"ADF" / Philip Vincent Haskins-Delici / Isabel Rosa Araujo - The Original Troon Commie Cow

The Dude said:
"Losing the proxy war in Ukraine"? LOL. The US aren't having to pull Patton tanks out of their rusty graves because their Abrams have been destroyed or captured. The US isn't having to conscript convicts, retards and mental patients because millions of their able-bodied men fled the country to avoid getting drafted. The US isn't struggling to feed its people and keep their head above water because the rest of the world has sanctioned them or otherwise cut them off economically. What the fuck is Phil smoking?
Click to expand...
Russia still hasn't figured out how destroy a single one of the initial batch of 16 HIMARS launchers that had turned the fight to Ukraine's favor last I checked. NATO is obviously terrified of tanks that NATO tanks have been proven able to reliably destroy from over a thousand yards beyond the Russian tanks' max range for over 30 years. In the first Gulf War the old versions of the Abrams were doing that to tanks buried in sand.

Russian tech has always been a letdown.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu, Falcon Sebben, Starre & Ruine and 3 others
@kcbbq The best Russia can do regarding destroying HIMARS is take photos of the common truck chassis (that make up a whole family of vehicles and systems because it was designed to be modular) that have been destroyed and claim they were HIMARS for the imbeciles who actually believe Russian propaganda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mesh Gear Fox
Nixie tubes are pretty rad, too. Obsolete as fuck, but still really cool. But most Russian equipment is shit. Take the Su-57 Felon fighter jet. It was supposed to be Russia's answer to the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II and it's performance is hardly any better than a Gen 4+ fighter (certainly nowhere near as good as a Gen 5 fighter like the 22 and 35), and despite being touted as being a stealth fighter, it still has a rather large radar cross section. I can only imagine how hilariously terrible the T-14 Armata tank is, but it's doubtful we will ever find out since Russia can't afford to field more than about 15 or 20 of them. They'll get plenty of propaganda shots of them tooling about safe behind Russian lines in occupied Ukraine, but they will never actually risk losing (or worse, having one captured when it gets abandoned by its crew) one by sending them to the front lines. Russia is such a joke. No wonder Phil feels a kindred connection to them.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Adamska, Aunt Carol, Bassomatic and 2 others
kcbbq said:
Russia still hasn't figured out how destroy a single one of the initial batch of 16 HIMARS launchers that had turned the fight to Ukraine's favor last I checked. NATO is obviously terrified of tanks that NATO tanks have been proven able to reliably destroy from over a thousand yards beyond the Russian tanks' max range for over 30 years. In the first Gulf War the old versions of the Abrams were doing that to tanks buried in sand.

Russian tech has always been a letdown.
Click to expand...
I think Phil suffers from what a lot of kids suffer from, not knowing how the real world works.

At 7 I thought America is stupid look at a Hind! It's got more guns and shit than an Apache, can fit a crew of marines more armor. It's def better right? Well I was 7. Now as an adult, I'm no general now, but I know what limits the Hind has and why it doesn't work as well (let alone Russia can't into upkeep).

Russia isn't the only mil that has a non NATO idea (and each nato member has own tweaks on how to war) so sometimes things that wouldn't make sense or work for US might work for someone else. Over all tho there's what works and what doesn't no matter.

Russia makes some cool shit, in theory. I'm also pretty partial to Russian firearms, aside being one of my fav shooters, I think the SKS is one of the best fire arms of the 20th century.

It's funny Phil is so needy to be edgy he's parroting far right (and not US) things just to sound cool. People whom are legit into dictators, etc are all Putin simps. Because as I like to call Putin a mob boss with a country. If you had daddy issues, Al Capone in Slav land would be a pretty cool guy to look up to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcon Sebben, REGENDarySumanai, Mesh Gear Fox and 1 other person
3.PNG
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Lesbian Sleepover, Ophelia, Falcon Sebben and 1 other person
kcbbq said:
Russia still hasn't figured out how destroy a single one of the initial batch of 16 HIMARS launchers that had turned the fight to Ukraine's favor last I checked.
Click to expand...
RUS know how to destroy HIMARS, but HIMARS is in a shoot-n-scoot role: what artillerymen call artillery raids, only with a small MLRS. I suspect that the HIMARS are being supervised and/or operated by U.S. SOF. HIMARS are part of 18B training.

