Nico Kenn De Balinthazy / Sneako - YouTuber, Manosphere, Slowly getting cancelled, Cuck for Three Pumps

[Active User]

In his video I remember him saying that the issues ended up spilling over into his real life, hence the institutionalizing himself, but I could be misremembering. Been some time since I watched that.

 

[nothing2]

ALI ALEXANDER

Milo has no friends, no past references, no past donors, no partners, no past employees who would work for him again. This is the mark of a very dark, evil, and depraved individual. What type of a person has lived 40 years on this planet and has no friendships to show for it? Jesus’ own...

t.me

Gay pedophile Ali Akbar claims that gay pedophile Milo tried to have gay sex with Sneako, and the entire reason he joined the Ye24 team was to provide gay sex!

 

[tantric_depressive]

ALI ALEXANDER

Milo has no friends, no past references, no past donors, no partners, no past employees who would work for him again. This is the mark of a very dark, evil, and depraved individual. What type of a person has lived 40 years on this planet and has no friendships to show for it? Jesus’ own...

t.me

Gay pedophile Ali Akbar claims that gay pedophile Milo tried to have gay sex with Sneako, and the entire reason he joined the Ye24 team was to provide gay sex!

Ali Alexander : too dumb dumb to realize when a smear campaign of his own devising gets just as much dirt on himself and others he doesn't intend. Laura Loomer is a political genius in comparison

 

[Croaking Spider]

MeatCanyon weighs in on the Sneako/Charlie situation.

A follow up video on MeatCanyon's side channel about his cartoon. It's funny to see him take the piss out of people without being malicious. Meat had always been well-spoken. I like the little horror references and homages he uses. As bizarre and silly as his cartoons are, he's such a goofy and humble guy.

 

[CatboyCumDump]

Sneako posted a picture to his twitter of him cosplaying as Morpheus
https://twitter.com/sneako/status/1641996446739189761/photo/1 (https://archive.ph/wip/97Td6)

 

[Yae]

Sneako made a video where he responds to Charlie/Moistcr1tikal/Penginz0 once more.

I LOVE THE NEW SNEAKO

SNEAKO ADDRESSES RECENT CONTROVERSY Enjoyed this video? Join my Locals community for exclusive content at sneako.locals.com! Full streams uploaded to Locals! Stop scrolling, start monetizing: https://

rumble.com

In the video, he says that he initially went after Charlie because he criticized fresh and fit and reiterates his love for the movie cuties.
He also claims that the criticism of him all comes from a place of jealously.

 

[Spatula]

Did Sneako actually convert to HEslam or is he still not in on the trend yet?

 

[Yae]

Did Sneako actually convert to HEslam or is he still not in on the trend yet?

He claims to be a Muslim.

 

[Yae]

Charlie dropped an hour-long video where he has a conversation with Sneako

They talk about cuties, boxing with Brandon Buckingham, and Andrew Tate.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Charlie dropped an hour-long video where he has a conversation with Sneako

They talk about cuties, boxing with Brandon Buckingham, and Andrew Tate.

Sneako really is the phsyical embodiment of a midwit. He almost makes some good points in this, only to ruin them and Charlie comes along with a much better version of the take...

 

[2 Faces 2 Colours]

I'm surprised how much I agreed with Charlie Critikal in his debate with Sneako, he seemed pretty chill here. I appreciate his fairness and engaging with Sneako's hypocrisy and idiocy properly instead of being a smug "debate-bro" wanker.

 

[Red flaming panda]

So that's why these fucking faggots are defending Cuties
"It's calling out le woke culture"
Fuck off. It dosen't matter what the message is, the movie is exploiting real fucking children
If these directors wanted to expose child exploitation on the internet, they shouldn't fucking exploit children
Tbh this argument sounds like a front to defend what is essentially child porn

 

[BoxerShorts47]

I'm surprised how much I agreed with Charlie Critikal in his debate with Sneako, he seemed pretty chill here. I appreciate his fairness and engaging with Sneako's hypocrisy and idiocy properly instead of being a smug "debate-bro" wanker.

I didn't. He's terrible. He reminds me of those arrogant skeptics from 10 years ago. I didn't find anything he said to be insightful. Everything he said was midwit crap.

So that's why these fucking faggots are defending Cuties
"It's calling out le woke culture"
Fuck off. It dosen't matter what the message is, the movie is exploiting real fucking children
If these directors wanted to expose child exploitation on the internet, they shouldn't fucking exploit children
Tbh this argument sounds like a front to defend what is essentially child porn

No. The ends justify the means. I haven't watched cuties so I don't know if Sneako's perspective is correct but it seems like he could be correct. If putting those kids in sexual positions was necessary to make an anti sexualization statement then that action was justified. It seems to me like you guys jumped the cuties hate bandwagon and you don't want to admit that you were wrong to judge the movie without actually watching it.

 

[Yae]

No. The ends justify the means. I haven't watched cuties so I don't know if Sneako's perspective is correct but it seems like he could be correct. If putting those kids in sexual positions was necessary to make an anti sexualization statement then that action was justified. It seems to me like you guys jumped the cuties hate bandwagon and you don't want to admit that you were wrong to judge the movie without actually watching it.

If it is such a necessary message, then why not use adult actors to play the child characters?

 

[Ivan Daniloff]

If it is such a necessary message, then why not use adult actors to play the child characters?

or cut away from suggestive dancing etc. rather than showing all of it. It's weird and unnecessary to get the intended effect (if that's what the director/writer had in mind).

 

[BoxerShorts47]

If it is such a necessary message, then why not use adult actors to play the child characters?

Sneako said that wouldn't had the same impact. I think this is a motte and bailey. The original argument was that cuties was normalizing pedophilia. Now the argument is that it's sexualizing girl. It seems like you guys have conceded the original argument and moved to a different argument.

 

[Yae]

Sneako said that wouldn't had the same impact. I think this is a motte and bailey. The original argument was that cuties was normalizing pedophilia. Now the argument is that it's sexualizing girl. It seems like you guys have conceded the original argument and moved to a different argument.

Sexualizing young girls in a movie is normalizing pedophilia. I do not think that anyone who has been against the movie cuties has changed their stance. From the beginning, the problem that people have had with it is the way that it shows actual child actors in sexual situations.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Sexualizing young girls in a movie is normalizing pedophilia. I do not think that anyone who has been against the movie cuties has changed their stance. From the beginning, the problem that people have had with it is the way that it shows actual child actors in sexual situations.

No. The original arguement was that they were sexualizing the girls to promote pedophilia. Now you guys are saying, "well actually the movie doesn't promote pedophilia but our outrage was still justified because sexualizing girls is wrong period." This isn't the same argument.

 

[Yae]

No. The original arguement was that they were sexualizing the girls to promote pedophilia. Now you guys are saying, "well actually the movie doesn't promote pedophilia but our outrage was still justified because sexualizing girls is wrong period." This isn't the same argument.

Even if it was not the intention of the director to promote pedophilia, that is still what the movie is doing. It promotes pedophilia by normalizing it through showing young girls getting exposed to sexual situations and such.

 

[tantric_depressive]

No. The original arguement was that they were sexualizing the girls to promote pedophilia. Now you guys are saying, "well actually the movie doesn't promote pedophilia but our outrage was still justified because sexualizing girls is wrong period." This isn't the same argument.

Remember the famous phrase "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"? Even if the film makers intended an anti pedo message, they counteract their own intended message by having real life children portray such situations on screen. A pedo inclined viewer isn't considering any deeper thematic elements, they only absorb that a mainstream outlet is titillating them with child sexualization