"I've seen too much" Begins with the thesis that the fear of pedophilia within the LGBT community is a Qanon conspiracy (then proceeds to make an entire forty minute video about the conspiracy that the United States is run by conservative Christians who want to kill trans people)
Also, what do you mean you've seen too much? (We'll get to the part of the video where he admits that the first time he learned about "trans groomer" culture was a torrent of tweets in late 2022 because he "took an internet break" for The Hunger)
Talks about the irrational fear that drag brunches and drag story hours are grooming children. Then proceeds to show a
twitter clip of a drag queen flashing his crotch with a small child behind him. (Oh, well, at least she didn't see the front! Conservatives pwned.)
After showing multiple clips of children being present at drag shows where there was nudity or sexualized behavior, Parrott continues to dismiss the concern by stating the definition of grooming according to NSPCC definition of grooming
"Children and young people can be groomed online, in person or both – by a stranger or someone they know. This could be a family member, a friend or someone who has targeted them – like a teacher, faith group leader or sports coach. When a child is groomed
online, groomers may hide who they are by sending photos or videos of other people. Sometimes this'll be of someone younger than them to gain the trust of a "peer". They might target one child online or contact lots of children very quickly and wait for them to respond."
And because drag brunch and drag story hour are not following this to the letter, they are definitionally not grooming.
As if complaints about grooming in trans activism are limited to drag events.
First of all, Parrott literally glosses over a girl watching a grown man flashing, a boy offering money to a stripper, and children watching another grown man twerking, all because they "aren't grooming." He wouldn't know what a child sexual assault was if it happened two feet away from him.
And that's a huge issue I personally have with Parrott's video.
He doesn't know what is age-appropriate for a child. He did not have a normal childhood growing up, he has not interacted with children for most of his adult life, and he has a warped sense of what is child-appropriate sexually.
Interesting that Parrott skips this part of the NSCPP definition of grooming. "Groomers might also try and isolate children from their friends and family, making them feel dependent on them and giving the groomer power and control over them. They might use blackmail to make a child feel guilt and shame or introduce the idea of 'secrets' to control, frighten and intimidate.
It's important to remember that children and young people may not understand they've been groomed. They may have complicated feelings, like loyalty, admiration, love, as well as fear, distress and confusion."
Hey, Nick! Since you enjoy taking things so literally, here are literal examples of the literal definition of grooming children!
Jeffrey Marsh telling kids to seek unconditional love from social media (AKA the queer community AKA him)
Dylan Mulvaney to seek community on his page if your parents aren't willing to see you as the queer/trans stunning and brave child you are meant to be
And here are a string of comments from self-proclaimed teen trans boys who seek Dylan as their "trans older sister"
Well, doesn't matter because Parrott knows allll about grooming.
"I was groomed by older men on the internet." At fourteen, he found out the girls he was talking to online were older men. "catfished basically into thinking that I was chatting with girls my age 14. it was only kind of later I kind of realized that I had been talking to adult men on dating sites as a 14 year old and had been manipulated coerced and tricked into sort of providing sexual performance for uh adult men"
I find it interesting that this is the first time he is bringing this up, despite being very open about his sex life and psychiatric history on YouTube. This still fits with the timeline of his teenage development ("Irresistible to the ladies 17 and onward" tweet circa 2017) (first started masturbating at 15,
Autogynephilia), and we can see how this influenced his more voyeuristic behavior in his twenties (livestreaming masturbating on BlogTV and shoving stuff up inside him, still need video confirmation). At the same time, the fact that he only brings up grooming online
now is questionable and sounds a bit like milking his own trauma for ethos. Please discuss, moving on
Conservatives believe that "
drag is inherently sexual and crossdressing is inherently sexual"
a) Drag is inherently sexual; it's the sexualized performance of gender
b) You literally were in several relationships with a feminization dynamic where the crossdressing WAS sexual (
"oh but it wasn't penetrative, we would just make out blah blah blah")
"
The longterm goal of conservatives is that we will be exiled from public life" says Parrott whose only social interaction is his girlfriend and whose only access to the outside world is Twitter. Says Parrott who lives in a multiple story Victorian mansion away from the peons of Baltimore.
Here he shows a Tweet from a creepy teacher talking about how a highlight for teaching was talking about comprehensive, queer-inclusive sex ed. Twists it into "conservatives think sex ed for children is grooming." This entire time, he paints the protective fear parents have over their kids being groomed at school into "parents don't want to lose control of their children."
a) the problem is not that kids are being taught "comprehensive sex ed"; the problem is that "queer teachers" find "delight" in teaching children about sex. But of course that's just a normal reaction to teaching kids the objective fundamentals of reproduction and reproductive safety, nothing more, nothing less, isn't that right, Nick?
b) have you even
looked at
comprehensive sex ed?
I'm curious about this line in the summary "Additionally, HHS must award grants for the provision of sexual health services to marginalized youth to youth-serving organizations and health care entities that are eligible to receive covered outpatient drugs at reduced prices through the 340B drug discount program." I assume this is talking about birth control for minors being covered.
