Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

How many people will show up to Aella's birthday gangbang?


  • Total voters
    168
  • Poll closed .
flirtingparty.png
source (a)
What the hell is a flirting party?
 
Has it been noted anywhere how you're supposed to pronounce her made up name? I realized that in my head I'm saying "Aye-yuh" because I took Spanish as my second language, but I suddenly realized that it's most likely supposed to be "El-uh" or "Aye-el-uh" since it's a play on her real name, Rachael.

Either way, fuck is it pretentious. It's the perfect stupid name for a stupid pick-me girl.
 
View attachment 4701063
source (a)
What the hell is a flirting party?
I assume it's an orgy where you never go beyond hitting on each other. Sounds dumb and a waste of time.
Has it been noted anywhere how you're supposed to pronounce her made up name? I realized that in my head I'm saying "Aye-yuh" because I took Spanish as my second language, but I suddenly realized that it's most likely supposed to be "El-uh" or "Aye-el-uh" since it's a play on her real name, Rachael.

Either way, fuck is it pretentious. It's the perfect stupid name for a stupid pick-me girl.
I'm pretty sure it's pronounced "Eye-Luh" since I saw a few videos she did where she pronounced it that way, or one of her friends did.
 
Has it been noted anywhere how you're supposed to pronounce her made up name? I realized that in my head I'm saying "Aye-yuh" because I took Spanish as my second language, but I suddenly realized that it's most likely supposed to be "El-uh" or "Aye-el-uh" since it's a play on her real name, Rachael.

Either way, fuck is it pretentious. It's the perfect stupid name for a stupid pick-me girl.
Just call her Paella. Reminds one of something tasty and wholesome; the opposite of what she is
 
Hat tip to LCF for the info.
I think the real page might be deleted


bit of a crossover account. Initials of abigail glass but actually links to the Aella_Girl onlyfans. can't let the onlyfans know she's an active whoring prostitute now. she'd have to blow more fat old men to afford those plane tickets.
Honestly kind of funny how fake her breasts are. Really obvious looking fakes are a fetish with some guys, but it just feels off to me that someone would shove giant hunks of plastic under their skin, and I'm a guy who likes breasts. So it seems like there's two options there: she's too autistic/pornbrained/both to realize how fake those look, or she thinks that the 90s bimbo look will land her the millionaire rationalist poly tech guy of her dreams. Both are dumb.

Aella is smelly and dumb and plastic and I would not have sex with her.
 
I try not to read or look at her stuff because I like some people in the rat sphere, but she just seems to only way to blather on about sex to maintain incels' attention. She's not a researcher. She's not even well-read about the things she alleges she's interested in. 6/10 girl who is boring, dumb, and fake becomes 0/10 after acting weird as an attempt to be "mysterious." Don't do this, ladies.
 
I try not to read or look at her stuff because I like some people in the rat sphere, but she just seems to only way to blather on about sex to maintain incels' attention. She's not a researcher. She's not even well-read about the things she alleges she's interested in. 6/10 girl who is boring, dumb, and fake becomes 0/10 after acting weird as an attempt to be "mysterious." Don't do this, ladies.
I submit she's a 13/30. She can tart herself up a bit to look alright.

Now granted, I can't smell her, so that could certainly drop her quite a bit if it's as bad as we think.
 
I submit she's a 13/30. She can tart herself up a bit to look alright.

Now granted, I can't smell her, so that could certainly drop her quite a bit if it's as bad as we think.
Anyone know what cosmetic surgeries she's had? I saw a photo of her recently where she had bandages on her nose, but I thought there were a couple more?
 
Anyone know what cosmetic surgeries she's had? I saw a photo of her recently where she had bandages on her nose, but I thought there were a couple more?
Off the top of my head she literally had the same hairline surgery MtFs get as part of their facial feminization bullshit, as well as breast implants. The whole irony is her trying to pornify herself when there's plenty of women that she and her simps would consider plain or even ugly, but they've settled down with the rich tech guy of Paella's dreams, because they're not insane.
 
She's unironically the skinniest polycuck woman I've ever seen. Most of them are built like Kentucky Walmart greeters.
this is possibly her biggest asset. mentally damaged enough to, well, be her, but hasn't cut her tits off and is still trying to trophy wife. the 'too stupid to realize how stupid she is' just hits her in the face at every turn and she's gonna be a really sad wine aunt to her whore sisters.

