Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Looks like a seed of the Current Year BS of "cultural appropriation" is the notion of "indigenous intellectual property".

Some "indigenous peoples" - likely tribal officials or lawyers living in the modern world - think that ways of "indigenous peoples" should always be "intellectual property" of certain peoples. They think "indigenous intellectual property" somehow "protects" those ways, and it also seems they think "customary laws" about such ways applies beyond their tribes. In 2002, some worldwide convention even claimed that the "unauthorized use" and "misappropriation" of "traditional knowledge" is "theft".

Such delusion supports the idea of permanent "intellectual property", and tries to rigidly or artificially pigeonhole certain ways. It also seems to subtly support The Narrative™ that one of a kind deemed "oppressor" is automatically responsible for the actions of others of their kind. And it also ignores that tribes likely copied "traditional knowledge" from each other throughout history - and of course that information itself is not like physical property: copying doesn't reduce it. I also doubt the notion of "indigenous intellectual property" existed before the modern world, and likely isn't a thing with "indigenous peoples" outside civilization.

Right then, since 98% of everything was invented by whites, then I demand non-whites stop culturally appropriating by stealing our intellectual property every time they use any technology past the stone age.
 
Gendered awards is a way to even the playing field.

Many of the best, most juice parts are for male actors. (Often ou of necessity, in for example historical dramas.)

By having gendered categories, you ensure that there’s also a female winner every year.

They could probably get away with adding gender neutral categories instead of removing anything. Best actor, best actress, and best scene performance, say based on specific scenes rather than the full movie. Sometimes best actor/actress will also win best scene but it still potentially allows a third winner that can be a man or a woman. Or best scene can be awarded based on the remaining non-winning nominees.
 
Last edited:
I think "cultural appropriation" BS stems from egotism at seeing people one doesn't like copying and enjoying something that "should only be enjoyed by the right people" - if so, they frame it as "theft" and "identity politics" and come up with BS how it's "exotifying" or whatever, when they're just butthurt at the "wrong people" having fun.

(that or they've been grifted by such people into believing that BS)

Of course a number may imitate a way to deliberately be a jerk, but that's not always a motive by those deemed "oppressors" by SJWs.
 
Last edited:
From what I've read, cultural appropriation is supposed to mean stuff like wearing sacred head dresses outside of its intended context. That's understandable. I doubt a devout Catholic would like seeing someone stuff rosery beads up their ass. Personally, I'd just call that being disrespectful. Not as likely to give semi-functional idiots a 50 dollar word to weaponize.
 
From what I've read, cultural appropriation is supposed to mean stuff like wearing sacred head dresses outside of its intended context.
If it's not deliberate jerkass mockery done by people who don't follow the religion, it's not different than non-Christian Japanese people casually wearing cross jewelry. It does not magically inhibit the "intended context" of believers, and could even lead to new ways and traditions.* "Culture" can be treated way too seriously nowadays...

*(and may already have in the past)
 
1.png
2.png
3.png
4.png
Now I want to hear the father's side of this story.
 
Not sure if this belongs in this thread, but it seems pretty SJW-adjacent.

Cactus City is "a feminist recording studio designed to be a safe space for women and gender minorities" in London. Their website is mainly devoted to promoting something they call their Charter Of Good Practice. This is a series of pledges that other recording studios can sign up to, to prove that they "provide a safe, inclusive working environment".

Signing up will cost you £99 per year.

There's no actual inclusivity audit. Essentially you're paying to have your business put on a list. Anyone can sign up, whether or not their studio is in fact a 'safe space'. It may or may not be possible to book Charter Studios through the Cactus City website, in which case they seem to take a commission.

Discrimination and sexual harassment in the music industry are real problems, but Cactus City misrepresents the evidence.

CC.png


The Musicians Union report in question does not mention recording studios once. It contains nothing to suggest that the recording studio is "exactly where serious problems lie".

The 'Meet the Team' section of the website lists eight staff. None of them is an engineer, assistant or runner. There's nothing about the studio itself that I can see. Do they even have a functioning studio?

