- Joined
- Nov 8, 2018
#TranswomenAreConMen is trending on Twitter today
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's been trending since yesterday. Of course, if you check the tag itself nothing really makes sense, as usual.#TranswomenAreConMen is trending on Twitter today
Part of this is evolutionary I’m afraid. Women are much more likely to acquiesce than a man, both because women are more willing to compromise, and because they are more likely to be victims of sexual violence if they stand against authority. It’s the exact reason why gay men can just laugh at a FtM while lesbians are having their spaces stripped away from MtF troons.Bro, I can't even mention genitalia in a scientific fashion to speak on any health issue without other women defending "trans rights". I've listened to women throw away their own personal bodily rights to accommodate a man in a dress.
I was talking to a young millennial girl who also works in our male-dominated industry. We were chatting about networking events and I brought up a hipster event that was led by a woman seeking clout and her minion man in a dress. It was very clear this was a man in a dress with chest hair under a poorly fitted corset and full beard.
My colleague (for lack of a better word) immediately started praising the man in the dress for such a great transition. I asked her if she thought this was a FTM and she said yes. I assured her that was absolutely a biological male in a dress.
She has utterly gaslit herself into believing a grown man with a beard, linebacker shoulders, and a chest full of hair could've been a biological woman. Perhaps the media has convinced her that one could transition to that degree of success. But instead, this man in a dress had taken away professional opportunities from her because he is claimed to be a greater minority
At this point, you risk other women attacking you as well. Women are not in a position, and have never been in a position, to defend themselves in public without backlash. If it turned out the black guy who played Elmo was a raging transphobe it would make zero difference to how many people watch Sesame Street. The fact JK Rowling is a woman they cannot silence or gaslight, IMO, is what makes them so angry.
To me, the trans movement is mostly based on the acceptable hatred of women. Including women that hate themselves.
How bad is it? If she's just a media-addled tomboy, that might be salvageable.
PL: Mrs Vesperus buys so many gun and truck parts, Amazon keeps suggesting beard oil.
There's nothing wrong with a bit of strange.
@Aero the Alcoholic Bat
Most likely exactly sunk cost fallacy. Granted, there’s a lot we don’t know like the age of your brother and his. Ehm.. Husband.
But it’s for the same reason many married couples move past infidelity. The longer you’ve been together, the more stuff and life you have accumulated, the bigger the temptation to just move past it.
Starting over at 40 or 50 isn’t attractive to most folks.
How bad is the situation?
Call me old fashioned, but there’s nothing wrong with a woman buying cool shit. It’s not even the same neighborhood as a woman who says she’s a man.
Also a massive red flag in all sorts of ways.
One is just having sorta unusual interests. The other is legit mental illness.
Early 80s Rowan Atkinson, why are you wearing a wig and novelty fake tits?
Christ he looks like a young Tommy Tooter.
Yeh funny that, this is usually where a woman would call on her men, but now since women don't need no man, they are now facing the monsters alone. How could this have happened?Women are not in a position, and have never been in a position, to defend themselves in public without backlash.
It's almost like men and women fill the niches the other one can't and they need each other. Oh wait, that's some kinda phobic to say.Yeh funny that, this is usually where a woman would call on her men, but now since women don't need no man, they are now facing the monsters alone. How could this have happened?
It will always amuses me that the more masculinity is attacked, the more femininity suffers.
Wow you're right we should return to the 1700s where women have no legal rights, can't own a house, can't handle their own money, can't instigate divorce, have no form of birth controlYeh funny that, this is usually where a woman would call on her men, but now since women don't need no man, they are now facing the monsters alone. How could this have happened?
It will always amuses me that the more masculinity is attacked, the more femininity suffers.
Thats so true, the minute we end the insanity of feminism, all the progress of the ~300 years will instantly disappear!Wow you're right we should return to the 1700s where women have no legal rights, can't own a house, can't handle their own money, can't instigate divorce, have no form of birth control
Stop being such a drama queen, its the whole DEI initiative thats driving this garbage thats a direct result of feminism. All we need to is the acknowledge the sanctity of male & female spaces then yes men will charge into the female toilets and yank out the smirking AGP.If the trade off is losing all of that so men feel women have enough value to publically debase a sex pest then we can all just live with the sex pests because we fucked ourselves as a greater society and deserve this.
literally only incels want that, it's edgy shitposting otherwise. Literally no one is calling for it to go back to the fucking 1700s. There's a difference between feminism and basic human rights. You can still believe in suffrage rights without drinking the feminism cocktail kool aid.
Wow you're right we should return to the 1700s where women have no legal rights, can't own a house, can't handle their own money, can't instigate divorce, have no form of birth control
If the trade off is losing all of that so men feel women have enough value to publically debase a sex pest then we can all just live with the sex pests because we fucked ourselves as a greater society and deserve this.
Trannies spark gender debates what can I say?I tried to respond to someone saying women should stand up for themselves with a comment that they cannot and multiple posters started sperging on needing to get rid of the concept of women standing up for themselves so men can do it instead?
I'll let people get back to posting troons.
But what do women need protecting from? Other men, in this case and others. Women are in a bind because seems like what's being said is that men are both the problem, but also the solution, to violence in their lives. So is it any wonder that more women aren't just diving into nuclear family+husband, now that they have options? It can't be assumed we can tell which man will choose to be benevolent, and which one will choose to commit domestic violence. Either way, you end up looking like a sucker- forgoing independence, you're vulnerable to the whims of your partner. Choosing independence, and any male outside the home who hurts you will be blamed on you not having a male protector. You can't win. Male violence is presented as both the problem and the solution, and once again hulking troon violence is somehow due to women, not men. Even though they're literally men.Yeh funny that, this is usually where a woman would call on her men, but now since women don't need no man, they are now facing the monsters alone. How could this have happened?
It will always amuses me that the more masculinity is attacked, the more femininity suffers.
We went thousands of years with traditional gender roles and somehow survived. Not that I agree with women having less rights than men, I do agree that the removal of traditional gender roles and the increase in broken families have a lot to do with this troonsanity.