Has it been noted anywhere how you're supposed to pronounce her made up name? I realized that in my head I'm saying "Aye-yuh" because I took Spanish as my second language, but I suddenly realized that it's most likely supposed to be "El-uh" or "Aye-el-uh" since it's a play on her real name, Rachael.

Either way, fuck is it pretentious. It's the perfect stupid name for a stupid pick-me girl.
something like she named herself when she was 8, in that ultra-controlling environment where she couldn't control anything else, and it stuck because everyone around her is as dumb as she is. came from Rachael -> rachaella -> aella
 
Last edited:
It seems apparent that Aella doesn't know how the "normal" world works, but rather went from one cultish, insular, hyper-analytical circle (a niche Calvinist/Charismatic/Apologetics religious group) straight into another (Rationalists / Effective Altruists.)

Aella has described her religious upbringing in various places. She was homeschooled, and her dad focused on Christian apologetics, the study of debating the validity of Christianity from a rational perspective. My upbringing was almost identical in those regards, except that I can tell from certain details her family was pretty over the line into cultish territory with their behavior. In contrast, my family made sure we could interact with normal people (to be "in the world but not of it").

I do think it's likely that Aella was in a church that was cultish or a borderline cult and that's not just her atheist critique of a standard Christian church. Or her dad could have simply pushed it to a cult level in their family. I haven't yet been able to find what specific church Slick was involved in back then, but we do know that Slick is both a Calvinist and a charismatic, which means it probably was a pretty weird / niche church because most Calvinists (Reformed Baptists, Presbyterians, Primitive Baptists, etc.) are very anti-Charismatic, and most Charismatic denominations (Pentecostal, Assemblies of God) are anti-Calvinist. Aella's detail that in addition to normal church services (3x a week) her family did Bible Study five nights a week is a pretty dead giveaway that this is a fairly unusual church, even by very conservative standards. Almost no churches/house groups I was familiar with growing up required that kind of everyday attendance and study unless they were focused on controlling members in an unhealthy, cultish way. I still hold to the faith I was raised with, but I know many kids in those more cultish circles, and pretty much 100% rebelled, for obvious reasons.

Aella has mentioned in the past that her behavior cost her father a leadership position. This probably means he was an elder at said church since Scripture teaches an elder "must manage his own household well" (1 Tim. 3:4), and "his children are believers and not open to the charge of debauchery or insubordination" (Titus 1:6). Most Protestant churches apply this to pastors as well, but elsewhere Aella refers to how their pastor convinced her mom not to leave her dad back when Aella ran away from home, so it seems her dad was not the pastor. It does make me curious exactly *what* church Aella grew up in since it seems a pretty unusual environment. EDIT: He was an assistant pastor and was ordained in 2006.

Anyway, the Rationalist / Effective Altruism community Aella settled in bears a LOT in common with the religious community she came from.

Some of the similarities:

1. An obsession with rationality and analysis.
Christian apologists are heavy on reading and discussing rational defenses of Christianity, and when you encounter this on online forums, you'll see the kind of thinking is similar to the long rationalist diatribes from fedora atheists. There is a good approach to Christian apologetics, but it often devolves into long, hypothetical discussions about minutiae that any outsider would find pretty alienating. So while the stated purpose of apologetics is to present a rational defense of the religion to nonbelievers, much of the internal conversation is really about stuff that a non-Christian wouldn't even begin to understand because they'd lack the philosophical/theological vocabulary to do so. Furthermore, why make a defense of Christianity if you have no interaction with nonbelievers, as was her upbringing? In the same way, EA is supposed to be about making the world better, but most of it is just sperging online about stuff normal people don't care about.

2. Wielding power through the threat of ex-communication from the community.
Reading Aella's long screeds defending herself to the EA community, I was struck by how similar they are to defenses and infighting in hyper-religious communities. Aella's father is also a Calvinist (as noted by OP), and if you visit a site like The Puritan Board, you'll see Calvinists debating for 20 pages over whether a pastor is really Calvinist. Additionally, you'll see board members defending themselves against such charges. For example, here are people complaining about being banned by mods from Matt Slick's own board, accusing him of not being a real Calvinist because he banned them. They are similar Reddit-style complaints and an obsession with purity tests. It's very similar behavior to the EA and Rationalist communities where people's membership in a community is based on how well they can type long, analytical filibusters justifying themselves. Aella could have never done this in the conservative world, as women are automatically barred from wielding power, but she can do so quite well in the EA / Rationalist community. And any Christian will tell you that often leaders use this sort of clout to wield power in a cultish, toxic way: members of the community are always in fear that they might be excommunicated. And Aella seems to have enjoyed excommunicating members of her community quite a lot!

