Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Liberals have created this emotional monster that is trump and he represents a boogie man for everything they hate and think they hate. So many people I've seen gone back to calling black people niggers and blaming trump's racism on it when it's literally they decided to stop saying it and use trump as an excuse.

Joe Biden is an exaggerated meme version of Donald Trump.

Which is crazy considering Donald Trump is an exaggerated meme version of a President.

Democrats have yet to figure out how Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. When they look at Trump, they see an unelectable mess. They can't wrap their collective heads around it.

Because Dems don't know how Trump won in the first place, they have no confidence they can beat him.

All Dems can figure is, even though they don't understand it, Trump must be what swing voters like.
Being so in the dark, they think their best bet is to simply copy Trump.

When Democrats look at Trump, all they see is an old, white man who has lost his marbles, tells lies, says racially awkward things, gets handsy with women, is a foreign puppet, picks stupid fights, and doesn't take his job seriously.

So what do the Democrats do? They put up an old, white man who has lost his marbles, tells lies, says racially awkward things, gets handsy with women, is a foreign puppet, picks stupid fights, and doesn't take his job seriously.

Their mistake is that only Democrats see Trump as anything like Biden.

“We hear you like angry dementia patients. Well, check out this guy!”

Frankly, I wouldn't believe Democrats could be so thoughtless and so cynical if I hadn't seen it for myself. But there it is.

Trump is the meme. Biden is the copy.

The Left can't meme.

And every day they all seem intent on proving that guy right.
 
Wow, more unlawful insurrection. Why aren't these cops magdumping into the crowd?! Aren't they aware they are the last line of defense for our democracy against these terrorists? I hope the FBI uses bank info, phone records, and family member snitches to find all of these dangerous terrorists.
 

Attachments

  • 1680199161699303.png
    1680199161699303.png
    476.8 KB · Views: 56
Wow, more unlawful insurrection. Why aren't these cops magdumping into the crowd?! Aren't they aware they are the last line of defense for our democracy against these terrorists? I hope the FBI uses bank info, phone records, and family member snitches to find all of these dangerous terrorists.

Zero news traction.
What about our democracy?!
 
Manhattan assistant DA Meg Reiss surely suffered from TDS. Because her former Twitter account showed anti-Trump bias.

Less than 24 hours after the Gateway Pundit exposed Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Meg Reiss' public hatred of Donald Trump on Twitter, Reiss - who's been accused of masterminding the case against the former president, locked and then deleted her account.



As TGP documented Thursday morning, Reiss 'liked' several anti-Trump tweets, exposing her absolute bias against the man her office is about to indict over hush money paid to former adult actress Stormy Daniels (real name Stephanie Clifford).
 
If it takes you that much to post middle fingers onto a place like Trump Tower, despite the fact that he no longer lives in NY (putting aside that he has to come back here for some ridiculous indictment), one must question what you could have done for that amount of time instead of posting a pointless pic like this to social media.
 
If it takes you that much to post middle fingers onto a place like Trump Tower, despite the fact that he no longer lives in NY (putting aside that he has to come back here for some ridiculous indictment), one must question what you could have done for that amount of time instead of posting a pointless pic like this to social media.
I think that's the Chicago tower even
 
Never forget that left wing people love to project their insecurities and bigotry onto trump, christians, and right wingers. It's very emblematic of the I'm not hitting you and if I am it's your fault crowd.
No doubt they believe they're doing something badass and historic like when the troops in WWII detonated the swastika on top of the Reichstag. Or raised the flag on Iwo Jima.

And the bubble they live in isn't going to tell them otherwise.
When your bubble is surrounded by mostly terminally online idiots who all watch CNN, read the new York daily as the post is far right and believe people in middle America are all dumb rubes who haven't seen a black or brown person before.

If that’s really true, then that’s even more embarrassing.

They care more about owning Trump than their city being plagued by urban crime and nonstop gun violence. Even with this one picture, they show what their priorities are.
Look leftist people will see homelessness and violent crime as part and parcel of diversity. They will put up with it right up until it becomes a them problem and leave coming up with excuses.

These people will ignore the shit covered streets and act like Jackson Mississippi having issues with is water system is proof evil racist Republicans want black and brown people to die!!!!

Wow, more unlawful insurrection. Why aren't these cops magdumping into the crowd?! Aren't they aware they are the last line of defense for our democracy against these terrorists? I hope the FBI uses bank info, phone records, and family member snitches to find all of these dangerous terrorists.
That won't happen, the protesters will instead be labeled as heroic, the media will run cover, you g people will cheer and clap all because trumpling Nazis are all bigots and racists according to the cool art profile on Twitter that makes me feel good as a zoolineal who is told Nazis are everywhere in America.
 
American Thinker posted that article althought we knew already then the NY Times have TDS but they reached a new height in TDS.
April 10, 2023

New York Times goes full Trump Derangement Syndrome​

By David Zukerman


The title of the April 9 Times Sunday Opinion piece was: "Four Opinion Writers on Trump's Indictment and 'the Borderlands of Illegality'", but, for purpose of precision, it should have been styled: "Three anti-Trump propagandists and one Never Trumper on the need to keep humiliating the S.O.B."
The propagandists participating in this anti-Trump exercise were Times Opinion (as propaganda) columnists Lydia Polgreen, Ross Douthat (the Never Trump voice), Carlos Lozada and Michelle Cottle of the Times editorial (as propaganda) board.

