DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell: General Discussion #2

[UaineRunei]

This dude is handholding him so much that he's even telling him when to take a break.

 

[hector85]

On his video and comment section he seemed eager to ask the hard hitting questions, but the level of "journalism" displayed made me lose confidence in this guy.

I know you've explained it to him, but do you think he understands the gravity of WWEChampions? (that makes him a blatant scammer, and not just negligent/"silly") And of course if he's going to ask about it in a not broad way?

For example, if he's asking about specific pieces of evidence (like Jasper revealing the screen)? I'm kind of interested in that one because he has no other choice but to face it with an extremely stupid excuse.
My bet is on that he'll admit to be playing it due to the "insistence of the mentally ill detractors, so I said fuck it, I'm going to play it a little bit. Of course without spending money, I have nothing to do with the account these idiots keep referencing".

Which is why Craig needs to be in his A game, although I understand that it's already out of anyone's hand, and if your explanations were insufficient, any hope for this interview to be remotely interesting is completely lost.

View attachment 4723932

---

Other stuff will be a prestream speech:

- "I'm not racist, these idiots are obsessed with the past when I was making very risqué commentary? (proceeds to mention Howard Stern)"

- "Oh, you mean Derich? He's a regular chatter. And because of it, you know- because he decided to be a positive viewer on my streams, these idiot trolls are harassing him. And the truth of the matter is that whatever Derich does out of my streams is none of my business... it's none of anyone's business! I don't give him preferential treatment, he's just a target of these losers that have nothing else to do."

Because of this (my opinion), a good interview with DarksydePhil needs to be akin to an interrogation, not rude, but with specific evidence on hand and while trying to cut off subjectiveness. E.g: for the topic of Derich (waste of time in my view, by the way), it would help to have captured instances of that preferential treatment that can be contrasted with the one granted to another fan, in order to establish a clear double standard. Because other way it's going to be "Do you?", "No I don't, (tangential rant)".

By the way this is just what I wanted to say, I'm not asking you or anyone to do anything else.

derich gets away with spamming the same question in chat 5+ times when anyone else would have been called out and berated by phil and maybe even banned. he reads and responds derich's questions without him needing to attach them to a tip or superchat if thats not preferential treatment then idk what is.

 

[clothes in my closet]

On his video and comment section he seemed eager to ask the hard hitting questions, but the level of "journalism" displayed made me lose confidence in this guy.

I know you've explained it to him, but do you think he understands the gravity of WWEChampions? (that makes him a blatant scammer, and not just negligent/"silly") And of course if he's going to ask about it in a not broad way?

For example, if he's asking about specific pieces of evidence (like Jasper revealing the screen)? I'm kind of interested in that one because he has no other choice but to face it with an extremely stupid excuse.
My bet is on that he'll admit to be playing it due to the "insistence of the mentally ill detractors, so I said fuck it, I'm going to play it a little bit. Of course without spending money, I have nothing to do with the account these idiots keep referencing".

Which is why Craig needs to be in his A game, although I understand that it's already out of anyone's hand, and if your explanations were insufficient, any hope for this interview to be remotely interesting is completely lost.

View attachment 4723932

---

Other stuff will be a prestream speech:

- "I'm not racist, these idiots are obsessed with the past when I was making very risqué commentary? (proceeds to mention Howard Stern)"

- "Oh, you mean Derich? He's a regular chatter. And because of it, you know- because he decided to be a positive viewer on my streams, these idiot trolls are harassing him. And the truth of the matter is that whatever Derich does out of my streams is none of my business... it's none of anyone's business! I don't give him preferential treatment, he's just a target of these losers that have nothing else to do."

Because of this (my opinion), a good interview with DarksydePhil needs to be akin to an interrogation, not rude, but with specific evidence on hand and while trying to cut off subjectiveness. E.g: for the topic of Derich (waste of time in my view, by the way), it would help to have captured instances of that preferential treatment that can be contrasted with the one granted to another fan, in order to establish a clear double standard. Because other way it's going to be "Do you?", "No I don't, (tangential rant)".

By the way this is just what I wanted to say, I'm not asking you or anyone to do anything else.

To me , this seems like another way of saying "I've seen the video, and the evidence is questionable."

 

[Toby Flenderson]

derich gets away with spamming the same question in chat 5+ times when anyone else would have been called out and berated by phil and maybe even banned. he reads and responds derich's questions without him needing to attach them to a tip or superchat if thats not preferential treatment then idk what is.

pills just waiting for derich to get a credit card

 

[Bigbadyeet]

On his video and comment section he seemed eager to ask the hard hitting questions, but the level of "journalism" displayed made me lose confidence in this guy.

