Opinion Cisgender People Practice Gender-Affirming Care Every Damn Day

Link (Archive)

Cisgender People Practice Gender-Affirming Care Every Damn Day​

Gender affirming healthcare is one of the frontlines of the hate movement against trans people. Transphobes go to great lengths to demonize gender affirming care, labeling it anything from delusion to mutilation in their efforts to erase trans people’s existence.

But what transphobes don’t want to admit is how often cis people engage in gender-affirming practices themselves.

Twitter user River pointed this fact out by sharing her practice of removing unwanted facial hair.
06D7DAA5-F671-4C48-97A9-0D0AE5621A95.jpeg
As River points out, women aren’t expected to have facial hair (even though many do, including me), so removing it is seen as a normal and healthy way of affirming one’s gender identity. At least, if you’re a cis woman.

Some cis people go even further to affirm their gender identity—and they’re right to, if it’s what they want or need for their bodies. Writing for NBC News, Justin T. Brown shares his experience growing breast tissue as a teenage boy:
As a teen boy who identified as a boy — randomly sprouting breasts really, really sucked. I hated my body, wore a shirt in the pool, dreaded the school locker room, dressed in layers and walked hunched over to hide my shape. I lived in constant fear of nipple-grabbers at school (teen boys are weird) and being outed as a “boob-haver.” I was uncomfortable and embarrassed 24/7 and had about zero percent confidence in myself, all because of the misalignment between how I felt I should look and how I actually looked.
However, Brown reports that a procedure to have the tissue removed was life-changing for him, writing, “Receiving care that affirmed my perceptions of my gender drastically changed my life for the better. I can attest that having mind-body alignment feels like a superpower.”

If pressed on issues like these—what’s the harm in letting trans and nonbinary people access the same gender-affirming care that cis people do?—transphobes will often argue that gender-affirming care for trans people “goes against nature.” If we all went along with nature, though, we’d see many more men with breasts, women with facial hair, and other varieties of human bodies. If we truly let nature dictate our self-expression, gender would reveal itself as an intricate constellation of differences, and not the simple binary that transphobes grasp at.

There are myriad gender-affirming practices, ranging from choosing a pair of shoes to modifying one’s body, that cis people engage in every single day. Gender expression can be joyous, expansive, and beautifully experimental. It’s a shame that transphobes are trying to turn it into a prison instead.
 
1. The argument about women having to wax their mustache actually shows how unfair "gender affirming" care is. Certain insurance pay for hair removal for troons, but not for women. Real woman have to pay their way for hair removal or they suck it up and live with it. Same with insurance covered breast implants, most women either pay for their own implants or just live with small tits.

2. Getting hair removal is not in the same ball park as getting your dick inverted or your tits lopped off, or taking hormones your body does not want or need. It's stupid how troons lump hair removal in with genital butchery and puberty stunting drugs, as if it's really facial hair that critics have a problem with.
 
Why can't they run with this and demand workplaces pay for wax jobs
TBH this has been brought up before and your idea has been floated, but as far as I know, no real woman has tried getting hair removal or breast implants by claiming to be a troon. Others have suggested real women trying this and if they are refused, suing the insurance companies for discrimination and prove how absurd the whole thing is. I wish someone would do this, but like I said, I don't think anyone has.

Meanwhile, troons like Kevin Gibes are getting free bimbo tits on the taxpayer's dime because "gender affirming care".
 
But mutilation is exactly what's happening. When someone gets cut up in a way that ends with them getting disfigured, be it loss of limbs or loss of functionality, its mutilation. All the people who had their tits or dick cut off definitely counts as mutilated. Eunuchs are Eunuchs because they had their ability to reproduce cut off to make the ultimate servant for the ruling class.

And this is why you will always be a troon and never be a woman. You are nothing more than a glorified attack dog by the establishment. Once they're done using you as a cudgel to bludgeon the masses with in order to bring forth communism, you will be lined up and executed. And they'll do it with a smile on their face.
 
Some cis people go even further to affirm their gender identity—and they’re right to, if it’s what they want or need for their bodies. Writing for NBC News, Justin T. Brown shares his experience growing breast tissue as a teenage boy:
If you read the article linked (archive) you'll realise that the person who wrote it was just a fat kid who grew moobs because he was fat. Thats not gender affirming care thats being fucking rich and lazy.
 