Polgreen started the anti-Trump propaganda by expressing surprise (dismay) that the former president had no prior arrests and suggested that was because he "always manag[ed] to wriggle out of trouble." Ms. Polgreen thereby suggests that she studied at the Pelosi "guilty unless you prove your innocence" school of law. Ms. Cottle (sharing Ms. Polgreen's conclusion) did not think Mr. Trump would end up in prison. Thereupon, Douthat interjected: "If we don't think he's going to end up in jail for any of these potential prosecutions [sic], then the purpose of a prosecution is a symbolic conviction?
 

DeSantis Is Letting Trump Humiliate Him​


By (((Michelle Goldberg)))
Opinion Columnist

Watching the nascent Republican primary race, I have a sickening sense of déjà vu. As much as I abhor Donald Trump’s opponents, I’m desperate for one of them to prevail. Trump might be easier for Joe Biden to beat, but anyone who gets the Republican nomination has a chance of being elected, and the possibility of another Trump term is intolerable. So it’s harrowing to see Trump abetted, again, by the cowardice of his opponents.

Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor who was supposed to stop Donald Trump, is deflating before even entering the race, with his poll numbers softening and donors fretting. Trump, meanwhile, seems more buoyed than hindered by his ever-proliferating scandals, and is racking up endorsements at DeSantis’s expense. There are several explanations for why this is happening, including the backlash to Trump’s indictment, DeSantis’s near total lack of charisma, and concern among Republican elites about the sweeping abortion ban he just signed. But there’s another dynamic at work here, and I think it’s the big one: Like Trump’s 2016 rivals, DeSantis is making the mistake of believing that the primary race is about issues, while Trump instinctively understands that it’s about dominance.

Dueling super PAC attack ads about Social Security and Medicare illustrate DeSantis’s problem. The ad from the Trump camp is inspired by reporting about DeSantis eating pudding with his fingers on an airplane. Over a nauseating video of a man messily consuming chocolate pudding with his hands, the spot says, “DeSantis has his dirty fingers all over senior entitlements.” But the policy argument is just an excuse for the disgusting visuals; the point is not to disagree with DeSantis, but to humiliate him.

The ad from DeSantis’s allies misses this point entirely. It attempts to fact-check the claims in the pro-Trump spot with video of DeSantis promising to protect Social Security, then tries to turn the tables by airing a clip of Trump saying that “at some point” he’ll “take a look” at entitlements. “Trump should fight Democrats, not lie about Governor DeSantis,” the ad continues — whining about Trump’s aggression rather than countering it.

This approach didn’t work in 2016 and it’s not working now. Witness the parade of Florida Republicans turning their back on DeSantis and bending the knee to Trump with their endorsements.

Republican attempts to outflank Trump from the right, a strategy tried by Ted Cruz in 2016, are also falling flat again. Before Mike Pence’s speech to the National Rifle Association last week, Politico reported that the former vice president was aiming “to get to the right of Donald Trump on guns, bringing debates the two once had behind closed doors in the White House into the public eye.” Pence ended up getting booed by the crowd and then mocked by his former boss.

The upcoming Republican primary race, like the last one, is going to be fought on a limbic level, not an ideological one. It will be about who is weak and who is strong. That’s why, if Republicans want a non-Trump candidate in 2024, they’re going to have to find someone willing to tear him down. I understand that this is made difficult by the fact that Republican primary voters often seem excited by Trump’s most repulsive qualities, including his authoritarianism, rapacious greed, incitements to violence, friendly relations with white supremacists and antisemites, and the corruption that’s already led to multiple felony charges. It’s also hard to tar Trump as a loser when so much of the right-wing base believes the fantasy that in 2020 he actually won.

Nevertheless, it’s worth thinking about how Trump would take on a candidate like Trump. I don’t think he’d do it with passive-aggressive sniping, like when DeSantis, while attacking the New York district attorney Alvin Bragg for indicting Trump, worked in a dig about the ex-president paying “hush money to a porn star.” Trump, faced with an opponent who had Trump’s own flaws, would just blast away at them all until he found something that stuck.

Trump’s approach to DeSantis’s war on Disney is instructive. Until approximately five minutes ago, DeSantis’s willingness to do battle with ostensibly “woke” corporations — even a giant of Florida tourism like Disney — was part of his appeal. But Trump didn’t try to show that he’d be even harder on Disney than DeSantis has been. Instead, he trolled DeSantis by taking Disney’s side, taunting the governor for getting “destroyed” by Disney and speculating that the company would stop investing in Florida. There is, so far, little sign that this is hurting Trump, even though the right has spent months demonizing Disney, a company Tucker Carlson compared to a “sex offender.” Consistent displays of dominance matter more to Republicans than consistent displays of principle.

This doesn’t mean that Republican candidates should try to copy Trump’s insult comic act; they’ll almost certainly fail if they do. But they need to be, to use a Trumpish word, tough. As House speaker, Nancy Pelosi managed to repeatedly emasculate Trump not because she imitated him, but because she treated him like a petulant child. Most of Trump’s would-be Republican rivals, on the other hand, are treating him like an unstable father, fantasizing about supplanting him even as they cower in fear of his wrath.

An exception is the former New Jersey governor Chris Christie, who understands that you can’t beat Trump without fighting him. “I don’t believe that Republican voters penalize people who criticize Trump,” he told Politico, adding, “If you think you’re a better person to be president than Donald Trump, then you better make that case.” Whether Christie can make it is hard to say, given that he’s already abased himself before Trump more than once. But he’s right that no one’s going to defeat Trump until they stop acting scared of him.

 
Back