needed to get a job?
 
"Been through real shit" what did he mean by this? No, seriously what did he mean by this, have they lost a kid? Was the house foreclosed on? Did he lose his job? Cheating? Sickness? Oh no, they just don't find each other attractive anymore and have gotten bored of waking up to the same face.

"Venerable?" On what fucking planet? What are these hardships that they overcame? Why should I respect a marriage that's lasted how many years and is already imploding, one that hasn't even had to go through the difficulty rising teenagers yet? A marriage that has never faced money problems, I mean has the wife ever even needed to get a job?
TBF they did have two miscarriages before they had a successful pregnancy which adds a lot of stress and emotion especially if not dealt with properly. No, she’s never really had a job I remember him saying once that she asked him about it and worked for a week or two and then quit.
 
TBF they did have two miscarriages before they had a successful pregnancy which adds a lot of stress and emotion especially if not dealt with properly.
That and that all of her pregnancies were a complete nightmare in one way or another, which Nick has mentioned several times. Not a single one went smoothly, and I don't think either of them has dealt with it healthily.
 
It would be funny to see Monty airing nicks deposition like he did in weeb wars, bit of a contraposso turn of events.
If a Rekieta deposition happens and they don't record and broadcast it, I will be absolutely furious at Monty and Schneider.

That said, Monty may be a loon, but I think he understands Youtube enough to know that he'd be sitting on content gold, if we get to that stage. He somehow has like 70,000 YT subscribers, so he must be doing something right.

Nick has consistently portrayed Kayla as the one initiating at least part of this. I'll reiterate some of what I posted in January here for convenience and spoiler them so they don't take up space on the thread in addition to a few other things.

Nick's recounting of events has that Kayla posted her bottle-ass pic before he did in his message to Kiwi Farms video. Kayla asked Nick what he thought (and it didn't register as a "shit-test" to him).
Correct. I flip-flopped on this issue myself.

I believe most people thought that his portrayal of Kayla as the instigator was simply public-facing PR from Nick. I have now flipped back to believing that Kayla is indeed the driving force, because Faran has given us reason to believe that he is saying similar things in private conversations.

Given their repeated offenses against the concept of monogamous relationships, especially in a sexual context (for example, lewds/nudes are inherently sexual and sharing them violates that), it is highly likely that Nick and co. are supplanting the definition of "monogamous" with the definition of "consensual", but still using the word "monogamous". This mental slight of hand is most likely an attempt to reconcile non-monogamous behavior through consent within the marriage.

Another example would be the married folk who post lewds in Nick's chat. What they are doing might be consented to by the concerned parties, but it is clearly not monogamous behavior, which is why it clearly confuses people in the chat who actually practice monogamy and why the attempted defenses of the lewding locals are laughable. Reasonable/sane people do not redefine words and then not expect a breakdown in communication.

The only reason to use the word "monogamous" would be to placate their conscience in some way, though it would be simpler for them to stop mixing terms and definitions of clearly defined words just to justify their lifestyle in a bid for broader acceptance.
Also correct. The use of the word "monogamous" repeatedly as a mantra is very obvious by Nick. The same word appeared in Faran's Twitter statement, which frankly gives the impression of being coached. Or other similar phrases, such as Kayla saying that "Nick is my ONLY partner". I have the impression that "swinging" is considered distinct from polyamory and that many swingers self-identify as monogamous, since any sexual partners outside the marriage only exist within the presence of the other spouse and are only around for a very short period of time.

Now, Nick refused to give a straight answer on this for months, and from that comes the impression that there's an iceberg we are just seeing the tip of. This week he's said they're not swingers and he didn't tell Faran they were swingers, but that wasn't exactly what Faran had claimed she said. To my knowledge, he STILL has not admitted to going to "swinger island" aka Hedonism II.
 
I know someone that would buy it
View attachment 4688108
I see Keffals borrowed Wingo his tits while he's in rehab.

Legitimately, he needs to take 3 months off the internet to get his life sorted out.

Go to counselling for addiction

Go to marriage counselling

Get a financial advisor and a budget

Go to counselling for any broken family ties

Get off social media entirely

Get a firm business plan.

He probably will not.


His shtick about 'I don't lie' has come back to bite him in the arse.

As much as I respect the 'our relationship is none of your business' as a general rule, HE was the one who invited internet retards into knowing the gory details.

Everything he says is suspect.
The best part is all he had to do was keep trucking along the way he had been for years. He was making bank, he had almost no Aylaawgs, the Farms mostly liked him, he was pretty much set if he just stuck to the formula that got him where he was.
He chose to starting talking about his gross coomer shit all the time.
He decided the viewers and fans that had got him where he was weren't good enough.
He decided to wave his Balldo at his old audience and start flirting with gross old leathery wine moms and simps
He stopped even trying to keep his drinking under control.
This is all on him.
He ruined his reputation and public image to be a cringy old coom brained closet homosexual and start acting like a fucking porn sick nerd thats just started College and moved out of his Moms house - in his fucking 40's.
He's a fucking joke, he's an alcoholic, and he had people screaming at him to pull up for months before he squandered the last of his good will, and from the spiraling he's starting to display, he's starting to realize how much he fucked up.
But its ok.
He doesn't care, like he keeps making sure to say.
Hey Nick, hows "chosing my midlife crisis" working out for you?
:story:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back