3. Insularism, a lack of awareness about the real world
Aella really hasn't spent much time in the real world at all--she went on a pendulum from isolated homeschool to a camgirl. She assumes that her experience as the latter has helped her experience the real world, but actually, sex workers are somewhat *outside* of society in exactly the same way hyper-religious conservative homeschoolers are. This manifests itself in many amusing ways, e.g., her insistence that she should be able to find a man who wants to marry and have children with her despite her being an escort and running an OnlyFans. When people on Twitter respond that men aren't going to want to have kids and be in a long-term relationship with a sex worker, she insists that "everyone she knows" doesn't care about her sex work and regards it as totally normal. She doesn't realize that 1) she is in an extremely weird cultish circle of people and that their beliefs, like the cult she was brought up in, don't apply more widely, and 2) people may even still be lying to her about not caring that she's a sex worker, given that she hasn't found a serious partner despite trying for years.

Consider this example from earlier in the thread:

She does NOT like it when one of her polls doesn't match her prior convictions. Almost like she's not a real researcher! (also the poll is currently leading with "less" followed closely by "the right amount" with the other two Aella-favored options far, far behind despite her attempt to change it.

This was fun from last week:

View attachment 4685062

View attachment 4685064
TBH, if I saw this stat I'd think, almost 30% of people having had sex with a stranger within an hour of meeting them was high, but I'm self-aware enough to think, "Yeah, well I'm from a conservative background, so that's probably why."
But Aella's response is the opposite: she doesn't believe them! It must be super common to have sex with someone within an hour of meeting! It couldn't be that her worldview is warped by hanging out with polyamorous sex workers!

In summary, while Aella has swung from one end of the pendulum to the other, the characteristics of the communities she gravitates toward are very similar.

EDIT: Thank you @Freya, I was indeed being a fag--post edited.
 
Last edited:
Didn't see the original post from @lyga before it was edited, but assume the PL is why it can't be quoted. There are a lot of astute observations in the edit though. PL or not, experience w/ the evangelical world (especially an evangelical upbringing) contributes knowledge & experience as to the patterns playing out here w/ Rachael.

It seems apparent that Aella doesn't know how the "normal" world works, but rather went from one cultish, insular, hyper-analytical circle (strict religious upbringing) straight into another (Rationalists / Effective Altruists.)

You see this a lot with bluehairs and genderblobs too. A disproportionate amount of them (at least the millennials and older) ran screeching from a pretty off-balance, performative version of the church into the arms of the performative rainbow libertine left. Freeeeeeedom! (But not really.) The common thread among these seeming polar opposites is virtue signalling. It's no coincidence that kids raised in either of these churches (because no-limits Progressivism is a religion as much as anything else) oscillate between the two. The Mallory thread is a prime example of this; just exchange ftm performative polyam dramatics with OF performative polyam whoredom. They're both disembodied addicts, not realizing that they are looking for someone or something to hand them down some damn limits.

Mind-body integration is a good thing. So are hard rules and laws (and not just around "consent").

There is a super-interesting mirror of the wonkiest side of apologetics (a niche to be sure) with the rationalists. The hardcore apologetics miss the forest for the trees, in the same way the autistic rationalists do: not everything is quantifiable, not everything is an argument. What is important transcends this, and you get this if you raise kids in a loving, connected way: duty, forgiving, being forgiven, selfless love, humility. What is true/good is not about "being right" or serving up proof. It's also not self-serving and revelling in the annihilation of boundaries. I think she's conflated the two.
 
Last edited:
Didn't see the original post from @lyga before it was edited, but assume the PL is why it can't be quoted.
The PL has nothing to do with it, the post is simply too long. You can get around it by putting /reply?quote= in the URL followed by the post ID but the button is removed in the first place to prevent pages from being bloated with replies of very long posts.
 
To add to what @lyga said about her father's church position, I remember her at one point mentioning that someone had somehow managed to show her porn on the projector while her father was speaking. Might be related.

She's also talked for a long time about having an "eroto-manic" stalker who she says interprets everything she says as a direct communication to him, which means her constant mention of her enthusiasm for being raped probably isn't the best idea (though on Facebook during her "date me" survey she said one of the qualities she was insistent on was something like "sexual malevolence" and when asked to clarify she said something like "I'm not comfortable anymore being more explicit than this.")
 
Back