I know you've explained it to him, but do you think he understands the gravity of WWEChampions? (that makes him a blatant scammer, and not just negligent/"silly") And of course if he's going to ask about it in a not broad way?

For example, if he's asking about specific pieces of evidence (like Jasper revealing the screen)? I'm kind of interested in that one because he has no other choice but to face it with an extremely stupid excuse.
My bet is on that he'll admit to be playing it due to the "insistence of the mentally ill detractors, so I said fuck it, I'm going to play it a little bit. Of course without spending money, I have nothing to do with the account these idiots keep referencing".

Which is why Craig needs to be in his A game, although I understand that it's already out of anyone's hand, and if your explanations were insufficient, any hope for this interview to be remotely interesting is completely lost.

View attachment 4723932

---

Other stuff will be a prestream speech:

- "I'm not racist, these idiots are obsessed with the past when I was making very risqué commentary? (proceeds to mention Howard Stern)"

- "Oh, you mean Derich? He's a regular chatter. And because of it, you know- because he decided to be a positive viewer on my streams, these idiot trolls are harassing him. And the truth of the matter is that whatever Derich does out of my streams is none of my business... it's none of anyone's business! I don't give him preferential treatment, he's just a target of these losers that have nothing else to do."

Because of this (my opinion), a good interview with DarksydePhil needs to be akin to an interrogation, not rude, but with specific evidence on hand and while trying to cut off subjectiveness. E.g: for the topic of Derich (waste of time in my view, by the way), it would help to have captured instances of that preferential treatment that can be contrasted with the one granted to another fan, in order to establish a clear double standard. Because other way it's going to be "Do you?", "No I don't, (tangential rant)".

By the way this is just what I wanted to say, I'm not asking you or anyone to do anything else.

Hmm I don't see "Yes I saw the spreadsheet, and the clear evidence from the bank leaks and the financial tracking, that he is spending a significant amount of his over $100k+ income on something that is not bills while begging his audience for money and crying poor. That is something that needs to be addressed in detail" for some reason? It's almost like this is all pre-planned to have Phil be a repeating guest for views and they're gonna softball him?

 

[clothes in my closet]

Hmm I don't see "Yes I saw the spreadsheet, and the clear evidence from the bank leaks and the financial tracking, that he is spending a significant amount of his over $100k+ income on something that is not bills while begging his audience for money and crying poor. That is something that needs to be addressed in detail" for some reason? It's almost like this is all pre-planned to have Phil be a repeating guest for views and they're gonna softball him?

Sorry for the double post, and the autism, but even like yesterday, Phil ranted about how he never spent 200 dollars a week on doordash, when the bank leaks clearly show that he did. This is a very recent example of Phil straight out lying. It would take all of 5 minutes to for Craig to look at this, see Phil was full of shit, and maybe think "What else is he lying about?" But something tells me he just really wouldn't give a fuck.

 

[hector85]

Sorry for the double post, and the autism, but even like yesterday, Phil ranted about how he never spent 200 dollars a week on doordash, when the bank leaks clearly show that he did. This is a very recent example of Phil straight out lying. It would take all of 5 minutes to for Craig to look at this, see Phil was full of shit, and maybe think "What else is he lying about?" But something tells me he just really wouldn't give a fuck.

i don't think craig looked at the bank leaks, they weren't "legitimately" obtained. i bet he'll buy the whole "trolls stole my identity and stole money from me costing me thousands of dollars to fix" story too. all i want is for craig to call him out and press him on his begging. though phil seems to be setting up for it with his recent apology/weak fallable human segments

 

[Soy Dora]

Jesus Christ. Some Sperging:

1) He admitted to playing games based on how well they perform financially. It was a couple of months back, not going to bother finding it because this is already too long.

2) “I have no aspirations for content I put out to explode in popularity” - between his ridiculous hyping up of shorts when they became further monitized and pig-acting in COD glitches this is obviously untrue. All this is is a cope because he has 300 real viewers, roughly. "I don't want to be mister views views views".

3) The trolls didn’t turn you into a negative meme, you rubbing one out on stream and you just being you did that.

4) “100% transparency and honesty” - What you do isn’t unique. The majority of reviewers/let’s players are not pure shills. There are a dozen I could name that do this and do it much better. You are however the only person who transparently begs for money. So I guess what you said is one of those "nugget of truths".

