Bank Run Watch 2023 after Silicon Valley Bank shutdown - Over 97% of SVB's assets were not FDIC insured

Yeah, it is totally fair that the fuckshit bank you trusted failed and you lost everything, but some cunt can buy your loan for a fraction of the price and nothing with you is renegotiated, even though the loan changed hands and the lender is completely different.
this is what pisses me off; I had a technically "liar's loan" back in the Bad Olde Days of Ye Original Housing Crisis and I have documentation that it was sold off in some liquidation group with a bunch of other loans for significantly below "face value" (eg, it was a loan for $100k, principle remaining was $95k, it was sold for $80k - numbers made up). So far below that it would have put me "not underwater" but there was no way to "buy my own loan".
17 billion in bonds, wiped out in one second.
those were weird AT1 things that were securities that pretended to be bonds - absolute fuckery. basically "this pays and acts like a bond until we fuck up in which case it becomes worthless overnight, also there's a clause that says the government can just declare this worthless shit". Levine is probably a jew of jews but he explains here (as an aside, in financial texts, the word "wrong" can be replaced with "getting fucked" - try it below:

These securities are, basically, a trick. To investors, they seem like bonds: They pay interest, get paid back in five years, feel pretty safe. To regulators, they seem like equity: If the bank runs into trouble, it can raise capital by zeroing the AT1s. If investors think they are bonds and regulators think they are equity, somebody is wrong. The investors are wrong.

ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT THAT YOU CANNOT EXPLAIN TO A MODERATELY INTELLIGENT 5 YEAR OLD IS A JEWISH BANKER TRICK DESIGNED TO SEPARATE YOU FROM YOUR MONEY. THIS RULE APPLIES WITHOUT EXCEPTIONS.

It might be understandable if some swindler sold "bonds" to grannies or something, but the banks and shit buying these pieces of crap are supposed to be knowledgeable about this shit. Turns out they ain't.

That's one of the few genuinely GOOD IDEAS I've seen on this entire motherfucking thread.
paying off FIXED DEBT going into inflation is not usually a pro-gamer move - you want to pay off VARIABLE DEBT and acquire fungible goods for FIXED DEBT as much as possible - unless you think we're headed into deflation (which is separate from depression, and scares the FED shitless more than anything ever, they'd probably prefer hyperinflation to deflation).

however, the above said, getting out from under the usurers is always a noble goal
 
those were weird AT1 things that were securities that pretended to be bonds - absolute fuckery. basically "this pays and acts like a bond until we fuck up in which case it becomes worthless overnight, also there's a clause that says the government can just declare this worthless shit". Levine is probably a jew of jews but he explains here (as an aside, in financial texts, the word "wrong" can be replaced with "getting fucked"
Oh damn, so they were not bonds, they did what they were designed to do and people who didn't understand what they are, are crying like whores...rekt
 
those were weird AT1 things that were securities that pretended to be bonds - absolute fuckery. basically "this pays and acts like a bond until we fuck up in which case it becomes worthless overnight, also there's a clause that says the government can just declare this worthless shit". Levine is probably a jew of jews but he explains here (as an aside, in financial texts, the word "wrong" can be replaced with "getting fucked" - try it below:


ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT THAT YOU CANNOT EXPLAIN TO A MODERATELY INTELLIGENT 5 YEAR OLD IS A JEWISH BANKER TRICK DESIGNED TO SEPARATE YOU FROM YOUR MONEY. THIS RULE APPLIES WITHOUT EXCEPTIONS.

It might be understandable if some swindler sold "bonds" to grannies or something, but the banks and shit buying these pieces of crap are supposed to be knowledgeable about this shit. Turns out they ain't.
I think that only strengthens my point that the fault should go to the shareholders that allowed this to happen and profited off of their purchase of them. Not the people who were sold a bill of goods.
 
I liquidated pretty much everything I had, took a bit of a hit selling when I did but fuck it, I'm using the funds to wipe out my mortgage. Whatever happens I will at least have a roof over my head thats mine. If there is a market bloodbath and recession I'll slowly buy back in with the spare cash I'll have from not having to make a monthly mortgage payment.
See, that's where property tax rent comes in, forever, and if you don't pay it the government takes "its" land back.
You get a bailout, and YOU get a bailout, EVERYBODY gets a bailout!

