Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

So desperate are they to claim this as some kind of moral victory, they're actually moving the goalposts from: "our enemies win if you buy this video game" to "our enemies are weak because the people who already bought the game don't play it as much as they used to".

View attachment 4841577
Link, Archive
Every time this faggot shows up on my radar again, I have to remind everyone, this is this faggot's avatar:
6dmrRuF1_400x400.jpg
And this is what he actually looks like:
gramuglia (1).png
Jesus Christ, even the memes they make are stupid, imao 'cruel' humour no textual queer characters and injustice and equality, I personally agree that Pratchett is the better writer but even things a simple as memes like these don't come from a place of pointed interest or actual criticism but actual hangups about wokism and bitching about being a Terf and other nonsense, it reeks of impotent rage at a figure they can't control rather than any real critique of the figure.
If Pratchett is so smart then why is he dead?
 
Every time this faggot shows up on my radar again, I have to remind everyone, this is this faggot's avatar:
6dmrRuF1_400x400.jpg
And this is what he actually looks like:
gramuglia (1).png

To this date, I'm still baffled this twat hasn't gotten a thread here. He pops in many lolcow threads more often than he should.
Rowling-deranged Twitter enby @hmvanderhart has decided that Joanne is responsible for the troon shooter.

Tweet | Archive

TikTok video;

View attachment 4911700

That's quite an accusation, do you have evidence of it? Or are you using the corpse of a monster to demonize JK? Because this is an incredibly underhanded, and disgusting tactic if it's the latter. These fucking maniacs will not stop until something is pinned on JK despite grasping at straws at best
 
Every time this faggot shows up on my radar again, I have to remind everyone, this is this faggot's avatar:
6dmrRuF1_400x400.jpg
Every single time the avatar looks like this, with the faggot look OR the blue/pink color scheme, you can tell EXACTLY what kind of person it is. It ALWAYS works and I'm deeply saddened by the current state of affairs.

Also applies to the real life face, but I find it even more sad with the avatar since these faggots have chosen to represent themselves with that. No "I can't change how I look" excuse.
 
Also applies to the real life face, but I find it even more sad with the avatar since these faggots have chosen to represent themselves with that. No "I can't change how I look" excuse.
I remember back in the day when Newgrounds staff had avatars like this and even when my elder uncle saw me on the website when I was a little kid he mentioned something like "I bet he looks like a fucking nerd IRL"
 
Been listening to that new Rowling interview podcast series and I swear she doesn't even bring into question >WHAT IS A WOMAN even once. She's an abuse survivor and want to protect women in all-women spaces. She has read thousands of pages of trans activism and entertain dialogue, yet trannies know only "trans rights" and violently disrupt spaces of discourse.

Like, Rowling has read more and care more about trans people than your average he-dyke and that's why they fear her. She's not saying "all lives matter", but "white lives matter too" and it cause the same controversy. All-female shelters, one of the few places women can be truly safe, to be full of men who get stiff at the thought of wearing stockings?

Most ironic of it all is that her haters are ex-potterheads. For once in their fucking lives it's not community tourism, such as when a new game emerges, they appear and cause a stink, only to leave once the "issue" is fixed and there is no longer any interest in it. Potter? oh boy, the one thing they grew up with, surely that has to be divine and treated properly!

Like fuck off. People had no issues with Ching Chong til after the movies concluded and she tweeted things.
Why are people defending Rowling simply over the trans drama she was caught up in? She was a regular mocking figure among conservative media and 'anti SJW' content for years. Everything from promoting radical feminist theories, inviting illegal immigrants into the country (then clamming up when people suggested she invite some of them to her castle), being a socialist, slandering Trump and his supporters, repeatedly retconning the HP series for shameless pandering and virtue signalling, and worst of all, she even wanted a man arrested for making an offensive joke. None of these things have changed, it's just the trans mob situation has overtaken everything else. It makes all the complaints that these people made about feminist theory being a big blight of society look disingenuous when they suddenly don't have a problem with people who actually preach anti male hatred in their doctrine, simply because they complain about trannies.

When it comes to people's opinions on trans people and calling people by their preferred pronouns or not, I don't think that really matters. But when it comes to bodily autonomy, that's where things are more important. I have seen some 'gender critical' feminists openly state they want to ban access to hormones and cosmetic surgery for people. Not just for children, but for adults. I don't think Rowling wants to, but quite a lot of her supporters do. At that point, I really don't think it's your right to dictate what an adult does with themselves. It comes off as concern trolling. You probably wouldn't want to ban people mountain climbing or paragliding, despite how dangerous it is and how many people get killed doing it. It's on an adult to take a risk if they want to.

There's also some huge hypocrisy on the subject of abortion, when it comes to all these 'gender critical' feminists opinions about biological reality. Feminist groups here in the UK have repeatedly made attempts to stifle anti abortion speech and protests, and have even made false claims of violence and harassment at anti abortion protests that were proven to be entirely false. My friend's aunt was threatened with being fired when she shared a negative opinion about abortion in her workplace, because it might have made people 'uncomfortable'. Even using words like kill or mutilation to describe destroying a fetus has been labelled as insensitive at best, hateful and bigoted at worst. You can't claim to support biological facts on the subject of sex, but then 5 minutes later you're telling people to censor factual statements about natal development and abortion just because it might hurt someone's feelings.
 
View attachment 4915929

I am not 100% sure, this could actually be a legitimate "catcha"" -moment (it would only apply to JKR having effectively said that there are trans people witch hunting her, but she did it so sneakily that there is no direct quote of it.)

However, it definitely sounds like they want to take the method from video below and use it seriously.

So did she name the podcast? Pretty sure she did not say on it that she is being witch hunted, plus the podcast is plenty "both sides have a point", so it's stupid to claim that the mere title is blaming trans people.
 
Neither side is 100% right about this (men do appear to have had worse outcomes when receiving blood from a female donor, but perhaps only because of a protein left behind after pregnancy), and both sides will claim moral victory.

But the way the first tweeter denies scientific findings that could potentially save lives, merely because they have the potential to strengthen the other side's arguments, is pants-shittingly retarded. If anyone deserves to be injected with the pregnancy blood, it's him.

screencapture-twitter-GDistaster-status-1640978835091910656-2023-03-29-15_39_29_-min.png

Link, Archive
 
Never.

People claim the goblins in HP are "anti-semitic stereotypes" which says more about them than anything else. They never complained about this for the decades the books were out until JKR didn't fully bend over for the troondick. But they're retarded faggots.

As for racism and anti-autistic people just make shit up all the time with no evidence.
I do vaguely recall this complaint rearing it's head around the time the first movie came out, but it was pretty short-lived.
 
I honestly think this is pretty cultural. Britain actually used to be slightly more homophobic than even the U.S. They had ''Section 28''. There was even pressure in the early 2010's the bring back those laws and re-criminalize gay marriage. So my sense is this.. despite less religious affiliation some Brits are pretty against the trans/gay thing overall.
 
Back