- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
hegemony over europewhat exactly are the genuine conflicts of interest between the US and Russia?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hegemony over europewhat exactly are the genuine conflicts of interest between the US and Russia?
Russia lost that game the minute Gorbachev announced the Red Army wasn't going to be enforcing Moscow's will on the Warsaw Pact members anymore. Gone, poof, and so too was communism once the boot of authority was no longer ensuring it remained intact.hegemony over europe
So they've run out of even Mosin's and WW1 muzzle loaders?You know, I just realized what those reminded me of:
View attachment 4705797
Now, I'm not saying its a bad mount design, but can Russia just stop copying the West for five minutes?
And some news:
View attachment 4705908
Now, I'm not saying shovels aren't lethal when used properly... but there has to be a better weapon for the job, right? Right?
What's especially telling is the Russia troops aren't prepared for it, which indicates a serious lack of training and pre-assault preparation work.
He had no choice, it was either let go of the periphery or plunge the planet into war. Since he was far smarter and more realistic than Putin, he let go.Russia lost that game the minute Gorbachev announced the Red Army wasn't going to be enforcing Moscow's will on the Warsaw Pact members anymore. Gone, poof, and so too was communism once the boot of authority was no longer ensuring it remained intact.
Oh, I'm well aware of why he did it. It was game over. People were tired of living under Moscow's boot, and Moscow just straight-up couldn't afford to keep their troops there to keep Eastern Europe in line. And somehow Putin thinks he can take over Ukraine when Russia is in an even worse state than it is during the Gorbachev era, and NATO is quite willing to see Russia's nose get bloodied so long as its Ukrainians who are doing the punching.He had no choice, it was either let go of the periphery or plunge the planet into war. Since he was far smarter and more realistic than Putin, he let go.
Nobody really wanted to stay. Everyone that got their 50 yrs dose of closed society, hunger, endless apartment buildings all in an oppressive grey color, and general societal dysfunction wanted out out out. Even the tiniest of things like some dumb carcinogenic Kent cigarettes or some sweatshop Levi's blue jeans were small miracles. Even the Cipiripi Nutella imitation the Yugoslavs made was heaven.
But that's all good, because once you understand what it's like to live in... that, you know you will not get back to it.
Mentioning Russia's need for more territory toprotect its heartland from invasion plays into the theory of Russia's nukes being mostly duds. It would explain the invasion as a last ditch effort to secure western flank before the news of bad nukes gets out. I doubt it's actually the case.The fact is, russia has been 100% invasion proof since the 1949 and even after this buck breaking clusterfuck of a war it inflicted on itself, it still will be even if it gets found that 99% of russia's on-paper nuke stockpiles were entirely fictional or had been scavenged for spare parts or just fucking rotted away, as that possible 1% of hypothetical remaining nukes is all it needs to ensure neither burgerland and friends nor china try anything even resembling a land invasion
It invading Ukraine in order to satisfy this imaginary security need is exactly as fucking retarded and fucking bullshit as Britain invading Australia with the realpolitik excuse of taking control of its fucking coal reserves in order to feed the fleet of ironclad steamships vital for Britain's defence against French or Prussian invasion
View attachment 4703980
Don't forget how many people in Russia have fallen down stairs, out of windows, or committed suicide since this invasion began. Some of them were Putin's supposed allies. Kadyrov and Prigozhin have been antagonizing Shoigu for a couple of months now. Kadyrov commands substantial amount of soldiers who operate de-facto outside of Russian military command. If things get unstable, he could be dangerous. Not enough to usurp power, but just enough to pressure Moscow into getting more special treatment, be a peacekeeper in the Russian South, or tip scales in case of a power struggle in Moscow.sounds absolutely delusional
i see zero reason for why putin would want kadyrov gone
Now you could argue that a lot of this Korean war surplus is just back-filling reserves as reserve equipment goes to the front. But its not just what they're digging out how they're digging it out. They aren't just using these things for battletaxis, they are bolting naval turrets on them.Im sure Russia has enough small arms to mobilize alot more people, but their pool of mechanized equipment is getting worse and smaller by the day, with no outside source to replenish it. Just look at Vuhlnedar, 130+ losses in a month in just that area with no gains.
New thread title?Welcome to Russian engineering. Where the physics are made up and the doctrine doesn't matter.
The problem here was the West wanted Russia to de-mafia & de-oligarch and Russian elite was having none of it.All Putin had to do was pivot towards the West and position Russia as a friendly counterbalance against Chinese ambitions and we'd be besties, with the West investing massively in Russia to build it up instead of dumping money in China. But here we are...
nonsense. nato didn't do shit when ussr rolled into hungary to crush the rebels, nor when they rolled into czechoslovakia, they werent gonna do anything if something like that happened again in 1990. everybody knew this, including the eastern bloc states themselves, so none of them would have dared make any kind of move away from moscow without gorbachovs approval.He had no choice, it was either let go of the periphery or plunge the planet into war.
