Zoosadist Million Pity / Baby Monkey Hate / 0chan.life / Million Tears / EvilUnveiled / VidLii - YouTube Monkey Torture horrorshow, a horrible rabbit-hole of international zoosadism. Now featuring fresh milk from monkeyfuckers themselves!

[EpicGamerMoment]

In fact, we were ready to wait for Limp Bizkit to play a festival in summer to see if anything surfaced on social media;

Petition to get Fred Durst to beat the shit out of Erica on stage

 

[Petrusha the White]

its also just that these people seem to lack a system of morals. This is most likely what they would do to vulnerable people if it weren't for laws barring them from doing so. Do you think that if there was some course of logic apart from morality that these amoral people could be convinced of, like punishment from god or something, they would be inclined to stop?

Well, there was that one guy who wasn archbishop. But also didn't he get discommended or whatever the term was for being fired from being an archbishop? Really, I get the feeling that despite how many nominally religious people we've found (since so many of them are old enough that being vaguely religious is their social default instead of vaguely atheist/agnostic, like with younger generations), probably none of them are true believers. Mainly because I don't think there are any major religions where abusing animals isn't considered some kind of sin.

 

[DrNow]

I've gotten similar responses from snake-haters and the like as well, claiming they totally love animals because they have a dog/cat/horse/etc, just that snakes are totally evil monsters that deserve to be mass slaughtered and tortured or w/e. It's absolutely compartmentalization and zoosadists trying to paint themselves as not being sick fucks.

Maybe they even legitimately believe they're good people who love animals because they only direct their sick urges at a specific type of animal. Regardless, anyone that gets off on deliberate cruelty towards any real animal is fucked and should seek psychological help (and failing that, apply some lead asprin to the braincase).

I haven’t really looked into other zoosadist communities, other than seeing some extracts from the zoosadism chat logs. From what I have seen, monkey zoosadist go above and beyond in terms of sheer evil, cruelty and blurring the line between animal and child abuse. They make no effort to make justify their evil, preferring instead to project blame outwards and level accusations of imaginary wrongdoings against their critics.

You’re more likely to hear things like ‘I know it’s wrong but at least I only do it to puppies that haven’t formed bonds’ from dog zoosadists. Monkey zoosadists won’t acknowledge any degree of evil on their part.

There is also the fact very few people have any idea that there are groups dedicated to torturing infant primates. They feel they’re above the law and beyond judgement and can behave in an entirely mask off manner. I’ve no doubt their attitude will change when consequences become more immediately apparent.

its also just that these people seem to lack a system of morals. This is most likely what they would do to vulnerable people if it weren't for laws barring them from doing so. Do you think that if there was some course of logic apart from morality that these amoral people could be convinced of, like punishment from god or something, they would be inclined to stop?

If they had no aversion to risk they’d be watching babies being tortured.

 

[Android raptor]

Well, there was that one guy who wasn archbishop. But also didn't he get discommended or whatever the term was for being fired from being an archbishop? Really, I get the feeling that despite how many nominally religious people we've found (since so many of them are old enough that being vaguely religious is their social default instead of vaguely atheist/agnostic, like with younger generations), probably none of them are true believers. Mainly because I don't think there are any major religions where abusing animals isn't considered some kind of sin.

Eh, some probably think they're true believers. Lots of snake zoosadists straight up cite the Bible as justification for cruelty to snakes (regardless of the fact that's not actually what the Bible implies or encourages). It's like how JimBob Duggar probably thinks he'll be raptured to heaven any day now despite defending his violent sexual predator son and throwing his daughters who were victims under a bus.

Speaking of Josh Duggar, I think he's a good example of what monkeyfuckers would be like if they had less risk aversion.

 

[JellyMaggot]

Well, there was that one guy who wasn archbishop. But also didn't he get discommended or whatever the term was for being fired from being an archbishop? Really, I get the feeling that despite how many nominally religious people we've found (since so many of them are old enough that being vaguely religious is their social default instead of vaguely atheist/agnostic, like with younger generations), probably none of them are true believers. Mainly because I don't think there are any major religions where abusing animals isn't considered some kind of sin.

religion isn't just a belief system for most people, its a comfort. The central belief is that they get to prosper in life if they play by the rules, but the rules are whatever they choose to believe.

 

[Android raptor]

religion isn't just a belief system for most people, its a comfort. The central belief is that they get to prosper in life if they play by the rules, but the rules are whatever they choose to believe.

That said, I think it's worth emphasizing that no one becomes a zoosadist or pedo because of religion, it's moreso that sick fucks try to hide behind religion to get away with shit. Exact same phenomenon as other sick fucks hiding behind woke politics (like trumping up minority status to distract from abuse allegations ala Keffals).

