Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 97 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 157 40.3%

  • Total voters
    390
@Not Who You Think Nick might also want to consider some of Paul's words. 1 Corinthians 9:27 "But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."

I'm going to assume he in some way believes in Eternal Security, the old "once saved always saved" mantra. Romans 6:1-2
"What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?"
I'd challenge him to reconcile himself with that belief. If you believe it Paul still commands you not to continue in sin. If he doesn't believe it, wtf are you doing nigga?
 
@Not Who You Think Nick might also want to consider some of Paul's words. 1 Corinthians 9:27 "But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway."

I'm going to assume he in some way believes in Eternal Security, the old "once saved always saved" mantra. Romans 6:1-2
"What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?"
I'd challenge him to reconcile himself with that belief. If you believe it Paul still commands you not to continue in sin. If he doesn't believe it, wtf are you doing nigga?
Christian theology is way more complicated and nuanced then most people give it credit for. The biggest failure of Protestantism is the doctrine of personal revelation and a personal relationship with God. Its led to an abundance of heresies, and has left the church uniquely unsuited to challenging the enlightenment assault on its doctrines that also glorify individual truth. Rackets to a certain extent understood this, in his debate with that mongoloid gunt guarding Keffals when he told him "nah, I just don't agree". At the time this came across as him standing on the foundational Christian axioms held in COMMUNION.

Sadly it seems it was just Rackets standing on his own revealed truth instead. A revealed truth certainly influenced by a christian upbringing, but ultimately not related too it.
 
I think you are putting a bit too much weight in his basic understanding of Christianity. I honestly believe the man never read the Bible or even attended Sunday school. I don't know how mass is held in protestant churches, especially the non denominational mumbo jumbo he went with. But if they did bother reading the Bible there he certainly didn't pay attention. His entire theological understanding is clearly acquired through nothing more than cultural osmosis. And his interpretation is what I expect from an agnostic trying to ingratiate himself to Christians. It puts me back in high school with such wisdom as "Like I'm not into this Church stuff man but I think like Jesus was cool."
He grew up a nominal Catholic. He was obviously poorly catechised or fell away A LOT from the basic doctrines and now just clings to tte title for good boi points and headpats... It did feed his 'conservative-ish father-next-door' grift
 
He grew up a nominal Catholic. He was obviously poorly catechised or fell away A LOT from the basic doctrines and now just clings to tte title for good boi points and headpats... It did feed his 'conservative-ish father-next-door' grift
Growing up Catholic doesn't mean anything. We don't know if the parents took him to church or forced him to be a choir boy. A lot of religious parents can end up laissez faire since you can't force someone to be saved.
 
Growing up Catholic doesn't mean anything. We don't know if the parents took him to church or forced him to be a choir boy. A lot of religious parents can end up laissez faire since you can't force someone to be saved.
I think the best thing my parents did in my teenage years was when I said I didn't want to go to church they just shrugged their shoulders. You can't force someone to be saved, and sadly this thread is probably a temple to it. I think what depresses me the most is that 30 years from now, if Rekieta is still alive, he's going to come back here to see that exact moment it all started to go wrong and how he willfully ignored all the well meaning advice given in favor of spite and pride.
 
Growing up Catholic doesn't mean anything. We don't know if the parents took him to church or forced him to be a choir boy. A lot of religious parents can end up laissez faire since you can't force someone to be saved.
You assumed he grew up a wishy-washy Protestant. Just correcting the record.

As for the involvement, his grandparents had enough clout to meet the Pope and donate 6 figures to hospitals and charities. Very devout, but it is absolutely true that by the second or third generation, the devotion dies off by a lot unless carefully tended. Even then, no guarantees.

I would be very curious what his parents' approach was. I get the sense with the weirdness surrounding the older sister, her divorce, and questions about who her parents are probably jaded Nick against religion.

TL;DR: Nose went the preacher's daughter route
 
You assumed he grew up a wishy-washy Protestant. Just correcting the record.