HIMARS requires little setup. It's a high mobility rocket system for these types of conflicts. The operators are probably setting up one place, receiving a target list, scooting to a launch point, then scooting back to another location.

16 HIMARS in that role is difficult to geolocate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcon Sebben
Starre & Ruine said:
RUS know how to destroy HIMARS, but HIMARS is in a shoot-n-scoot role: what artillerymen call artillery raids, only with a small MLRS. I suspect that the HIMARS are being supervised and/or operated by U.S. SOF. HIMARS are part of 18B training.

HIMARS requires little setup. It's a high mobility rocket system for these types of conflicts. The operators are probably setting up one place, receiving a target list, scooting to a launch point, then scooting back to another location.

16 HIMARS in that role is difficult to geolocate.
Click to expand...
Ukraine sent Ukrainians to Sill. Quite a few.
 
  • Like
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai and Starre & Ruine
Twrx said:
Ukraine sent Ukrainians to Sill. Quite a few.
Click to expand...
Yes. That doesn't exactly mean they got trained up on only HIMARS. They may have received training on a lot of other things as well. It stands to reason that, if USSOF is supervising the HIMARS raids, then they would need trained crews to supervise, plus some extra for combat losses, Train the Trainer, etc.

Sometimes, movements go to one place publicly, then redeployed internally, privately. Sill is a bit isolated, but with more infrastructure, then say, McCoy.
 
Starre & Ruine said:
Yes. That doesn't exactly mean they got trained up on only HIMARS. They may have received training on a lot of other things as well. It stands to reason that, if USSOF is supervising the HIMARS raids, then they would need trained crews to supervise, plus some extra for combat losses, Train the Trainer, etc.

Sometimes, movements go to one place publicly, then redeployed internally, privately. Sill is a bit isolated, but with more infrastructure, then say, McCoy.
Click to expand...

Hit me with off topics, but I doubt any bravos are in Ukraine. Ukraine is in 10th's AO, but with the shit that 7th and 3rd have done lately, usasoc is hyped focused on appearances and back to basics. The last thing they'd want to do is thrown a bunch of green hats in a warzone rife with war crimes.
 
Twrx said:
Hit me with off topics, but I doubt any bravos are in Ukraine. Ukraine is in 10th's AO, but with the shit that 7th and 3rd have done lately, usasoc is hyped focused on appearances and back to basics. The last thing they'd want to do is thrown a bunch of green hats in a warzone rife with war crimes.
Click to expand...
It's just a disagreement then. I would be surprised if there wasn't SF in UKR, but I'm no longer in a position to say definitively.

I'll speculate further that CAG is there, at least providing VIP protection to Jewlinsky and some of his cabinet. Also, there was some narrative that US forces were trying to account for weapons? I can totally see CAG/SOCOM using SSE skills to identify and monitor weapon distribution, working with various agencies like they have before. In fact, that would be the labor pool for inspections and accountability of weapons not in depot.

Just speculation
 
Starre & Ruine said:
It's just a disagreement then. I would be surprised if there wasn't SF in UKR, but I'm no longer in a position to say definitively.

I'll speculate further that CAG is there, at least providing VIP protection to Jewlinsky and some of his cabinet. Also, there was some narrative that US forces were trying to account for weapons? I can totally see CAG/SOCOM using SSE skills to identify and monitor weapon distribution, working with various agencies like they have before. In fact, that would be the labor pool for inspections and accountability of weapons not in depot.

Just speculation
Click to expand...
I can definitely see cag and other SMU's in Ukraine doing spooky boi shit.
 
As a newb, I wish to remark on the erudite confluence of Russian weapons system analysis and transipants drama. This is the CSIS coffee break chat?
 
Positron said:
View attachment 4797012
Click to expand...
Lol, no he didn’t. Phil doesn’t even know what a recession is. Phil, a recession is a situation where your artisan pizza and mall ninja toys become too expensive for you to afford. If it gets really bad, people start asking about all those people on benefits who are physically capable of working.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Lesbian Sleepover, Ophelia, DavidFerrie and 2 others
Twrx said:
How long until he starts exchanging dollars for shit like Kuwaiti dinars again?
Click to expand...
I'd guess he's prioritizing exchanging his dollars for cheap carbohydrates and lipids. But fear not, any tard trinkets he'll be getting with leftovers are going to be utterly worthless. Maybe authentic russian manual for firearm he'll never own, written in a language and script he can never read?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska, Suspendered, REGENDarySumanai and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back