View attachment 4836065

Ahh, "emergency powers", their favorite cheat code for unilaterally enacting their agenda without a vote.
Literally AGAIN! I hate the Synagogue of Satan, the Anti-christ, and his beast mark currency debt.
 
don't @ me if I'm late I need to fp this

View attachment 4834557
My favorite thing is that logo in the upper left hand corner. For the uninitiated, McKinsey is the name of a management consulting firm which has infected most fortune 500 companies at least once in the past 40 or so years. They are responsible for hollowing out the middle class and have even acted as policy shapers for the Canadian government over the last couple of decades. The majority of "human capital" decisions that have ruined your lives rests squarely on them. More so than the WEF.
 
See, that's where property tax rent comes in, forever, and if you don't pay it the government takes "its" land back.
i am still moderately pissed that I missed out getting an allodial title (a thing so rare spellcheck doesn't know what it is) in nevada in the glory days of 1998-2005 (a)

null should find some hot widow with one of those titles and become an heir in mind and body (huehuehue) and establish the freehold of kiwi

(i am one of those weirdos who hold that property tax is morally bankrupt, evil, and unjust but income tax is morally fine and praiseworthy and ok)
 
See, that's where property tax rent comes in, forever, and if you don't pay it the government takes "its" land back.
This is why you should always have an inflation proof asset backstopping things. If Hyperinflation takes off, land prices go up with it and the government will adjust its taxes. But if you have some Gold and Silver those will ALSO take off and you will be able to keep the goon squad away until things stabilize.
 
This is why you should always have an inflation proof asset backstopping things. If Hyperinflation takes off, land prices go up with it and the government will adjust its taxes. But if you have some Gold and Silver those will ALSO take off and you will be able to keep the goon squad away until things stabilize.
J.P. Morgan himself supposedly said that "gold is wealth, and everything else is credit."
 
Y'know, market implosions and radiation sickness have a lot in common. They both start out with the thing affected vomiting and feeling like everything is burning down, then they think they are starting to feel fine again, and then they finally have their DNA implode and die. The market just vomited everywhere, now it thinks it's feeling good. Gee I wonder what will happen next.
 
Why the fuck is anyone listening to him about anything? Because he has money. We assume people who have money are smart. When they're all terminally fucking retarded sociopaths doing everything to enrich themselves and blame the poor when it stops working.
Ya ever see a rich guy in a situation when people don't recognize him or don't know he's rich/how rich he is? It's fucking hilarious.
 
SVB’s Loans to Insiders Tripled to $219 Million Before It Failed

As Silicon Valley Bank deteriorated late last year and regulators began internally flagging flaws in its risk management, the lender opened up the credit spigot to one group: insiders.

Loans to officers, directors and principal shareholders, and their related interests, more than tripled from the third quarter last year to $219 million in the final three months of 2022, according to government data.

That’s a record dollar amount of loans issued to insiders, going back at least two decades.

The surge in loans to high-up figures may draw scrutiny as the Federal Reserve and Congress investigate the breakdown of Silicon Valley Bank, the biggest US bank collapse in more than a decade. The firm — one of three US lenders to fall this month — collapsed after investors and depositors tried to pull $42 billion in a single day and it failed to raise capital to shore up its finances.

The government reports don’t disclose loan recipients or their purpose, and there have been no allegations of wrongdoing connected to the insider loans.

The Fed takes enforcement action, or refers violations to other regulators, if it finds problems with these loans, said a spokesperson for the central bank, which oversaw SVB before its collapse. A representative for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the receiver for the bank, didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Before regulators seized Silicon Valley Bank on March 10, it had a reputation as the go-to lender for tech companies and the venture capital firms that seeded them. The Fed’s interest-rate hikes last year took a toll on the lender, whose liquidity was tied up in longer-term government bonds that lost value in that environment.

Under federal regulations meant to guard against banking executives getting preferential treatment, banks are only allowed to lend to insiders if they’re given terms similar to those provided to other customers. To help prevent conflicts, regulators require banks to publicly disclose the number of such loans and their value.

In its most-recent proxy statement, SVB Financial Group, the parent company of Silicon Valley Bank before its collapse, said it made loans last year to related parties including “companies in which certain of our directors or their affiliated venture funds are beneficial owners of 10% or more of the equity securities of such companies.”