As for the involvement, his grandparents had enough clout to meet the Pope and donate 6 figures to hospitals and charities. Very devout, but it is absolutely true that by the second or third generation, the devotion dies off by a lot unless carefully tended. Even then, no guarantees.

I would be very curious what his parents' approach was. I get the sense with the weirdness surrounding the older sister, her divorce, and questions about who her parents are probably jaded Nick against religion.

TL;DR: Nose went the preacher's daughter route
Way more than 6 figures. Well into 8 figures, actually.
 
I think you are putting a bit too much weight in his basic understanding of Christianity. I honestly believe the man never read the Bible or even attended Sunday school. I don't know how mass is held in protestant churches, especially the non denominational mumbo jumbo he went with. But if they did bother reading the Bible there he certainly didn't pay attention. His entire theological understanding is clearly acquired through nothing more than cultural osmosis. And his interpretation is what I expect from an agnostic trying to ingratiate himself to Christians. It puts me back in high school with such wisdom as "Like I'm not into this Church stuff man but I think like Jesus was cool."
Seems to me that Nick is the one putting too much weight in his basic understanding of Christianity. Likely because he taught Sunday school to teenagers, allegedly using the Bible or at least the book of Titus. Nick was confident enough to criticize the church for not following Christ's ministry and message while making his thoughts on Biblical transgenderism public.

Decided to revist Rekieta's FB, which I'm sure is already documented in this thread somewhere amongst the 1400+ pages...

But I wanted to see if he has truly "always been this way"


Link was dead to the article - but I couldnt find a note, blog, or post detailing out his thoughts on transgenderism and Christianity that he refers to in this post... would love to read that.



I guess we know why he doesnt do sunday school anymore... he cant live up to this standard either.



Just thought this was amusing, considering he could write a book on the subject.

I had hoped that my assessment of Nick's recent take on Christianity and God was obvious, so let me be clear; Nick Rekieta's professed understanding of God and the Bible are both entirely self-serving and deserving of criticism. If he opens his mouth about this, proffers laughable ideas, and responds to criticism in this insincere manner:



...then, yeah, if anyone is putting too much emphasis on Nick's understanding of God or the Bible, it's him.
 
So when is he starting his own church?
Based on some of his ramblings linked above it appears he already has. In his classic smug way he proudly declares himself a Heretical Christian. What does this mean? By definition heresy is a belief contrary to the orthodox religious doctrine (Christianity by his own admission). In the christian church no denomination I can find or have known of describes itself as Heretical. Witnessing the way he crows about the description, I believe he just made this shit up (and is pretty proud of what he came up with).

His beliefs as he’s described include the following heresy: Inclusivism, Pluralsim, Universalism, and Works Righteousness. Then there’s the concept he described that Jesus was sent back not to die but to live, but humans just killed him. This beaut is not a traditionally defined heresy in any way (as best I know) so let’s call this one Balldoism.

At this point with as many things about almost any christian denomination that Rackets indicates he doesn’t believe in, he might as well just say he’s “spiritual” but doesn’t regularly practice in a brick and mortar church/traditional christian denomination.
 
I had hoped that my assessment of Nick's recent take on Christianity and God was obvious, so let me be clear; Nick Rekieta's professed understanding of God and the Bible are both entirely self-serving and deserving of criticism. If he opens his mouth about this, proffers laughable ideas, and responds to criticism in this insincere manner.
I'm not saying or implying that you are wrong or that he is above or below criticism. My point which admittedly was expressed poorly is that Nick is too dumb and doesn't know anything. You're going high when he is going low and you don't need to.
 
All this god talk is gay. Can we get back to the degeneracy please?

Looks like Nick is going to shit out another bad Friday show with COOM-A-LOT and some THOTS. Fucking Christ. What I wouldn't give for a big brain panel.