Granted conservative, isolated religious communities tend to concentrate and even directly encourage abuse like IBLP and the FLDS, but situations like that are more straight-up cults where a sick fuck manages to take control of a group of people.

To tie this back to monkeyfuckers, it's good most monkeyfuckers are losers too stupid and risk averse to try to gain control over a group of people. Sadistic psychopaths can cause untold human suffering when they're intelligent and charismatic enough to manipulate large groups of people.

 

[the gouts]

finally got my way through the thread. was a hard read.

i took around through vidlii after noticing it had not been mentioned much in the thread lately and it seems, for the most part, the monkeyfucking scene there is not what it once once was. there are clips floating around but nothing particularly egregious (and that’s saying something…), nothing really uploaded within the last month and most monkeyfucker accounts have proven inactive.

they still a disproportionate amount of views though, with channels like KarenMafiaTV being the 22nd most viewed channel on the site as of this week despite no uploads in 2 months. vidlii and fucking facebook of all places would be my guess to be the easiest clearnet gateway into the more depraved shit.

on facebook from links in vidlii comment sections i’ve seen some seriously fucked shit and so many people brazenly supporting it on public accounts. i will definitely be making my way through these groups and start assembling doxes because it seems so fucking easily with how terrible boomer opsec is.

 

[vomitusdeux]

finally got my way through the thread. was a hard read.

i took around through vidlii after noticing it had not been mentioned much in the thread lately and it seems, for the most part, the monkeyfucking scene there is not what it once once was. there are clips floating around but nothing particularly egregious (and that’s saying something…) and nothing really uploaded within the last month and most monkeyfucker accounts have proven inactive.

they still a disproportionate amount of views though, with channels like KarenMafiaTV being the 22nd most viewed channel on the site as of this week despite no uploads in 2 months. vidlii and fucking facebook of all places would be my guess to be the easiest clearnet gateway into the more depraved shit.

on facebook from links in vidlii comment sections i’ve seen some seriously fucked shit and so many people brazenly supporting it on public accounts. i will definitely be making my way through these groups and start assembling doxes because it seems so fucking easily with how terrible boomer opsec is.

I was looking at reels on facebook and a LOT of monkey content is coming up at random. Nothing outright abuse but sketch as fuck. Locked down accounts except reels of macaques usually of a mother and baby. Lots of breastfeeding. Would it be a stretch to be concerned? Before this week I never had monkey content show up that way or at all.

 

[the gouts]

I was looking at reels on facebook and a LOT of monkey content is coming up at random. Nothing outright abuse but sketch as fuck. Locked down accounts except reels of macaques usually of a mother and baby. Lots of breastfeeding. Would it be a stretch to be concerned? Before this week I never had monkey content show up that way or at all.

most of the footage of mothers and baby monkeys are usually filmed at religious temples under controlled circumstances to encourage stress on part of abuse which leads to abuse. generally ANY content of macaques where you can see people in frame are being filmed under those circumstances.

the breastfeeding and more palatable scenes are uploaded for wholesome 100 internet points and clicks.

i saw straight up fucking abuse. an young adolescent monkey with a wire wrapped around its neck, having a blanket continuously given and ripped away from its grasp as the VOs presumably mock it. with plenty of deplorable comments encouraging the behavior galore.

 

[Alabaster Disaster]

Dumb fucker is still lurking.
View attachment 4723381

Update: still checking up on us


@nickd9393 something bothering you, friend?

 

[vomitusdeux]

most of the footage of mothers and baby monkeys are usually filmed at religious temples under controlled circumstances to encourage stress on part of abuse which leads to abuse. generally ANY content of macaques where you can see people in frame are being filmed under those circumstances.

the breastfeeding and more palatable scenes are uploaded for wholesome 100 internet points and clicks.

i saw straight up fucking abuse. an young adolescent monkey with a wire wrapped around its neck, having a blanket continuously given and ripped away from its grasp as the VOs presumably mock it. with plenty of deplorable comments encouraging the behavior galore.

Nothing malicious happened in what I saw or I would have put it on full blast here. But I noticed the babies looked very nervous, I wasn't sure if it was just the fact a human was so close, but the mother monkey didn't seem thrilled either, and there were TONS of these videos like the entire profile was full of them but everything but public monkey videos that are "cute" was on lockdown so I'm assuming this person has regular access to them. I'll keep an eye out on these fucks and try to do my best at a dox if I can too if I see anything abusive like what you described. Maybe we'll get the monkey fuckers off facebook too with any hope.

 

[Android raptor]

Don't forget, if you see anything featuring monkeys in diapers or other human clothes, that's a massive red flag. Bare minimum usually signifies an animal that's been trafficked being kept as a pet, worst case the VO is involved in much darker shit.