5) The “vested interest” shit is a repeat of the above. ACG is a perfect example of someone who gets free products, reviews games honestly and isn’t a corporate shill. So again, not unique, just coping and laziness to justify his failing business.

6) Callisto protocol was universal hated because it wasnt very good. Mangaloregaming, ACG, ShillUp, all rated it poorly for valid reasons. You wanted to be edgy for clicks and tips. Also learn how to pronounce things. It's not "Cal-eesto" you fucking moarahn (see what I did there).

7) “You can come and enjoy things at face value” - Really? Like with Atomic Heart, Wo Long, and COD most recently? You constantly shitting on the games because it’s clear you don’t like them/they aren't making enough money is not being able to watch at face value. All three have lack of support in common despite your audience wanting them. Your playthroughs are almost unwatchable with how much you bitch, snort, burp, derail and take the time to manually do tips. So again, I guess you get a "nugget of truth" for this one.

The absolute slander that almost everyone is a shill is ironic coming from Mr. “Defamation and Slander”. Odd how you never name names isn't it?

9) "The common person just wants to know if it’s good” - Which is why they watch reviewers, not let’s players. Are you retarded? No wonder your business is failing. You don't even know what your business focus is. No one is going to wait for 2-months for you to finish a game for you to maybe give it a real review.

To answer the question for Phil - What makes his playthroughs meaningful? Having a retard to laugh at.

 

[Martys_not_smarty]

Craig we know Derish is a pedo but it's more about how Dave let's him tard up his chat with Harold Ramis and red envelopes and Sunny Delight with no recourse and people telling him to lay of the four same posts in ten minutes get a tongue lashing. oh yeah and the whole spending every waking minute retweet porn actresses and not being called out for being a sex pest.

 

[Crooked 16th]

What are we at 3 games that Phil has shit on this year for no reason? Signalis a masterpiece he hated and Atomic Heart and Wo Long that are good but he stopped playing.

 

[Coke Zero]

At this point I think Craig has been given enough info to at least do the first interview and ask decent questions. If anything it should be entertaining to see phil answering questions and talking to another actual human being.

Phil will lie his ass off during the interview though and then detractors can send Craig specific clips/evidence that show phil lied directly to his face. Most people don't like being lied to so once Craig realizes phil is exactly who we've been saying he is, any future interviews will be way more interesting.

 

[hector85]

slightly derailing here but has Phil stopped making his diabetus sauce? i remember the last time he made it he made a big deal of having to stop game play every hour or so to run downstairs to stir it i believe LSB was restreaming it.

 

[Coke Zero]

i don't think craig looked at the bank leaks, they weren't "legitimately" obtained. i bet he'll buy the whole "trolls stole my identity and stole money from me costing me thousands of dollars to fix" story too. all i want is for craig to call him out and press him on his begging. though phil seems to be setting up for it with his recent apology/weak fallable human segments

I hope Craig is at least intelligent enough to realize Phil's claims about the bank leaks being both real and also false makes zero sense. Phil's narrative to this day is the bank hacking did happen but then the person released thousands of made up transactions, which raises the obvious question of why bother actually getting into his account at all if you're just going to make up false info anyway?

 

[Sup3r]

And yet he was so afraid to create a podcast with Boogie and WingsOfRedemption when Keemstar brought the idea up. He has more in common with those two slobs than any other content creators I know of, but I guess he is too blind to see that or admit that. Of course, his massive ego makes it so difficult for him to accept that he is a "lahlcow", but this appearance won't do him any favors either.

I think his lofty visions of appearing on SideScrollers multiple times are going to be destroyed by the detractors the moment he gets on the podcast. There's no way he is getting out of this without his ego being shattered by at least a few people.

His decline of the podcast wasn't out of fear, it was purely out of spite. Phil has hated Keem ever since the spat they had when Keem had first announced that he was retiring and Keem was not subtle about how his hopes were to cash in on the detractorsphere. Phil never had any intentions of working for Keemstar, especially since he wants to ditch his shit reputation and he wouldn't want to work to someone else's schedule.

2) “I have no aspirations for content I put out to explode in popularity” - between his ridiculous hyping up of shorts when they became further monitized and pig-acting in COD glitches this is obviously untrue. All this is is a cope because he has 300 real viewers, roughly. "I don't want to be mister views views views".

Don't forget his constant hoping for a viral tweet, just remember how much he hoped for new viewership after the BK burger incident and that one oscars tweet

The absolute slander that almost everyone is a shill is ironic coming from Mr. “Defamation and Slander”. Odd how you never name names isn't it?