Website archive (sorry it's a Waybackmachine link, couldn't get other archive services to work)
 
If I had a family member tell me to vote for something and threaten me with disownership if I don't do their bidding I'd tell them to go fuck themselves.

Whether I support their cause or not is irrelevant; you don't have the right to tell people what their views should be. Also lol'd at the fag doomsday prepper hysterics. This guy is mentally ill.
 
Also lol'd at the fag doomsday prepper hysterics. This guy is mentally ill.
Lefties who act like a Republican winning means the beginning of the end for the LGBT movement are literally the same as righties who act like a Democrat winning means they will be hunted in droves. Sure, it makes progress a lot harder for either side in either scenario, but this line of thinking is just paranoid spiraling.
 
Lefties who act like a Republican winning means the beginning of the end for the LGBT movement are literally the same as righties who act like a Democrat winning means they will be hunted in droves. Sure, it makes progress a lot harder for either side in either scenario, but this line of thinking is just paranoid spiraling.
They've been saying that since Bush II for fuck's sake. The hysteria ramped up to 11 when Trump took office. You'd have thought roving bands of MAGA sturmabteilung were roaming the streets killing everyone who wasn't white and cishet. Hell, they can't even calm down about the smallest stuff. Every goddamned setback or 'no' to their demands is LITERALLY GENOCIDE GUISE. Exhibit A of a bazillion: the whole 'canceling the Willow series is literally wiping out LGBTQ people' idiocy.

It's projection. Progressive rhetoric treats anyone to the right of Mao as some kind of subhuman who needs to be reeducated or killed. Now they're worried someone might say, 'OK, since that's your take, let's just skip to the fucking civil war right now.'
 
Another SJW "gaslighting" tactic I noticed some time ago ago: when a SJW "calls out" a perceived "injustice" (read: delusional BS), non-SJWs can get mad at that. A SJW can then claim that those getting mad are "mad the SJWs are telling the truth and they know it".

What's going on is that SJWs can get "triggered" when told the anti-woke truth. The SJW can then project that onto non-SJWs who get mad not because a SJW lie is truth, but because of how asinine SJW claims are. Like how you may easily react if you were told you couldn't wear shoes because it somehow "oppresses" some "marginalized group" with "white supremacy" or some other similar delusion.
 
Lefties who act like a Republican winning means the beginning of the end for the LGBT movement are literally the same as righties who act like a Democrat winning means they will be hunted in droves. Sure, it makes progress a lot harder for either side in either scenario, but this line of thinking is just paranoid spiraling.
Well considering how over a thousand conservative protesters were arrested for trespassing, denied their constitutional rights, and labeled as insurrectionist trators, with the DOJ planning on arresting a thousand more for Jan6th, I don't think that sentiment is too far from the truth.
 
Another SJW "gaslighting" tactic I noticed some time ago ago: when a SJW "calls out" a perceived "injustice" (read: delusional BS), non-SJWs can get mad at that. A SJW can then claim that those getting mad are "mad the SJWs are telling the truth and they know it".

What's going on is that SJWs can get "triggered" when told the anti-woke truth. The SJW can then project that onto non-SJWs who get mad not because a SJW lie is truth, but because of how asinine SJW claims are. Like how you may easily react if you were told you couldn't wear shoes because it somehow "oppresses" some "marginalized group" with "white supremacy" or some other similar delusion.
Notice how people NOT in the minority group of the day can get angry at [problem that seemingly oppresses minority group], but they can't discuss or debate whether the problem is real or the causes or anything.

You can take place in the discussion no matter your race as long as you're sucking our dick, but if you're challenging us then you better have those race creds ready. And even then you'll probably get called uncle Tom anyway.
 
Lefties who act like a Republican winning means the beginning of the end for the LGBT movement are literally the same as righties who act like a Democrat winning means they will be hunted in droves. Sure, it makes progress a lot harder for either side in either scenario, but this line of thinking is just paranoid spiraling.
Remember the ongoing trans genoicde is currently the only one in history where the group being genocided grew in population
 
Back