Kadyrov is a useful idiot who is becoming less useful. He is seeking to position himself to be far more than Putin would ever allow him to be. Building his own cult of personality. I think the moron might actually think he has the potential to be Putin's succesor. His fate was always going to be at the bottom of a tall building. The only question is has he annoyed Vlad enough to reach that point. Or has he simply annoyed Shoigu enough, and the calculus is Putin won't care? It's clear from all group photos and videos that regardless of whatever disagreements the Russian Cabinet might have with each other, they all view Kadyrov as a vile clown.sounds absolutely delusional
i see zero reason for why putin would want kadyrov gone
Now you could argue that a lot of this Korean war surplus is just back-filling reserves as reserve equipment goes to the front. But its not just what they're digging out how they're digging it out. They aren't just using these things for battletaxis, they are bolting naval turrets on them.
Canada had to raid branch base museums for 40mm bofors in 2000 for thier new coastal defense vehicles. The US used a lot of Vietnam-era equipment in desert storm and the early days of Iraq, and there was a lot of "field expediency" happening with shipped systems during Vietnam.
But the fact they are reaching this far back is embarrassing, showing they can't keep up.
But yeah, its NATO that's totally finished because they're gifting 70's systems to Ukraine to fight the best of the Soviet's WWII arsensal.
New thread title?
The problem here was the West wanted Russia to de-mafia & de-oligarch and Russian elite was having none of it.
The serfs running the country? POSH! Might as well just hand it over to the Tartars.
If Russia can’t get the Ukies under heel within the next year or so, that would be the Africans & Sand Bandits in OPEC. And the Burgerboofer Mapleleaf Coalition to a lesser degree...I’d think the extra shipping costs would make ours less competitive. Europe is frantically constructing new LNG import facilities. I can’t see even countries that favor Russia being able to turn their backs on that windfall. I.E. Algeria.I see one: who will provide gas to Europe. But now it isn't a competition, it is just some ashes which will be cleaned in two next years.
I think the fundamental difference is that the UK didn't try to cling to its superpower "status" after the empire fell save a few half hearted attempts to preserve atleast some of its overt sphere of influence and instead focused for better and for worse on trying to improve its own position in and of itself, as did Canada/Australia/New Zealand with reasonable success, as opposed to pissing away its potential and future in a futile attempt to "rival" the US
Maybe its because the UK already had a term as big swinging geopolitical hegemon dick for the previous almost two centuries which gave everyone involved the perspective that being top buck breaker was not all it was cracked up to be.
Maybe its because its loss of empire was tied in to its victory in WW2 which soothed any damaged nationalist ego and allowed it a narrative of it going out in a blaze of glory as opposed to simply sputtering out on its own or being shamefully defeated.
Or maybe there was just a general awareness that the gap between it and the US in terms of power was just too damn big and was growing bigger by the year, and pretending otherwise would just result in needless failure and humiliation for everyone involved.
Either way the result was bongland, boganland, canuckland, and kiwiland all just dusting themselves off and being content with what they had and what they could realistically do going forwards, and accordingly winding up as some of the richest, most developed, most advanced, and most powerful countries on the planet despite their relatively small populations.
Nah, Russia put most of its defense budget into its nukes rather than it's army. They've been doing that since the fall of the USSR when their army was weakened yet they still needed some sort of defense. I also think the "buffer state" argument is a weak one based on bad or outdated strategy, but I can't find most of the information I've seen regarding it so I guess take my opinion with a grain of salt.Mentioning Russia's need for more territory toprotect its heartland from invasion plays into the theory of Russia's nukes being mostly duds. It would explain the invasion as a last ditch effort to secure western flank before the news of bad nukes gets out. I doubt it's actually the case.
Ukraine has been doing counterattacks in the south and reinforcing the northSo does anyone know wtf is up with Bakhmut right now? I thought Ukraine was pulling out, but apparently the city is still contested and there is talk of a counter attack somewhere?
Best guess is Ukraine appears to be holding on so long as defense is viable for obvious reasons of the Russians being autistically obsessed with taking it. MUH CULDRON is on hold until... uh.... Russia will encircle and cut off Bakhmut any day now!So does anyone know wtf is up with Bakhmut right now? I thought Ukraine was pulling out, but apparently the city is still contested and there is talk of a counter attack somewhere?
So we are back to 2 more weeks again. Lovely. Team Z was convinced several days ago that it was all over for Bakhmut. This level of blue balling has to be excruciating for them.Best guess is Ukraine appears to be holding on so long as defense is viable for obvious reasons of the Russians being autistically obsessed with taking it. MUH CULDRON is on hold until... uh.... Russia will encircle and cut off Bakhmut any day now!