Why are women always liberal?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Women tend to be more agreeable, and will go which way the wind is blowing. I’d imagine several thousand years of having to adapt to bride raiding has done wonders for our ability to adapt and please the new owners rather than be objectionable and killed. Not every member of a tribe can be the leader or confrontational, you do need people who raise the kids and care for the animals and weave the cloth and forage for food. So women are agreeable
I mean not all of us. I’m about the least agreeable human I know and I have a long list of people types who’d be up against the wall if I was ever in charge. I’d run a tight ship and it would be as far from liberal nonsense as possible. I mainly want to be left alone, but i can clearly see how liberalism is an absolute cancer of an ideology and how it weakens and wrecks society. I’d like to say I know other women who have the same opinion but I only know a couple. The rest are probably as tight lipped in public as I am to avoid being fired and having our lives destroyed or they are brainless cheerleaders for whatever social media tells them to care about.
Women want to please people, other women as well. They will not stand up and say no if there’s bad consequences for them. I refused the covid shots and talking to people at work was just bizzarre. They’d say they ‘had’ to and I’d say why? Why do you have to?
Everyone else is
They said I had to
They’ll fire us ( has anyone been fired though? No.) oh but they will
Maybe I’m just a grumpy old git.
 
Many of you need to close your browser/put your phone down, go outside, touch grass, and go places where conservatives congregate, like church. Then try not to be a complete sperg when you talk to women there and you'll find lots of conservative women.

I live in the bluest of blue states and I can still find plenty of conservative women. Hell, I even found them in the Bay Area. Conservative women are not terminally online, they're productive and actually living life. If you want to meet them you'll have to be the same.
 
You mean 'girls'. Us old birds see through the manipulation. Youngsters are drawn in by the need to be 'good', then we learn that we've been lied to and a 'good girl' is a goddamn useful idiot poised against society by family hating monsters.

The older I get the more people I'd have my men folk line against the wall.

ALL shitlib old women are just retards stuck in arrested development or aging BPD whores who've discovered their sex don't sell any more, but their useful idiot bullshit does. They can meet the wall too, granny faggots.
The older you get, the less hormones and feelings you have.

I saw the same when looking at driving stats recently and seeing how men cause more accidents as drivers, but the difference becomes smaller with age. Men and women become more similar as aging grinds us down.
 
I mean not all of us.
LOL. My friends and I? We aren't liberal. Nor do we hide it. Most of us are single too. Only one is married. She flipped her liberal husband conservative!

I think we know it's not ALL Women. We've seen the Women branded as TERFS. But it does seem the only Women pushing back on other Women publicly, are not the level headed kind. But the Radical Feminists who are only out there due to their combined hatred of Men, and Men in dresses is a cause they can rally around. And they aren't willing to critique larger LGBTQ+ / BLM / CRT / DEI / Radfem stuff. Because they still partly support it.
 
Last edited:
Hit the broscience juice all you like, but this comment summarized it succinctly:
When I hear people like Matt Walsh saying a woman is ready for pregnancy at 16 and generally spouting some draconian bullshit that all adds up to women being no better than children under the care of their husbands and/or fathers, it doesn't exactly sell me on conservativism.
There's plenty of women who hold beliefs that go directly against liberalism. I know as many as I know men. Almost all of them either hide in plain sight or avoid men. Not because they like liberalism, but because between a liberal coomer and a conservative that sees you as a lower class of being, the coomer is fundamentally less insufferable. Sure I know a few women who are into being tradwives, but they were as a whole either abused as children or have some kind of body dysmorphia or significant anxiety/other mental illness. I'm sure normal ones exist, but they aren't in my social circle, on or offline.

Even look at the conversation here, and the anti-women rhetoric found in many online con spaces. Think for a second. What would it take for you to accept an ideology whose main proponents in our society see you as a subhuman?

That plus the aforementioned 'policies reflecting women's needs' basically covers it. I know multiple unironically fascist women who would abstain or vote 3rd party before voting con because of this.
 
What would it take for you to accept an ideology whose main proponents in our society see you as a subhuman?
Women seem to love it en masse when it's sold in bookform.

A coomer is a slave to his passions where his passion is what he can get from women. As their drugdealer, women have incredible leverage over such a man. This is good when he's in the friend group. For a partner though, it's quite different to have someone that weak and women (despite what they say and think) end up preferring capable men and they tend to lean right and see women as a little less capable (because they are).
 
Marketers discovered in the 90's that Women respond well to emotional pleas when it comes to advertising.
Don't be exceptional. The correlation between women and emotionalism has been understood since the dawn of time.

@Judka
What would it take for you to accept an ideology whose main proponents in our society see you as a subhuman?
Muslim women seem to have no problem with it.
 
Last edited:
Even look at the conversation here, and the anti-women rhetoric found in many online con spaces. Think for a second. What would it take for you to accept an ideology whose main proponents in our society see you as a subhuman?

