Authorities Reinstate Alcohol Ban for Aboriginal Australians


Geoff Shaw cracked open a beer, savoring the simple freedom of having a drink on his porch on a sweltering Saturday morning in mid-February in Australia’s remote Northern Territory.

“For 15 years, I couldn’t buy a beer,” said Mr. Shaw, a 77-year-old Aboriginal elder in Alice Springs, the territory’s third-largest town. “I’m a Vietnam veteran, and I couldn’t even buy a beer.”

Mr. Shaw lives in what the government has deemed a “prescribed area,” an Aboriginal town camp where from 2007 until last year it was illegal to possess alcohol, part of a set of extraordinary race-based interventions into the lives of Indigenous Australians.
Last July, the Northern Territory let the alcohol ban expire for hundreds of Aboriginal communities, calling it racist. But little had been done in the intervening years to address the communities’ severe underlying disadvantage. Once alcohol flowed again, there was an explosion of crime in Alice Springs widely attributed to Aboriginal people. Local and federal politicians reinstated the ban late last month. And Mr. Shaw’s taste of freedom ended.

From the halls of power in the nation’s capital to ramshackle outback settlements, the turmoil in the Northern Territory has revived hard questions that are even older than Australia itself, about race and control and the open wounds of discrimination.

Image
A man and woman sitting on a shaded porch look down at a small dog the man is holding.

“For 15 years, I couldn’t buy a beer,” said Geoff Shaw, shown with his partner, Eileen Hoosan, at their home in Alice Springs.Credit...Tamati Smith for The New York Times


For those who believe that the country’s largely white leadership should not dictate the decisions of Aboriginal people, the alcohol ban’s return replicates the effects of colonialism and disempowers communities. Others argue that the benefits, like reducing domestic violence and other harms to the most vulnerable, can outweigh the discriminatory effects.

For Mr. Shaw, the restrictions are simply a distraction — another Band-Aid for communities that, to address problems at their roots, need funding and support and to be listened to.

“They had nothing to offer us,” he said. “And they had 15 years to sort this out.”

The liquor restrictions prohibit anyone who lives in Aboriginal town camps on the outskirts of Alice Springs, as well as those in more remote Indigenous communities, from buying takeaway alcohol. The town itself is not included in the ban, though Aboriginal people there often face more scrutiny in trying to buy liquor.

One recent day at Uncle’s Tavern, in the center of Alice Springs, patrons — almost all of them non-Indigenous — drank beneath palm trees strung with lights. In the town of 25,000, it seemed as if everyone had a friend, relative or neighbor who had been the victim of an assault, a break-in or property destruction.

As night fell, Aboriginal people who walked the otherwise empty streets were separated from the pub’s patrons by a fence with tall black bars, like something out of a prison. Sometimes, those outside pressed up against the bars; children asked for money for food, and adults for cigarettes or alcohol. The pub’s gate was open, but there were unspoken barriers to entry for the people outside.

Image

White Australians have not faced the same alcohol restrictions as Aboriginal people.Credit...Tamati Smith for The New York Times

Two women in the back of a pickup truck on a beach watch a third woman emerge from the water, as a man with a baseball cap opens the vehicle door.

Many Aboriginal people travel into town for basic services from the remote communities where they live, in conditions more akin to those of a developing country. Some Indigenous leaders in and around Alice Springs attribute the spike in crime to these visitors.
In the daytime, they were often the only people sitting in public spaces, with nowhere to go to escape the blistering heat. One Aboriginal visitor to Alice Springs, Gloria Cooper, said she had traveled hundreds of miles for medical treatment and was camping in a nearby dry creek bed because she couldn’t afford a place to stay on her welfare income.

“Lots of people in the creek,” she said. “Lots of children.”

The roots of the 15-year alcohol ban were a national media firestorm that erupted in 2006 over a handful of graphic and highly publicized allegations of child sexual abuse in the Northern Territory.

Many of the allegations were later found to be baseless. But just months before a federal election, the conservative prime minister at the time used them to justify a draconian set of race-based measures. Among them were the alcohol restrictions, along with mandatory income management for welfare recipients and restrictions on Indigenous people’s rights to manage land that they owned.

Now, the debate has flared up again at another politically charged moment, as Australia begins to discuss constitutionally enshrining a “voice to Parliament” — an Indigenous body that would advise on policies that affect Aboriginal communities.

Image
Two men sit on the porch of a structure in a sandy field.