 

[JellyMaggot]

Hey @nickd9393 would you like to engage in a formal discussion on the ethics of causing harm to animals? Don't be shy.

 

[Petrusha the White]

Would really love to see the data on how many people in these more public "cute" facebook monkey groups are monkeyfuckers and how many are just clueless people watching videos that they don't realize are fucked up. Most normies aren't aware of the trafficking and psychological damage done to wild animals in unnatural environments, like @Android raptor said.

 

[vomitusdeux]

Don't forget, if you see anything featuring monkeys in diapers or other human clothes, that's a massive red flag. Bare minimum usually signifies an animal that's been trafficked being kept as a pet, worst case the VO is involved in much darker shit.

No diapers, monkeys seemed like they weren't confined by humans and had some other monkeys around in a more wild area, I didn't see anything man made at all in the videos, just an uncomfortable amount of breast feeding and a lot of focus on the baby monkeys in general compared to the adults which made me have a red flag. If I see a diapered monkey like that I know now to tell someone though thank you.

 

[Android raptor]

Would really love to see the data on how many people in these more public "cute" facebook monkey groups are monkeyfuckers and how many are just clueless people watching videos that they don't realize are fucked up. Most normies aren't aware of the trafficking and psychological damage done to wild animals in unnatural environments, like @Android raptor said.

Yeah and there are some exceptions to animals in unnatural environments being a red flag, like photos/videos of animals at zoos or shelters in indoor or behind the scenes holding areas (most zoos in temperate areas have indoor habitats for primates in the colder months, as well as behind the scenes holding areas). Paying attention to the source of the media is important especially for stuff like this, an official social media account for a zoo or sanctuary is a lot more trustworthy than some random guy.

It's definitely an uphill battle for conservationists and wildlife educators to make normies aware of all these issues.

 

[Petrusha the White]

Yeah and there are some exceptions to animals in unnatural environments being a red flag, like photos/videos of animals at zoos or shelters in indoor or behind the scenes holding areas (most zoos in temperate areas have indoor habitats for primates in the colder months, as well as behind the scenes holding areas). Paying attention to the source of the media is important especially for stuff like this, an official social media account for a zoo or sanctuary is a lot more trustworthy than some random guy.

It's definitely an uphill battle for conservationists and wildlife educators to make normies aware of all these issues.

It's especially hard because in a lot of developing countries, smaller/more local boots-on-the-ground conservation orgs tend to dip their toes into questionable practices themselves, because they usually get a lot of funding from tourist money, and tourists love to do shit like ride elephants or pet baby tigers. It can be hard enough to sus out who's legit in the first place without the added issue of having to balance unethical (though not outright abusive) animal keeping versus the genuine good that they do - especially since in some places these smaller tourist-funded orgs are the quite frankly doing more immediate/material good than the big international orgs with all their shit in order... since the big ones with the huge grants take time to get anything done. Ironically, the places most likely to take in and rehab monkeys rescued from these VOs might be the same places who generate "cute" social media content of their monkeys interacting with retard tourists. There's kind of a sliding scale. Places that do dolphin shows are a good example because there's some pretty credible evidence that training the dolphins do shows kinda fucks with them, but a lot of the places that do them are AZA-accredited and do a lot of genuine good for conservation stuff.

Anyway, speaking of rehab, do you think the "exposing animal abuse" pages that actually post million pity type content under the veneer of showing someone "helping" the monkey "recover" have a higher ration of sadists to clueless normies? It seems like it'd be higher, but honestly, my gut tells me it's about the same ratio. There are a lot of clueless people who watch/share animal abuse videos because they're convinced that they're just showing the journey of an animal who is now in a safe place. I'm pretty sure that Dodo channel has posted monkey hate before on accident.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

Hey @nickd9393 would you like to engage in a formal discussion on the ethics of causing harm to animals? Don't be shy.

Is this faggot thread banned? Or maybe he just likes all this attention we lap onto him, no matter how abhorrent his actions.

 

[Needlemouse]

Sorry for not really contributing much, but I felt like some good macaque content that wasn't dubious would be a nice momentary reprieve from this nightmare. Wildlife photo taken in Baluran National Park by Dwi Agung Sulistyo.

Hehehe he's saying 'fuck you'

 

[EpicGamerMoment]

Don't forget, if you see anything featuring monkeys in diapers or other human clothes, that's a massive red flag. Bare minimum usually signifies an animal that's been trafficked being kept as a pet, worst case the VO is involved in much darker shit.

Really? I saw a video of a baby monkey in diapers. I thought it was cute and innocuous.

This is the video

Never thought something like this would have darker implications.