Children aren't subhuman, they're just less capable.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: frozen_runner
There was a time when the female psyche manifested into a politics of temperance and prohibition, eugenics, anti-immigration, racial purity and Christian moralism, and in Germany women were instrumental in getting Hitler elected. Women's politics are different from men and it's true that they are more attracted to soft and cushy liberal or progressive values, at least in the modern West, but it's more complicated than the idea that women are just inherently liberal.

Hitler wasn't elected, he was appointed. The opinions of Women that supported Nazis was simple: “They keep Antifa from clubbing my face in.” In most of Germany there was still enough of a hold on law to keep Antifa at bay, which meant the Nazis couldn’t make inroads via being “protectors”. Nazis never got a veto-proof majority in Germany until being a Nazi party member was mandated by law. Sorry for the history lesson, it is just that Hitler’s support was born from necessity, his power from poor decisions and bad luck, not from some brilliant campaign.

Look at today’s America, being conservative and female is almost always asking for a beating. Normally this would have a spike in conservative women as men rose up to defend them from harm, as being conservative would equal instant protection from harm by the top crop of men. However, men that fight for these women are likely to be arrested and severely punished, which discourages such protection. Hence, most women are liberal because it is the only way to be safe.

Women seek risk mitigation. They will happily marry a man with a $20/hr stable paycheck, zero debt that owns his land and house over a man with a $200/hr unstable paycheck who rents an apartment and is working off a decent amount of debt. This is why women go on dates, they are trying to feel out if you’re stable enough to stick with. Sure personality counts and charm can go a LONG way, but potential reliability when the chips are down means a lot more than you think.
 
Hit the broscience juice all you like, but this comment summarized it succinctly:

There's plenty of women who hold beliefs that go directly against liberalism. I know as many as I know men. Almost all of them either hide in plain sight or avoid men. Not because they like liberalism, but because between a liberal coomer and a conservative that sees you as a lower class of being, the coomer is fundamentally less insufferable. Sure I know a few women who are into being tradwives, but they were as a whole either abused as children or have some kind of body dysmorphia or significant anxiety/other mental illness. I'm sure normal ones exist, but they aren't in my social circle, on or offline.

Even look at the conversation here, and the anti-women rhetoric found in many online con spaces. Think for a second. What would it take for you to accept an ideology whose main proponents in our society see you as a subhuman?

That plus the aforementioned 'policies reflecting women's needs' basically covers it. I know multiple unironically fascist women who would abstain or vote 3rd party before voting con because of this.

How do people manage to date and sometimes even marry and have children then? If all men are either "liberal coomers" or evilbadmeanwrongstupid conservafascists. Your narrative would imply that women all just instinctively hate men and want nothing to do with them. Yet I have a sneaking suspicion that if we observe reality, we will see some behavior that does not quite accord with this notion.
 
Also, this, and the way most conservative figures speak about women doesn't help. I personally believe a woman is generally happier being a homemaker and healthy subservience in a heterosexual relationship is important but some women do have the drive and desire to join the workforce. They shouldn't be scolded or judged by the men in their lives for wanting to get an education and pursue a career.

Story of the life of the traditional HSTS tranny. kf users have double standards or something

I'm sick of trannies

Why be sick of trannies that literally just want to be tradwives? We will have the technology needed to unfuck them in a decade or two and there you go, you have a tradwife that wants to and can have children. They'd consequently contribute more to society than woke libtard women fighting for social acceptance (of themselves lmao) instead of traditional values.

Women are more of a social creatures and thus support what is perceived to be the popular opinion amongst other women. That's why they are so in support of things like trannyism despite actively hurting them.

It's why the concept of a "trad wife"absolutely frightens the media. Because if conservatism becomes in fashion, the entire USA voting blocs would switch for decades.

Same shit as above lol

Sure I know a few women who are into being tradwives, but they were as a whole either abused as children or have some kind of body dysmorphia or significant anxiety/other mental illness.

Even if it's a coping mechanism, why is that bad? You get the same based tradwife anyway.
 
Because the left gives them everything and anything they could want, just like non-Whites, just like non-heterosexuals, just like transsexuals and every other voting group they have. I can only assume you made this thread out of sexual frustration since you've posted a lot about how hard it is getting a date as a racist White man living in Canada.
 
Maybe cause the predominant conservative view on women's rights is "back to the kitchen"?

Considering the current state of society. And the things I see prominent Women saying and supporting. Despite it being used as a shallow surface level meme. Women's behavior at large aren't really causing me to wholly disagree with that statement.
 
Weak groups that end up being controlled and oppressed need allies and protection against the dominant group, this is a normal, biological drive.
Modern social liberalism (to not be confused with classical liberalism which is OK with hierarchy and natural order, if based on provable characteristics) is a very useful tool in dismantling hierarchies.
Problem is that every time a socially progressive group dismantles an inimical hierarchy, it creates a new one, and the cycle repeats. When revolutionary peasants took power from the bourgeoisie, they did just that, replaced the former rulers with their own form of elite government, and ruthlessly imposed rules and pursued opponents mercilessly.
TL:DR - you better fight to be as close to the top as possible, and the groups you belong to as well, or you will get abused. But you should also conceal that you are doing that, to avoid as much competition as possible. Life's tough.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: George Geef and ._.
Back