𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Um ackshually while the funding of the BBC is decided by the state the funding itself doesn't come from the state. British law is that to watch a TV you need to pay a license fee, which the BBC collects. It doesn't get the money direct from the state.

Where the government of the day can apply pressure is to threaten that source of funding, but that's a long term pressure not a 'change your editorial line on story X if you want your cash' threat.
The fee is collected by tv licensing (administered by capita), then paid into the consolidated tax fund. The government then allocates funding to the BBC, as well as funding Freesat and freeview from the same allocation. It's a tax. They just play word games with it.
 
Um ackshually while the funding of the BBC is decided by the state the funding itself doesn't come from the state.
The BBC licence fee is a tax, according to the British government. It's paid into public sector current receipts and paid out to the BBC. Calling it a "fee" is just a political trick to justify the taxation. Clearly state-funded. I hate to say it, but Twitter has it right.
 
Um ackshually while the funding of the BBC is decided by the state the funding itself doesn't come from the state. British law is that to watch a TV you need to pay a license fee, which the BBC collects. It doesn't get the money direct from the state.

Where the government of the day can apply pressure is to threaten that source of funding, but that's a long term pressure not a 'change your editorial line on story X if you want your cash' threat.
 
1681198959850.png1681199029626.png
07 twitter
 
The fee is collected by tv licensing (administered by capita), then paid into the consolidated tax fund. The government then allocates funding to the BBC, as well as funding Freesat and freeview from the same allocation. It's a tax. They just play word games with it.
I love the sheer unadulterated temper tantrum it's caused just to label the world's most obvious state-affiliated media, where you literally have to pay a tax just to own a TV and it directly funds it, as "state-affiliated media," when the BBC is literally the definitive example of such media.

If the BBC isn't state-affiliated media, then what is?

Pure retardation.
https://twitter.com/TitterDaily/status/1645560710447915008 Pretty Much Matt Gloating about Substack walk back
I thought that was a really stupid thing to do and as much as Musk flies off the handle and does dumb shit from time to time, he is also capable of realizing when something was dumb and reversing it.

That's not a sign of weakness but of strength.

Sometimes doing dumb shit is not a lolcow trait. Being absolutely incapable of recognizing it is.
 
Last edited:
exactly this. people are so fucking hungry now for even one single drop of enemy blood that a retarded bumbler like Elon can be lauded as Epic™ simply by getting the libs mad at him specifically for like two days at a time even though mad is the default setting for all online culture warriors. but all this provocateur shit he does bespeaks a screaming desperation for people to like him. that's why he keeps doing one thing to troll people and then takes it back after people start screaming their heads off. and he swings wildly by day, some days he's in hijinks mode, other days he's in super serious business mode, there's no strategy, none of it makes sense. Elon barely has a personality. he's just another empty rich retard trying to farm upboats and if you're one of the people glued to his antics because "it makes the other guys real mad", friend, you badly need to log off and find a better hobby
I do find it amusing with the legions of low rent basement journalists losing their fucking minds because a checkmark that was bestowed on them by some tech tranny now costs $8. They've been diluted by anyone with a spare $8 per month. Now it's the star of David, Elon will sew that shit on anyone who he takes money off.
 
The Twitter policy page now has this section explaining what government funded means:
How government-funded media accounts are defined

Government-funded media is defined as outlets where the government provides some or all of the outlet’s funding and may have varying degrees of government involvement over editorial content. We may use external sources similar to this one in order to determine when this label is applied.

(I can't upload images for some reason so text only.)

The "external source" links to a category at the world's most trusted encyclopedia. Yes that's right Musk is naively deferring to the objective editors at Wikipedia. Wikipedia has quickly (over the last few hours) added a new paragraph to the category page explaining that NPR and the BBC are not at all government-funded:
Note: Though publicly-funded broadcasters may receive support from government sources, they are not necessarily government-funded. Notably, NPR reports "On average, less than 1% of NPR's annual operating budget comes in the form of grants from CPB and federal agencies and departments." The British Broadcasting Corporation is not funded by the government, but rather by licence fees charged to households, and some commercial income.

By the way, NPR gets to the 1% figure by not counting substantial indirect funding. But NPR's statements about NPR is a reliable source for Wikipedia.

Musk still does not understand the system that he is up against.
 
The Twitter policy page now has this section explaining what government funded means:


(I can't upload images for some reason so text only.)

The "external source" links to a category at the world's most trusted encyclopedia. Yes that's right Musk is naively deferring to the objective editors at Wikipedia. Wikipedia has quickly (over the last few hours) added a new paragraph to the category page explaining that NPR and the BBC are not at all government-funded:


By the way, NPR gets to the 1% figure by not counting substantial indirect funding. But NPR's statements about NPR is a reliable source for Wikipedia.

Musk still does not understand the system that he is up against.
He knows exactly what he’s doing and is driving the hornet’s nest to cause drama. He knows some cuck Wiki editors will change articles and get called out on Twitter for it, driving even more traffic to his website.
 
It was the one thing making them feel like they were special. They had sucked the dick of the right person and got the Oh So Special Blue Badge on their microblogging account to make them feel like they were important. Now anyone can throw 8 dollars at Elon and have one. The mystique is gone.
Just wait until Elon will offer packages like "Blue checkmark with gold" or "Blue checkmark with gold and oak leaves" just to mess with the lefty lunatics some more
 
Every time I think "fuck Elon Musk this guy is just a complete dickhead" he pulls something like this and wins me back. Quit toying with me you South African Nazi!
Still heavily dislike the dude, he has raised the profile of the dumbest people on the right.
I hope Substack Notes, which is now public, will be successful and manage to compete, and that Substack can figure out a way to pacify the schizos and leftoid types.
 
Um ackshually while the funding of the BBC is decided by the state the funding itself doesn't come from the state. British law is that to watch a TV you need to pay a license fee, which the BBC collects. It doesn't get the money direct from the state.

Where the government of the day can apply pressure is to threaten that source of funding, but that's a long term pressure not a 'change your editorial line on story X if you want your cash' threat.

Wow I didn't know that paying taxes wasn't something forced upon people by the government with threats of imprisonment. Yeah, that's just like a mom and pop store on the corner. Same thing.

WTH are you talking about he always caves, immediately at the slightest amount of pushback. He’s the most easily bullied man on the planet.

Musk desperately craves approval and attention more blatantly than any 14-year-old girl. The only similarity he shares with JK Rowling is wealth, otherwise he is her polar opposite.

He didn't even cave in this case, he doubled down.
 
Back