>One thing I don’t get about Kiwifarms is you can show them evidence of pedophile rings and pedophiles and they just shrug it off and don’t give af.
Is that what you think, Chris? Interesting.
It would be idiotic of me to reply to a claim as retarded as this, but I'll humor you.
First of all, have you even looked at any other thread in this site except for yours, Henri's, or the VTuber thread?
The only other thread I've personally caught your current sock checking out is the Million Pity thread, weirdly enough.
But anyways, if you think we haven't seen your autistic ramblings before, you are gravely mistaken. Trust me, Chrissy, it's not that we are "shrugging off evidence of pedophiles," it's that we're actively trying not to turn this thread into your personal billboard of fake altruism.
Not counting the tweet
@h2_jGX just archived, Chris has made at least 6 other tweets regarding pedophiles, his supposed work against them, and the Farms' alleged inaction against them:
archived 5 Mar 2023 16:17:11 UTC
archive.ph
archived 5 Mar 2023 16:17:18 UTC
archive.ph
archived 5 Mar 2023 16:17:53 UTC
archive.ph
archived 5 Mar 2023 20:51:44 UTC
archive.ph
archived 5 Mar 2023 21:18:50 UTC
archive.ph
archived 9 Mar 2023 14:27:54 UTC
archive.ph
All of these tweets were deleted mere
minutes after they were posted. It is extremely clear that Chrissy only made those tweets so we would see them and repost them here. He just wrote them to virtue signal as some sort of "pedo hunter."
He even hopped on his sock account and checked his thread after tweeting each and every one of them, to see if we would repost them. Trust me, I was monitoring heh.
But that's not all.
If Chrissy just LARPed as an Internet good guy vigilante but in fact just sat on his ass all day doing nothing, then that would just be hypocritical and only slightly funny.
No, in fact, Chrissy is not just lazy and pretentious, but
dangerously inactive towards pedophilic behavior.
We
already mentioned how he did not care about the underage user in his old 18+ server (until we brought it up).
This time, in his
new server, something even worse took place.
The following incident took place approximately 14 hours ago in his new server.
A user by the name LillyLoves joined his server and announced to everyone that she is a whore and that she wants to expose herself. Her avatar was a selfie of her exposing her breasts. Users responded negatively to her, most saying she's probably a dude, a troll and a catfish.
She then posted a full-frontal nude selfie of a teenage girl, saying that's her.
One user asked her age. She replied with "I don’t want to say."
Another user said "yeahhhhhhhh. she's in her 20s. wink wink." And to that she said "I am not."
She clearly implied she was underage.
Chrissy showed up eventually and said "Should I ban boys" and "If it’s a kid she’s gone
"
I do not know if she was banned or if she left on her own, but when I checked the server a few hours after the incident, she was not in there. Judging by the whole conversation, she wasn't banned by Chris.
And
even if he banned her, her picture was
never deleted. It was still there about half an hour ago.
Now, I don't know if that user was really a girl, who that picture belonged to, or how old the pictured girl really is (even though it does look pretty damn young). However, that is not the point. The point is
Chrissy very well knew that this girl could be underage and still decided to keep her nude picture on his server.
Bellow is a screenshot of the chat logs of Chris' server the moment the incident took place.
The girl's pictures have been censored.
This is where the line between retardation and criminal negligence (at best) gets blurry, Chris. What the fuck is wrong with you?
www.instagram.com
