US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Confused Doggo, Yamma Damma, Aidan and 9 others
It's not like this shit happened over night. Western institutions have slowly been taken over by anti-Western radicals since the early 60s. People only started pushing back on it very recently, and most of those efforts have been hollow. It's like telling someone that smoked for 50 years that they have lung cancer and their response is "how do we fix this?"
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: A_Skellington, Yamma Damma, Irrational Exuberance and 17 others
ForTheHoard said:
It's not like this shit happened over night. Western institutions have slowly been taken over by anti-Western radicals since the early 60s. People only started pushing back on it very recently, and most of those efforts have been hollow. It's like telling someone that smoked for 50 years that they have lung cancer and their response is "how do we fix this?"
Click to expand...
The push for straight-up non-enforcement is relatively new, and backed by a couple of ideological billionaires more than the general populace.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance, Pig Cups, madethistocomment and 13 others
Bartolomeow Kittensberger said:
The conservative faggots like Gorsuch may use "parental authority" as an excuse to indemnify parents from those lawsuits, in combination with liberal justices who will ratify anything as long as it's sexually depraved. Even with the Court's current make-up, I foresee a 5-4 decision removing all parental liability for these horrific surgeries. Gorsuch + either Barrett or Kavanaugh (or maybe both) will join the liberals.
Click to expand...
The plaintiffs should head off that argument by showing the court graphic images of what exactly the results of surgery and hormones are. I don’t know why none of the mainstream anti-trans groups don’t show what the “gender affirming care” actually is. Most pro-trans normies think it’s literally magic and it creates a working vagina/penis and that girls who cut their tits off have a normal flat chest instead of a horrific scar. If everyone knows what a stink ditch/rot dog/“top surgery” results actually look like they’d be a lot less likely to support it.

They should then follow up by saying allowing parents to do this to their children is the same as allowing them to beat their kids and the parental authority argument doesn’t apply.
 
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: Confused Doggo, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Irrational Exuberance and 8 others
quaawaa said:
The plaintiffs should head off that argument by showing the court graphic images of what exactly the results of surgery and hormones are. I don’t know why none of the mainstream anti-trans groups don’t show what the “gender affirming care” actually is. Most pro-trans normies think it’s literally magic and it creates a working vagina/penis and that girls who cut their tits off have a normal flat chest instead of a horrific scar. If everyone knows what a stink ditch/rot dog/“top surgery” results actually look like they’d be a lot less likely to support it.

They should then follow up by saying allowing parents to do this to their children is the same as allowing them to beat their kids and the parental authority argument doesn’t apply.
Click to expand...
General Emílio Médici said:
That might help some but tranny worship is very strong.
Click to expand...
Yeah, unfortunately, @General Emílio Médici is correct. It's like trying to break the curse of nigger worship by showing them hulking niggos and sheboons beating up on/shooting wypipo for the unforgivable crime of looking at them the wrong way: the cries of "SYSTEMIC RAYCISUM MADE THEM DO IT" and some such will abound. I'd imagine the reaction to the above would be along the lines of "oh, so showing teens childbirth is OK, but gender-affirming care isn't, you heckin' transphobe?"
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: name68126988, Yamma Damma, Aidan and 6 others
From CPAC yesterdya, Nikki Haley's speech was to a 25% full room:
00009.png


Steve Bannon calls out Fox News:
00008.png




Trump has a nice vision proposal, just the beautification part alone is something that should be hammered every day, the issue is we've had so many liberal lies about shovel ready jobs and infrastructure it becomes white noise, but this is believable.
00007.png




And for dessert, Kellyanne Conway is finally getting a divorce from her Pedo Project Pinoy husband, Trump calls it like we all saw it:

00005.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Confused Doggo, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Yamma Damma and 22 others
You'd think beautification would be common sense, but I got in an argument with a liberal over Trump's EO mandating new Federal buildings look nice. She didn't really have an argument, she just knew Trump wanted nice things therefore she wanted ugly things.

#1 and #2 on the list aren't workable; I assume they are sacrifice propositions so he can concentrate on 3-5.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: LurkTrawl, ChefKiss, Spirelord: Downfall and 3 others
GamerGateSurvivor said:
I don't like it. As much as I hate journalists, they should be able to write anonymously. Especially when they're criticizing government officials.

Plus it should be fairly obvious (((who's))) funding the journos.
Click to expand...
My understanding is that the bill exempts journalists writing for "normal" outlets, who are still free to get paid on the side by whomever.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
mandatorylurk said:
Trump has a nice vision proposal, just the beautification part alone is something that should be hammered every day, the issue is we've had so many liberal lies about shovel ready jobs and infrastructure it becomes white noise, but this is believable.
00007.png
Click to expand...
#1 is not happening due to all the protests from environmentalists and #2 feels too much like the boomer fantasy of a futuristic 21st century. #4 seems like a risk given the fed will be printing more money to spend.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria and Vyse Inglebard
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back