The summary is pretty broad, but I have heard cases of students being taught kink and different types of sexual acts, but if anyone can confirm or deny this, please do so.
This is weird. Parrott shows clips of parents at a school board discussing how their children are being transitioned behind their backs and that primary schoolers are being affirmed in their identities as "animals," and his commentary is that this is identical to the "moral panic of homophobia in the 1970s."
a) your commentary does not match your examples
b) the trans acceptance movement isn't even comparable to the gay rights movement
Glosses over "children being transitioned at school" as a conspiracy theory
And I could easily find more, this is just the first one that came up
Another claim Parrott has against people calling TRAs groomers is that "
they see trans as inherently sexual" so mentioning trans kids is sexualizing kids.
Nick, are you forgetting what pushed you to transition in the first place?
"
At the same time I realized that I would need to transition to have any hope of a genuinely genuinely fulfilling sex life."
Talks about how gay teachers were fired for being gay.
Well,
this trans teacher was fired for encouraging sixth graders to subscribe to his "salacious" tiktok videos.
But I really shouldn't have to keep showing proof, because Nicky told me not to engage with people who aren't interested in facts and logic.
Again, Nick, gay rights are completely different from trans rights!
Here he talks about how the OK Groomer derivation of OK Boomer was first used by
Graham Linehan in 2019, so it's all his fault. And of course,
who was behind this but 4chan!
Breezes through the history of grooming in the trans community, where he criticizes Abigail Schreier's book "Irreversible Damage" as falsely seeing "transmasculine youth" as "confused little girls."
Stfu, Nick, you've never been a little girl, a teen girl, or a "transmasculine youth."
Criticizes people for calling the "Don't Say Gay" bill the "Anti Grooming" bill, now who's insinuating that all gay people are groomers? The bill literally just said don't teach young primary schoolers about gender identity and sexual orientation. Did you even read the bill, Nick? Because I did.
His brain must really be broken.
Calls out Janice Turner for accusing Mermaids as a grooming charity because it "provides information to children without the parents' consent." It is literally the parents'
jobs to protect the child's health so that they aren't going on random websites buying drugs and hormones.
Also, the previous head of
Mermaids Susie Green literally took her 16 year old son to be castrated in Thailand, so think about how that reflects on the public opinion of Mermaids in general. I noticed you didn't address that. Did you miss it? Or are you also sweeping that little inconsistency in the "trans kids don't medically transition" narrative under the rug?
"
One person's indoctrination is another person's education" Again, this whole time, he's talking about things in a philosophical sense, while there is a ton of proof of trans teachers turning out to be pedophiles and children medically transitioning and being encouraged to transition in public schools.
Here we get to the honest truth.
"
I was only vaguely aware of the situation in the summer of 2022" He took an internet break to "
publish The Hunger May 30, 2022" (thank goodness for you it was actually May 28, 2022, just two days off, but I get it, mixups happen, it was eight months ago, of course).
(Unironically, I don't think he's purposefully misremembering), but in the months leading up to The Hunger, he began tweeting about how conservatives want to kill trans people, until he began trolling conservatives, i.e. the infamous "I won't stop until I have transed every child" tweet.
Parrott is in awe that people took this
"transing every child" tweet seriously, but as Nykysnottrans here has mentioned before, many, many trans and detrans zoomers have talked about how ContraPoints was instrumental to them discovering their transgender identity, being the largest political trans YouTuber. Even if Parrott's attitude toward his audience transitioning in Nihilistically indifferent, he is still creating the demand to transition that seedier YouTubers like Keffals provide with the supply to privately transition. So in his defense, Parrott is not an
active groomer, but he is still complicit in the online culture of the wave of mass child transitioners.
He spends a weird amount of time focusing on an Idaho community's take on how the wokes are being controlled by Satan to take over the West (strawmanning much?)
Out of context clip talking about Ben Shapiro wanting to protect his children. "He literally wants to shoot trans people!!"
"
Boston Children's Hospital falsely accused of performing hysterectomies on minors" regardless of whether this is true or not, there is proof that minors have gotten vaginoplasties, double mastectomies, and cross-sex hormones in other places.
Talks about how now "cis gays" are turning on the trans people with their "Gays Against Groomers" organization. Gay rights are not trans rights.
Laments how trans people avoid children so they aren't seen as pedophiles (adds the ever-loved ContraPoints meme
"kill your shitty children.")
After completely misrepresenting the arguments of grooming within the trans community, Parrott ends the tangent by telling his audience
"I'm done with all this, don't engage"
Talks about how children do have sexual feelings (you might want to specify the difference between little kids and teenagers), mentions slight
sexual innuendos in Disney movies (Also, why specifically Jasmine and Jafar, a young girl with a much older man? Never mind, reading too much into this) and why aren't conservatives complaining about that? (They are)
No more engaging with criticism, only trolling
