I think it's worthwhile to recap how the
lesser Rat King tried to bully notch because Nora will distort what actually occurred.
With
apropos of nothing this idiot decided to advise notch that "some women actually have penises" (read tweets from bottom-up):
View attachment 105465
Source:
https://twitter.com/magicnanners/status/744031984884776964
Archive:
http://archive.is/FerIg
You can see from the above that this bearded
faux transsexual initiated by calling notch a transphobe and small-minded. This wasn't an attempt to engage notch in dialogue, it was just name-calling. Further, nowhere can I find any tweet by notch which represented the negation of the statement "some women actually have penises". The bearded troon was just seeking to antagonise notch.
Notch replied to these hostile tweets as follows:
View attachment 105467
Source: https://twitter.com/notch/status/744035356950036480
Archive: http://archive.is/bREoi
In other words, "shoo!", "go away!", "I'm not interested", which is a perfectly reasonable response to an unsolicited Tumblr-esque opinion about genitals and gender.
Then our beloved Nora decides to get involved:
View attachment 105468
Source: https://twitter.com/notch/status/744035356950036480
Archive: http://archive.is/bREoi
So notch--without having done anything to warrant it--has been called: transphobic, small-minded and an asshole.
What follows is
crybully behavior from the
lesser Rat King.
Bonus:
View attachment 105470
Source: https://twitter.com/NoraReed/status/744048342506811392
Archive: http://archive.is/7dmEy
This confirms for me that Nora doesn't have any substantive knowledge on
any matter, even a matter as central to Nora's identity as gender. Nora cites Steven Pinker as a source in defense of
social constructionism when Pinker wrote an entire book dedicated to critiquing social constructionism:
The Blank Slate. Pinker's book has an entire chapter dedicated to debunking social constructionism in relation to gender:
http://www.pasadena.edu/files/syllabi/txcave_18360.pdf