I would rather watch the worst Star Trek episode than a single minute of Racket's COOM stream. IT'S SUB ROSA TIME!
 
Last edited:
Looks like Nick is going to shit out another bad Friday show with COOM-A-LOT and some THOTS. Fucking Christ. What I wouldn't give for a big brain panel.
I'm not surprised since he can't be damned to do some digging for a remotely interesting case/legal stuff. Good one would be that failure of the bank Thursday and explaining the powers of the FDIC and it's legal powers granted by Congress.
 
Last edited:
Looks like Nick is going to shit out another bad Friday show with COOM-A-LOT and some THOTS. Fucking Christ. What I wouldn't give for a big brain panel.
What? You want LEGAL talk on a channel called Rekieta LAW starring a LAWYER, what are you nuts? Nah bro, its coom town all around.
 
Christian theology is way more complicated and nuanced then most people give it credit for. The biggest failure of Protestantism is the doctrine of personal revelation and a personal relationship with God. Its led to an abundance of heresies, and has left the church uniquely unsuited to challenging the enlightenment assault on its doctrines that also glorify individual truth. Rackets to a certain extent understood this, in his debate with that mongoloid gunt guarding Keffals when he told him "nah, I just don't agree". At the time this came across as him standing on the foundational Christian axioms held in COMMUNION.

Sadly it seems it was just Rackets standing on his own revealed truth instead. A revealed truth certainly influenced by a christian upbringing, but ultimately not related too it.
"Now don't get upset, Dr. Luther, I think I speak for all of us, when I say that we're all deeply in your debt [...] so we could follow your example by quitting our church bodies and starting a new one the second we don't like the cut of someone's theological jib"
-Henry VIII, Lutheran Satire

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked"
-Jeremiah 17:9

"In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes."
-Judges 21:25

Its almost like the Bible predicted this sort of behavior and cautioned against it. Anyone with half a brain cell can justify all of their worst behaviors and vices.
 
Based on some of his ramblings linked above it appears he already has. In his classic smug way he proudly declares himself a Heretical Christian. What does this mean? By definition heresy is a belief contrary to the orthodox religious doctrine (Christianity by his own admission). In the christian church no denomination I can find or have known of describes itself as Heretical. Witnessing the way he crows about the description, I believe he just made this shit up (and is pretty proud of what he came up with).

His beliefs as he’s described include the following heresy: Inclusivism, Pluralsim, Universalism, and Works Righteousness. Then there’s the concept he described that Jesus was sent back not to die but to live, but humans just killed him. This beaut is not a traditionally defined heresy in any way (as best I know) so let’s call this one Balldoism.

At this point with as many things about almost any christian denomination that Rackets indicates he doesn’t believe in, he might as well just say he’s “spiritual” but doesn’t regularly practice in a brick and mortar church/traditional christian denomination.
Definitely different than he used to be...

Circa 2012:
IMG_20230311_010109.jpg

2016:
IMG_20230311_005102.jpg

Bonus:

to much for me to read... so only got the first 7
IMG_20230311_010349.jpg

Bonus bonus:


15590139_10153907054646076_6327621590423586687_n.jpg

11743008_10152852577176076_8937085840664574340_n.jpg
 
KIWISISTERS, WE CAN'T LET ART KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH OWNING US LIKE THIS!!!
The problem Art specifically has is Art's psychotic episode when his favorite wine moms cellulite posting in chat got made fun of: this caused him to determine the proportional response to such was to try to smear that clipper as a pedophile enabler by twisting around what happened in the Sophie case so thoroughly as to be a lie, so it's hard to take almost anything he says as an intentional joke.

If the probable disinfo campaign is his plan, and it kind of seems like it is as it's both poorly conceived and clumsily executed, that only reinforces my suspicions that he's a psycho (probably a dumb one): at every point he doesn't have the awareness to understand when something is actually humorously implausible as opposed to just unhinged or completely plausible (drag show).
 
Back