Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

[Kiwi Lime Pie]

Maybe Kat was too crazy even for Elliot?

LFJ does tend to sever ties with anyone who outlives their (real or perceived) usefulness. Also, LFJ uses people like a parasite and drops them like a hot potato when there is no more benefit to be gained by associating with them. Perhaps Kat was no longer seen as useful or necessary for LFJ's efforts and the partnership has soured and dissolved.

What the fuck is he even talking about?

Maybe Kat identifies as another color. If gender and pronouns can be made up by these folks, why not their skin color. Still, it's rich when these folks give online lectures about privilege when they themselves have some sort of privilege they find so unpalatable in others.

It won't be long until he tries to fuck with the Farms again.

Since the original bout of downtime, I've had the impression that LFJ never actually stops, and does a lot of crap behind the scenes that goes unannounced because it doesn't impact us one bit. They sound like the person who constantly flings shit to the wall to see what sticks and then acts accordingly. As such, LFJ silently plotting behind the scenes can't be ruled out.
Edited for spelling and clarity.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Since the original bout of downtime, I've had the impression that LFJ never actually stops, and does a lot of crap behind the scenes that goes unannounced because it doesn't impact us one bit. They sound like the person who constantly flings shit to the wall to see what sticks and then acts accordingly. As such, LFJ silently plotting behind the scenes can't be ruled out.
Edited for spelling and clarity.

I wonder if we'll see the moment when LFJ meet his Waterloo?

 

[AnOminous]

Let's recall that he has no internal monologue (self-reported) or empathy (obvious). It he can't conceive of internal expression then it makes sense for him to equate external expression with the entirety of verbal thought… scary.

People this damaged, legitimate NPCs, are actually pretty terrifying. How can someone live like that? It's like they're not even human.

 

[quackrock]

The tier 1 ISP GTT is now dropping clearnet connections to Kiwi Farms. Any claim of responsibility from Elliot? Hopefully just a transient networking fuck-up.

 

[Dread First]

The last time I provided any updates on Elliot's LinkedIn shenanigans was 02MAR. Once again, you niggers disappoint me with your inability to keep up with Elliot's lunacy on Boneless Doxbin corporate recruitment platforms. The onus has fallen on me to, once again, elucidate us all on the latest happenings. For my sanity's sake, I will not go into painstaking detail about the various people that Elliot interacts with this time around. If you wish to do such a thing, please do so. Perhaps I'll circle back and archive what I can from other people if it's interesting enough. For now, this thread needs a defibrillator to resurrect its necrotic and gangrenous corpse.

One last note: I will be working from his most recent posts, all the way back to 02MAR 25MAR (I got sick of this - I'll update yall about the shit I skipped out on later on); I will abstain from archiving the posts he interacts with, largely to make this task easier on myself. If any of you wish to take matters into your own hands and archive those interactions, please do so.

---

07APR - Elliot reposts Charity Majors' LinkedIn post about raising another 50 million USD in funding for Honeycomb.io. I can't help but feel disappointed that they haven't gone tits-up yet, but that's neither here nor there. Honeycomb blog post here.



07APR - Elliot reposts a fluff piece someone else made about Honeycomb's business partnership with Odyssey Interactive. Vimeo video for your reference. Local archive attached below.

07APR - Elliot reposts more self-aggrandising Honeycomb drivel. Link to TechCrunch post here, advising their extortion securing of 50M in funding.



07APR - Elliot reposts a thread about ChatGPT and OpenAI making fake news. Washington Post article here.



07APR - Elliot posts about their employee board member boosting employee morale and engagement. Please note that I have made a post about their employee board member on 16FEB; consult that at your leisure if you wish.



06APR - Elliot posts about ChatGPT's propensity to tell lies on the internet. Ordinarily, I'd agree with you there... yet the Bing AI and ChatGPT previews both point out that being a rapist consent accident enthusiast is fucking degenerate. But, I digress. Gizmodo Australia article and Canadian Privacy Ministry's posts linked for your convenience.



06APR - More 50M funding shit. The same TechCrunch article is linked, so I won't bother with linking that again.



06APR - Elliot himself makes the announcement of the future for observability being bright. Christine Yen's twitter thread here, Nitter 1, Nitter 2, and Nitter 3 for your convenience. @mailfrawd your thoughts?



06APR - Elliot plugs Kiwi Farms being dropped by Cloudflare, though he neglects to mention the move had a negative impact on their Q3 2022 earnings. Interestingly enough, he mentions that someone he knows works for Fastly and plugs his own recommendations for alternate services. Blog and cohost posts linked here for your convenience.



06APR - Elliot posts about his sour grapes with Google... for the umpteenth time. @Cuckoman please tell me that most Xooglers ain't like Elliot or the adult children he surrounds himself with. CNBC post linked here.



05APR - Elliot reposts Christine Yen's latest post about a new hire at Honeycomb - a (presumably) Desi woman named "Reet Mand." I pray she isn't the victim of future rapes consent accidents at Elliot's oars for hands.