As River points out, women aren’t expected to have facial hair (even though many do, including me), so removing it is seen as a normal and healthy way of affirming one’s gender identity. At least, if you’re a cis woman.
I am now peddling on the side of the road for tophats.

Yes, I am aware that this woman is trying to argue for mutilation by labcoats by attempting to equate shaving with surgery (which strangely would have worked in a bygone era where barbers doubled as surgeons), but this tendency isn't unique to this aim and it is not unrelated to transgenderism.

I had a short conversation yesterday with my sister and sister-in-law-- the former was going to take her and her other nieces and nephews out somewhere, but there was some tiff over a shirt one of the nieces was wearing. It was a very normal, very basic (albeit oversized) shirt with an inoffensive graphic.

When I interjected that it was a normal shirt and there was nothing wrong with it, my sister first tried to lie to me that I didn't know what they were talking about, and then-- presumably realizing that there's not much context that could be behind them saying an inoffensive shirt is inappropriate-- both of them managed to stammer out how it was inappropriate and it wasn't "feminine" enough (at some point after that conversation ended, she talked wistfully about how she was 14 when she started wearing lip gloss).

This wasn't the first time this kind of conversation was had about this niece, and the first time was actually more revealing because it was a longer conversation about hairstyles-- but his time, it was about a fucking basic t-shirt. She wasn't wearing booty shorts, she wasn't wearing a crop top, she wasn't sagging her pants, she wasn't wearing a shirt with offensive graphics on it, but it was somehow "inappropriate" because it wasn't "feminine"...?

It was a t-shirt.

They were going to the movies.

And she's fifteen.


I'm going to be unequivocal here: most women (not men) themselves establish standards for what "femininity" is well beyond the the biopsychosocial reality of them being women, and well beyond any roles they have in society on account of being women. They then foist their shitty neuroses onto the next generation as soon as they're able to wobble on two feet-- which is why, among other things, mothers can get holes punched in the ear lobes of their one-year olds so they can put bits of plastic crap in them. Ear studs that the kids don't even value and will lose and/or swallow-- who the hell are they supposed to be impressing with them?

Some girls deviate from these conventions and more, and we sometimes call them "tomboys". If they don't conform out of self-interest or for the sake of fitting in (or they have odd-but-not-abnormal features such as a small bust and generally narrow figure), there's the risk they'll be looked down on by their female peers. There's additionally the chance they'll attract remarks that question or outright attack their femininity-- sometimes it goes as far as saying that they look like boys, even when it's known that they're truly women.

It's fine for a woman to say that they don't like how they look with facial hair (for example, they may think it makes them look ugly), so they shave it off as often as they need to. I have a bone to pick with makeup (the aforementioned sister can't take even commemorative photos without it, it's unnerving and pitiful), but even wearing it "to look prettier" is categorically better than the outright horseshit that's saying that you're doing it because "it makes you look feminine", as if your femininity is stored in a vial of nail polish or at the tip of a contour stick. As if Yakub created the female essence in at least 3000 BC.

All this venom has a point: one (not all, and maybe not even the biggest) of the reasons that girls are trooning out is because they and other women interpret their inability (or unwillingness) to fit female subcultural norms, as an indication that they're actually boys trapped in the bodies of girls. The ultimately superficial standards that women create, what they choose to ascribe femininity to, and especially their borderline instinctual allegiance to them-- these all work to externalize, commodify, and cheapen femininity.

It has the effect of helping lead women into the sexual delusion that they're men, and it helps to delude men into thinking that they can become women if they wear dresses and slather makeup on their already ghastly faces.

Some cis people go even further to affirm their gender identity—and they’re right to, if it’s what they want or need for their bodies. Writing for NBC News, Justin T. Brown shares his experience growing breast tissue as a teenage boy:
Why did he get surgery for being fat?
 
Last edited:
TBH this has been brought up before and your idea has been floated, but as far as I know, no real woman has tried getting hair removal or breast implants by claiming to be a troon. Others have suggested real women trying this and if they are refused, suing the insurance companies for discrimination and prove how absurd the whole thing is. I wish someone would do this, but like I said, I don't think anyone has.

Meanwhile, troons like Kevin Gibes are getting free bimbo tits on the taxpayer's dime because "gender affirming care".
Some women have started to figure out the angle.
 
Back