The bank issued the loans in the normal course of business, and with similar interest rates and collateral as other customers received around the same time, according to the filing. Still, loans in other categories such as real estate and commercial grew at a much slower rate — just over 3% — than those issued to insiders, according to data in separate government reports.

Rate Risks​

The loans to executives and other senior figures surged as the bank’s weaknesses came to light.

Late last year, Fed examiners identified a critical problem: the bank needed to improve how it tracked interest-rate risks. The firm had about $15 billion in unrealized losses at year-end on mortgage-backed securities that it loaded up when rates were lower.

The bank had also directed its lending business increasingly toward larger borrowers, including its private equity and venture capital clients. About 63%, or $46.8 billion, of the firm’s lending portfolio was comprised of loans to clients who received at least $20 million, according to SVB Financial Group’s annual report for 2022.

“Our loan portfolio has a credit profile different from that of most other banking companies,” the company said in the report. The firm added that “a significant portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of larger loans, which could increase the impact on us of any single borrower default.”
 
Uh oh. I wonder why this article (a) came out now?
JPMorgan Chase owned bags of material kept in a Dutch warehouse that were supposed to contain nickel but turned out to be full of stones, people familiar with the matter said.
The London Metal Exchange said last week that sacks thought to hold 54 metric tons of nickel in an unnamed warehouse had failed to comply with its standards. The bags were in a shed in the Dutch port city of Rotterdam, The Wall Street Journal and other outlets reported. The problem: They contained stones instead of a silvery metal used in steel and electric-vehicle batteries.
The LME didn't disclose the name of the company that believed itself to be the owner of nickel briquettes valued at $1.3 million at current prices. The firm was JPMorgan, according to the people, some of whom said the bank first bought the material several years ago.
The company that controls the warehouse, sprawling logistics firm Access World Group, was owned by miner and trader Glencore PLC at the time. In a statement, Access World said it is inspecting "warranted bags of nickel briquettes at all locations" and that it believes the issue to be "an isolated case and specific to one warehouse in Rotterdam."
Access World, rather than JPMorgan, is likely to face pressure to foot the bill because it is responsible for checking metal on entry and keeping it safe while it is in the shed. The LME has said it is working with the operator to find out what went wrong.
Wall Street banks aren't as active in physical commodity markets as they were a decade ago, when companies such as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group shipped oil on tankers, stuffed metal into warehouses and shuttled sugar between continents. New regulations brought in after the 2008 financial crisis and a stretch of calm markets encouraged banks to pull back from trading commodities.
Still, JPMorgan remains a big player in metals, trading copper, aluminum, zinc and others on the LME as well as precious metals like gold.
JPMorgan was a major trading partner of China's Tsingshan Holding Group, and led discussions with other banks after a blowup in the metal giant's nickel trades spawned a crisis on the LME last year.
Let me highlight the key portion:
"The London Metal Exchange said last week that sacks thought to hold 54 metric tons of nickel in an unnamed warehouse had failed to comply with its standards (Edit: just "rocks")[...] The LME didn't disclose the name of the company that believed itself to be the owner of nickel briquettes valued at $1.3 million at current prices. The firm was JPMorgan, according to the people, some of whom said the bank first bought the material several years ago"

There is a sinking feeling inside me that Cramer curse is on JP Morgan.
I think this should almost be a community feature almost. Can you imagine a bank buying rare earths, not doing any checks on it and getting duped into buying gravel off the ground?
(i am one of those weirdos who hold that property tax is morally bankrupt, evil, and unjust but income tax is morally fine and praiseworthy and ok)
Property tax is unjust in the current method that you literally cannot vote for what services are/are not provided to you and you could technically, not own property. It is a fee rendered for a set of service(s) be in the future, past or present.

Income tax, by definition is fundamentally unjust. It relies on the proposition that a person should not be entitled to the fruits of their labor and does not obtain any "service" for said loss of value. It is merely appropriated at will of the legislature, which means a man is not entitled to the entirety of his property, nor should he be allowed to fully pursue his liberty or happiness.
 
Last edited:
Can you imagine a bank buying rare earths, not doing any checks on it and getting duped into buying gravel off the ground?
This isn't the first instance of this, there is a lot of dodgy business going on in the commodities world that is coming to light at the same time. A mint in Australia was producing gold and sending it to an exchange in China, but the gold did not meet the proper quality standards and now every single bit of gold produced by this mint for the past decade or more is at question.
 
Back