04APR - Elliot reposts and comments on some AWS post, plugging a GitHub pull request he made.



04APR - Elliot shares a post linking to a Business Insider article. Said article talks of an elaborate scam involving static information.



01APR - Despite Elliot's sour grapes with Google, he's certainly not above plugging their services. Landing page here.



01APR - Overpaid eunuch in drag with a Jay Leno chin bitching about tech companies laying off overpaid parasites who don't care one iota about operations sales staff.



01APR - Elliot reposts some mumbo-jumbo about why you must hire an SLO for your organisation. Don't know what an SLO is, nor do I care enough to inform myself at this moment. All I know is that "Elliot plug something = shy away from it at all costs."



01APR - Elliot reposts some douchebag's Medium article about SLOs. Scribe mirror, for those of us who want an open-source front-end.



01APR - Elliot makes a disingenuous sincere appreciation post for some danger-haired broad (or potential tranny) named Jessica Kerr.



01APR - Elliot assaults our eyes blesses our vision with a fresh IRL photo of himself.



You can see that he looks like a WW2-era caricature of a Tojo Chinaman, no matter what setting he's in. Seriously, open your psychopathic, autoimmune eyes fully when you're smiling. Also, his man-tits totally feminine breasts are pointing outward. Barf.



01APR - Elliot reposts someone else's self-aggrandising LinkedIn post about how great he allegedly is. Usenix post here, PDF that it links to attached locally (roughly 50 slides long).



01APR - Another SRECon photo op. Elliot's eunuch hunch has him slouching, so he can't match the height of the other males posing next to him.




25MAR (At this point, LinkedIn doesn't provide useful dates. Assume I mean "week of" rather than literal date, if that wasn't obvious by now) - Elliot posts more sour grapes about Google, this time involving some douchebag named "Urs Holze" having a leaked email about scaling down the number of "engineers" they have on payroll. I'm inclined to think this is more a move to get rid of all the screeching retards who claim engineer status without having authored anything meaningful. Of course, that's conjecture on my part. Business Insider article linked and CNET article from comments here.



25MAR - Elliot brings up the Google Zurich lay-offs, entirely unprompted. Hey, Massive Mandarin Mandible, shouldn't you avoid talking about Ground Zero for your rape consent accident?



25MAR - Elliot plugs an SRE job opening at Sony for PlayStation crap.



25MAR - More SRECon drivel. Ghost link, that's still active for an event long passed by now.

 

[DavidS877]

01APR - Elliot reposts some mumbo-jumbo about why you must hire an SLO for your organisation. Don't know what an SLO is, nor do I care enough to inform myself at this moment. All I know is that "Elliot plug something = shy away from it at all costs."

Service Level Objective. Not a bad thing, basically making sure you actually don't suck at your job. But it's an Objective not and Agreement. So there's no actual enforcement if you miss it.

If your vendor says "We strive to answer all tickets within 4 hours." with no penalties or escalation then it's probably time to run the other way.

 

[Soup Sammiches]

Sitting down next to the other men was a brilliant move. Hate giving props to degens but it was a solid idea.

 

[quackrock]

The tier 1 ISP GTT is now dropping clearnet connections to Kiwi Farms. Any claim of responsibility from Elliot? Hopefully just a transient networking fuck-up.

False alarm, it works again.

 

[siegemeister675]

Service Level Objective. Not a bad thing, basically making sure you actually don't suck at your job. But it's an Objective not and Agreement. So there's no actual enforcement if you miss it.

If your vendor says "We strive to answer all tickets within 4 hours." with no penalties or escalation then it's probably time to run the other way.

What's the difference between that and an SLA? That's what I usually hear.

 

[Kees H]

What's the difference between that and an SLA? That's what I usually hear.

From the perspective of a networking nerd, not a software dev nerd, but I think we have the same terms for SLA/SLO defined in both industries:

A SLA is a agreement, internally within a company or between a vendor and a customer, in which targets are defined and fines when they are not being met. Internally a vendor can set a certain SLO, which is the level of performance or targets they want to achieve, which is a objective, and not defined in contracts/agreements.

Basically, a SLA is usually a contract between a vendor and a customer or an agreement internally within a company, and a SLO is what you want to achieve when it comes to a certain level of uptime or performance. In networking we set a SLA between a ISP and a customer, in which we define a minimal uptime, bandwidth, latency or other measurable metrics. When the ISP fails to meet those metrics, there are usually fines and penalties defined in the SLA that will apply. A SLO is way looser, it's certain points of uptime, latency, performance, whatever you want to meet as a company, but they are not bound by penalties or fines. The SLO of the ISP is usually not shared with the customers, and is used internally at the ISP to make sure they don't violate the SLA.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

I think it’s a lack of a theory of mind. He thinks that if you can prevent people from disagreeing that he’s an uwu smol bean, that’s the same as everyone believing it.

Like how he believes that if someone doesn’t resist hard enough, that’s the same as them consenting.