That's not even the most retarded part about it. It's that when Phil is given the opportunity for the same advantages, he becomes the biggest suck up ever known.

9) "The common person just wants to know if it’s good” - Which is why they watch reviewers, not let’s players. Are you retarded? No wonder your business is failing. You don't even know what your business focus is. No one is going to wait for 2-months for you to finish a game for you to maybe give it a real review. [/ISPOILER]

And just to add that the majority of reviews usually come out before he gets his hooves on a given game. No one's going to wait when he's still at the starting line while everyone else has already finished and have no idea if he's even going to bother to finish the race himself. And that's not counting the times he's used the very pro's reviews he complains so much about to justify not doing the job he claims to do.

 

[Factual OST Aficionado]

Aaaaaand it's back.

View attachment 4723153

*Cyraxx Scream*

 

[QwahlityKahntent]

He always has a hate on for any "souls like" that isn't made by FromSoft. He hates this company in particular because they made Nioh. The game he was playing when he jerked off on camera. Game was doomed from the start. Especially with how half assed he was with the death counter.

but he hates fromsoft too

 

[Where Am I Playing]

View attachment 4723932

I don't have any faith in StutteringCraig or the rest of his panel members, but some of the questions detractors told him to ask Phil are probably going to end up being retarded. That Being Said podcast asking Craig to question Phil about "favorable treatment of a pedophile" for example. People who are familiar with the Derich lore know about the little girls playlists Derich had. But for Craig, the only evidence that he has been given is a screenshot of the playlists. DSP could just say the pic is fabricated, he doesn't know what viewers' do in their personal time, etc. And what's Craig going to do? He'll just have to go along with it since he won't have any proof of Derich being a pedo since he can't see Derich's playlists anymore.

Regardless, it still will be nice to see piggy interact with another human being on stream after a long hiatus. I watched the Side Scrollers episode where they talked about DSP, and the faggot in the bottom right was hardcore defending DSP. If he is there during the interview, he might be a bigger laughing stock than Phil. The dude in the top right seemed not that bad though, girl in the bottom left was annoying.
Some stuff from the sidescrollers comment section after the podcast (I think the Travis guy was the fag in the bottom right simping for DSP)

And this guy is still around..

 

[JimiHendrix]

I don't have any faith in StutteringCraig or the rest of his panel members, but some of the questions detractors told him to ask Phil are probably going to end up being retarded. That Being Said podcast asking Craig to question Phil about "favorable treatment of a pedophile" for example. People who are familiar with the Derich lore know about the little girls playlists Derich had. But for Craig, the only evidence that he has been given is a screenshot of the playlists. DSP could just say the pic is fabricated, he doesn't know what viewers' do in their personal time, etc. And what's Craig going to do? He'll just have to go along with it since he won't have any proof of Derich being a pedo since he can't see Derich's playlists anymore.

Regardless, it still will be nice to see piggy interact with another human being on stream after a long hiatus. I watched the Side Scrollers episode where they talked about DSP, and the faggot in the bottom right was hardcore defending DSP. If he is there during the interview, he might be a bigger laughing stock than Phil. The dude in the top right seemed not that bad though, girl in the bottom left was annoying.
Some stuff from the sidescrollers comment section after the podcast (I think the Travis guy was the fag in the bottom right simping for DSP)

View attachment 4725564View attachment 4725572
View attachment 4725580
And this guy is still around..
View attachment 4725584

"morally you shouldn't dig into someones public records"

how's he feel about the sex offenders registry? i can probably guess on account of the fact he talks like he's on it.

 

[Dona Morte]

Playlists no.
Soos subscription yes.

https://archive.md/YFsh6

Now who is Baby love?
Is that a relative?

How about asking where is the 5k expenses going?
Nope still not interested.

 

[Big Brown Schlub]

He always has a hate on for any "souls like" that isn't made by FromSoft. He hates this company in particular because they made Nioh. The game he was playing when he jerked off on camera. Game was doomed from the start. Especially with how half assed he was with the death counter.

He always praises Nee-yoh when he plays a FrahmSafhtwehr game and vice versa. He keeps talking about wanting to do another run of Elden Ring and I bet that when he does he's gonna keep saying how Nioh and maybe even Wo Long did [thing that made him die in Elden Ring because he's incompetent] soooo much better.

The only reason why he refuses to play knahk-ahff soulslikes is because they aren't completely mapped out and don't have EZ weapons and strats and boss guide videos before the game even fucking releases.