An Aboriginal town camp in Alice Springs. Little has been done to address Indigenous communities’ severe underlying inequality.Credit...Tamati Smith for The New York Times


Opponents have used the Alice Springs debate to argue that the proposal distracts from practical issues facing Indigenous communities. Supporters say that such a body would have allowed more consultation with affected residents and prevented the problem from escalating.

Indigenous leaders say that the roots of the dysfunction in their communities run deep. A lack of job opportunities has left poverty entrenched, which in turn has exacerbated family violence. Soaring Indigenous incarceration rates have left parents locked away and children adrift. Government controls on Aboriginal people’s lives, imposed without consultation, have bred resentment and hopelessness. Add alcohol to the mix, and the problems only mount.

“We’ve never had our own choice and decision making, our lives have been controlled by others,” said Cherisse Buzzacott, who works to improve Indigenous families’ health literacy. Because of this, she added, those in the most disadvantaged communities “don’t have belief changes can change; they don’t have hope.”

Some Indigenous leaders oppose the alcohol ban on these grounds, arguing that it continues the history of control of Aboriginal communities. Others say that their own contributions to the community show why blanket bans are unfair.

“Some of my mob, some are workers and some are just sitting down, haven’t got a job,” said Benedict Stevens, the president of the Hidden Valley town camp, using a colloquial term for an Aboriginal group. “And what I’m saying is it wouldn’t be fair for us workers to not be able to go back home during the weekends, relax, have some beers.”

Before the alcohol ban expired last year, a coalition of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal organizations predicted that a sudden free flow of alcohol would produce a sharp rise in crime. They called for the restrictions to be extended so affected communities could have time to develop individualized transition plans.

Image
A sign listing rules for entering an Aboriginal town camp looms over a gated entrance. An expanse of trees and grass extends beyond the sign.

A sign stating that alcohol is prohibited in a town camp.Credit...Tamati Smith for The New York Times


The predictions proved accurate. According to the Northern Territory police, commercial breaks-ins, property damage, assaults related to domestic violence and alcohol-related assaults all rose by about or by more than 50 percent from 2021 to 2022. Australia does not break down crime data by race, but politicians and Aboriginal groups themselves have attributed the increase largely to Indigenous people.

“This was a preventable situation,” said Donna Ah Chee, the chief executive of one of these organizations, the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress. “It was Aboriginal women, families and children that were actually paying the price,” she added.

The organization was among those that called for a resumption of the ban as an immediate step while long-term solutions were developed to address the underlying drivers of destructive drinking. Ms. Ah Chee said she considered the policy to be “positive discrimination” in protecting those most vulnerable.

What Indigenous leaders on all sides of the debate agreed on was that long-term strategies were needed to address the complex disadvantages facing Indigenous communities.

The problems in Alice Springs were caused by decades of failing to listen to Indigenous people, said William Tilmouth, an Aboriginal elder. The answers, he added, would be found when “politicians and the public looked beyond the alcohol. What they will find is people with voice, strength and solutions waiting to be heard.”
 
>But little had been done in the intervening years to address the communities’ severe underlying disadvantage.

Hmmm… what could that disadvantage be, white man? Lower IQ? Inability to handle fire water? Millennia of cultural degeneracy that advocates the raping of minors? Chronic robbery, spousal abuse, and huffing of gasoline? I’d like the (((journalist))) to expand on that statement.
 
Did abbos never learn to make alcohol? Can't they go back to getting high on tree root sap or whatever instead of appropriating white culture that they are complaining about?
Prior to the introduction of alcohol, they chewed something called pituri. It's basically tobacco. High doses can put the user in a trance.
 
I visited Cairns a couple times a ways back. I saw a lot of people from a number of different races working very hard in many, many different capacities. And I also saw a number of Aboriginals who were not working, were very drunk, or were kids far too young to be roaming around by themselves. There was plenty of work available, but even the various rainforest and bush tours were run by Caucasians.

Without a doubt employment is an incredibly vital thing to a community and a family- an idle, drunk man (or woman) is dangerous no matter the race, culture or country- but these people need to take responsibility for themselves. Yes, they've had a raw deal in the past but- my father's children did- they need to say, "This ends with us." No one is holding a gun to their head forcing them to drink and abuse their own children. No one is forcing them to refuse school or stay in places where there is no work and nothing to do. 'Spiritual connection to the land'? Well, that's nice, but what did your hunter gatherer forefathers do when there was a drought and no food or water? They upped and moved and looked for a place that had food and water. Certainly they hesitated a bit and did a corroberee or two to try and butter up the rain spirits first, but if that didn't work and the children were dying, they moved on.

Your children are dying. It's time to move on.
 