You know, until you put it this way I hadn't considered why the "autistic" mind might be susceptible to the academic relativist nonsense. They don't get that those people are lying and simply trying to obtain power over others, something they readily admit when challenged but don't say in the original writings ever. (Since it's a motte-and-bailey type argument: "I'm proclaiming something profound about the very nature of reality. You object? Haha jk, I'm really only saying something stupid and obvious you just misunderstood because you aren't as brilliant as me.") So someone like Elliot reads some idiot paraphrasing, say, Judith Butler's garbage and Elliot thinks "aha! The cheat code to reality! I can become a woman, I just need to consent accident enough people until it's true!"

 

[Joe Cool]

I'm just happy that we use observability tools which are actually good at work, not overpriced, feature poor pieces of shit like Honeycomb.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

I'm just happy that we use observability tools which are actually good at work, not overpriced, feature poor pieces of shit like Honeycomb.

That would be insulting for the poor pieces of shit to be compared to Honeycomb.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

01APR - Another SRECon photo op. Elliot's eunuch hunch has him slouching, so he can't match the height of the other males posing next to him.

This one is like watching the LOTR movies where they used forced perspective to make the halflings look short. It doesn't seem real.

 

[Procrastinhater]

You can see that he looks like a WW2-era caricature of a Tojo Chinaman, no matter what setting he's in. Seriously, open your psychopathic, autoimmune eyes fully when you're smiling. Also, his man-tits totally feminine breasts are pointing outward. Barf.

Christ he looks like fucking Mickey Rooney shouting down the stairs at Audrey Hepburn.
What a terribly dysgenic abomination. He would have made a violently ugly man, as a eunuch he just looks worse, and he still has that purple lipstic that just shows off the ghastly ichor yellow of his teeth.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

From the perspective of a networking nerd, not a software dev nerd, but I think we have the same terms for SLA/SLO defined in both industries:

A SLA is a agreement, internally within a company or between a vendor and a customer, in which targets are defined and fines when they are not being met. Internally a vendor can set a certain SLO, which is the level of performance or targets they want to achieve, which is a objective, and not defined in contracts/agreements.

Basically, a SLA is usually a contract between a vendor and a customer or an agreement internally within a company, and a SLO is what you want to achieve when it comes to a certain level of uptime or performance. In networking we set a SLA between a ISP and a customer, in which we define a minimal uptime, bandwidth, latency or other measurable metrics. When the ISP fails to meet those metrics, there are usually fines and penalties defined in the SLA that will apply. A SLO is way looser, it's certain points of uptime, latency, performance, whatever you want to meet as a company, but they are not bound by penalties or fines. The SLO of the ISP is usually not shared with the customers, and is used internally at the ISP to make sure they don't violate the SLA.

And generally speaking, "SLA" is commonplace terminology inside an organization as well, and not strictly a tech term. It often gets semi-misused in the corporate to refer to any required or declared delivery timeframe (e.g., a governing policy requirement, or even self-set turnaround times [which should be called SLOs at best, though sometimes they are part of reporting, so a fairly hard objective]).

 

[AnOminous]

The SLO of the ISP is usually not shared with the customers, and is used internally at the ISP to make sure they don't violate the SLA.

And it's completely meaningless when the "people" supposedly upholding it are absolutely useless shovel-faced chink troons.

An SLA is what you actually want because there are defined penalties for failure.

Let me guess honeyscam is mainly about the former rather than the latter.

He would have made a violently ugly man, as a eunuch he just looks worse, and he still has that purple lipstic that just shows off the ghastly ichor yellow of his teeth.

Troons are so fucking weird.

Real women are generally acutely aware of their flaws, or even things they merely think are flaws despite the fact no man would even notice them. They put great effort into concealing or mitigating them.

Troons seem to have an uncanny knack for picking their utterly worst, ugliest feature and then putting it on blast with absolutely insane fashion decisions.

It's so bizarre and brazen you don't even have to be gay to notice it.

 

[Thomas Eugene Paris]

This dude, Tony Reed, and James Radich are neck and neck for the grand prize in incoherent, tediously discursive, unnecessarily jargon-laden writing. Their collective corpus oozes that kind of "I am very smart" energy most truly intelligent people abandon in adolescence. Half the time I can't figure out what any of them are even on about.

 

[AnOminous]

This dude, Tony Reed, and James Radich are neck and neck for the grand prize in incoherent, tediously discursive, unnecessarily jargon-laden writing. Their collective corpus oozes that kind of "I am very smart" energy most truly intelligent people abandon in adolescence. Half the time I can't figure out what any of them are even on about.

It's the sort of prose where I look at it a few seconds and think I could figure it out if I put some mental effort into it, but whatever message is encapsulated into it is so retarded I'd literally lose IQ points just by thinking about it.

 

[InteracialBowelSyndrome]

Honeycomb announced the closing of another $50M funding round from VC's yesterday ('Series D').

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/observability-market-creator-honeycomb-nabs-50m-in-rare-series-d-funding-as-economy-fuels-its-growth-301791720.html

Any idiot VC stupid enough to invest their money in a company run by pedos deserves to go bankrupt.