I always love seeing the small-government, taxation is theft, 2nd amendment posters simping for restricting personal freedoms. If communities want to be “dry” then that’s one thing, but I don’t think many people here would be really happy if precedents on restricting freedoms based on race or birthplace become widespread in the developed world.
 
The roots of the 15-year alcohol ban were a national media firestorm that erupted in 2006 over a handful of graphic and highly publicized allegations of child sexual abuse in the Northern Territory.

Many of the allegations were later found to be baseless.
whoa whoa whoa you can't just drop something like this and not elaborate. many, NOT ALL, of the allegations of graphic childhood sexual abuse were found to be baseless? and they were bad enough to get alcohol banned completely from your community???
 
Pretty sad shit and mandatory return to reality.
The truth is those aborigines don't have much to live for, so the moment they are offered a drug, they take the easy way out.
These people lived in child-like, yet ultra-violent societies. Look at the Sentinelese or Amazon lost tribes. Their tech, if left alone, is way, way behind Ancient Egypt or Greece. They don't write, so they're fucking behind the Jewish tribes from 2000BC.
This is the split between us and them. It's thousands upon thousands of years of evolution that we tried to accelerate with "all humans are equal" propaganda. Obviously not the case.
It's not just the drinking. They're incredibly naive, easy to take advantage of, very short tempered and impulsive, and generally unable to wrap their mind around the abstractions that constitute modern life. Math, physics - out of question. Literature even might be a challenge.
To add to all this, they KNOW that they are occupied and will NEVER get back their territories and ancestral way of life. It's over. Europeans set foot there, and took over, and there ain't removing them. Only a more advanced, more technological, more warring human tribe will be able to do that. They are forever conscripted to misery and slow assimilation and oblivion.
You'd drink too.
 
According to the Northern Territory police, commercial breaks-ins, property damage, assaults related to domestic violence and alcohol-related assaults all rose by about or by more than 50 percent from 2021 to 2022. Australia does not break down crime data by race, but politicians and Aboriginal groups themselves have attributed the increase largely to Indigenous people.
I found data from 2021 at least. 2022's statistics don't get released for a few more months.

In the Northern Territory, despite being 26% of the population, abbos are involved in 65% of domestic violence cases.
 
Good attitude but I think I can propose a better plan:
View attachment 4794062
Encircle Ayer's rock with a militarized border at a 250 mile radius. Everything inside is theirs. I'm not sure how non-Abbo residents of Alice Springs would feel about evacuating to Coober Pedy but I imagine "no more abbos, ever" would be a strong selling point. A87 becomes a Mad Max type highway tourists can pay to go down. Who would brave the desolate wasteland and potentially violent abbos for tourism? Well I have it on good authority whites in Seth Effrika are very competent at this and looking for reasons to get out.

Oi! Say wat ya want 'bout da boyz, but da ladz can at least make sum' good fungus beer.

Maybe in 40 thousand years they'll invent the wheel, much to the joy of Papa Smurf.
 
Alot of the victimhood crying comes from peoples not associated in anyway with impoverished communities. They read about at risk populations, shed a fake tear and tweet about it. Much sound and fury. Until they have taken part in or be associated these areas, victim enthusiasts will never get the whole on the ground picture.
White. Race. Traitors.

If they feeeeeeeeel so much for this stuff, the rest of the normal population needs to take care of this. Make them honorary niggers/abbos. Let children see this, lest they get any cute ideas about altruism.
Take care of these people with extreme prejudice and the rest of the Western Hemisphere can restore ORDER and PEACE.
 
What's in the air in Australia to where every animal that goes there loses IQ points?

It's weird to think about. With how much everything there wants you dead you'd expect IQ to go up but it doesn't, I guess it probably has to do with everything there being poisonous or venomous. +resistance to poisons give -IQ points.
Certain kinds of harsh environments don't seem conducive to intelligence. A lot of people seem to assume, evolutionarily speaking, the more smarts the better, but that's not necessarily the case in practice. There are tradeoffs. As an example, aborigines have extraordinary eyesight, which makes sense for survival in the outback, but it could be that adaptation leads to deficiencies elsewhere.

I have no doubt that, in their way, aborigines are extraordinarily well adapted to their environment, but apparently not to modern civilization.
 
Their average IQ is 62.
"Richard Lynn (2006) states that several studies show that Australian aborigines have a low average IQ of 62 and a small average brain size. Other studies have found similar results for New Guinean aborigines.[2]" In the western world 70 IQ and under is considered mentally impaired. Imagine an entire race of people who are have the intelligence of downsyndrome people.
 
Back